Ku Klux Klan Endorses George W. Bush
Communist Maynards
29-10-2004, 01:12
Ku Klux Klan endorses George W. Bush:
Support President George W. Bush and re-elect him for 4 more years.
http://www.johnnyleeclary.com/questions_on_the_ku_klux_klan.htm
Ku Klux Klan also endorsed Ronald Reagan:
In September, the newspaper of the Invisible Empire, Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, declared Reagan its favorite candidate, asserting that 'the Republican platform reads as if it were written by a Klansman.
What I will never forget or forgive is that Reagan had no minorities of consequence inside his campaign team. His Cabinet had only one black man in it, and he was embarrassing. And worst of all, Reagan went eight years refusing to talk to any civil-rights leaders.
http://www.nationalreview.com/31dec96/buckley.html
New Anthrus
29-10-2004, 01:15
Endorsement not accepted. But I don't feel like all the cooks are endorsing us. Yasser Arafat and Fidel Castro have already endorsed Kerry, so we're even.
Communist Maynards
29-10-2004, 01:17
Endorsement not accepted. But I don't feel like all the cooks are endorsing us. Yasser Arafat and Fidel Castro have already endorsed Kerry, so we're even.
Iran supports George W. Bush as well...
New Anthrus
29-10-2004, 01:19
Iran supports George W. Bush as well...
Like I said, we're even. But why did Iran endorse Bush? Don't they realize how dangerous either candidate can be to Tehran? If I were the aylotollahs, I would have just kept my mouth shut on it.
Roach-Busters
29-10-2004, 01:20
If I were running for President and the KKK endorsed me, I'd invite them all to meet with me somewhere. I would then proceed to whip out a submachine gun and blow them all away.
The KKK has killed more americans than either of those 2 guys...
Catholic Germany
29-10-2004, 01:24
Why does it not suprise me that the KKK endorsed Bush?
Kinda Sensible people
29-10-2004, 01:25
Why does it not suprise me that the KKK endorsed Bush?
Because they are a socially conservative bunch of rednecks...
Roach-Busters
29-10-2004, 01:27
Because they are a socially conservative bunch of rednecks...
No, they're just @$$holes.
Die, KKK scum!!!!!!!
(Left)KKK (Right)Me
:eek: :sniper: :gundge: :mp5: :upyours: :mp5: :gundge: :sniper:
Communist Maynards
29-10-2004, 01:28
Because they are a socially conservative bunch of rednecks...
I am a redneck myself from Eastern Kentucky.
However, even with the second rate public education I recieved in my youth, I am still not stupid enough to vote for George W. Bush.
The Class A Cows
29-10-2004, 01:29
Why does it not suprise me that the KKK endorsed Bush?
I have no idea, considering that the KKK were founded as a Democratic group and have an ideology focused on providing social programs to whites, which opposes the ideology of modern republicans of providing social programs for almost no one.
They really are kooks i guess.
Kinda Sensible people
29-10-2004, 01:30
I am a redneck myself from Eastern Kentucky.
However, even with the second rate public education I recieved in my youth, I am still not stupid enough to vote for George W. Bush.
Redneck does not = from the south
Redneck = Ignorant person from a rural area.
You clearly are not ignorant
Communist Maynards
29-10-2004, 01:36
Redneck does not = from the south
Redneck = Ignorant person from a rural area.
So anybody from a rural area that votes for Bush is a Redneck?
Kinda Sensible people
29-10-2004, 01:39
So anybody from a rural area that votes for Bush is a Redneck?
No, anyone who supports a socially conservative agenda, and lives as a "Right Godfearin'" person and is white/male/christian supremisist is a redneck.
don't they still hate catholics? that kind of limits their options right there.
Gurguvungunit
29-10-2004, 01:41
When dealing with NSers, yeah, that's about the size of it.
Also, neither the President or Senator Kerry can control who chooses to endorse them. The KKK probably felt that the more conservative candidate was closer (but not, mind you, close) to their whackjob political ideas.
I have no idea, considering that the KKK were founded as a Democratic group
We've been over this. The Democrats and Republicans switched sides. The Republican New England became the Democratic New England. The Democratic South became the Republican South. The KKK was founded in the South. There's really no more to this than that.
and have an ideology focused on providing social programs to whites, which opposes the ideology of modern republicans of providing social programs for almost no one.
