NationStates Jolt Archive


The Daily Aggression Against The Palestinian People

Al Anbar
24-11-2004, 02:28
Israeli Aggression against the Palestinian People
From: Monday, November 22, 2004
To: Tuesday, November 23, 2004

http://www.p-p-o.com/Eng/flag2.gif


(5) Palestinians were wounded including (1) child. (12) Palestinians were arrested. (30) trees were uprooted and (10) dunams of land were bulldozed. (3) houses and (1) animal farm were damaged. (1) new military post was deployed. Palestinian areas were shelled and bombarded (6) times.


Ramallah & El Bireh: The occupation forces thrust into the City and the villages of Beit Ikssa, Beit Oor and Beit Rima and searched & ransacked houses and arrested three citizens.

Tulkarem: The occupation forces thrust in Izbet Jarad area, firing, which wounded one citizen.

Qalqilya: The occupation forces bulldozed vast areas of agricultural land in the city and the village of Habla.

Salfeet: The occupation forces deployed a number of checkpoints in several villages and stopped & searched citizens and cut the power supply off several villages.

Hebron: The occupation forces thrust into the towns of Dora & Bani Naem using fire, searched & ransacked houses, arrested six citizens and Jewish settlers robbed a Palestinian of his horse.

Bethlehem: The occupation forces thrust into the City and the towns of Beit Jala & Douha, searched houses, attacked residents, arrested four citizens, demolished a house and confiscated 29 livestock.

Northern Gaza: The occupation forces deployed monitoring cameras at Beit Hanoun crossing.

http://www.p-p-o.com/Eng/2004/kh11/23-11-2004.htm
Gnostikos
24-11-2004, 02:35
Good God, when will you religious fanatics realise that the Middle East is an unstable cesspool of violence and war. Israel is attacked. Palestine is attacked. It will go on until they stop being so thick-headed or they kill each other off. Each nation is just as correct as its adversary. All they're doing is fighting over territory. That's what animals do, after all. Dogs mark their territory with urine. Hyenas with hyena butter. Humans with percieved boarders. It's all quite biological, really.
Dark Kanatia
24-11-2004, 02:35
Funny a site with a terrorist on the front page condemning the Israelis. Maybe if Arafat hadn't rejected the Oslo Accord this wouldn't be happening? Maybe if Arafat would have (while he was alive) suppressed suicide bombers this wouldn't be happening?
Maybe if the PLO wasn't committed to destroying Israel the Israelis wouldn't have to protect themselves?
Stephistan
24-11-2004, 02:41
Maybe if Arafat hadn't rejected the Oslo Accord this wouldn't be happening?

You're probably right, but then again, maybe if Israel had tried to be fair and not tried the land grab of Jerusalem 100% for themselves, Arafat would of said yes. People like to say "Oh Israel was willing to give 97%" what they fail to tell every one is that 3% was Jerusalem!
New Granada
24-11-2004, 02:42
Funny a site with a terrorist on the front page condemning the Israelis. Maybe if Arafat hadn't rejected the Oslo Accord this wouldn't be happening? Maybe if Arafat would have (while he was alive) suppressed suicide bombers this wouldn't be happening?
Maybe if the PLO wasn't committed to destroying Israel the Israelis wouldn't have to protect themselves?


Hard to stand by when poor people are being so totally and violently opressed by massive military force that they become desperate enough to embark upon suicide missions in a hopeless attempt to dissuade their cruel overlords.


May yahweh have mercy on the souls of the israeli leadership and military and may allah have mercy on their victims and those courageous men and women left with no choice but death and resistance.
Lokisia
24-11-2004, 02:44
Funny a site with a terrorist on the front page condemning the Israelis. Maybe if Arafat hadn't rejected the Oslo Accord this wouldn't be happening? Maybe if Arafat would have (while he was alive) suppressed suicide bombers this wouldn't be happening?
Maybe if the PLO wasn't committed to destroying Israel the Israelis wouldn't have to protect themselves?

And maybe if innocent Palestinians weren't persecuted for their radical countrymen, those radicals would cease to have a reason attacking the Israelies. I mean the attitudes of both peoples is unbalanced, Israelis have no right to continually expand their borders and resettle the Palestines and the Palestines have no right to suicide bomb civilian targets.

This is what happens when too many peoples rights are trampled on for too long, look at South Africa, look at Bosnia, look at Ireland.....
Al Anbar
24-11-2004, 02:48
Good God, when will you religious fanatics realise that the Middle East is an unstable cesspool of violence and war. Israel is attacked. Palestine is attacked. It will go on until they stop being so thick-headed or they kill each other off. Each nation is just as correct as its adversary. All they're doing is fighting over territory. That's what animals do, after all. Dogs mark their territory with urine. Hyenas with hyena butter. Humans with percieved boarders. It's all quite biological, really.

Are you calling me a "religious fanatic"? Since I'm neither Muslim nor Arab... I do not believe in any religion unless it can be proven.

Secondly, this is a injustice. Millions of poor Palestinians are being occupied, murdered, and arrested daily for no other reason than being Palestinian. This is a great injustice.
Lokisia
24-11-2004, 03:31
Are you calling me a "religious fanatic"? Since I'm neither Muslim nor Arab... I do not believe in any religion unless it can be proven.

Secondly, this is a injustice. Millions of poor Palestinians are being occupied, murdered, and arrested daily for no other reason than being Palestinian. This is a great injustice.

I think he was saying ALL parties involved are acting like a pack of Hyenas....
New Genoa
24-11-2004, 03:34
Can you just make one thread for these topics and post the daily updates as replies instead of starting a new topic each time? You don't have to, but I don't see the point in starting so many focused around the same exact debate.
HawthorneHeights
24-11-2004, 03:38
i like it started as a new thread everytime. You dont need to look for the post with that days numbers, you can just look at the new thread.

if that makes any sense.
i didnt really know how to word it.
New Granada
24-11-2004, 03:40
I for one favor the 'new topic every day' approach.

It allows the day's aggressions to be viewed immediately and discussed and not become muddled up in a long thread.