NationStates Jolt Archive

*it appears that the sexually repressed Catholic facist O'Reilly expressed his sexual frustrations in typical rightwing fashion

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html

LOL, what a douche..

It's probably just a fake story, but funny nonetheless...

Geez... I hate to say this but what does she except when she works for Fox?

LOL, what a douche..

It's probably just a fake story, but funny nonetheless...
its a real story--O'reilly is just a typical sexually repressed rightwing pervert

Yep. A typical right-wing thing to do.

It just sounds too typical to be true.

It just sounds too typical to be true.
stereotypes become stereoypes for a reason

stereotypes become stereoypes for a reason

You're gonna open up pandora's box with that

*it appears that the sexually repressed Catholic facist O'Reilly expressed his sexual frustrations in typical rightwing fashion

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html

Great, what a douche, the fascists (reps :sniper: :sniper: :sniper: ) must have a real problem here. :p

That narcissist maggot wouldnt show his face at ASU these last couple days.

CNN and MSNBC had stages which they broadcast from on campus, the fox channel did not.

Typical cowards

That narcissist maggot wouldnt show his face at ASU these last couple days.

CNN and MSNBC had stages which they broadcast from on campus, the fox channel did not.

I WAS THERE!!! :D

I was at the Kerry rally afterwards, but I was too damn far away to see the man! :mad:

oh well, it was awesome.

...

back to the Oreilly thing, it could be opportunism, or it could be real. We'll see, as always.

As for the "typical rightwing thing" comment...I will say, I think liberals and conservatives are both just as nasty people in this regard. However, right-wingers are the hypocrites, liberals just admit we're all sexual deviants.

Ok, I see. It's ok for Bill Clinton to be accused and proven to be guilty (as it doesn't matter as it was his private life), Clarence Thomas was falsely accused, and now O'Reilly is charged. Why don't you people stop being two faced and hold everybody to the same standards? Oh, that's because you are all fearmongering, rascist, pinko liberals.

Ok, I see. It's ok for Bill Clinton to be accused and proven to be guilty (as it doesn't matter as it was his private life), Clarence Thomas was falsely accused, and now O'Reilly is charged. Why don't you people stop being two faced and hold everybody to the same standards? Oh, that's because you are all fearmongering, rascist, pinko liberals.

ahem, all the racists are conservatives.

just clearing up that last part.

Ok, I see. It's ok for Bill Clinton to be accused and proven to be guilty (as it doesn't matter as it was his private life), Clarence Thomas was falsely accused, and now O'Reilly is charged. Why don't you people stop being two faced and hold everybody to the same standards? Oh, that's because you are all fearmongering, rascist, pinko liberals.

*lol* I am soooo glad that I am not voting republican this year!

Ok, I see. It's ok for Bill Clinton to be accused and proven to be guilty (as it doesn't matter as it was his private life), Clarence Thomas was falsely accused, and now O'Reilly is charged. Why don't you people stop being two faced and hold everybody to the same standards? Oh, that's because you are all fearmongering, rascist, pinko liberals.

You don't seem to understand.

Clinton never took the moral high ground. he never said "I'm perfect and God loves me best."

For the most part, people readily understood that yeah, Clinton was full of shit. Only, it was a much NICER and readily available shit. O'Reilly, on the other hand, is like Rush. They think they're better then everyone else. ANd then it turns out that they're hypocrites, and then we laugh, because everyone loves it when a hypocrite falls.



...and...uh...racist? When were racist veiws shown? Pinko? When were socialist views shown?

Dumbass.

It was Michael Savage who said the Kerry campaign now has a chocolate chip, referring to Jesse Jackson's endorsement. It was Rush Limbaugh who was fired from his ESPN show for saying a certain black player only got so much coverage because the media wanted to see a black man do well. It was Trent Lott who told former segregationist that if he had won the presidency, "we wouldn't have all these problems over the years". Any borderline racist comment from a congressman or media pundit, and it's a Republican. Always.

Can anyone tell the one thing that all of the following have in common:

The Man who freed slaves
The Man who prosecuted Brown v. Topeka board of Education
The man who called out the national guard to allow the Little Rock 9 to enter Central High School
The Man who Pressured The Governor of Alabama into allowing blacks into the University of Alabama

Give up

:headbang:

They are all REPUBLICANAS

Nice try.

