NationStates Jolt Archive

but allow lesbian marriage!

My reasons:

1) The Bible clearly says man-on-man is wrong. "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination", Leviticus 18:22. However, nothing is mentioned about woman-on-woman.

2) God destroyed the city of Sodom, not Cunnilingus.

3) HIV rates are lower among lesbians than among the general heterosexual public. HIV is a big concern these days.

4) Penile-Vaginal sex is risky and can cause damage to the woman. Traditional female on female intercourse is much less damaging to their bodies.

5) Lesbian couples can procreate with a single sperm donation, just like infertile heterosexual couples, if need be.

6) Women are generally more caring and devoted than men, and thus lesbian relationships will last longer than heterosexual relationships.

7) Lesbians are sexy.


Objections?

Objections?
Yes. The whole ban gay marriage bit at the beginning.

A morally, biblically and politically sound proposal. :) Kudos!

Yes. The whole ban gay marriage bit at the beginning.
You must admit, gay men have lots of sex, transmit diseases at higher rates, have a higher percentage of HIV, are expressly condemned in the Bible, cannot through any way have children, and rip each others rectums with their naughty sodomy.

Lesbians on the other hand have none of these problems.

It's quite simple. :)


Edit: Oh, and lesbians are quite sexy. Unlike gay men.

My only concern is that they may object to having video cameras installed in their bedrooms.

Lesbians are God's chosen because they rarely ever get HIV. :)

Objections?

Oh, it's just not worth it...

You must admit, gay men have lots of sex, transmit diseases at higher rates, have a higher percentage of HIV, are expressly condemned in the Bible, cannot through any way have children, and rip each others rectums with their naughty sodomy.

Lesbians on the other hand have none of these problems.

It's quite simple. :)


Edit: Oh, and lesbians are quite sexy. Unlike gay men.

gay men don't really have much more sex than the general heterosexual male population that i know of, and a number of them don't engage in anal sex...

also, not all lesbians are lipstick lesbians.

Most real lesbians are butch man lookalikes - it might as well be man on man.

Ban the lot of them, except in porn.

Nice, hah... but watch as people take you seriously and this turns into a huge, ceaseless debate.

A morally, biblically and politically sound proposal. :) Kudos!

The Bible has sound moral judgement? Yeah, I'd consult a 2000 year-old fairy tale to see what other kind of retarded laws I can make to legislate and enforce. :rolleyes:

I’m still for the banning of all forms of marriage. If people cant be nice regarding the issue than nobody will be able to get married.

[QUOTE=

also, not all lesbians are lipstick lesbians.[/QUOTE]
Shit. Next I suppose you're going to tell me there's no Santa Claus.

You must admit, gay men have lots of sex, transmit diseases at higher rates, have a higher percentage of HIV, are expressly condemned in the Bible, cannot through any way have children, and rip each others rectums with their naughty sodomy.

Lesbians on the other hand have none of these problems.

It's quite simple. :)


Edit: Oh, and lesbians are quite sexy. Unlike gay men.
I will admit about the condemantion in a desuet part of the bible who also calls for wearing only one kind of fabric and the children thing.

However, being a firm believer in equal rights, I have objection in banning gay marriage. Hell, if we followed the same logical steps you did, we could ban most type of marriages.

I will give you that you made me smile :)

Most real lesbians are butch man lookalikes - it might as well be man on man.
By that logic, we should allow really really feminine men to marry?

Ban the lot of them, except in porn.
Ah, but lesbian porn is all fake anyways. :(

The Bible has sound moral judgement? Yeah, I'd consult a 2000 year-old fairy tale to see what other kind of retarded laws I can make to legislate and enforce. :rolleyes:
This was just on South Park. The Bible is just a bunch of stories designed to be used as a guide.

Nice, hah... but watch as people take you seriously and this turns into a huge, ceaseless debate.
I am being serious, sort of. ;)

There is nothing wrong with lesbians! At all!

Once we legalize lesbian marriage, it's only a short time before equal protection clauses come up in court and gay men get that right too.

And uh, lesbians are sexy. :)

The bible IS just a bunch of fairy tales... and an outdated bunch at that... but other than that part, I have no problems with your proposal :D :P

Lesbian relationships last longer? No way!

We went on a vacation with my class, a few years ago. Of course the girls had to sleep on seperate rooms from the men. And where did the frustrations and (verbal) catfights break out?

With the girls, off couse

"Aaw, you should change the roll of toilet paper when it is empty!!"
(not that there was no toilet paper in the bath room. The roll on the hanger was just empty)

QED :p

True story!! (okay, the quote was made up, but empty tioletpaper rolls was one of the arguments)

Unlike gay men.

Actually, gay men are quite sexy, and perhaps if you wish to see lesbian sex, stick with the heterosexual drunks, as those are the sexiest ones.

