NationStates Jolt Archive

Reagan was a nationalistic, unmitigated fascist. Not only was he ridiculously deceptive, he built a ridiculous stockpile of nuclear weapons. At the peak of Reagan's Reign of Terror, the US had over 35,000 ICBM's. How many "unnecessary" WMD's does one country need? He also built a debt that was so grotesque we are still suffering from it.

http://www.slightlywarped.com/forumpictures/trolls/feed_troll.jpg

Heil Reagan :)

I suppose this buildup of "useless" WMD's had nothing to do with causing the collapse of the Soviet empire by breaking their economy while trying to keep up with us? While the liberals of the world were just willing to live with it forever?

http://www.picdump.org/albums/dragmire/Troll_XING.jpg

Reagan was a nationalistic, unmitigated fascist. Not only was he ridiculously deceptive, he built a ridiculous stockpile of nuclear weapons. At the peak of Reagan's Reign of Terror, the US had over 35,000 ICBM's. How many "unnecessary" WMD's does one country need? He also built a debt that was so grotesque we are still suffering from it.


Newbies.. Must kil...

Seriously, though. Raegan was the only good rep. prez in a long while. he was an actual conservativ, which had good points and bad points, but not a neocon, which just pleain sucks ass.
Leave raegan alone.

and yet he was smart enough to use a trickle down effect on big business to actually put more money in the people's pockets...Reagan was one of the best presidents the US has had...

Have I insulted the uber-fuehrer? I will add that I do not support the USSR (they were stalinists, and NOT socialists). The collapse of the USSR was terrible on a global scale. Prior to the collapse of the USSR, there was stringent control/regulation on every single ICBM in the USSR, following the breakup it was chaos. We now encounter a scenario in which there are prolific post-soviet nations which are vulnerable to radical elements (the very same that wouldn't hesitate to nuke a major city). This doesn't strike me as intelligent foreign policy. You don't make the world safer by impoverishing twenty countries at once.

And your first clue was?

NS: National socialism

Reagan was a nationalistic, unmitigated fascist. Not only was he ridiculously deceptive, he built a ridiculous stockpile of nuclear weapons. At the peak of Reagan's Reign of Terror, the US had over 35,000 ICBM's. How many "unnecessary" WMD's does one country need? He also built a debt that was so grotesque we are still suffering from it.




Attack Bush if your gonna attack a Republican but not Reagan.

Reagan was a nationalistic, unmitigated fascist. Not only was he ridiculously deceptive, he built a ridiculous stockpile of nuclear weapons. At the peak of Reagan's Reign of Terror, the US had over 35,000 ICBM's. How many "unnecessary" WMD's does one country need? He also built a debt that was so grotesque we are still suffering from it.

I don't like Raegan very much, but how the hell does any of this make him a Nazi? I think You yourself are being a little deceptive with your Thread Title.

You realise, of course, this habit of refering to anyone you don't like as a 'fascist' is why card-carrying fascists get away with murder - literally.

My best friend in primary school was the son of 'a swiss doctor who emigrated here after the war' ie a nazi concentration camp guard. Said Nazi was able to operate freely because people tuned out the claim 'fascist' believing it just meant that the speaker was an immature leftie. (He finally had to leave the country when OZ started looking at investigating war criminals from WWII, but no doubt he's still taking advantage of this habit - wherever he is).

Evil? Yes. Nazi? No.

How many countries that claim to be socialist idylls are actually working well :gundge:

Any president who didnt completely destroy the DEA and everything it stands to waste money on is an idiot. Thusly... every president after nixon (I believe it was Nixon's dumb ass who created the DEA... might be wrong there) sucked.

The DEA has wasted billions, and I might go so far as trillions, of tax payer money on a useless fight against what really wouldnt be much of a problem if managed correctly.

I digress. Reagan sucks for the afore mentioned reasons.

Have I insulted the uber-fuehrer? I will add that I do not support the USSR (they were stalinists, and NOT socialists). The collapse of the USSR was terrible on a global scale. Prior to the collapse of the USSR, there was stringent control/regulation on every single ICBM in the USSR, following the breakup it was chaos. We now encounter a scenario in which there are prolific post-soviet nations which are vulnerable to radical elements (the very same that wouldn't hesitate to nuke a major city). This doesn't strike me as intelligent foreign policy. You don't make the world safer by impoverishing twenty countries at once.

Are you seriously saying that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a bad thing? Think, man! How many countries are now free democracies, now that the Wall has come down? Germany is reunified. Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, all formerly under the Soviet boot, now thriving democracies. And are you saying these twenty countries weren't impoverished before the Soviet collapse? That East Germany wasn't an environmental disaster, and is just now cleaning itself up? What do they teach these people at school these days?

35,000 ICBMs? Umm...that would mean at one point the US had more nukes the Soviet union..this wasnt the case..ever..infact the US had less nukes than the Soviet Union throughout most of the Cold War. And so what if Reagan was nationalistic? Is that a bad thing? Holding pride in ones country doesnt make a person evil. Nor does it make them a Nazi. The Nazi party was itself socialist. Reagan was far FAR from socialist. I suggest you pipe down a shut up now.

Any president who didnt completely destroy the DEA and everything it stands to waste money on is an idiot. Thusly... every president after nixon (I believe it was Nixon's dumb ass who created the DEA... might be wrong there) sucked.

The DEA has wasted billions, and I might go so far as trillions, of tax payer money on a useless fight against what really wouldnt be much of a problem if managed correctly.

I digress. Reagan sucks for the afore mentioned reasons.

Are you advocating the legalisation and taxation of class A drugs

Speak no ill of the dead.

Reagen was right wing, but saying that he was a national socialist may be a little far-fetched. Even though he did ignore the AIDS epidemic since it was a "homosexual" disease

Seriously, though. Raegan was the only good rep. prez in a long while. he was an actual conservativ, which had good points and bad points, but not a neocon, which just pleain sucks ass.
Leave raegan alone.

Not a neo-con? haha a little revisionist are we? it was Bush snr that wasn't the neo-con, Reagan certainly was, laugh

If you want to follow the path of the neo-con in the USA, it pretty much started with Teddy Roosevelt, disappeared under the true conservative Taft, and pretty much gone until WW2 (utopian liberalists like Wilson, or true conservatives for a while), reappeared during the war with Franklin Roosevelt and showed it's true colours with Truman, disappeared completely under the republican Eisenhower (true conservative), reappeared thru Kennedy and LBJ, then as the democrat party pushed left (remember, it was the demcorats who led the USA into WW1, WW2, Korea and Vietnam), the neo cons shifted to the right and found themself rallying under Reagan (who was the prototype of the shift).

Are you advocating the legalisation and taxation of class A drugs

I sense a George Soros disciple . . .

look at were that nation was in the 1970s compare to the 1980s .. america was back looking to the future with pride and are victory spirt restored .

why libs hate reagan well . they dreamed of a self hating self lothing america one that beived in its limits onescared forever by vietnam one were people would look to fedral programs and soicalism instead of to there own human spirit and an america with a UN Forein Policy .

well that didnt happen and look were evil right winger have taken america in the last 24 years lol reagan rebuilt the miltary and restored are econ then under bush we lead the world in stoping the sadam . then for only 2 years libral controled the US . clintons plans for destroying are miltary might and plans forunversal health and other soiclist ideas failed everwhere else was halted when newt andrepulicans won in 1994 the congress and the house stoping the democrates return to failed carter policys . and lead the way to shirnking the fedral goverment and balanceing the budget . then in the late 1990s the tech bubble burst bush2 inherted a huge econ crisis with corprate scandals that under reno were no investgating shoke the econ evan further then came 9-11 . then thnks to the tax cuts this resession was one of the shallowest in history with the US leading the western world wit only 5.6% unemployment rate and us right wingers lead the US into two succesful wars .

now in 2004 the once powerful aluqeda network can only hit the US with video tapes lol and elections in afganstan something librals weeks into the war said would never happen lol . american under repuican control has done somthing the britsh empire at the top of its power couldnt do something the soviets couldnt do . now sits in that nation a pro american democracy . and we shift to the second front on terrior iraq . sadam in a cell . elections on the way . yet the same libral naw sayer claim we will fail clam we will be destroyed by terrisst in that front . they were wrong in afganstan they will soon be provedwrong in iraq .......


and thanks to repulican like regan newt and the bushs the pillers have been set .... america comes into the world with are rival defeated . with the soviets gone we come into the world much like rome did after the fall of powerful carthrage .

welcom to the american Millenium =-) lol

Reagen was right wing, but saying that he was a national socialist may be a little far-fetched. Even though he did ignore the AIDS epidemic since it was a "homosexual"




if u ask me to much is given to aids . why e should spend more moeny on problems jsut hit people instead of giving so much to a problem thatis brought on to a peron through reckless behaveior .