NationStates Jolt Archive

This will be a companion thread to one for Bush-haters. I just want to see who on the ticket scares them more: Kerry or Edwards.

So basically.. you say that a Kerry-hater is either scared of Kerry or Edwards. Another possibility is impossible. No?

Yes! Thats what you imply with your title and poll options.

Assuming Kerry's prostate cancer doesn't come back, Edwards means nothing. Kerry's the one actually making decisions, so it's Kerry. Besides, Kerry's left of Edwards.

So basically.. you say that a Kerry-hater is either scared of Kerry or Edwards. Another possibility is impossible. No?

Yes! Thats what you imply with your title and poll options.
Yes, because they are the only two on the ticket.

Yes well besides that i think there are a lot more interesting discussions on the subject.. than who scars you.. i mean.. scares? but that's probably just me... :)

Yes well besides that i think there are a lot more interesting discussions on the subject.. than who scars you.. i mean.. scares? but that's probably just me... :)
Of course their are, but I want a feel for the VP choices. They pretty much do nothing in office, and are good mostly for the campaign trail. I want to get a feel if the VP appeals to the opposition at all.

Of course their are, but I want a feel for the VP choices. They pretty much do nothing in office, and are good mostly for the campaign trail. I want to get a feel if the VP appeals to the opposition at all.

Hmm, in regards to the Dems, i think Edwards does because he looks quite like a gentlemen, behaves like one. I think he'll snoop away some of the middle class people who are still chosing between Reps/Dems (together with the poor the group which matters. The rest doesn't matter .They made up their mind. Some of this group already did, too..)

Cheney is obviously better argumenting though.

Now as for this poll, that's a no brainer if you ask me. Because a poll on the Internet just doesn't indicate such. Even not with a low # of voters, as well as a biased group polled (youngsters), as well as easiness to fraud.

Anyone -i repeat- anyone who does not restrict the people who are able to vote to exactly one and uses a dynamic group of people OR takes that factor into account afterwards (e.g. as note to the reader) is using a flawed design. And that flawed design is increasingly common on the 'Net.

Hmm, in regards to the Dems, i think Edwards does because he looks quite like a gentlemen, behaves like one. I think he'll snoop away some of the middle class people who are still chosing between Reps/Dems (together with the poor the group which matters. The rest doesn't matter .They made up their mind. Some of this group already did, too..)

Really? I think Edwards would be great for the woman vote. Married women tend to vote Republican, single women Democrat. Edwards has the charm to get both. He does appeal to the "poor", but they are subdivided into so many groups that are fiercely Democrat or Republican already. And of course, Edwards may make some headway in the South, a traditional Republican stronghold.

Neither really.
However, Kerry has that look about him when he's not telling the truth :eek: . That shit eating, I really don't care about you, but give me your vote expression.

Edwards, he is the one to be concerned about. It's no secret he made millions as a lawyer. With that said, he can shake your hand, look you in the eye, smile, and put the dagger in your back! Luckily Dick was wearing his IBA.