NationStates Jolt Archive

I like Gore more than Kerry, why? He didnt support the Iraq war, Gore would have paid attention to the reports of Terrorists planning on attacking by hi-jacking planes, he would have gone into Afghanistan and stayed there, he wouldnt have FLEW THE BIN LADEN FAMILY BACK TO AFGHANISTAN AFTER THE ATTACKS. But wouldve questioned them, he wouldnt have given Bin-Laden a three month head start, and wouldve stayed in Afghan until he captured the little bitch and completely overthrown the terrorists there and the talliban, not go into Iraq, that was pointless, I still support Kerry, but I would rather Gore going for his re-election, Gore, you were cheated, but we want you back.

I agree with you completely. Gore would have been a far better president than George Bush, and, IMHO, Senator Kerry.

Let's just hope that Bush gets that plane ticket back to Crawford tomorrow (Nov. 2nd.)

Gore, you mean the last elected president...

Gore, you mean the last elected president...
Bush?

I agree with you completely. Gore would have been a far better president than George Bush, and, IMHO, Senator Kerry.

Let's just hope that Bush gets that plane ticket back to Crawford tomorrow (Nov. 2nd.)

yes please o god. sorry atheists, budhists and agnostics. (probably more i might offend but those are all of the ones i know off the top of my head) Gore would be better, but kerry is still better than Bush!

It's funny you say that, because Gore was there when the decision not to take Bin Ladin into custody before the attack was made, and he didn't object to it. He was in a position to stop the whole thing before it ever happened, and he didn't.

Bush?

well more people wanted gore, and it was proven that an actual recount would have made a gore presidency.

Haw! Under Gore, we would've still been in negotiations with the UN, begging to be allowed to strike Afghanistan to hunt Osama.. Gore would've issued a formal apology after 9/11 and gone off to hide. :cool:

Gore ain't fooling Pepe Dominguez no sir. :rolleyes:

It's funny you say that, because Gore was there when the decision not to take Bin Ladin into custody before the attack was made, and he didn't object to it. He was in a position to stop the whole thing before it ever happened, and he didn't.

no as VP gore didn't run the show. (unlike Dick Cheney)

Gore, you mean the last elected president...
Quit the conspiracy bullshit. It doesn't change anything - what happened, happened. Just make sure you've got your ass to the polls to make sure it doesn't happen again.

I was campaigning for Badnarik, but this is an Anyone-but-Bush situation, so John Kerry is the man to go for - all you third-party voters, make your point next election, when it's less important.

well more people wanted gore, and it was proven that an actual recount would have made a gore presidency.

Where? Oh right, I remember... nowhere.. ;) :cool:

well more people wanted gore, and it was proven that an actual recount would have made a gore presidency.
Link? From what I've seen, the majority of recounts done show that Bush would have won, the exceptions being when you fudge around with the military votes.

Quit the conspiracy bullshit. It doesn't change anything - what happened, happened. Just make sure you've got your ass to the polls to make sure it doesn't happen again.

I was campaigning for Badnarik, but this is an Anyone-but-Bush situation, so John Kerry is the man to go for - all you third-party voters, make your point next election, when it's less important.

thank you, save the state of our country now, protest later please! (yes i need to get a life for those of you who are wondering, but i'm 13 and it's 7:00 on a Monday so there isn't much ta do.

Link? From what I've seen, the majority of recounts done show that Bush would have won, the exceptions being when you fudge around with the military votes.

You're right. Still, even if a recount would've given FL to Gore, he NEVER asked for one! ;)

Gore got greedy, asking for recounts in democrat-only counties, and the SCOTUS said you need one standard throughout the state... Gore got greedy, but a fair recount wouldn'tve helped him anyway, so I guess he gets credit for trying.. :D

Where? Oh right, I remember... nowhere.. ;) :cool:

i have no idea what you are talking about. and by the way it wan sot a recount of all counties, but that doesn't mattr.

Haw! Under Gore, we would've still been in negotiations with the UN, begging to be allowed to strike Afghanistan to hunt Osama.. Gore would've issued a formal apology after 9/11 and gone off to hide. :cool:
And Bush is gonna declare war on the entire world and enslave all Islams and convert them to Christianiaty. :rolleyes:

You're right. Still, even if a recount would've given FL to Gore, he NEVER asked for one! ;)

Gore got greedy, asking for recounts in democrat-only counties, and the SCOTUS said you need one standard throughout the state... Gore got greedy, but a fair recount wouldn'tve helped him anyway, so I guess he gets credit for trying.. :D

2 points, 1 the supreme court said no because there wasn't 1 standard, and 2 they said it couldn't be used as precedence for other hearing which never happens, hmm wonder if there was a bias.

Since I've got to go do other things, my source on the ultimate recount winner :
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/florida.ballots/stories/main.html
Depending on the standards used, either Gore or Bush won.

