Terran Individualists
03-11-2004, 18:02
first: socialism
socialists are like vampires to applied anarchist activism. when socialists are busy being socialists, great. socialists. no one in china is pretending that china is anarchist. same for cuba and same for spain. in spain teh socialists, who took over after the tragedy of 3/11/04, cotrol the state military with the skil of bureaucrats. the same in greece and cuba. no one is pretending i thos enationstates that socialism is anarchism.
however in other countries where people reject capitalist notions, socialist theory and rhetorick stand as a serious pothole to anarchism -- co-opting what it will. the so called 'anarchosocialists' show dangerous parallels to the national Socialists of Hitler's Germany and it's only funny to the shortsighted who don';t think about it hard enoug, or of cours eto nazis who want it that way. jello Biafra, the seminal punk bard, write a song called 'nazi punks fuck off' to describe his furry with and dissatisfaction with the polemic provided by so called anarchosocialists.
these cryptobolsheviks basically have co-ppted the name of anarchism to think veil their true racism that lurks generally not far below the surface. in europe these so called 'black bloc' socialists attend antiwar rallies and do what they can to start riots and goad police into acts of brutality -- often paid well by local statists who use them to deter would-be peace activist.
why should anyone care? well arch statists who believe in capitalism don;t care. i imagine socialists may be divided -- into those who wantth sham to go on to swell their ranks -- but i know wone thing --the crust punks i have encountered would be put in jail in china - put to work or put in the ocean. they wouldn't be wanted and Chung'quo is a thriving and sicnerely socialist nation with no real desire to pretend that they are anarchistic in anyway.
feminism is another problem of modern day anarchism - -but it is a problem oprecisely because anarchism is seen as ahaven for women who seek to escape the tyranny of patriarchal culture -- they gemnerally embrace anarchistic notions as a way to avo8id the harshness of patriarchalistic values to gfreater o lesser degrees. but once again socialism stands as a fake gateway to freedom. breeding conformity and groupthink, socialist scenes generally render people caught on the bottom of the bottom and providing no actual answers. many women are frustrated and distraught and emotionally off balance -- made so by the hartshness of dictatorial patrirarchalist capitalist cultures like the United Kingdom or the United States. but soveit-style mentalities are no better -- it is the Soviet union that became the MODEL for tyranny, oppression and fear -- and now in the 21st century fem9nists have been suckered into swallowin the same bait that once again, made a monster come out of austra9 hungary and decieve all of germany into following that monster into a futile war or nationalism.
the spontaneity and freedom that are implicit in anarchism,as well as the lack of a belief in property are abandoned for the glomming collectivism that Stalin's era used to gross effect in the infamous 'prgroms' of the early 20th century. neoBolshevism provides no actual freedom while promising women the moon and this is something that, once people get involved with is like epistemplogical quicksand. peopel become proud of what they give up - individualism -- in the name of the same mentality that empowered the harsh premiers of the USSR. with classic double think patterns these neobolshevist women lie to thesmselvesand each other in an urge to conform --
even non anarchists hear of these explotis and laugh. they may not be anarchists themselves but they know what it is. it is an absence of leaders.
when Marx, Stalin and others are oeading from beyond the graves, it's not anarchism, it's something altoghegether different informemed by a opolemic that consistently builds nation states. leaving pointles syouth screaming 'smash the state' at rally after rally -- themsleves caught in a state of denial that they must smash themselves out oi if ever to be anarchists in more than name. they lie a lot basically and are called 'poseurs'
feminsm is a priobelm in modern day anarchism but because it is necessary vital and a core issue...and socialism doesn't provide any freedom for anyone. (but try telling those whove been tricked by its seductive promise of a permanent revolution...a nightmare that never provides anything but grist for the mill and bodies for the hidden bosses of socialism the commisars and facilitators, organoizers and other obvious lying leaders to dominate and pass their torches of control ontp others who think just like them. It is very sad and almost tragic because these women want an alternative to the horrid ooptions that capitulating to capitalist demands and strictures offers -- but socialismwould use them like pieces in a long running game of 'tomorrow the world' -- often these women are youthful and perhaps came into the socialist idea by world of mouth -- they don;t know what the fifth international is and how it works to create a world slave state. they think it's anarchism because it seems to be against capitalist Statism.
anarchism is the realisation that human beings are born with free will an inherent part of them. there's no need for revolutions and every revolution that has taken place n t5he world, by vviolent means has without one exception created a pliice state arguably a sbad as what wa sthere before -- the gaps are shown in those who get marginalized by the idealistic and violent revolutionaries -- thesehumanb beings are written off as the price of freedom, their sufferings called necessary evils.
