NationStates Jolt Archive


Should Bestiality marriages be allowed?

Presidency
12-11-2004, 23:26
After reading some of the numerous postings on gay/homosexuals and straight/normal people, it would only be fair to include at least one forum posting on bestiality. (yes, polygamy is intentionaly left for some other forum topic discussion)

Why can't PETA people have their dreams come true too? (Its only fair after all) Or even ordinary average everyday pet lovers who love their pets a little more than others for that mater?
Should it depend on what kind of animal/ creature it is and as to wether or not they will be allowed to "tie the not with it?
Should polygamal bestiality join in "holly matrimony"? Why/ Why not?

Love takes all forms right? Love is Blind and all that sh#t, Right?

Now is time to think of the true minority and hear their voice...those that are too few, step up to the mic and let your voice be heard.
Conceptualists
12-11-2004, 23:28
Only when an animal can show concent, and have a decent understanding on what it means to be married.

Other wise, it may as well be rape.

PS, a verb cannot marry.
Sdaeriji
12-11-2004, 23:29
Because an animal does not have the mental capacity to understand marriage, much less give consent.
The Black Forrest
12-11-2004, 23:32
*Sighs*

Why is it Christians always bring up Beastiality or NAMBLA as what will follow if gays can get married?

You can't marry without consent and how do you know if the animal wants to marry?
Clonetopia
12-11-2004, 23:38
Read this and read it carefully:

1. Marriage requires consent
2. Animals cannot consent to marriage.
3. Therefore, animals cannot marry.
Presgreif
12-11-2004, 23:40
WTF? :rolleyes:
Dementate
12-11-2004, 23:42
Besides consent, don't forget to mention the age requirement! Are we talking human years or dog/cat years? That could be difficult.

*don't take me seriously here*
Keruvalia
12-11-2004, 23:47
It makes me chuckle.

Man who married his cow: "When you get in a bad fight, ya'll might divorce. I simply have dinner."
Kryogenerica
13-11-2004, 00:39
They can't give consent, but they can teach their molesters a lesson. I know of a specific incident where one guy was at a farm that belonged to friend of mine. He was looking at the new calves and put 2 and 2 together - calves suck things, don't they?

He had never seen a calf actually feeding before and had no idea about the actual process of a calf extracting milk from its mother.

Well, to cut a long story short, he discovered (at the expense of a blackened, bruised, nearly torn off penis) that it is a really bad idea to put your willy into any animal other than a human. :p

As well as this one, I read about a couple of gay guys who "lost" a gerbil. One of them had a look but couldn't find it, so he lit a match to assist the investigation. This ignited a small pocket of gas which travelled upward and ignited a large pocket of gas which ejected said gerbil with enough force to break the nose of the investigator and inflicted 2nd degree burns to the inside of his friends bowel. Couldn't have happened to a more deserving couple if you ask me.... :p
The Tribes Of Longton
13-11-2004, 00:40
I want the freedom to marry my ewok lover!
Colodia
13-11-2004, 00:54
I think the poll looking like a middle finger is a respectable answer from the people that voted.
Soviet Narco State
13-11-2004, 01:29
I think somebody is getting all their opinions from south park.
Soviet Narco State
13-11-2004, 01:32
They can't give consent, but they can teach their molesters a lesson. I know of a specific incident where one guy was at a farm that belonged to friend of mine. He was looking at the new calves and put 2 and 2 together - calves suck things, don't they?

:p

That is hillarious! Why don't we shave some monkey's and give each and every child molestor a pet monkey to molest? I think a shaved monkey would probably look a lot like a little kid.
Tuesday Heights
13-11-2004, 01:32
Homosexuals can consent, animals cannot, therefore, bestiality - which is an act, not a relationship - participants cannot be wed.
Ninjadom Revival
13-11-2004, 01:39
Exactly, folks. Animals cannot consent. They don't understand. Someone having sex with an animal would terrify that creature. It's immoral by anyone's standards that isn't an imbecile. It's disgusting. Penalties against it should be increased.
Halide
13-11-2004, 01:40
Animals are owned as property, they're totaly different from being actual people. Besides, if animals are owned and subjected to owner wiles, marital rape of animals, if it is even RECOGNIZED, probably won't be considered a crime.

THINK OF THE POOR ANIMALS!
Pepe Dominguez
13-11-2004, 01:43
Only when an animal can show concent, and have a decent understanding on what it means to be married.

Other wise, it may as well be rape.

PS, a verb cannot marry.

Beastiality isn't a verb. ;)
The Tribes Of Longton
13-11-2004, 02:10
Beastiality isn't a verb. ;)
Nor is it the proper noun for describing one who commits the act of bestiality.