Bush Arrested in Canada
http://www.world-cnn.com/2004/WORLD/americas/11/30/bush.arrest/index.html
and yes - it's a spoof - but a damned good one. lol.
Forumwalker
03-12-2004, 20:56
I have only one thing to say, that is...
HAR!
Tuesday Heights
03-12-2004, 20:58
Very funny, indeed! :D
Teh Cameron Clan
03-12-2004, 21:02
lolz i wish they belived in death penalty ^.^
New Fuglies
03-12-2004, 21:05
lol I wish we denied him permission to enter.
Stroudiztan
03-12-2004, 21:06
He should have gotten pied.
The milky lake
03-12-2004, 21:09
Oh why can't it be real...
I love the way hes not speaking to the Canadian Parliament for fear of being heckled - hes not a statesmen... he couldn't handle it -.-
He should have gotten pied.
I'd guess that the secret service might react more strongly to that than the Mounties typically have.
Korarchaeota
03-12-2004, 21:57
lol I wish we denied him permission to enter.
i wish you'd denied him permission to leave!
i wish you'd denied him permission to leave!
That would've been funny. He would've had to eat our mad cow steaks and stay at our SARS-infected hotels. :p
That would've been funny. He would've had to eat our mad cow steaks and stay at our SARS-infected hotels. :p
Actually - in fairness - he did eat Alberta beef at the formal dinner.
RightWing Conspirators
03-12-2004, 23:09
Canadian's would get thier asses stomped, there's more guns in North Dakota and South Dakota than anything your military could hope to handle, and yes those are Bush supporting states. :sniper: :)
Costa Coffee
03-12-2004, 23:12
Canadian's would get thier asses stomped, there's more guns in North Dakota and South Dakota than anything your military could hope to handle, and yes those are Bush supporting states. :sniper: :)
Yeah, but the Canadians have intelligence.
Dobbs Town
03-12-2004, 23:16
Oh, if only. If only...
Rising Tide
03-12-2004, 23:21
Yeah, but the Canadians have intelligence.
they sure do, eh. :rolleyes: Is that why your government paid for a nuclear sub and then couldn't figure out how it worked and it sank?
Terra - Domina
03-12-2004, 23:22
Yeah, but the Canadians have intelligence.
its pretty dumb to think canada would put up any fight against america, regardless of intelligence.
however, the fact that we dont immediatly resort to bragging about whose ass we can kick is a sign of our civilization.
Rising Tide
03-12-2004, 23:24
The fact that we wouldn't make jokes of arresting your leaders, especially because they seem so intent on allowing draft dodgers and criminals escape to their country, may show a level of more maturity. And if you did take our President, you can guarantee the Marines would be at your doorstep.
Dobbs Town
03-12-2004, 23:28
Canadian's would get thier asses stomped, there's more guns in North Dakota and South Dakota than anything your military could hope to handle, and yes those are Bush supporting states. :sniper: :)
Yeah, but the Canadians have intelligence.
they sure do, eh. :rolleyes: Is that why your government paid for a nuclear sub and then couldn't figure out how it worked and it sank?
I didn't realize North and South Dakota were concerned about our (non-nuclear, BTW, as if you care) submarine fleet. Do those pobuckers think we'll launch torpedoes inside of one of their drainage ditches? From inside their bathtubs?
LOL turnips
Austrealite
03-12-2004, 23:28
Damn I hate Americans who go around saying "We can kick your countries arse" etc...
I mean what a bunch of clowns, sorry to normal Americans but these tools add to the overall stupidity of your nation. Maybe their should be a law that they can be shot for their stupidity...
they sure do, eh. :rolleyes: Is that why your government paid for a nuclear sub and then couldn't figure out how it worked and it sank?
The Canadian Forces have never once in its history owned or expressed interest in owning a Nuclear Submarine. You sir are folly, and your opinions meaningless. Furthermore I would like to say that the reason for the fire on the HMCS Chicoutimi was the fault of the British Royal Navy as they failed to install the proper electrical insulation. Thus, on behalf of all Canadians I would like to take this opportunity to call you a fool!
Asylum Nova
03-12-2004, 23:33
If you hadn't told me it was a spoof, I probably would have believed it, being the foolishly gullible person I am. XD
Still though, my Canadian honey's gonna get a kick out of this! *sends it off*
- Asylum Nova
Austrealite
03-12-2004, 23:34
And sure your probably right, America could beat maybe all of the nations of the world. But remember you spend so much on your military that your schools and hospitals are lacking quite a lot.
Sad really...
"My son is dying in hospital to which I can't afford to pay the bill and their is no medical cover but it doesn't matter as my nation can kick your nation"
they sure do, eh. :rolleyes: Is that why your government paid for a nuclear sub and then couldn't figure out how it worked and it sank?