The KKK is much more opposed to black affirmative action. Scroll through their website, it's always "Blacks take this! Blacks take that!"
They really are kooks i guess.
I really don't know what point you're trying to make. The KKK is an extreme right-wing fringe group.
Catholic Germany
29-10-2004, 01:44
don't they still hate catholics? that kind of limits their options right there.
*sigh* Yes they still do hate us. I don't know why either. I mean what have we done to them?
Magnetom
29-10-2004, 01:44
I find this hilarious. Ironic too. KKK supports a political party that was created as a party to stop the spread of slavery. Pro-slavery people supporting the essentially Abolotionist party. HAH!
Roach-Busters
29-10-2004, 01:44
We've been over this. The Democrats and Republicans switched sides. The Republican New England became the Democratic New England. The Democratic South became the Republican South. The KKK was founded in the South. There's really no more to this than that.
The KKK is much more opposed to black affirmative action. Scroll through their website, it's always "Blacks take this! Blacks take that!"
I really don't know what point you're trying to make. The KKK is an extreme right-wing fringe group.
I don't think I could ever look at their website without barfing all over the computer screen.
And not all KKK were right-wing. Sam Bowers (a KKK leader) was a 'former' communist who hung portraits of Marx and Lenin on his wall and admitted that he used communist tactics.
Choo-Choo Bear
29-10-2004, 01:45
I am a redneck myself from Eastern Kentucky.
However, even with the second rate public education I recieved in my youth, I am still not stupid enough to vote for George W. Bush.
That gets me thinking:
Maybe the incredibly short-sighted policies of screwing up the education system have a purpose... to create more illiterate hicks who will vote for people like Bush.
Anyhoo... I'm thinking of donating a large sum of money to the KKK so they can advertise that they support Bush. Anyone care to help out?
Decisive Action
29-10-2004, 01:45
There is no "KKK" today, there are many groups that call themselves "Klan" but "The klan" ceased to exist after the 1920s-1930s
The old copyright of the name "Invisible Empire Knights of the Ku Klux Klan Inc" was stripped from the klan in the late 20s early 30s due to back taxes (They had eight million members for about five years, and each member had to pay ten bucks per year, and then there were the fees to get the robes and klorans (secret ritual books) and such, so the klan was racking in the dough) however, by the end of the 20s, the Imperial Wizard declared the klan bankrupt after being told they had to pay 600,000 in back taxes. My question is, if they were racking in tens of millions... Where did it all go? (I personally believe the leadership embezzled the money)
Anyway, most of what you think you know about the klan, is just wrong and ignorant "commonly held beliefs" if you want answers and the truth, IM me.
Communist Maynards
29-10-2004, 01:45
*sigh* Yes they still do hate us. I don't know why either. I mean what have we done to them?
What did people poor do to George W. Bush?
Nothing, but that doesn't mean he won't take away thier healthcare and social security.
Roach-Busters
29-10-2004, 01:46
*sigh* Yes they still do hate us. I don't know why either. I mean what have we done to them?
Don't let it get to you. They're just a bunch of assholes. They hate pretty much anybody who isn't white and doesn't wear a dumb blanket over their head. Sick bastards.
Communist Maynards
29-10-2004, 01:48
And not all KKK were right-wing. Sam Bowers (a KKK leader) was a 'former' communist who hung portraits of Marx and Lenin on his wall and admitted that he used communist tactics.
Communism supports racial and social equality.
Malcom X and Helen Keller are notable American Communists. Also, Nelson Mandela recieved support from the Soviet Union while the United States supported the corrupt South African government.
Decisive Action
29-10-2004, 01:53
Communism supports racial and social equality.
Malcom X and Helen Keller are notable American Communists. Also, Nelson Mandela recieved support from the Soviet Union while the United States supported the corrupt South African government.
Here is something your freedom fighting Nelson Mandela's group ANC (African National Congress) did to opponents (both white and black)
http://www.africancrisis.org/photos11.asp
http://www.africancrisis.org/photos5.asp
http://www.africancrisis.org/photos15.asp
Current ANC murder campaign against whites:
http://www.africancrisis.org/photos16.asp
Ten Years After Apartheid: State of South Africa today:
http://www.africancrisis.org/Ph_TenYears.asp
Choo-Choo Bear
29-10-2004, 01:54
Jesus, why are Americans so opposed to socialist ideals?
