NationStates Jolt Archive


TV reporter guilty of contempt for refusing to ID source of tape

Tuesday Heights
18-11-2004, 22:38
PROVIDENCE, R.I. - A television reporter was convicted of criminal contempt Thursday for refusing to say who gave him an FBI videotape showing a city official taking a bribe.

Jim Taricani of WJAR-TV is to be sentenced by U.S. District Judge Ernest Torres on Dec. 9. The undercover tape was aired prominently and repeatedly by the station.

Taricani faces up to six months in prison.

The tape was part of a federal probe into corruption at Providence City Hall during former Mayor Vincent “Buddy” Cianci Jr.’s administration.

Taricani, 55, broke no law by airing the tape, which shows Frank Corrente, a top aide for Cianci, taking an envelope stuffed with cash from an undercover FBI informant.

But attorneys, investigators and defendants were under court order not to disseminate any tapes connected to the probe, and a special prosecutor had been appointed to find out who leaked the tape.

Torres has said the leak was meant to either disrupt the corruption investigation at City Hall or deprive defendants of a fair trial by influencing prospective jurors.

The tape aired in 2001, two months before Cianci, Corrente and others were indicted in the investigation code-named “Operation Plunder Dome.” Both Cianci and Corrente were convicted and are serving time in federal prison.

After his 45-minute trial Thursday, Taricani called the conviction an “assault on journalistic freedom” and said he never expected to have to spend time behind bars for doing his job.

“I made a promise to my source, which I intend to keep,” he said.

In March, Torres found Taricani in civil contempt for refusing to disclose his source and imposed a $1,000-a-day fine until he did. WJAR, which is owned by NBC Universal Television Group, paid $85,000 for its reporter until judge suspended the fine two weeks ago, saying it had not achieved its goal.

Torres had said before Thursday’s trial that he wouldn’t sentence Taricani to more than six months in prison because of the reporter’s health. Taricani underwent heart transplant surgery in 1996.

Around the nation, several reporters face possible fines or jail, including in cases of the leaked identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame and a lawsuit against the government by nuclear physicist Wen Ho Lee. Taricani would be the first of this crop of reporters to go to jail on a charge of criminal contempt.

© 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: MSNBC (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6521977/)

So, what d'you all think? Personally, I admire his ability to keep a lid on his sources, I can only hope that I would have the same resolve if faced with that situation when I become a journalist.
Vittos Ordination
18-11-2004, 23:07
That's one strong willed SOB. I applaud him and his station.
Spoffin
18-11-2004, 23:57
Bloody good bloke.
Chikyota
19-11-2004, 00:00
He wins my immediate respect for that.
Superpower07
19-11-2004, 00:03
I thought reporters were allowed to keep their sources in confidence!

WTF . . . I'm a student reporter on my school paper; does this mean I could be guilty of contempt too?!

Good for him though for sticking to ethical journalism
CSW
19-11-2004, 00:09
*cough*© 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.*cough*

No, that's one of the rules journalists drew up for themselves, not an actual legal rule...
Cybertoria
19-11-2004, 00:14
:sniper: :mad: Exicute the ****! :mad: :sniper:
Tuesday Heights
19-11-2004, 00:17
I thought reporters were allowed to keep their sources in confidence!

There's no laws protecting journalists from revealing their sources; cases like this happen once or twice a year all around the world.

WTF . . . I'm a student reporter on my school paper; does this mean I could be guilty of contempt too?!

Yes, it does. As I'm also a journalist, and News Editor, of my university's paper and have been in a few sketchy situations where if legal action would've been taken, they would've found me in contempt, too.

*cough*© 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.*cough*.

Yeah, I know. I left it in to tell the AP that they can kiss my ass, I'll reproduce what I like to faciliate a discussion. :p
Semper Liber
19-11-2004, 00:22
There really should eb legislature about that...
Kryogenerica
19-11-2004, 01:06
There is a journo over here called Derryn Hinch who has gone to gaol several times for refusing to give names. In most other ways he seems to be a bit of a wanker but I do admire and respect his integrity regarding his sources.
EricTheRed
19-11-2004, 01:29
There's a few reason why the FBI is seeking to punish this guy for showing
that tape. Maybe there's an identity on that tape that the FBI didn't want
revealed. Perhaps when the guy took that bribe money it was given to him
by an undercover agent. Then the news just showed the identity of this
agent and has blown his cover. You can't take the property of our Federal
government and think that it's ok.
Spoffin
19-11-2004, 21:40
There's a few reason why the FBI is seeking to punish this guy for showing
that tape. Maybe there's an identity on that tape that the FBI didn't want
revealed. Perhaps when the guy took that bribe money it was given to him
by an undercover agent. Then the news just showed the identity of this
agent and has blown his cover. You can't take the property of our Federal
government and think that it's ok.
Yeah, that's all maybes though, and if any of that were true, then really they should have mentioned that in the trial.
CthulhuFhtagn
19-11-2004, 21:43
There's a few reason why the FBI is seeking to punish this guy for showing
that tape. Maybe there's an identity on that tape that the FBI didn't want
revealed. Perhaps when the guy took that bribe money it was given to him
by an undercover agent. Then the news just showed the identity of this
agent and has blown his cover. You can't take the property of our Federal
government and think that it's ok.
Cianci has already been convicted. We just have a slow legal system. The tape is probably several years old.