socialists are like vampires to applied anarchist activism. when socialists are busy being socialists, great. socialists. no one in china is pretending that china is anarchist. same for cuba and same for spain. in spain teh socialists, who took over after the tragedy of 3/11/04, cotrol the state military with the skil of bureaucrats. the same in greece and cuba. no one is pretending i thos enationstates that socialism is anarchism.
however in other countries where people reject capitalist notions, socialist theory and rhetorick stand as a serious pothole to anarchism -- co-opting what it will. the so called 'anarchosocialists' show dangerous parallels to the national Socialists of Hitler's Germany and it's only funny to the shortsighted who don';t think about it hard enoug, or of cours eto nazis who want it that way. jello Biafra, the seminal punk bard, write a song called 'nazi punks fuck off' to describe his furry with and dissatisfaction with the polemic provided by so called anarchosocialists.
these cryptobolsheviks basically have co-ppted the name of anarchism to think veil their true racism that lurks generally not far below the surface. in europe these so called 'black bloc' socialists attend antiwar rallies and do what they can to start riots and goad police into acts of brutality -- often paid well by local statists who use them to deter would-be peace activist.
why should anyone care? well arch statists who believe in capitalism don;t care. i imagine socialists may be divided -- into those who wantth sham to go on to swell their ranks -- but i know wone thing --the crust punks i have encountered would be put in jail in china - put to work or put in the ocean. they wouldn't be wanted and Chung'quo is a thriving and sicnerely socialist nation with no real desire to pretend that they are anarchistic in anyway.
feminism is another problem of modern day anarchism - -but it is a problem oprecisely because anarchism is seen as ahaven for women who seek to escape the tyranny of patriarchal culture -- they gemnerally embrace anarchistic notions as a way to avo8id the harshness of patriarchalistic values to gfreater o lesser degrees. but once again socialism stands as a fake gateway to freedom. breeding conformity and groupthink, socialist scenes generally render people caught on the bottom of the bottom and providing no actual answers. many women are frustrated and distraught and emotionally off balance -- made so by the hartshness of dictatorial patrirarchalist capitalist cultures like the United Kingdom or the United States. but soveit-style mentalities are no better -- it is the Soviet union that became the MODEL for tyranny, oppression and fear -- and now in the 21st century fem9nists have been suckered into swallowin the same bait that once again, made a monster come out of austra9 hungary and decieve all of germany into following that monster into a futile war or nationalism.
the spontaneity and freedom that are implicit in anarchism,as well as the lack of a belief in property are abandoned for the glomming collectivism that Stalin's era used to gross effect in the infamous 'prgroms' of the early 20th century. neoBolshevism provides no actual freedom while promising women the moon and this is something that, once people get involved with is like epistemplogical quicksand. peopel become proud of what they give up - individualism -- in the name of the same mentality that empowered the harsh premiers of the USSR. with classic double think patterns these neobolshevist women lie to thesmselvesand each other in an urge to conform --
even non anarchists hear of these explotis and laugh. they may not be anarchists themselves but they know what it is. it is an absence of leaders.
when Marx, Stalin and others are oeading from beyond the graves, it's not anarchism, it's something altoghegether different informemed by a opolemic that consistently builds nation states. leaving pointles syouth screaming 'smash the state' at rally after rally -- themsleves caught in a state of denial that they must smash themselves out oi if ever to be anarchists in more than name. they lie a lot basically and are called 'poseurs'
feminsm is a priobelm in modern day anarchism but because it is necessary vital and a core issue...and socialism doesn't provide any freedom for anyone. (but try telling those whove been tricked by its seductive promise of a permanent revolution...a nightmare that never provides anything but grist for the mill and bodies for the hidden bosses of socialism the commisars and facilitators, organoizers and other obvious lying leaders to dominate and pass their torches of control ontp others who think just like them. It is very sad and almost tragic because these women want an alternative to the horrid ooptions that capitulating to capitalist demands and strictures offers -- but socialismwould use them like pieces in a long running game of 'tomorrow the world' -- often these women are youthful and perhaps came into the socialist idea by world of mouth -- they don;t know what the fifth international is and how it works to create a world slave state. they think it's anarchism because it seems to be against capitalist Statism.
anarchism is the realisation that human beings are born with free will an inherent part of them. there's no need for revolutions and every revolution that has taken place n t5he world, by vviolent means has without one exception created a pliice state arguably a sbad as what wa sthere before -- the gaps are shown in those who get marginalized by the idealistic and violent revolutionaries -- thesehumanb beings are written off as the price of freedom, their sufferings called necessary evils.