NationStates Jolt Archive

See here (http://www.christian-thinktank.com/gr5part1.html)

If you cant be botered to read the page, you dont deserve to know why.

Didn't we go through this already?

Didn't we go through this already?

I thought I would bring it to a wider audiance.

See here (http://www.christian-thinktank.com/gr5part1.html)

If you cant be botered to read the page, you dont deserve to know why.

What are you doing?

Are you making a point?

Causing a discussion?

Just posting random links... I'd say that was some kind of spam offense..

Anyone who can't be bothered to explain what their thread is ABOUT. doesn't deserve to start one?

See here (http://www.christian-thinktank.com/gr5part1.html)

If you cant be botered to read the page, you dont deserve to know why.
Can we read just the bolded parts and get a gist?

What are you doing?

Are you making a point?

Causing a discussion?

Just posting random links... I'd say that was some kind of spam offense..

Anyone who can't be bothered to explain what their thread is ABOUT. doesn't deserve to start one?

1) Read the link.

2) The title explain what the thread is about.

3) And a debating point, since the Bible never says that its God's job to stop all the pain in the world, why do people get the idea that a God of the three O's (as described in the Bible) is a mutually exclusive idea to pain?

This changes the idea that he's an asshole, how exactly?

In attempting to overcomplicate simple logical errors on both sides, the writer of that article has succeeded.

1) Read the link.

2) The title explain what the thread is about.

3) And a debating point, since the Bible never says that its God's job to stop all the pain in the world, why do people get the idea that a God of the three O's (as described in the Bible) is a mutually exclusive idea to pain?

Well, having read the article - I have come to the conclusion that it was written by a grade-school student bored during their vacation... at least, I hope so.

I don't really see you having made an argument... so what good would evidence do, assuming that WAS evidence?

To me... it looks like you made up a title, then found an article that rubbished it.

So - I guess congratulations are in order... you normally need at least one other person to turn up, before your arguments are totally invalidated.

Well, having read the article - I have come to the conclusion that it was written by a grade-school student bored during their vacation... at least, I hope so.

I don't really see you having made an argument... so what good would evidence do, assuming that WAS evidence?

To me... it looks like you made up a title, then found an article that rubbished it.

So - I guess congratulations are in order... you normally need at least one other person to turn up, before your arguments are totally invalidated.

Care to actually explain yourself?

Care to actually explain yourself?

I assume this is a joke?


YOU post a cryptic title, backed up by a grade-school 'essayist' - and make no argument.

Then - when I arrive and, basically, say "huh"?... you think I need to explain MYSELF?

Start again, Neo.

Make a post to start the thread... explain what it is you think you know, and how you think your little 'source' proves or disproves that...

We can maybe work from there.... yes?

MKULTRA was banned for posting links and stories without commentation to go with them.

Do not do the same.