NationStates Jolt Archive

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110005808

That's it, folks. Bush is finished; the WSJ has never been wrong in their endorsements in close elections. Bush people had better pack up and work on the Senatorial elections, 'cause Bush is history. :(

I'm appalled that they need to put on this:
Editor's note: This is a satire of the Angry Left. Please do not take it seriously.

How big a dumbass would you have to be, I mean honestly :rolleyes:

Haha funny.

I was just reading it and thinking "wow, this guy is really stupid; what's he doing in WSJ?"

Then I saw

Editor's note: This is a satire of the Angry Left. Please do not take it seriously.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110005808

That's it, folks. Bush is finished; the WSJ has never been wrong in their endorsements in close elections. Bush people had better pack up and work on the Senatorial elections, 'cause Bush is history. :(
The WSJ already indirectly endorsed Kerry by making short work of Bush's failures as president. I wish they'd directly endorse Kerry though :)

Psst hey buddy?

Did you notice:

Editor's note: This is a satire of the Angry Left. Please do not take it seriously.

Yes, but I mean the real WSJ. Not this propaganda site.

Psst hey buddy?

Did you notice:

Editor's note: This is a satire of the Angry Left. Please do not take it seriously.

Save your breathe. Or in this case fingers

Save your breathe. Or in this case fingers

That's what I get for typing a message, walking away, and returning.....

You can deduct from my post count! ;)

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110005808

That's it, folks. Bush is finished; the WSJ has never been wrong in their endorsements in close elections. Bush people had better pack up and work on the Senatorial elections, 'cause Bush is history. :(
:) ROTFLBSAOTP

I'm appalled that they need to put on this:


How big a dumbass would you have to be, I mean honestly :rolleyes:


I think they put it there for the Kerry supporters who might have thought it was a real endorsment.

http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/press_endorsements.html

These are impressive!!!

(Bush lost a lot of support from the press!)

http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/press_endorsements.html

These are impressive!!!

(Bush lost a lot of support from the press!)
Kerry is also endorsed by NAMBLA, The Communist Party, Hezbollah, and militant Palestininas. So what?

Kerry is also endorsed by NAMBLA, The Communist Party, Hezbollah, and militant Palestininas. So what?
Bush is endorsed by the KKK, Osama, terrorists everywhere, and southern hick rednecks. So what?

Bush is endorsed by the KKK, Osama, terrorists everywhere, and southern hick rednecks. So what?
I think the point is that the only thing more stupid than an endorsement is the people who think they count for something.

Bush is endorsed by the KKK, Osama, terrorists everywhere, and southern hick rednecks. So what?
Now for a reality check, bigot. None of these endorsed Bush, all the ones I listed endorsed Kerry. :)

Now for a reality check, bigot. None of these endorsed Bush, all the ones I listed endorsed Kerry. :)

Source for those endorsments?

I'm really suprised that FT is supporting Kerry.

I don't like the idea of newspapers endorsing anyone. They are just openly admitting their bias.

Um… why are newspapers endorsing candidates anyway? It is hard to stay impartial when you back a guy.

Kerry is also endorsed by NAMBLA, The Communist Party, Hezbollah, and militant Palestininas. So what?
Lies. None of those people have endorsed Kerry. It's still interesting to note that you have visited the websites of Hezbollah and militant Palestinians. Expect a visit from John Ashcroft soon. :evil:

I think they put it there for the Kerry supporters who might have thought it was a real endorsment.
Yeah, that's what it must be.

:rolleyes: