Bush administration = The Leninists/Stalinists of the rightwingers?
Mr Basil Fawlty
27-10-2004, 00:50
Hummn, they compare more then they want to.
Guess they don't like this rightfull comparision.
They act in the same way. (Falsifying next election with the computers, sabotaging the vote of the blacks in Democratic counties aso.)
I am lucky to know that next election is allready falsified by the republicans. So I can win some money at Ladbroakes... In the free world, we are aware of the manipulations that will cost the Democrats the election. It is a shame that this can happen in a nation that was free before the last real elected president: Clinton.
Hmm happy to live in the free world and not in the Lenninist Rightwingers regime!
MunkeBrain
27-10-2004, 00:52
Hummn, they compare more then they want to.
Guess they don't like this rightfull comparision.
They act in the same way. (Falsifying next election with the computers, sabotaging the vote of the blacks in Democratic counties aso.)
I am lucky to know that next election is allready falsified by the republicans. So I can win some money at Ladbroakes... In the free world, we are aware of the manipulations that will cost the Democrats the election. It is a shame that this can happen in a nation that was free before the last real elected president: Clinton.
Hmm happy to live in the free world and not in the Lenninist Rightwingers regime! :p
Hey, you got anymore of Terry Mcaulifs talking points in ya?
You are doing a good job. Goerbles would be proud to have such a fine offspring.
Bushrepublican liars
27-10-2004, 00:57
:p
Hey, you got anymore of Terry Mcaulifs talking points in ya?
You are doing a good job. Goerbles would be proud to have such a fine offspring.
Hahaha, I guess that our rightwing dummy means "Goebels" or do you mean a kind of Republican marxist soup "Goerbels". Wow, you are such a bright person :rolleyes: :p .
Jezus, get some education (oh yeah, your führer W, wants you to stay so dum) :rolleyes:
Goerbels, hahahhaha, a typo hahahaha, come on you're just the typical dum fascist, the way your führer wants it. ("no knowlidge is good for me").
Goerbels, HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA.
MunkeBrain
27-10-2004, 01:00
Hahaha, I guess that our rightwing dummy means "Goebels" or do you mean a kind of Republican marxist soup "Goerbels". Wow, you are such a bright person :rolleyes: :p .
Jezus, get some education (oh yeah, your führer W, wants you to stay so dum) :rolleyes:
Goerbels, hahahhaha, a typo hahahaha, come on you're just the typical dum fascist, the way your führer wants it. ("no knowlidge is good for me").
Goerbels, HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA.Wow, a typo, good catch. I type with one hand, because the other was crushed, but good catch. Notice the E and R are right next to each other. You got me though! :rolleyes:
Waynesburg
27-10-2004, 01:01
HHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHA...
....what are we laughing at again?
MunkeBrain
27-10-2004, 01:03
HHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHA...
....what are we laughing at again?
The ineptitude of Bushrepublican liars.
Dyressendel
27-10-2004, 01:03
Wow, this is such a great debate, I can't wait to see who wins. Because it's totally worth arguring over. :rolleyes:
Bushrepublican liars
27-10-2004, 01:03
Wow, a typo, good catch. I type with one hand, because the other was crushed, but good catch. Notice the E and R are right next to each other. You got me though! :rolleyes:
Don't excuse, since it wasn't a typo. BTW show us the "r" in Goebels.
A typo is a excuse for a monkey's brain.
You are so dum that you don't know Goebels, admit it.
We all saw it :p
Xichuan Dao
27-10-2004, 01:08
Don't excuse, since it wasn't a typo. BTW show us the "r" in Goebels.
A typo is a excuse for a monkey's brain.
You are so dum that you don't know Goebels, admit it.
We all saw it :p
You spelled "dumb" wrong on several occasions.
Nationalist Hungary
27-10-2004, 01:20
Leninists and Stanists both belong to the extreme left you ignorrent pig.....
The Lightning Star
27-10-2004, 01:23
Leninists and Stanists both belong to the extreme left you ignorrent pig.....
Thats true.
This whole post, and everyone involved in it, is stupid.
Excepting myself, of course
Siljhouettes
27-10-2004, 01:25
Hummn, they compare more then they want to.
Guess they don't like this rightfull comparision.
They act in the same way. (Falsifying next election with the computers, sabotaging the vote of the blacks in Democratic counties aso.)
Hitler was the right-wing version of Stalin.