I mean, there's a sliding scale... it doesnt have to be all government OR all business. Everything is good in moderation, nothing is good in excess.
The whole hating communism thing came from allied governments in WW2 getting the public (sheep) all patriotic and angry at the evil enemy.
Anyway, most of what you think you know about the klan, is just wrong and ignorant "commonly held beliefs" if you want answers and the truth, IM me.
hehe...I'd rather not. :p
Roach-Busters
29-10-2004, 01:56
Here is something your freedom fighting Nelson Mandela's group ANC (African National Congress) did to opponents (both white and black)
http://www.africancrisis.org/photos11.asp
http://www.africancrisis.org/photos5.asp
http://www.africancrisis.org/photos15.asp
Current ANC murder campaign against whites:
http://home.mweb.co.za/sa/savimbi/photo1.htm
Ten Years After Apartheid: State of South Africa today:
http://www.africancrisis.org/Ph_TenYears.asp
I read about these things, but I never actually saw photos. Ugh.
:eek:
What did people poor do to George W. Bush?
Nothing, but that doesn't mean he won't take away thier healthcare and social security.
What you just said is like saying that 2 + 2 = George Washington. Everyone else that has said shit about all the hicks and rednecks voting for Bush, please do us a favor. Hold your breath and count to one thousand. And, redneck =/= ignorant hick from the south. Anyone can be a redneck, it doesn't matter where the hell you live. Jeff Foxworthy described it best as "a glorious absence of safistication. You all are liberal ass stereotyping bastards. Maybe Reagan didn't hire many blacks because there weren't many that were qualified for the job? Didn't think of that one, did you?
In closing, afffirmitive action is fucking stupid.
Decisive Action
29-10-2004, 01:58
Why does it not suprise me that the KKK endorsed Bush?
Actually most klansmen are probably against Bush because he is a mason and is pro-Israel.
Most klansmen are probably voting third party or write-in for David Duke.
Roach-Busters
29-10-2004, 01:59
DA, have you ever seen any of the photos of what Mugabe did to his victims?
(Both black and white)
Communist Maynards
29-10-2004, 02:00
The whole hating communism thing came from allied governments in WW2 getting the public (sheep) all patriotic and angry at the evil enemy.
100,000 Americans voted for Communism and over 1,000,000 voted for Socialism in the 1936 election.
This is before they shut down the Communist Party. In the 1940's, we had around 100,000 members and growing, but then McCarthy and the US government made Communism illegal.
Sadly, now the American Communist Party only has 10,000 people...
Communist Maynards
29-10-2004, 02:01
Actually most klansmen are probably against Bush because he is a mason and is pro-Israel.
Then why does the KKK endorse Bush?
100,000 Americans voted for Communism and over 1,000,000 voted for Socialism in the 1936 election.
This is before they shut down the Communist Party. In the 1940's, we had around 100,000 members and growing, but then McCarthy and the US government made Communism illegal.
Sadly, now the American Communist Party only has 10,000 people...
Ya...It's just too bad that communism won't work.
Hot and Nasties
29-10-2004, 02:03
The KKK took my baby away!!! *sniffle* ';+)
Communist Maynards
29-10-2004, 02:04
Ya...It's just too bad that communism won't work.
Atleast we aren't endorsed by the KKK.
Roach-Busters
29-10-2004, 02:06
http://home.wanadoo.nl/rhodesia/terrorism.html
(Mugabe's victims)
Actually most klansmen are probably against Bush because he is a mason and is pro-Israel.
Most klansmen are probably voting third party or write-in for David Duke.
If Klansmen have any sense at all, they'd vote Bush or risk Kerry taking office, and upholding affirmative action.
Atleast we aren't endorsed by the KKK.
I see no relevence...Capitalism will work with or without nutjob groups like them. Everyone seems to have this generalization that "OH NOES TEH REPUBLICANS ARE EVAL NEO-NAZI FASCISTS!" No. True, there are groups like the KKK, but they are so far right they can't the light of day. Normal republicans are hardworking, average americans.