The Canadian Forces have never once in its history owned or expressed interest in owning a Nuclear Submarine. You sir are folly, and your opinions meaningless. Furthermore I would like to add that the reason for the fire on the HMCS Chicoutimi was the fault of the British Royal Navy as they failed to install the proper electrical insulation. Thus, on behalf of all Canadians I would like to take this opportunity to call you an ignorant fool! The HMCS Chicoutimi did not sink, research things before you try to talk about them.
Silent Truth
03-12-2004, 23:38
The fact that we wouldn't make jokes of arresting your leaders, especially because they seem so intent on allowing draft dodgers and criminals escape to their country, may show a level of more maturity. And if you did take our President, you can guarantee the Marines would be at your doorstep.
Um first off a draft dodger could go to any country, but Canada's closer (psssst ...and hippies don't have a lot of money). Second, why should Canada be held responsible for rounding up people that the US chased out? Third I don't think you should try and brag about the maturity level of the average American citizan. That "article" was a well thought out piece of satire, in America alot of the satire is just terrible (Jon Stewart, The Onion, and sometimes SNL excluded). Do you remember that stupid "Come Mister Taliban" song?
And last you seem to have missed alot of the points in this thread, which is "There's more to being a country than being able to kick everyone's ass" although if you missed that there's probably no point in trying to argue the point.
Spirit Crushing
03-12-2004, 23:43
we don't really need subs. We don't piss peope off every day like Americans do, so we don't need to protect ourselves from people who want to kill us for being assholes.
That was really stupid. :rolleyes:
There would probably be a friggin' war if Canada "arrested" Bush for any reason. I don't think anyone wants another war.
Goed Twee
04-12-2004, 02:31
Am I the only one who remembers history?
Didn't Canada (well, semi Britain at the time) burn down the white house before?
Armed Bookworms
04-12-2004, 02:37
And sure your probably right, America could beat maybe all of the nations of the world. But remember you spend so much on your military that your schools and hospitals are lacking quite a lot.
Sad really...
"My son is dying in hospital to which I can't afford to pay the bill and their is no medical cover but it doesn't matter as my nation can kick your nation"
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Well considering that if we had had socialized fucking healthcare my dads legs would have been amputated, my mom's seizures from her head injury would have been a lot worse, and I might have lost an eye from the same car accident that my mom get her head injury from I'm damned glad we have privatized healthcare.
Canadian's would get thier asses stomped, there's more guns in North Dakota and South Dakota than anything your military could hope to handle, and yes those are Bush supporting states. :sniper: :)
That is because everyone (and their dog) has at least three or four. If Canada were to gice every drunk raving lunatic a gun there would be a lot of guns there two. This is a little bit of an exxageration, but it is to make a point. I am not against guns, just playing devils advocate (my favorite hobby). Besides what will a .22 or even a .45 do to a tank. Not much I am afraid. :sniper:
Armed Bookworms
04-12-2004, 02:38
Am I the only one who remembers history?
Didn't Canada (well, semi Britain at the time) burn down the white house before?
You mean not even 30 years after we had gained independence, yeah, that happened, but if I remember correctly we ended up winning that war too.
Armed Bookworms
04-12-2004, 02:40
That is because everyone (and their dog) has at least three or four. If Canada were to gice every drunk raving lunatic a gun there would be a lot of guns there two. This is a little bit of an exxageration, but it is to make a point. I am not against guns, just playing devils advocate (my favorite hobby). Besides what will a .22 or even a .45 do to a tank. Not much I am afraid. :sniper:
Who has more M1 Abrams again? For that matter, aren't LAWs stocked in every Nat. Guard Armory?
Who has more M1 Abrams again? For that matter, aren't LAWs stocked in every Nat. Guard Armory?
Your avarage Dakota hick doesn't hve an Abram or a LAW missle. I for one would not aprove of taking the country to war over the arrest of one person, even if that person were the president. Wouldn't matter who the one person was. But, you honestly think the Dakota's could take on a nation, you are welcome to try.
Way to get my hopes up...
ExCathedra
04-12-2004, 03:20
As interesting a topic as this is, I sense a lot of Canadian to American hostility on this board. In light of a few things, I feel compelled to respond. The americans here claiming a war would result seem to forget that their nation is almost divided right in half on the political front, and strongly divided at that. You wouldn't have the whole country backing you like you might think. It might even prove the excuse for a second civil war, the real winner of which would be Canada since it wouldn't be busily destroying itself and could sweep up afterwards. Secondly, on a historical note, no one won the war of 1812. The outcome might have been different if Britain hadn't been busy with Napolean at the time but as it stands both sides lost much and gained nothing as all political boundaries were reset.
As it stands now however, both countries rely on each other too heavily and are too similar for a war to evolve, no matter how arrogant the americans or how much Bush is hated in Canada. Hopefully the west will never experience an internal conflict again.
Austrealite
04-12-2004, 03:22
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Well considering that if we had had socialized fucking healthcare my dads legs would have been amputated, my mom's seizures from her head injury would have been a lot worse, and I might have lost an eye from the same car accident that my mom get her head injury from I'm damned glad we have privatized healthcare.
UM yeah cause everyone in America can afford privatized healthcare *sigh*
Austrealite
04-12-2004, 03:26
Who has more M1 Abrams again? For that matter, aren't LAWs stocked in every Nat. Guard Armory?
You’re an idiot mate. The fact is, yes you have more M1 Abrams tanks, but last I checked Canada had better Schools, Hospitals, which I find more important that a Military force as big as Americas. I guess though when you live in a Nation hell bent on pissing other nations off it must be important to spend those billions of tax dollars on the military instead of teaching children and saving their lives. But I guess every American citizen is rich and can afford good schooling and hospital care.
Arribastan
04-12-2004, 03:33
You’re an idiot mate. The fact is, yes you have more M1 Abrams tanks, but last I checked Canada had better Schools, Hospitals, which I find more important that a Military force as big as Americas. I guess though when you live in a Nation hell bent on pissing other nations off it must be important to spend those billions of tax dollars on the military instead of teaching children and saving their lives. But I guess every American citizen is rich and can afford good schooling and hospital care.
Yes, schools and hospitals are more important than tanks.
The problem is, the rednecks don't believe that. Obviously, the rednecks are the majority, seeing as we elected Bush.
And that article rocks. I was really hoping that it was true. But no. :headbang:
Austrealite
04-12-2004, 03:38
Yes, schools and hospitals are more important than tanks.
The problem is, the rednecks don't believe that. Obviously, the rednecks are the majority, seeing as we elected Bush.
And that article rocks. I was really hoping that it was true. But no. :headbang:
Yeah I know I would prefer to live in a Nation that doesn't attack others so it doesn't require billions of Military money every year and that money can go to Hospitals and Schools which I and my fellow citizens can use. As you said, the rednecks don't believe it, which is why they are mostly as dumb as a door post
And yeah I was hoping it was true ...one can dream
Sel Appa
04-12-2004, 03:42
MY friend told me about this today. Very funny, too bad it isnt true.
Kwangistar
04-12-2004, 03:42
You’re an idiot mate. The fact is, yes you have more M1 Abrams tanks, but last I checked Canada had better Schools, Hospitals, which I find more important that a Military force as big as Americas. I guess though when you live in a Nation hell bent on pissing other nations off it must be important to spend those billions of tax dollars on the military instead of teaching children and saving their lives. But I guess every American citizen is rich and can afford good schooling and hospital care.
The USA has some of the highest per-capita spending rates on education in the industrialized world. There's problems with the sub-university level, but its not that there's not enough money.
You mean not even 30 years after we had gained independence, yeah, that happened, but if I remember correctly we ended up winning that war too.
Actually no. The United States did not win the War of 1812, because it had not achieved a single one of its objectives. If the United States of America won the war of 1812 I would be waving ol' glory...Canada, The Natives and Britain won the war of 1812, they accomplished the objective of defending their homes. The United States lost the war of 1812 when it ended in a stalemate.
they sure do, eh. :rolleyes: Is that why your government paid for a nuclear sub and then couldn't figure out how it worked and it sank?
It was a diesel SSK, and that makes it worse. The Canadians can't figure out how to run a friggin' diesel. The reason they don't use nuclear power is because they don't know how to run a reactor. I'd stand by the safety record of the US sub fleet, NO NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS in 50 years and 4 months of operation.
It was a diesel SSK, and that makes it worse. The Canadians can't figure out how to run a friggin' diesel. The reason they don't use nuclear power is because they don't know how to run a reactor. I'd stand by the safety record of the US sub fleet, NO NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS in 50 years and 4 months of operation.
A friggin' diesel? Diesel?! Tha's embarassing. A Diesel/elc sub is so simple to maintain!
What did they do, choke on the gases by forgetting to surface?
US Sub Fleet has excellent safety record.
Superpower07
04-12-2004, 04:38
Roflmao
You mean not even 30 years after we had gained independence, yeah, that happened, but if I remember correctly we ended up winning that war too.
Riiiight. As demonstrated before, you los t1812! The only large battle you won was the one for New Orleans and that was after the war was over.
Arribastan
04-12-2004, 04:44
Riiiight. As demonstrated before, you los t1812! The only large battle you won was the one for New Orleans and that was after the war was over.