Waynesburg
27-10-2004, 01:26
Wow, this is such a great debate, I can't wait to see who wins. Because it's totally worth arguring over. :rolleyes:
Which is usually a direct relation to the substance of the original topic.
Roach-Busters
27-10-2004, 01:26
Hitler was the right-wing version of Stalin.
Hitler and Stalin were virtually identical.
The Lightning Star
27-10-2004, 01:28
This whole post, and everyone involved in it, is stupid.
Excepting myself, of course
....
All i said was two words? I could tell it was a troll so i was gonna stop..
/sob/
/sob again/
Why are you so mean?
/TLS breaks down crying and runs into a corner/
Al Hammad jab hasseim
27-10-2004, 01:36
I dont have too much against president Bush. (not that I agree with anything he does) I think its not him as much as it is vice president Cheney. Doesn't anyone find it strange that the former chairman (or whatever the position was) of Haliburton comes into office, then we suddenly invade the 2nd largest oil producing country in the world for a trivial reason? You never really hear too much about him on the news either.
Free Soviets
27-10-2004, 01:56
Leninists and Stanists both belong to the extreme left you ignorrent pig.....
putting stalin on the left is entirely debatable - he certainly didn't hold any values i would recognize as leftist. and while lenin was definitely on the left (particularly before he got into power) he certainly didn't think he was as far left as you can get. after all, "left-wing communism is an infantile disorder".
Selivaria
27-10-2004, 02:01
Hitler and Stalin were virtually identical.
Wow........that's a huge insult to Stalin. Last I heard, Stalin never started a war that killed 55 million people and destroyed most of a continent. He may have caused many deaths, but it's debatable as to how many that actually was.
....
All i said was two words? I could tell it was a troll so i was gonna stop..
/sob/
/sob again/
Why are you so mean?
/TLS breaks down crying and runs into a corner/
AWwwww...
**pauts TLS on the back** nawww, issok...you're excluded from the list too, mmkay?
Listen Bush=Stalin,Lenin and all other `Psychotic Dictators you can think of or possibly imagine.The man's a friggin` Nightmare for all. :eek:
Mauiwowee
27-10-2004, 02:28
I have written and re-written a dozen replies to in this thread and deleted them all before posting: hard core dems will not be swayed by logic and sense and hard core members of the "vast right wing conspiracy" will not be swayed by logic and sense. It is the intelligent middle group that count.
Who those people are is open to debate, but I will say that comparing Stalin, Hitler, Bush and Kerry to each other and making a decision based on that comparison is proof that you are not a member of the intelligent middle.
RSDarksbane
27-10-2004, 02:31
Wow........that's a huge insult to Stalin. Last I heard, Stalin never started a war that killed 55 million people and destroyed most of a continent. He may have caused many deaths, but it's debatable as to how many that actually was.
Not really. Stalin actually made a non-agression pact with Hitler at first and worked with Hitler until Hitler started going crazy and turned on him.
Stalin's kill tally is ranked at about 20 million by this website, but anyone else with better info please add on to this.
http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/stalin.htm
Since when did Hitler and Stalin go to liberate countries from other psychotic dictators. And dont anyone dare say we plan to make Iraq the 51st state, that would be a lie.
And who else was there to give the contract to? The only other companies able of handling the jobs in Iraq aside from Haliburton was a French company, and a handful of others that did not help us in Iraq, and after all the resistance we recieved from France on this issue, would you prefer them to have it? If you do you once more prove your not thinking.
And since when has stopping a madman from getting WMD's been considered trivial? Did he have them? We know he had them in the past, and we know for a FACT even the weapons inspectors said that Saddam was putting money and programs in place to get them. Had we not gone in then and Saddam had gotten them after the sanctions had been lifted, then we would be guilty for the deaths of 10's of thousands rather than the 1000 dead now. Which do you prefer? The latter sound the best to me and if you think other wise you thrice now have been wrong.
Broken left wingers
27-10-2004, 02:46
Hitler and Stalin are only identical on an authoritarian scale. When it comes to economics, both differ greatly. As for comparing Hitler and Stalin regime's, both were awful and had disastrous consequences on humanity, but at least Hitler had a vision of teh world, while stalin was only a power craving fiend.
The Lightning Star
27-10-2004, 02:48
AWwwww...
**pauts TLS on the back** nawww, issok...you're excluded from the list too, mmkay?
/sob/
REally?
/sniff/
Thank you thank you thank you! Here, have a cookie! its Chocolate chip flavored!