Actually, gay men are quite sexy, and perhaps if you wish to see lesbian sex, stick with the heterosexual drunks, as those are the sexiest ones.
Quite a few girls seem to have something for gay guys kissing...

Quite a few girls seem to have something for gay guys kissing...
Well if a majority of our government was comprised of women, then gay men probably would get the right to marry before lesbians. But since the majority of government is men, I'm thinking lesbians will come first. Just a hunch.

Most real lesbians are butch man lookalikes - it might as well be man on man.
you realise you're stereotyping just as much as the original poster who assumed that all lesbians are lipstick lesbians.

Well if a majority of our government was comprised of women, then gay men probably would get the right to marry before lesbians. But since the majority of government is men, I'm thinking lesbians will come first. Just a hunch.
why do you think that?

here they both came at the same time...

*sigh*

Where's all the anti-gay trolls now? Where's everyone I argued with in the Gay Marriage threads? Where's all the people with such reasonable arguments against homosexuality?

Instead I'm surrounded by people chastizing me for being a fool. :p

Is there ANYONE against lesbian marriage?

There's nothing wrong with gay marriage, as long as they don't marry each other.

Ban all marriage.

Then the gay guys can have 'life partners', the straight people can continue to 'live in sin', because we all know that's more fun anyway, and the lesbians can continue to move in and out of each others houses. They don't call 'em U-Haul girls for nothin'.

Quite a few girls seem to have something for gay guys kissing...
Oh, isn't that just a total mystery. :rolleyes:

PS. Lesbians are s/...SHUT UP!// funny stuff Chodolo.

Quite a few girls seem to have something for gay guys kissing...

Well that's new. I'm a gay man and I'd never before heard of that one from any girl I know.

Personally, I don't get it (I don't get hetero males who get worked up over lesbians either). I mean, it's not like I'd be interested in having a girl watch me kiss another boy... and get turned on by it. Ewww.

I'm sure most lesbians out there feel the same way about you het horndogs, too.

but allow lesbian marriage!

My reasons:

1) The Bible clearly says man-on-man is wrong. "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination", Leviticus 18:22. However, nothing is mentioned about woman-on-woman.

2) God destroyed the city of Sodom, not Cunnilingus.

3) HIV rates are lower among lesbians than among the general heterosexual public. HIV is a big concern these days.

4) Penile-Vaginal sex is risky and can cause damage to the woman. Traditional female on female intercourse is much less damaging to their bodies.

5) Lesbian couples can procreate with a single sperm donation, just like infertile heterosexual couples, if need be.

6) Women are generally more caring and devoted than men, and thus lesbian relationships will last longer than heterosexual relationships.

7) Lesbians are sexy.


Objections?

1. says nothing about marrige however, only about not lying with a man, and also note this, the bible was written how many thousands of years ago? now tell me in that time when were women but in anything important unless they were important, and even than, a man was always more important than them.

2. sodom also committed various other sins, maby god dint destroy it because of gays

3. umm okay u no why HIV rates are lower among lesbians? maby because they cant really get it from each other that well? i mean really think about it. and also the HIV rates among gay men is also lower than that of the heterosexual society

4. theres this thing, its called mating, its what animals do in nature, its also what the penis and the vagina are there for CREATING LIFE!!!! so if normal sexual intercourse was so damaging, thered be a different way to do it, other wise wed be extinct, ever think of that ????

5. ummm so? i mean really just because guys cant make life doesnt mean they cant do something like abopt, i mean there are alot of parentless children out there. it would prbly help society if ppl didnt protest gay men adopting children, i mean really

6. cough cough cough YOUR SUCH A FUCKING STERIOTYPER, so what if women are more loving and caring, i dont think they neccessarily are that much more loving and caring than men, and u really think that a lesbain will last londer because of that, i mean really there are plently of long lasting relashionships out there. i mean if you dont love the person anymore, u cant help it, and if u dont love each other nothing is going to make the reashionship work, i no tons of guys who are devoted people, seriously, really think about it

7.okay thats a personal opionion, not something that can be proven and thus shouldnt be used as a factor for determining weather or not lezbians should be married

im not opposed to making lezbian marrige leagle, im just against making it leagle and gay guy marrige not. im all for gay marige, im just opposed to your ideas about why and for equality, u cant give an "A" to a girl in school just because shes a girl and than fail a guy just because hes a guy

(stuff)
Yes we know all that already...;)

I'm still waiting for someone to argue against lesbian marriage.

oh sry

And uh, lesbians are sexy. :)

Not the ones I've met... in fact, one I knew was pretty ugly, but her girlfriend was hot!

Well that's new. I'm a gay man and I'd never before heard of that one from any girl I know.

Personally, I don't get it (I don't get hetero males who get worked up over lesbians either). I mean, it's not like I'd be interested in having a girl watch me kiss another boy... and get turned on by it. Ewww.

I'm sure most lesbians out there feel the same way about you het horndogs, too.
Really? I've heard of quite a bit of it.