ELECTION RESULTS, 1860 compared to 2000 (http://www.geocities.com/chodolo/states.html)

As you can see, the Democrats and Republicans SWITCHED SIDES.



Yes, that's right, the liberals used to be Republicans and the conservatives used to be Democrats.

Nice try.

ELECTION RESULTS, 1860 compared to 2000 (http://www.geocities.com/chodolo/states.html)

As you can see, the Democrats and Republicans SWITCHED SIDES.

:headbang:

Check your facts

1. Most are 20th Century events
2. Now Democrats hide behind the soft discrimination of "Affirmitive Action" which tells some minorities that they are not good enough to succeed without a government action.
3. Look at the cabinets, which cabinet has minorities in high places.

Please, from now on, engage your brain and dont just spout political stereotypes that just ARE NOT TRUE!

Bill O'Reilly really does suck. Here's the url of an article supporting that fact: http://maddox.xmission.com/c.cgi?u=bill_oreilly

Nice try.

ELECTION RESULTS, 1860 compared to 2000 (http://www.geocities.com/chodolo/states.html)

As you can see, the Democrats and Republicans SWITCHED SIDES.



Yes, that's right, the liberals used to be Republicans and the conservatives used to be Democrats.

:headbang:

ATTENTION K-MART SHOPPERS

Republicans NEVER were Liberal.
Republicans have always espoused Equality of Opporotunity and Democrats favor Equality of outcome.

Remember boys and girls the Declaration of Independance talks about the Pursuit of Happiness not mandated happiness

ahem, all the racists are conservatives.

just clearing up that last part.

ROBERT BYRD is not a conservative.

Dumbass.

Butt-lover.

Bill O'Reilly wasn't charged with anything. He was accused of it. There's a difference.

but funny nonetheless...


No it isn't.

ROBERT BYRD is not a conservative.

WRONG.

Robert Byrd, one of the Senior Democrat Senators (from West Virginia) is a racist, agreed. He is an "ex-Klansman", and unlike Republican Strom Thurmond, who campaigned for president under the segregation ticket, but later reformed his views, Byrd still lets some fairly offensive rhetoric out of his mouth.

But, are you honestly trying to say Byrd is a liberal?! :p

When the gay marriage constitutional amendment was defeated in the Senate, only 3 Democrats voted for it. They were: Zell Miller of Georgia, who said he would have switched to the Republican Party if he wasn't so old, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, who opposes abortion, and Robert "KKK" Byrd.

These three men are not liberals. They are conservatives, but for some reason call themselves Democrats.

You know why? Because 50 years ago, when the Southern Democrats broke away, were Dixiecrats for a bit, then merged with the Republicans (like Strom Thurmond), not all the conservatives followed. Thus the aging conservative southern Democrats about to get replaced to by actual conservative Republicans.

Republicans NEVER were Liberal.

You're trying to tell me that Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt were conservatives?! :p

Republicans have always espoused Equality of Opporotunity

Except for homosexuals.

the Declaration of Independance talks about the Pursuit of Happiness not mandated happiness

Hard to pursue happiness when the government denies you fundamental rights...such as marriage to whom you choose, free from discrimination based on sexual orientation.

1. Most are 20th Century events

That occurred right before the big switch. Those events were the catalyst for the switch!

Now Democrats hide behind the soft discrimination of "Affirmitive Action" which tells some minorities that they are not good enough to succeed without a government action.

I disagree with affirmative action too. But it's not as bad as the overt discrimination and racism of some ultra-rightwing (that means conservative ;)) groups like the Aryan Nation, etc.

Look at the cabinets, which cabinet has minorities in high places.

LOOK AT ME! I PICKED TWO BLACK PEOPLE IN MY CABINET! I'M TOLERANT!

heh.

There's lawsuits being fired at both sides; but NEITHER side has been CHARGED with ANYTHING.

No it isn't.
Sorry. I think my sense of humor is broken. You wouldn't happen to manufacture replicates of your own that I could purchase on ebay, would you?

Can anyone tell the one thing that all of the following have in common:

The Man who freed slaves
The Man who prosecuted Brown v. Topeka board of Education
The man who called out the national guard to allow the Little Rock 9 to enter Central High School
The Man who Pressured The Governor of Alabama into allowing blacks into the University of Alabama

Give up

:headbang:

They are all REPUBLICANAS
Yep, that has a lot to do with verbal sexual abuse...

So was the chick O'Reilly creeped out hot or not? Has to be better than those beat, NASCAR chicks that Clinton was so fond of. Oh and Cholodolo or whatever it is, Democrats until very recently were always conservative...I was, until this year, a Texas Democrat; it pains me to be a member of the party of Lincoln, but I'd rather be a Republican that a limousine liberal like your friends Kerry and Company.
AlmightyWhitey has spoken.

You have the right to your opinions, but making generalizations about all Republicans puts you right down to the level you think they are at. Some of these responses are just not well thought out at all.

The article seems to be valid because I have checked other sources. However, I would like to note that everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Right now, we have no evidence except word of mouth. More is needed. I am currently an O'Reilly supporter, but if valid evidence is shown that provides a good explanation that he is indeed guilty of these accusations, I will change my mind. I've noticed some of you have been quick to call names and assume that it's true without looking at any evidence. That is unacceptable. My advice is to evaluate everything.

I would also like to point to another article that also talks about how O'Reilly has filed his own lawsuit against the producer which accuses her of blackmail. This is an important read about this issue. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40907

I hope that 'verbal rape' isn't a real crime or charge, because then most guys are going to be liable for it when drunk in bars trying to 'meet' women...damn it...

He likes to think he's hot, he talks about his looks on almost every show.

He's not. He's a wrinkly old prune and a fatuous windbag.

He threatened to get back at her big time. Oh, right. whatchya goona do, screw her? Oops, already tried that.

:headbang:

ATTENTION K-MART SHOPPERS

Republicans NEVER were Liberal.
Republicans have always espoused Equality of Opporotunity and Democrats favor Equality of outcome.

Remember boys and girls the Declaration of Independance talks about the Pursuit of Happiness not mandated happiness
*Attention 4th Grade Drop-Outs*

Republicans were the liberals from their creation until the Great Depression wherein Roosevelt's new coalition began the gradual reformation of the two parties that would ultimately see their supporters almost entirely switch sides, and each other's platforms would for the most part swap.

The only mainstays have been their economic policies, which although they have changed with the times, have in their general nature stayed largely the same.

The men mentioned, Lincoln and that group, would very likely be democrats if they lived today.

Ok, I see. It's ok for Bill Clinton to be accused and proven to be guilty (as it doesn't matter as it was his private life), Clarence Thomas was falsely accused, and now O'Reilly is charged. Why don't you people stop being two faced and hold everybody to the same standards? Oh, that's because you are all fearmongering, rascist, pinko liberals.
Bill CLinton was never PROVEN to be guilty you partisan bigot--he SETTLED the case to get that skank off him

Can anyone tell the one thing that all of the following have in common:

The Man who freed slaves
The Man who prosecuted Brown v. Topeka board of Education
The man who called out the national guard to allow the Little Rock 9 to enter Central High School
The Man who Pressured The Governor of Alabama into allowing blacks into the University of Alabama

Give up

:headbang:

They are all REPUBLICANAS
yeah they were all LIBERAL republicans who were purged out of the party by the rightwing racists who control todays GOP

YOU, of all people are calling him partisan?

:headbang:

Check your facts

1. Most are 20th Century events
2. Now Democrats hide behind the soft discrimination of "Affirmitive Action" which tells some minorities that they are not good enough to succeed without a government action.
3. Look at the cabinets, which cabinet has minorities in high places.

Please, from now on, engage your brain and dont just spout political stereotypes that just ARE NOT TRUE!
and NONE of those republicans represent TODAYS GOP so try to stay in the PRESENT

ROBERT BYRD is not a conservative.
yes he is conservative--also Byrd doesnt belong to anymore racist organizations like he used to when they were in style-however todays republicans like Trent Lott and Tom Delay are both grand dragons of the CCC

Oh and Cholodolo or whatever it is, Democrats until very recently were always conservative...I was, until this year, a Texas Democrat; it pains me to be a member of the party of Lincoln, but I'd rather be a Republican that a limousine liberal like your friends Kerry and Company.
AlmightyWhitey has spoken.

Of course. That was the point I was making. Rutentuten was trying to say that today's Republicans can claim Lincoln as one of them...when they obviously cannot.

The North and Pacific Coast has always been liberal. The South and West have always been conservative. The only thing that has changed is the party names.