Tremalkier
29-10-2004, 02:08
What you just said is like saying that 2 + 2 = George Washington. Everyone else that has said shit about all the hicks and rednecks voting for Bush, please do us a favor. Hold your breath and count to one thousand. And, redneck =/= ignorant hick from the south. Anyone can be a redneck, it doesn't matter where the hell you live. Jeff Foxworthy described it best as "a glorious absence of safistication. You all are liberal ass stereotyping bastards. Maybe Reagan didn't hire many blacks because there weren't many that were qualified for the job? Didn't think of that one, did you?
In closing, afffirmitive action is fucking stupid.
Not quite. Affirmative action is stupid in some scenarios, but not in others. For instance, I am violently against AA in college applications. To bring race into the mix brings up the idea of quotas, obvious attempts to avoid lawsuits, and other incredibly stupid things. Applications should be as anonymous as possible. Give a name, give the transcript, if you get interviewed they send their report without any details on appearance or the like.
However, affirmative action in some businesses is a good idea. Take the NFL for instance. The fact is that most people therein get their jobs because the owner likes them. Most owners are white (just a fact), and are for the most part likely to hire people they know, or have recommended to them. The fact is that in most cases these super-rich people don't know many minorities, who might be the best candidate. In that scenario, AA works.
Chelovekia
29-10-2004, 02:11
haha. Al Quada published an official statement that read something like, We are hoping very much that Bush not lose the election. "His idiocy and religious fanaticism does much to incite the arab world."
Im just thinking that if Al quada endorsed kerry, the media and republicans would be all over that in their arguments.
Decisive Action
29-10-2004, 02:13
Then why does the KKK endorse Bush?
Again, there is no "Klan" today.
There are about 100 different Klan groups, the Imperial Klans of America, the Alabama White Knights, the Georgia White Knights, American Knights, American White Knights, etc. there are many different, and often competing, klans today. One klan is not the representative of all the klans.
The last time there was any klan considered the strongest or the primary klan, was David Dukes "United Klans of America" in the 70s early 80s, but it is now defunct, it had as many as 50,000 members.
haha. Al Quada published an official statement that read something like, We are hoping very much that Bush not lose the election. "His idiocy and religious fanaticism does much to incite the arab world."
Im just thinking that if Al quada endorsed kerry, the media and republicans would be all over that in their arguments.
More likely, is they pretend to endorse Kerry, so that all the idiots who give a rats ass who endorses who jump to Bush's side. Then Osama sits back and says, "Reverse Psychology, yeah!"
Chelovekia
29-10-2004, 02:14
I see no relevence...Capitalism will work with or without nutjob groups like them. Everyone seems to have this generalization that "OH NOES TEH REPUBLICANS ARE EVAL NEO-NAZI FASCISTS!" No. True, there are groups like the KKK, but they are so far right they can't the light of day. Normal republicans are hardworking, average americans.
normal reubicans are either greedy or mislead on the facts.
Decisive Action
29-10-2004, 02:14
If Klansmen have any sense at all, they'd vote Bush or risk Kerry taking office, and upholding affirmative action.
I know many klansmen who want AA to pass, they realize the more whites get alienated and pissed off, the greater the chance the kkk membership numbers increase and the more chance for a race war.
The old "things must get worse before they get better" approach, is how they look at it.
Not quite. Affirmative action is stupid in some scenarios, but not in others. For instance, I am violently against AA in college applications. To bring race into the mix brings up the idea of quotas, obvious attempts to avoid lawsuits, and other incredibly stupid things. Applications should be as anonymous as possible. Give a name, give the transcript, if you get interviewed they send their report without any details on appearance or the like.
However, affirmative action in some businesses is a good idea. Take the NFL for instance. The fact is that most people therein get their jobs because the owner likes them. Most owners are white (just a fact), and are for the most part likely to hire people they know, or have recommended to them. The fact is that in most cases these super-rich people don't know many minorities, who might be the best candidate. In that scenario, AA works.
I can see where you are coming from, it's just too bad thay the NFL isn't the whole entire business world. Hiring employees should be based solely on the qualifications of the employee, not because the goverment says you must have so many blacks, so many whites, etc. For example if one white and three blacks apply for the same job, and the white has better skills (it's a scenario), but if the business already filled it's qouta for whites, he must hire someone with worse qualifications, and it will hurt the business. Hiring employees should be about hiring the best person for the job, not racial equality. (But I realize that, yes, racial equality is good.)
