NationStates Jolt Archive


Interesting 1984-type website

Clonetopia
23-10-2004, 19:34
http://www.studentsfororwell.org

I think this pretty much speaks for itself.
Siljhouettes
23-10-2004, 20:04
I can't believe that they think they're influential

Oceania (commonly called the US and Britain) is at war with Afghanistan/ Iraq. Oceania has always been at war with Afghanistan/ Iraq. - No, we don't think this

Eurasia (commonly called Russia, Pakistan, etc.) is allied with Oceania in war against Afghanistan. Eurasia has always been allied with Oceania. - Wrong again, everyone knows of the Cold War

US Congressman Charlie Rangel has been arguing for a return of military conscription (“The Draft”) as—so he tells the public— a way of reducing war.
No, it's to provide enough troops, not reduce war.

It's not easy to capture someone killed the year before—until you harness the power of Ingsoc. When you've got Ingsoc on your side, though, it's so easy that the US did it again. -?

Three cheers for Homeland Security drone patrols! -?

In order to fight terrorism, we must cause it, says Donald Rumsfeld. - this one's true

It's okay that there were no “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq; that's not why we went to war. It's equally okay that there are so many of them in Oceania. - this one's true

The Nobel prize committee has been considering nominating George Bush and Tony Blair for their prestigious Peace prize. - this one's true

Just like in 1984's Room 101, the Miniluv operations in Guantánamo Bay were authorized to “exploit[] a prisoner's phobias, sometimes using muzzled dogs in interrogations.” Doubleplusgood! - this one's true

According to the Bush administration, the Duelfer report which conclusively showed that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq actually justifies the war in Iraq. - this one's true, but of course it's election season

“I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace.” — George W. Bush, 43rd President of the United States - this one's true
Clonetopia
23-10-2004, 20:06
I think it is probably some kind of parody, trying to convey the appearance of 1984-esque happenings and ideas in real life.
Dalradia
23-10-2004, 21:13
I think it is very funny. Fairly well written and with accurate comments. The author is highlighting how society is becoming more like that of Orwell's 1984. The author does not support these changes, nor does SOS exist.

It isn't a parody, that would involve being a novel written in the style of 1984.