So was the chick O'Reilly creeped out hot or not? Has to be better than those beat, NASCAR chicks that Clinton was so fond of. Oh and Cholodolo or whatever it is, Democrats until very recently were always conservative...I was, until this year, a Texas Democrat; it pains me to be a member of the party of Lincoln, but I'd rather be a Republican that a limousine liberal like your friends Kerry and Company.
AlmightyWhitey has spoken.
yeah she was pretty decent looking--and yeah we need many more limosine liberals all over America

He likes to think he's hot, he talks about his looks on almost every show.

He's not. He's a wrinkly old prune and a fatuous windbag.

He threatened to get back at her big time. Oh, right. whatchya goona do, screw her? Oops, already tried that.
without all his makeup on Oreillys wrinkled old face is pockmarked with bulbous lesions

YOU, of all people are calling him partisan?
Im not partisan--I believe in 3rd partys

You don't seem to understand.

Clinton never took the moral high ground. he never said "I'm perfect and God loves me best."

For the most part, people readily understood that yeah, Clinton was full of shit. Only, it was a much NICER and readily available shit. O'Reilly, on the other hand, is like Rush. They think they're better then everyone else. ANd then it turns out that they're hypocrites, and then we laugh, because everyone loves it when a hypocrite falls.



...and...uh...racist? When were racist veiws shown? Pinko? When were socialist views shown?

Dumbass.

"We should all be the same party. Because Republicans are so stupid."

"Democrats are just uneducated people who are being taken advantage of. Democrats are so stupid."

How about this. We should all be anti-government libertarian militant activists and bring down the world organization with force!

On a lighter note, RaWR.

"We should all be the same party. Because Republicans are so stupid."

"Democrats are just uneducated people who are being taken advantage of. Democrats are so stupid."

How about this. We should all be anti-government libertarian militant activists and bring down the world organization with force!

On a lighter note, RaWR.
I agree with this but republicans are stupider and eviller

ahem, all the racists are conservatives.

just clearing up that last part.
Really? Is that why we ended slavery? Hmm? Lincoln ring a bell? Not to mention the fact that Liberals are the ones who believe minorities are too stupid to get into college without the help of "affirmative action"....

Anyways, I couldn't care less what some lady says O'Reilly did. Honestly, I just don't care. It's a typical case of liberals ignoring certain actions committed by the biggest politicians in their party, and then hammering us Repubs when some guy that works at Fox News gets busted for it. Honestly, he isn't even a politician, so why should I care what he did?

"We should all be the same party. Because Republicans are so stupid."

"Democrats are just uneducated people who are being taken advantage of. Democrats are so stupid."

How about this. We should all be anti-government libertarian militant activists and bring down the world organization with force!

On a lighter note, RaWR.

Uh...when did I mention parties once?

Someone was just being an idiot and I called them on it, then ripped apart their logic :p


Really? Is that why we ended slavery? Hmm? Lincoln ring a bell? Not to mention the fact that Liberals are the ones who believe minorities are too stupid to get into college without the help of "affirmative action"....

Oh BLOODY FUCKING HELL. Did you read the fucking thread at all? We were JUST TALKING ABOUT THAT.

Bill CLinton was never PROVEN to be guilty you partisan bigot--he SETTLED the case to get that skank off him
You will have to remind me, which skank? Because as I recall there was an endless stream of them. Starting long, long before he became President. Were they all liars then? Or perhaps was it just that he kept buying his way out of his troubles, something that we know never happens here in America where the rich and famous are treated the same as everyone else :rolleyes: .

Uh...when did I mention parties once?

Someone was just being an idiot and I called them on it, then ripped apart their logic :p




Oh BLOODY FUCKING HELL. Did you read the fucking thread at all? We were JUST TALKING ABOUT THAT.
I'm well aware you were just talking about it. However, your logic is flawed, and need I remind you that you managed to notice only a few words out of that entire post? I didn't find your faulty generalizations about our former parties to be worth my time. Also, in support of my view, I need only point to Andrew Jackson, hero of the common man, and a Democrat. He swamped the White House with so many men of the average Joe type during his inauguration that the damage and theft incurred were almost unheard of. Done. Game over.

I read this thread and I just want to cry. anyone who votes based purely on party lines is an idiot. At this point in history how the hell does Lincoln relate to O'Reily being accused of sexual harrasment? Honestly what the hell is wrong with you people. So what if he is a O'Reily is a dip shit, what the hell does it matter? until he is proven guilty I am not gonna draw any conclusions, plus the fact that he is suing her for blackmail kind of puts the entire situation in a different light.

