NationStates Jolt Archive


'Oil-for-Food' May Have Bankrolled Clinton Library

Stinky McGee
14-12-2004, 19:24
The investigation into the United Nations Oil-for-Food scandal has turned up evidence that places Pardongate fugitive Marc Rich at the center of the probe, the New York Post revealed in its Monday editions.

"We -think [Rich] was a major player in this - a central figure," a senior law enforcement official told the Post.

The bombshell development raises new questions about whether some of Saddam Hussein's Oil-for-Food cash may have found its way into the hands of Rich's ex-wife Denise, who contributed heavily to Bill Clinton's presidential library during the years now under investigation.

A 2001 report by the House Government Reform Committee on the Rich clemency deal established that the fugitive billionaire had been dealing with Saddam since the early 1990s - a fact well-known to the CIA and other U.S. law enforcement agencies.

The report detailed loans by Rich directly to Saddam in violation of U.N. sanctions. The Iraqi dictator would later repay the well-connected crook with preferential treatment on oil prices.

Investigators told the Post they have received information that Rich and Ben Pollner, a New York-based oil trader who heads Taurus Oil, put together deals between Saddam and his international supporters as part of the Oil-for-Food scam.

When it became known in January 2001 that the ex-president had pardoned Rich, probers immediately zeroed in on his ex-wife Denise, who had donated more than $1 million to Democratic campaigns - including Hillary Clinton's first Senate race - during the same period that Rich was doing business with Saddam.

Rich's ex also ponied up $450,000 for Clinton's library and donated the max to the Clintons' defense fund.

During public testimony before Congress in February 2001, Denise Rich invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, raising prosecutors' suspicions that she was covering up the money trail between her husband and the White House.

A criminal investigation by the U.S. Attorney for New York's Southern District into the Rich clemency deal is officially still under way, though many believe the probe has fizzled under pressure from the Bush White House, which is said to fear that any indictments would be regarded as a political vendetta.

But new probes into Rich's role in Oil-for-Food could put the spotlight back on Clinton, who said during a recent interview about the opening of his library that the only thing he regretted about pardoning the fugitive billionaire was that it was misconstrued by the media.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/12/13/101107.shtml
Zooke
14-12-2004, 20:00
I first heard of this link to the Clintons over the weekend. Doesn't really surprise me. What does amaze me, though, is the lack of response to this news item. It would probably be pretty safe to bet that if it was about GWB a lot of the folks on here would be hopping all over it and bashing Bush. :rolleyes:
My Gun Not Yours
14-12-2004, 20:03
If Clinton killed Hillary on national television during a talk show, it wouldn't get any more press.

But, if Hillary killed Bill, well, that would be front page news...
Stinky McGee
14-12-2004, 23:43
So first, Clinton takes money fromn the Oil-for-Food Program, and now he wants Annans job? What a pig.
Lunatic Goofballs
14-12-2004, 23:51
They'll never get Teflon Billy. I'm not saying they shouldn't, I'm saying they won't. It'd be like trying to nail jell-o to the wall.

Bill Clinton has turned covering his ass into an art form.
CSW
15-12-2004, 00:02
"Newsmax"


No. Bad.
Stinky McGee
15-12-2004, 00:26
Wow, what a retort. attack the source with absolutly nothing to say about the story. Good job!!!! :rolleyes:
Zekhaust
15-12-2004, 00:41
"Newsmax"


No. Bad.

No no, hes got a point. I click on it an see very little actual news things besides the story. Its just a lot of avertisements. And then when I close it I get this "Buy your Bush county win map! Shocked Liberals!"
Squi
15-12-2004, 00:50
No no, hes got a point. I click on it an see very little actual news things besides the story. Um, this is an archived story from NewsMax, not their frontpage. See how ppor a source the BBC is here, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/events/crisis_in_the_gulf/texts_and_transcripts/236858.stm , where there are very few actual news things besides the article. Now instead of criticising NewsMax what you want to point out is that the apparent original source of the article is The New York Post, which has a reputation for playing fast and loose with the truth.
Chess Squares
15-12-2004, 00:52
Um, this is an archived story from NewsMax, not their frontpage. See how ppor a source the BBC is here, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/events/crisis_in_the_gulf/texts_and_transcripts/236858.stm , where there are very few actual news things besides the article. Now instead of criticising NewsMax what you want to point out is that the apparent original source of the article is The New York Post, which has a reputation for playing fast and loose with the truth.
and is also quite pro-republican-conservative bs
Sumamba Buwhan
15-12-2004, 01:03
I think it's cute how they can't get over Clinton - Me thinks it's really that they are attracted to him, much like kindergarten boys pulling a girls hair when he likes her.
Ogiek
15-12-2004, 01:03
Oh, please!

NewsMax is an unabashedly right-wing biased website owned by Richard Mellon Scaife, who has been trying to tear down the Clintons since the Big Dog was elected to office.

Scaife was the major backer of the American Spectator, whose Arkansas Project set out to find embarassing facts about Clinton and in which Paula Jones' accusations of sexual harassment against Clinton were first widely publicized. The project not only accused Clinton of financial and sexual indiscretions but spread wacky conspiratorial notions that the Clintons collaborated with the CIA to run a drug smuggling operation out of the town of Mena, Arkansas, and that he had arranged for the murder of White House aide Vince Foster as part of a coverup of the Whitewater scandal. He has literally spent hundreds of millions going after Bill and Hillary.

NewMax also offers its readers "Deck of Weasles" cards lampooning prominent liberals as well as the "Deck of Hillary."

Judge the source of this “news” for yourself.
Eutrusca
15-12-2004, 01:33
Oh, please!

NewsMax is an unabashedly righ-wing biased website owned by Richard Mellon Scaife, who has been trying to tear down the Clintons since the Big Dog was elected to office.

Scaife was the major backer of the American Spectator, whose Arkansas Project set out to find embarassing facts about Clinton and in which Paula Jones' accusations of sexual harassment against Clinton were first widely publicized. The project not only accused Clinton of financial and sexual indiscretions but spread wacky conspiratorial notions that the Clintons collaborated with the CIA to run a drug smuggling operation out of the town of Mena, Arkansas, and that he had arranged for the murder of White House aide Vince Foster as part of a coverup of the Whitewater scandal.

NewMax also offers its readers "Deck of Weasles" cards lampooning prominent liberals as well as the "Deck of Hillary."

Judge the source of this “news” for yourself.
Hmmm! Sounds pretty reputable to me! :D ( JUST KIDDING! )
The Mycon
15-12-2004, 01:43
While being on Newsmax is generally proof that it isn't true, let's play devil's advocate for a second here.

So... a campaign contributor got a a kickback by "mis-filing" some cash. The cash, had it not gone to her, would have gone to a corrupt dictator who you likely believe woud have used it to support terrorism and plans for WMD program concept infrastructures.

What kind of a mental disconnect would it take for you to not be praising Clinton if you actually believed that?
Armed Bookworms
15-12-2004, 02:10
"Newsmax"


No. Bad.
It appears to be a Post story, not a newsmax specific one.
CSW
15-12-2004, 02:12
It appears to be a Post story, not a newsmax specific one.
Link?
Armed Bookworms
15-12-2004, 02:19
Link?
given this: "a senior law enforcement official told the Post" and this: "Investigators told the Post they have recent" I would assume such.
CSW
15-12-2004, 02:23
given this: "a senior law enforcement official told the Post" and this: "Investigators told the Post they have recent" I would assume such.
Link.