This is another one of those, "who cares?" kinda threads. Oh no, somebody endorses their party! How evil they must be! :rolleyes:
normal reubicans are either greedy or mislead on the facts.
You have a biased view on Republicans, since you are peace loving, AA supporting, environment protecting, pussy liberal.
I can generalize, too ;)
Communist Maynards
29-10-2004, 02:26
I'm thinking of donating a large sum of money to the KKK so they can advertise that they support Bush. Anyone care to help out?
I couldn't bear to support such a mislead and un-Goldy group as the KKK.
Likwise, I couldn't bear to support the Republican Party.
I couldn't bear to support such a mislead and un-Goldy group as the KKK.
Likwise, I couldn't bear to support the Republican Party.
Again, there's that stereotyping that all Republicans are white supremicists. Bush is surely not, so, why does it matter?
imported_DerFuhrer
29-10-2004, 02:30
That site is bullshit, white nationalist leaders in America HATE Bush, they see him as a white traitor, and should be shot. They don't like Jew Kerry either, but the slogan seems to be "anybody but Bush" in the white nationalist ideals also. So again, that site is by some fucking retard, look at racialist David Duke's (http://duke.org) site.
http://duke.org/images/dukesalzburg.jpg
New SwissLand
29-10-2004, 02:30
So the Klan supports Bush? Who cares? The Klan is only a shadow of their former selves and they haven't done anything news worthy in years. The last time they did something news worthy, they bombed a church. Now lets see who supports John F'ing Kerry: Kim Jong Il, Fidel Castro, and terrorists world wide are hoping that this pussy gets put into the White House. I don't like Bush. I don't like Kerry. But I don't see what the big deal is if you got a redneck white supremacist group on Bush's side whereas Kerry has communist dictators and genocidal maniacs on his. It's an even balance of evil. I seriously think America would be in a better state of anarchy then this excuse we call a democracy. Screw the Klan, Kim Jong Il, Castro and terrorists. Vote...nah, don't vote. It doesn't matter anyway.
I couldn't bear to support such a mislead and un-Goldy group as the KKK.
Likwise, I couldn't bear to support the Republican Party.
KKK=Evil
Republicans=Good
Democrats=Misguided
Other=Other
Me=Perfect
You=Suck
Choo-Choo Bear
29-10-2004, 02:34
You have a biased view on Republicans, since you are peace loving, AA supporting, environment protecting, pussy liberal.
I can generalize, too ;)
What the hell is wrong with protecting the environment, you fool?
Anyone with a tertiary education in any science knows that if we dont clean up our act in the next 50 years we'll kill ourselves off, along with (arguably) the only example of life in the entire universe.
Who gives a shit about money when you cant breathe air, drink water or eat food?
So the Klan supports Bush? Who cares? The Klan is only a shadow of their former selves and they haven't done anything news worthy in years. The last time they did something news worthy, they bombed a church. Now lets see who supports John F'ing Kerry: Kim Jong Il, Fidel Castro, and terrorists world wide are hoping that this pussy gets put into the White House. I don't like Bush. I don't like Kerry. But I don't see what the big deal is if you got a redneck white supremacist group on Bush's side whereas Kerry has communist dictators and genocidal maniacs on his. It's an even balance of evil. I seriously think America would be in a better state of anarchy then this excuse we call a democracy. Screw the Klan, Kim Jong Il, Castro and terrorists. Vote...nah, don't vote. It doesn't matter anyway.
Step 1: Cover mouth with hand.
Step 2: do not let any air enter your lungs
'Excuse' of a democracy? Are you fucking kidding me? America has the most freedom of any country, of any time period, ever. What the fuck are you complaining about, when you have all these 3rd world countries with peoplle starving to death. Don't fucking complian when you have the freedom to say what you want, and do what you want. I think you need to go over there and live for a while. Or, maybe you could take a little vacation to Iran? Count your damn blessings and be happy.
What the hell is wrong with protecting the environment, you fool?
Anyone with a tertiary education in any science knows that if we dont clean up our act in the next 50 years we'll kill ourselves off, along with (arguably) the only example of life in the entire universe.
Who gives a shit about money when you cant breathe air, drink water or eat food?
I'm an enviornmentalist, and also a republican. I feel so alone.
Choo-Choo Bear
29-10-2004, 02:38
Ah yes. God Bless America Land of the Free.
The chorus of the ignorant.
What the hell is wrong with protecting the environment, you fool?
Anyone with a tertiary education in any science knows that if we dont clean up our act in the next 50 years we'll kill ourselves off, along with (arguably) the only example of life in the entire universe.
Who gives a shit about money when you cant breathe air, drink water or eat food?
Obviously, you didn't catch my sarcasm. Nothing is wrong with protecting the environment. We should, we need the resources for the future. Your logic is skewed, because first of all, you need money to fund the protection of the environment, and to eat food. I'm not an environment freak like obviously are, however. We do need to be a little more effecient with our resources, but not over protected. They'll get used in the end. I don't know where you pulled that 50 years from...your ass, perhaps?
Go play in traffic.
Ah yes. God Bless America Land of the Free.
The chorus of the ignorant.
Nope, the chorus of the patriotic ;)
Obviously, you didn't catch my sarcasm. Nothing is wrong with protecting the environment. We should, we need the resources for the future. Your logic is skewed, because first of all, you need money to fund the protection of the environment, and to eat food. I'm not an environment freak like obviously are, however. We do need to be a little more effecient with our resources, but not over protected. They'll get used in the end. I don't know where you pulled that 50 years from...your ass, perhaps?
Go play in traffic.
You don't mneed money to protect the enviornment! You can go outside and pitch in. Not everything needs government funding to get done.
New SwissLand
29-10-2004, 02:58
Step 1: Cover mouth with hand.
Step 2: do not let any air enter your lungs
'Excuse' of a democracy? Are you fucking kidding me? America has the most freedom of any country, of any time period, ever. What the fuck are you complaining about, when you have all these 3rd world countries with peoplle starving to death. Don't fucking complian when you have the freedom to say what you want, and do what you want. I think you need to go over there and live for a while. Or, maybe you could take a little vacation to Iran? Count your damn blessings and be happy.
Might want to rethink your suicide strategy there, smart guy. Humans can breath through their noses too. What a fucking miracle! Now that we know you are a moron, I shall continue.
So we have the most freedom to do whatever whenever right? We are the basis for all other democracys? Wow, your stupidity knows no bounds. Ever heard of Switzerland jackass? They've been a democracy since August 1st 1291. America has been one since July 2, 1776. Yes you may find that odd but I'm a history fan so bear with me dumbass. Alright let's see here. What does democracy have to do with people starving to death? Apparantly you think it has something to do with it. Maybe because the 3rd world countries are ruled by incompetent douche bags or that their presidents/kings/dictators refuse to feed the common man. Yes, take this in slowly. Some 3rd world countries are democracies too! Oh my God! You ARE an idiot. Our neighbor to the south, Mexico and even more southbound. Jackass. So now I'm supposedly bashing on the 3rd worlders when I say, Screw Castro, Jong Il, and blah. Er ok, your knowledge or lack their of confuses me. Look jackass, we aren't a democracy. If we were a democracy I could take a shit without the government making sure I only had 1.5 gallons to flush with. I could say I wanna smoke in public and not feel like a criminal. I could kill a black man and not be sued for a hate crime. I would still be punished but not for a hate crime. I could own military issue weaponry and not have to worry bout the communist ATF taking it away. That is the way democracy functions you fucking twit. Every man is equal, can vote, and has other amazing freedoms that our government has denied us. This is fascism intertwined with democracy but mainly fascism. Now you fumb fuck:
Step 1: Load Shotgun
Step 2: Execute yourself, "Kurt Cobain" style (Hint - That means pull the trigger)
I hate you
You don't mneed money to protect the enviornment! You can go outside and pitch in. Not everything needs government funding to get done.
Did I say government spending? Everything needs funding...just not necesarily by the government. Corporations should pitch in a little bit.
Did I say government spending? Everything needs funding...just not necesarily by the government. Corporations should pitch in a little bit.
My point still stands.
Choo-Choo Bear
29-10-2004, 03:10
http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/climate/climatescenario.jsp
New Swissland: maybe I missed something, but you want the Amercian government to have less power over its citizens?
If the majority of Americans were halfway intelligent, sure, leave them to their own devices... but they're not.
Freedom isn't being able to drive a tank to work everyday. Freedom isn't being able to consume resources until they're dry. Freedom isn't about being a selfish fuck. Freedom isn't no government and ruling corporations.
Freedom is allowing people their rights, but allowing others to have theirs to, and that includes people who will be living on this earth in the future. The government has to make sure that everybody gets a fair go, and not allowing some arsehole cant take over the world with some massive corporation, leaving everyone else to be either employees of this corporation or starving.
Might want to rethink your suicide strategy there, smart guy. Humans can breath through their noses too. What a fucking miracle! Now that we know you are a moron, I shall continue.
So we have the most freedom to do whatever whenever right? We are the basis for all other democracys? Wow, your stupidity knows no bounds. Ever heard of Switzerland jackass? They've been a democracy since August 1st 1291. America has been one since July 2, 1776. Yes you may find that odd but I'm a history fan so bear with me dumbass. Alright let's see here. What does democracy have to do with people starving to death? Apparantly you think it has something to do with it. Maybe because the 3rd world countries are ruled by incompetent douche bags or that their presidents/kings/dictators refuse to feed the common man. Yes, take this in slowly. Some 3rd world countries are democracies too! Oh my God! You ARE an idiot. Our neighbor to the south, Mexico and even more southbound. Jackass. So now I'm supposedly bashing on the 3rd worlders when I say, Screw Castro, Jong Il, and blah. Er ok, your knowledge or lack their of confuses me. Look jackass, we aren't a democracy. If we were a democracy I could take a shit without the government making sure I only had 1.5 gallons to flush with. I could say I wanna smoke in public and not feel like a criminal. I could kill a black man and not be sued for a hate crime. I would still be punished but not for a hate crime. I could own military issue weaponry and not have to worry bout the communist ATF taking it away. That is the way democracy functions you fucking twit. Every man is equal, can vote, and has other amazing freedoms that our government has denied us. This is fascism intertwined with democracy but mainly fascism. Now you fumb fuck:
Step 1: Load Shotgun
Step 2: Execute yourself, "Kurt Cobain" style (Hint - That means pull the trigger)
I hate you
Oh, I'm sorry, I just now realize that I am a Fumb Fuck, maybe I should just anounce that to the world. Did I ever fucking say that 3rd world countries weren't democracies? No, I said that they don't have food on their plates, and they don't have toilets to fucking shit on. Be glad that you have your damn toilet and 1.5 gallons to flush with, and be glad you don't have to fuckin SHIT ON THE OGDDAMN GROUND, AND WIPE YOUR FUCKING ASS WITH LEAVES. We ARE the free world. Yes, I've heard of Switzerland. They're a democracy, I realize that, they have freedoms, and I realize that. You however, fail to realize that you have freedoms yourself. I agree with you, government should not control guns, it's the damn 2nd amendment, yet Kerry has a 100% voting record on gun control, which is one of the reasons I don't want this pussy bastard in office. True, hate crimes are fucking stupid. What freedoms has our country denied us? Maybe you should read the Bill of rights, moron. Every man IS equal, every man CAN vote. Yes, our government is fascist, I fail to realize it. I'm sorry, we ARENT allowed to say what we want...
Oh, and never take my lines.
Oh, one more thing: Cobain took the pussy way out. Oh well, He sucked anyways.
don't be hatin my children! peace my friends!
Communist Maynards
29-10-2004, 03:52
A vote for George Bush is a vote for the KKK.
A vote for the KKK is a vote for Terrorism.
A vote for George Bush is a vote for the KKK.
A vote for the KKK is a vote for Terrorism.
Prove it. Prove that he's a racist. I dare you, prove it to me, and maybe I'll accept it. But I'd still support Bush. Just because the KKK endorses him doesn't make him racist. Just because he's from the south doesn't mean he's racist. You make too many generalizations there, bud.
Well, thats ok, because Al Qaeda endorsed John Kerry.
Well, thats ok, because Al Qaeda endorsed John Kerry.
When? I'm sure Fox News reported it.
New Genoa
29-10-2004, 21:54
Well, thats ok, because Al Qaeda endorsed John Kerry.