I have friends who are liberal and friends who are conservative, and guess what, just because they have different political views doesn't make them go for each others throats, why is it that on on-line forums if someone doesn't agree with what you have to say they suddenly become the worlds biggest retard? Guess what people have different political views and opinions that doesn't make them good or evil or smart or dumb.

I don't know why I even bother oh well make of this what you will and have a nice life.

Cpl Monastyrsky, Ilya USMC
4th Force Service Support Group
6th Engineer Support Battalion
Headquarters & Service Company

I read this thread and I just want to cry. anyone who votes based purely on party lines is an idiot. At this point in history how the hell does Lincoln relate to O'Reily being accused of sexual harrasment? Honestly what the hell is wrong with you people. So what if he is a O'Reily is a dip shit, what the hell does it matter? until he is proven guilty I am not gonna draw any conclusions, plus the fact that he is suing her for blackmail kind of puts the entire situation in a different light.

I have friends who are liberal and friends who are conservative, and guess what, just because they have different political views doesn't make them go for each others throats, why is it that on on-line forums if someone doesn't agree with what you have to say they suddenly become the worlds biggest retard? Guess what people have different political views and opinions that doesn't make them good or evil or smart or dumb.

I don't know why I even bother oh well make of this what you will and have a nice life.

Cpl Monastyrsky, Ilya USMC
4th Force Service Support Group
6th Engineer Support Battalion
Headquarters & Service Company


What is this about people being people and not liberal or conservative? Are we all greater than our labels?

The sum of the parts is obviously not equal to the sum of the parts. It takes all kinds.

Really? Is that why we ended slavery? Hmm? Lincoln ring a bell? Not to mention the fact that Liberals are the ones who believe minorities are too stupid to get into college without the help of "affirmative action"....

Anyways, I couldn't care less what some lady says O'Reilly did. Honestly, I just don't care. It's a typical case of liberals ignoring certain actions committed by the biggest politicians in their party, and then hammering us Repubs when some guy that works at Fox News gets busted for it. Honestly, he isn't even a politician, so why should I care what he did?
CONSERVATIVES no matter what their party label is are ALWAYS opposed to equal rights

You will have to remind me, which skank? Because as I recall there was an endless stream of them. Starting long, long before he became President. Were they all liars then? Or perhaps was it just that he kept buying his way out of his troubles, something that we know never happens here in America where the rich and famous are treated the same as everyone else :rolleyes: .
the Paula Jones skank who sued Clinton cause she needed a new snout...as for the steady stream of skanks they only came out of the woodwork because wealthy bigots like Richard Scaife was running an organized witch-hunt based on sexual harassment charges to bring the Clinton Presidency down since he couldnt stomich the fact that CLinton was our first middle class President

I read this thread and I just want to cry. anyone who votes based purely on party lines is an idiot. At this point in history how the hell does Lincoln relate to O'Reily being accused of sexual harrasment? Honestly what the hell is wrong with you people. So what if he is a O'Reily is a dip shit, what the hell does it matter? until he is proven guilty I am not gonna draw any conclusions, plus the fact that he is suing her for blackmail kind of puts the entire situation in a different light.

I have friends who are liberal and friends who are conservative, and guess what, just because they have different political views doesn't make them go for each others throats, why is it that on on-line forums if someone doesn't agree with what you have to say they suddenly become the worlds biggest retard? Guess what people have different political views and opinions that doesn't make them good or evil or smart or dumb.

I don't know why I even bother oh well make of this what you will and have a nice life.

Cpl Monastyrsky, Ilya USMC
4th Force Service Support Group
6th Engineer Support Battalion
Headquarters & Service Company

You see, someone said we were being racist for actually trying to get O'Reilly in trouble for, you know, rape. Heaven forbid. I pointed out "who the fuck is being racist?"


It all exploded from there.

CONSERVATIVES no matter what their party label is are ALWAYS opposed to equal rights

Jesus, are you obtuse.

Um. I'm a conservative...American Indian. Do I disbelieve in equal rights?

o'reilly is screwed

That very well may be true, Chess.

I'm gonna wait for the rest of the story. Something just doesn't sound right about it.