Haw! Under Gore, we would've still been in negotiations with the UN, begging to be allowed to strike Afghanistan to hunt Osama.. Gore would've issued a formal apology after 9/11 and gone off to hide. :cool:

Gore ain't fooling Pepe Dominguez no sir. :rolleyes:

but bush is? the UN wanted to go to Iraq including the French, 1 French newspaper said "We are all Americans now!" so that theory don't hold up, Pepe Dominguez ain't fooling me.

You're right. Still, even if a recount would've given FL to Gore, he NEVER asked for one! ;)

Gore got greedy, asking for recounts in democrat-only counties, and the SCOTUS said you need one standard throughout the state... Gore got greedy, but a fair recount wouldn'tve helped him anyway, so I guess he gets credit for trying.. :D

Yeah because in those heavy Democratic areas it said Bush had the lead. Why? Hmm I dont know, ask a non- Bush supporter and find out.

And yes please, dont vote for third parties now, just vote for the guy you want to see win more, Kerry or Bush.

The Druids of Celtlund are conducting a sacrifice this evening. The purpose of this momentous occasion is to appease the Gods and assure the sins of the 2000 election will not be repeated. The Gods will assure that the truly elected President of the noble country. the United States will take office. Viva George. Viva Bush. Viva the leader of the free world.
No, there will be no Virgin Sacrifice, but some may sacrifice their virginity for the cause. Republicanism for all.

The Druids of Celtlund are conducting a sacrifice this evening. The purpose of this momentous occasion is to appease the Gods and assure the sins of the 2000 election will not be repeated. The Gods will assure that the truly elected President of the noble country. the United States will take office. Viva George. Viva Bush. Viva the leader of the free world.
No, there will be no Virgin Sacrifice, but some may sacrifice their virginity for the cause. Republicanism for all.

cna you be led by someone you hate? (yes we are led by Bush, but when you have a choice.) I mean the majority of the populace of the free world hates Bush why would he classify as the leader of the free world? because we have the most bombs?

Compromise what you believe in so you can elect someone you don't like...

Love that theory. Voting for Kerry because he's the lesser of two evils is a sure way to ensure that more liberal (or more -truly- conservative) ideas stay marginalized by blocking out third parties. I'm voting Badnarik (I live in SC which is going Bush anyways) after getting paired with a Nader supporter in Charleston through votepact.com He was gonna vote Kerry and I was going to vote Bush, but now we're both voting for the candidate we really feel strongly about.

Bush is certainly a douche bag (to use a technical term) but Kerry isn't that much better. Vote your conscience and keep in mind that the Republican controlled congress is more responsible for a lot of things (Healthcare, the economy, gay marriage, etc, etc...) than the office of president is.

o and also, if you ain't careful Bush might decide that hte druids of Celtland should be denied tax exempt staus (like those evil Unitarians) and invade a country to impose his/god's (supposedly) will upon them.

All I know it that Gore doesn't matter anymore. He isn't running for election. It's Bush vs. Kerry. As far as whoever said don't vote for a 3rd party, I just have this to say. America was designed under the idea that you can choose your leader, without being told who to vote for. Telling someone not to vote for any of the dozens of 3rd parties out there is like telling someone that you must choose either black or white, and that it can't be shades of grey. Trust me, shades of grey is what politics is all about.

-Vote for Walt Brown for president!-

-if you don't know who Walt Brown is, look it up. If you're to lazy to do that... vote for the candidate who hasn't been condemned by the earthly leaders of his own religion.-

Compromise what you believe in so you can elect someone you don't like...

Love that theory. Voting for Kerry because he's the lesser of two evils is a sure way to ensure that more liberal (or more -truly- conservative) ideas stay marginalized by blocking out third parties. I'm voting Badnarik (I live in SC which is going Bush anyways) after getting paired with a Nader supporter in Charleston through votepact.com He was gonna vote Kerry and I was going to vote Bush, but now we're both voting for the candidate we really feel strongly about.

Bush is certainly a douche bag (to use a technical term) but Kerry isn't that much better. Vote your conscience and keep in mind that the Republican controlled congress is more responsible for a lot of things (Healthcare, the economy, gay marriage, etc, etc...) than the office of president is.

honestly man, normally i would respect people like you, i mean Kerry isn't liberal enough for my tastes either (and stop talking about Kerry being liberal that is total bs) but please this is a relay, really important election vote for the lesser of 2 evils.

Compromise what you believe in so you can elect someone you don't like...

Vote your conscience and keep in mind that the Republican controlled congress is more responsible for a lot of things (Healthcare, the economy, gay marriage, etc, etc...) than the office of president is.

Although I do not agree with most of what you say, I must agree with "Vote your conscience and keep in mind that the Republican controlled congress is more responsible for a lot of things (Healthcare, the economy, gay marriage, etc, etc...) than the office of president is."