Yeah, but we Americans can be really proud of winning a battle after a war is over. Just because that was the best we could do doesn't mean we didn't win!
sorry for the triple negative :\
Liberta Islands
04-12-2004, 04:58
ok why is canada seen as smarter ? what is the intelgence in having a system were people that produce are taxed to support loosers that cant make it on there own ??
and in what catgory is the US worce the canada in ? and calling us dumm ? we poduce over HALF the world R and D 54% . But since we dont embrace failed 20th centry soicalism ? we are called dumm ? lol what ever . not to mention that fact that canada has spratist movmetns in more than one spot .. But the world likes them ?? i suppose having red china North korea and iran like u is important to some . i for one i'm glad those nations hate us mean we stands for somthing .
ok but anyways i do like canadains jsut sick of the False sence of superorty . stateism and soicalism does not and never has = a High IQ it just shows lack of ablilty to care for ones self .
Liberta Islands
04-12-2004, 04:59
Yeah, but we Americans can be really proud of winning a battle after a war is over. Just because that was the best we could do doesn't mean we didn't win!
ahhh the best they can do is dig up somthin this old . lol =-) well we have since redemed areselfs since then =-) and we grown in power .... not lost a empire =-) .
Dostanuot Loj
04-12-2004, 06:21
Guys, argue all you want, but get your facts straght.
War of 1812: America invaded British North America (Canada) for the land now occupied by Alberta, Manitoba, and Ontario. The British, Canadian militia, and Native forces beat the US back, at which point the British Empire decided to retake the US, the Canadian Militia expressed that they did not approve of this, and the Native forces pulled out alltogether at this point. Thus leaving the British army to fight for themselves and once again be beaten back. As more and more Canadian land was taken the Natives and Canadian militia stepped back in full strength and got back to fighting, the war ended in a stalemate as the borders were the same.
Technicly, Canada won as we stopped the US invasion (The starting point of the war), and technicly America won as they stopped the British invasion. The only looser is Great Britian.
The Subs: Britian sold Canada these disel subs that they gaurenteed were safety checked and were set for service. I know one of the Engineers the RCN sent over to England for a month to assist in the conversion to Canadian specs for the subs to come here before we continued the conversion, and he has personallt told me the British said they had checked all the wiring and systems. The fire however, was caused by faulty wire insulation on the British side, which last I checked met with British standards, but not Canadian standards.
Nuclear Power: Canada has no interest in nuclear powered weapons or weapons systems, however Canada is the worlds leader in Nuclear research now. As proof of this, the CANDU Reactor (Canadian Deuterium Uranium) is considered one of the safest and most advanced reactors in the world, not to mention cheaper then most commercially avalible American reactors. And last time I checked, many American Nuclear Power stations were upgrading to the CANDU, as well as several classes of US warships had been planned to be built with a simmilar design, or upgraded to it.
ExCathedra
04-12-2004, 06:37
ok why is canada seen as smarter ? what is the intelgence in having a system were people that produce are taxed to support loosers that cant make it on there own ??
and in what catgory is the US worce the canada in ? and calling us dumm ? we poduce over HALF the world R and D 54% . But since we dont embrace failed 20th centry soicalism ? we are called dumm ? lol what ever . not to mention that fact that canada has spratist movmetns in more than one spot .. But the world likes them ?? i suppose having red china North korea and iran like u is important to some . i for one i'm glad those nations hate us mean we stands for somthing .
ok but anyways i do like canadains jsut sick of the False sence of superorty . stateism and soicalism does not and never has = a High IQ it just shows lack of ablilty to care for ones self .
From what I've seen in this thread so far, while maybe not possessing more intelligence, though that may be disputed, Canadians definitely destroy Americans when it comes to spelling and grammar. Maybe other nations like us because they can actually understand the printed materials we send to them. :)
And thank you for mentioning the CANDU reactors Dostanuot Loj. I was just about to do that myself. You seem to know your Canadian history well. but yet you forgot about Saskatchewan, that big, flat stretch of prairie between Alberta and Manitoba. I don't think the Americans would just leave millions of acres of land alone. We're easily over looked, I know, but it happens far too often...
Austrealite
04-12-2004, 07:09
ok why is canada seen as smarter ? what is the intelgence in having a system were people that produce are taxed to support loosers that cant make it on there own ??
and in what catgory is the US worce the canada in ? and calling us dumm ? we poduce over HALF the world R and D 54% . But since we dont embrace failed 20th centry soicalism ? we are called dumm ? lol what ever . not to mention that fact that canada has spratist movmetns in more than one spot .. But the world likes them ?? i suppose having red china North korea and iran like u is important to some . i for one i'm glad those nations hate us mean we stands for somthing .
ok but anyways i do like canadains jsut sick of the False sence of superorty . stateism and soicalism does not and never has = a High IQ it just shows lack of ablilty to care for ones self .
You have more spelling and Grammar mistakes than a 5 year old kid trying to rewrite a Dictionary without any help. But I guess that’s ok as you have such a great Military :)