I'm well aware you were just talking about it. However, your logic is flawed, and need I remind you that you managed to notice only a few words out of that entire post? I didn't find your faulty generalizations about our former parties to be worth my time. Also, in support of my view, I need only point to Andrew Jackson, hero of the common man, and a Democrat. He swamped the White House with so many men of the average Joe type during his inauguration that the damage and theft incurred were almost unheard of. Done. Game over.

Pardon me? Perhaps you wrote this just prior to going to bed or after slamming a couple Xanex with a beer?

Maybe you could connect some of the dots in your reasoning. For that matter, what is your point? If you found the post to be not worth your time, why are you replying?

Let's be pleasant and call it a discussion, no lets say debate, okay let's not be pleasant either... You are anything, but well aware.

If in a debate you choose to dismiss someone's argument due to flawed logic and faulty generalizations it may behoove you to say why! You know - just a sentence or two, before launching into some random, totally disconnected and utterly false conclusion about Andrew Jackson's inauguration.

It is true that Jackson was a popular Democrat and well known for opening the doors of the White House to the public, he is also remembered for being somewhat mean-spirited by today's standards on gender and race. However, the short-lived tradition of opening the White House for refreshments after the Inaugural Parade began under President Monroe, a Republican, clutch the pearls. Too many people showed up and Jackson was almost injured in the crush of the crowd. It is far more likely that the large crowds were due to his popularity based on his military service during the War of 1812 and the Seminole War of 1818, then what you call, Average Joe types, perhaps I give you too much credit, but I believe you are trying to say that Democrats stole from and damaged the White House and that somehow translates into your main point or that is your main point. Yes? And they took unheard of amounts which is why you mention it? Yes? Ok? OK! (Wink) :confused:

You smugly smudged on your facts and not even cleverly, you are either an imbecile or lazy. Well, you could just be a horse’s ass too. Or D: all of the above.

Wahoo!
ScoMo the Homo

Firstly, sexual frustration is not affiliated with one party or another. Secondly, Bill O'rielly didn't take the moral stand, either, just like Clinton. I'm not surprised to see people spring into action on this though. Of course, some people still make fun of George "Bush" and "Dick" Cheney.

You all need to grow up.

Jesus, are you obtuse.

Um. I'm a conservative...American Indian. Do I disbelieve in equal rights?
if your a rightwing conservative then yes

*Attention 4th Grade Drop-Outs*

Republicans were the liberals from their creation until the Great Depression wherein Roosevelt's new coalition began the gradual reformation of the two parties that would ultimately see their supporters almost entirely switch sides, and each other's platforms would for the most part swap.

The only mainstays have been their economic policies, which although they have changed with the times, have in their general nature stayed largely the same.

The men mentioned, Lincoln and that group, would very likely be democrats if they lived today.

This never ceases to amaze me. With all the negative stigma behind the term "liberal" which literally comes from the word for "Freedom", these people have the audacity to claim that their party was responsible for various radical, liberal, and socially progressive events, persons, and actions throughout history, simply because the cognate of freedom has become so horrific in their indoctrined minds that they deny the slightest possiblity of it being a good thing or a part of their party's past.

Tremalkier's right. The liberals and conservatives switched from Republican to Democrat, and vice versa.

It's a simple fact.

Has there been anything new on this?

I find it interesting that her complaint only surfaced after a purported blackmail attempt against O'Reilly which he refused and instead filed suit.

Interesting how the left-wing conspiracy nuts leave that part and instead immediately attack him for being Catholic huh?

Firstly, sexual frustration is not affiliated with one party or another. Secondly, Bill O'rielly didn't take the moral stand, either, just like Clinton. I'm not surprised to see people spring into action on this though. Of course, some people still make fun of George "Bush" and "Dick" Cheney.

You all need to grow up.

Don't forget "Colon" Powell.

... Giggle.

I find it interesting that her complaint only surfaced after a purported blackmail attempt against O'Reilly which he refused and instead filed suit.

Interesting how the left-wing conspiracy nuts leave that part and instead immediately attack him for being Catholic huh?

He's Catholic? I honestly didn't know.

And my first post in this thread was "it could be opportunism, or it could be real. We'll see, as always."

I attack moralizing hypocrisy when I see it though, when Rush Limbaugh calls drug abusers the filth of society or whatnot, and then gets busted for abusing Oxycodin. There was another evangelist preacher (I can't remember his name) who was caught with a prostitute.

If Oreilly is guilty, he's a hypocrite.

If not, then he's a victim of being targeted because he's famous.

Simple as that.