And Iran endorsed Bush too. :rolleyes: It doesnt matter.
Siljhouettes
29-10-2004, 22:01
Anyway, most of what you think you know about the klan, is just wrong and ignorant "commonly held beliefs" if you want answers and the truth, IM me.
The uber-right is back!
Siljhouettes
29-10-2004, 22:20
You have a biased view on Republicans, since you are peace loving, AA supporting, environment protecting, pussy liberal.
What's wrong with peace and environment protecting? It's one of the most patriotic things you can do.
Disganistan
29-10-2004, 22:24
What the hell is wrong with protecting the environment, you fool?
Anyone with a tertiary education in any science knows that if we dont clean up our act in the next 50 years we'll kill ourselves off, along with (arguably) the only example of life in the entire universe.
Who gives a shit about money when you cant breathe air, drink water or eat food?
First off, Who's to say that we [humanity] can do anything to the Environment that Nature can't recover from? I'd say it's pretty arrogant to say that we could destroy all of life on earth just from existing and polluting. I think that while we could destroy all human life, some other form of life would prevail and grow up big and strong . . . like cockroaches. I'm not worried about destroying (arguably) the only example of life in the universe.
Disganistan
29-10-2004, 22:35
http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/climate/climatescenario.jsp
New Swissland: maybe I missed something, but you want the Amercian government to have less power over its citizens?
If the majority of Americans were halfway intelligent, sure, leave them to their own devices... but they're not.
Freedom isn't being able to drive a tank to work everyday. Freedom isn't being able to consume resources until they're dry. Freedom isn't about being a selfish fuck. Freedom isn't no government and ruling corporations.
Freedom is allowing people their rights, but allowing others to have theirs to, and that includes people who will be living on this earth in the future. The government has to make sure that everybody gets a fair go, and not allowing some arsehole cant take over the world with some massive corporation, leaving everyone else to be either employees of this corporation or starving.
Freedom is being able to drive that tank to work if you have the resources and the desire to. Freedom is being able to run naked down the main street of a city smeared in marshmallow sauce. Freedom is swinging upside down from traffic lights while singing "I am the very model of a modern Major General." Freedom is being able to go hunting if you so desire. Freedom is being able to do whatever the fuck you want as long as it doesn't interfere with somebody elses rights. The moral: Do unto others. I state this not as a christian (since I'm not), not as a Republican (because I'm not), and not as a pro-police activist (because I'm most definitely not). I say this because these are our freedoms in America that have been diluted to the point of nausea. Creating laws that inhibit rights of the individuals to raise capital for the state are wrong and we need to gather our testicles from the toilet and tell the government so.
Disganistan
29-10-2004, 22:36
And the purpose of government is to make sure that other nations' people play nice with us at recess.
Onion Pirates
29-10-2004, 23:36
Some endorsements you don't need or want. Bush is probably embarassed by this (although Ashcroft made a graduation speech at Bob Jones University which is practically the Klan Kollege).
I'm sure a bunch of socialists and communists have endorsed Kerry too. Who else are these groups going to endorse, after all?
As if anyone cared.
Lunatic Retard Robots
29-10-2004, 23:46
Like I said, we're even. But why did Iran endorse Bush? Don't they realize how dangerous either candidate can be to Tehran? If I were the aylotollahs, I would have just kept my mouth shut on it.
Iran's economy is effigy-based. Without an incompetent man in office, the economy would collapse.
Panhandlia
30-10-2004, 04:49
Endorsement not accepted. But I don't feel like all the cooks are endorsing us. Yasser Arafat and Fidel Castro have already endorsed Kerry, so we're even.
And don't forget who has a Grand Klugle (or whatever the *)&(*^ they are called) of the Klan among its leadership...Robert Byrd (D-WV), come on down!
Incertonia
30-10-2004, 06:09
And don't forget who has a Grand Klugle (or whatever the *)&(*^ they are called) of the Klan among its leadership...Robert Byrd (D-WV), come on down!
Fuck you, Panhandlia. Byrd left the Klan years ago and repudiated them openly, and you know that. Unlike the late Strom Thurmond, the unrepentant Dixiecrat, or his political heirs from Mississippi, Haley Barbour and Trent Lott.