Heck, I've even voted for George Wallace (who of you knows who he was?) and Ross Perot. No candidate is perfect, none will match your "ideal" but you are right, you must vote your conscience. I may not agree with your vote, but I am willing to give my life to defend your righ to vote as you see fit.
Peace!
The Ard Re of Celtlund
Sean

if gore were our president, saddam and bin laden would be attacking us with nukes right now...

You're right. Still, even if a recount would've given FL to Gore, he NEVER asked for one! ;)

Gore got greedy, asking for recounts in democrat-only counties, and the SCOTUS said you need one standard throughout the state... Gore got greedy, but a fair recount wouldn'tve helped him anyway, so I guess he gets credit for trying.. :D

Dang Pepe, your on all of my forums, the abortions whats wrong with them one, and this one. Both started by me. Always against me though, thats not good, boys take care of this Pepe character. :mp5: :mp5: :mp5: :mp5:

if gore were our president, saddam and bin laden would be attacking us with nukes right now...
Where would they get the nukes? :p

Dang Pepe, your on all of my forums, the abortions whats wrong with them one, and this one. Both started by me. Always against me though, thats not good, boys take care of this Pepe character. :mp5: :mp5: :mp5: :mp5:

I can't help it.. you're the author of half the threads on Page 1! ;)

if gore were our president, saddam and bin laden would be attacking us with nukes right now...

Hmm, so far, no WMDs found! Thats a shocker, cause I could of sworn that the Republicans swore that there are WMDs, in fact listen to this, this is a knee slapper!

One guy said, "I have seen the WMDs"! How dumb is that! Theyre trying to defend Bush, when Bush hasnt seen this things himself! HAHAHA! See the level of Republicans!

I like Gore more than Kerry, why? He didnt support the Iraq war, Gore would have paid attention to the reports of Terrorists planning on attacking by hi-jacking planes, he would have gone into Afghanistan and stayed there, he wouldnt have FLEW THE BIN LADEN FAMILY BACK TO AFGHANISTAN AFTER THE ATTACKS. But wouldve questioned them, he wouldnt have given Bin-Laden a three month head start, and wouldve stayed in Afghan until he captured the little bitch and completely overthrown the terrorists there and the talliban, not go into Iraq, that was pointless, I still support Kerry, but I would rather Gore going for his re-election, Gore, you were cheated, but we want you back.

going by the syntax, unproven statements, and the clear inability of your research ability that can be seen in that whole rant, I can either assume you are a 13 year old, or you are just one un-educated Democrat.

I can't help it.. you're the author of half the threads on Page 1! ;)

Ah yes! I enjoy making the threads, I can make my voice heard, watch this, I am going to insult Europeans, even though I dont mean it, than when they get mad Ill say I was kidding! HAHAHA! Thats a riot. Help me out, it will be called Europeans suck!

Hmm, so far, no WMDs found! Thats a shocker, cause I could of sworn that the Republicans swore that there are WMDs, in fact listen to this, this is a knee slapper!

One guy said, "I have seen the WMDs"! How dumb is that! Theyre trying to defend Bush, when Bush hasnt seen this things himself! HAHAHA! See the level of Republicans!

The Democrats thought the same thing about Iraq having WMD.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998.

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

Where would they get the nukes? :p
From Saddam or Iran.

The Ard Re of Celtlund
Sean

oh yeah, your boy Gore supported the Iraq war when it was politically gainful to do so...

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

Since I've got to go do other things, my source on the ultimate recount winner :
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/florida.ballots/stories/main.html
Depending on the standards used, either Gore or Bush won.

Simply put, excellent.

umm if Al Gore were president.... we might aswell call ourselves The United Islamic States of America

true though between Gore and Kerry i would choose Gore

but dont forget BUSH WON FLORIDA FAIRLY
YOU PEOPLE ARE TO BLIND YOU CANT SEE SIMPLE FACTS

I like Gore more than Kerry, why? He didnt support the Iraq war, Gore would have paid attention to the reports of Terrorists planning on attacking by hi-jacking planes, he would have gone into Afghanistan and stayed there, he wouldnt have FLEW THE BIN LADEN FAMILY BACK TO AFGHANISTAN AFTER THE ATTACKS. But wouldve questioned them, he wouldnt have given Bin-Laden a three month head start, and wouldve stayed in Afghan until he captured the little bitch and completely overthrown the terrorists there and the talliban, not go into Iraq, that was pointless, I still support Kerry, but I would rather Gore going for his re-election, Gore, you were cheated, but we want you back.
Yes, Gore would have jumped up from the classroom, flew out the window,and saved thousands by intercepting the planes, then he would have singlehandidly defeated Al-quaeda with his mind-bullets, the Tliban would have been squashed with his mighty thunder punch, and the internet would have been invented. Oh wait, he says he did tht one already. :rolleyes:

From Saddam or Iran.

The Ard Re of Celtlund
Sean
Yes, because it's well known Saddam had nuclear weapons. :p

Iran too. :p