Axis Nova
11-10-2004, 19:32
I feel that there are better ways in which to disseminate the following information, but this letter will have to suffice. What follows is a call to action for those of us who care -- a large enough number to begin the debate about John Kerry's propositions. Are his analects good for the country? The nation's suicide statistics, drug statistics, crime statistics, divorce statistics, and mental illness statistics give us part of the answer. These statistics should make it clear that there is no doubt that Kerry will impair the practice of democracy any day now. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that by allowing Kerry to mollycoddle uncompromising schmucks, we are allowing him to play puppet master.
He seems utterly incapable of understanding that he uses the very intellectual tools he criticizes, namely consequentialist arguments rather than arguments about truth or falsity. The Kerry-ization of our political and spiritual lives will waste natural resources some day. In just a moment I'll discuss some important recent developments based on this fundamental truth. First, however, I want to add a bit to what I wrote previously. If Kerry believes that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to lay the foundation for some serious mischief, then it's obvious why he thinks that he is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha.
To those unprofessional antagonists who think that there should be publicly financed centers of hooliganism, know this: Whenever anyone states the obvious -- that in this era of rising quislingism, we must maintain social tranquillity -- discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "What does Kerry hope to achieve by repeatedly applying his lips to the posteriors of wicked finks?" While I don't know the answer to that particular question, I do know that Kerry's reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth, but only malignant answers, brain-damaged resolutions to conflicts. He feeds on our goodwill like worms feed on buried corpses. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that if the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to make technical preparations for the achievement of freedom and human independence.
You might think this is all pretty funny now, but I doubt I'll hear you laughing if, before the year is over, Kerry is successfully able to obfuscate the issue so that one can't see what ought to be entirely obvious to all. If one needs a sign that he is foolish, consider that the unalterable law of biology has a corollary that is generally overlooked. Specifically, there must be some ascertainable mental block that makes him so libidinous. Period, finis, and Q.E.D. I use such language purposefully -- and somewhat sardonically -- to illustrate how the poisonous wine of priggism had been distilled long before Kerry entered the scene. Kerry is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity. Astute observers have known for years that I can't stand him or his cohorts. If you doubt this, just ask around.
Kerry's allies maintain that "'the norm' shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel." First off, that's a lousy sentence. If they had written that the wisdom that comes from maturation of the spirit, mind, and body will some day prevail over the idiocy of Kerry's flimflams, then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, it is immature and stupid of Kerry to put mephitic, huffy energumens on the federal payroll. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to expose injustice and puncture prejudice, and that's why I say that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, his hired goons don't really care that I want to burn away social illness, exploitation, and human suffering. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé, but because he is totally versipellous. When he's with plebeians, Kerry warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against anarchism. But when he is safely surrounded by his sycophants, Kerry instructs them to weaken family ties. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that I overheard one of Kerry's shock troops say, "Faddism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to lend support to the thesis that we must do away with the misconception that Kerry is omnipotent. Quite simply, I, not being one of the many acrimonious scrubs of this world, am thoroughly shocked and angered by Kerry's illogical, neo-repressive improprieties. Such shameful conduct should never be repeated.
Now that I've had time to think hard about Kerry's precepts, my only question is this: Why? Why evoke a misdirected response to genuine unresolved grievances? If I'm not mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that Kerry truly believes that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. It is just such malicious megalomania, belligerent egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Kerry to force me to play right into the hands of complacent power brokers. While he has a right, as do we all, to believe whatever he wants about recidivism, his petulant objectives are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of heathenism are blooming all around us.
Kerry's convictions are somewhere between a scam and a sham. With this central point cleared up, the rest of his arguments are rendered moot, as I, not being one of the many raving turncoats of this world, have never been in favor of being gratuitously lecherous. I have also never been in favor of sticking my head in the sand or of refusing to raise issues, as opposed to guns or knives. Kerry must think that being unpleasant entitles one to tear down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue. One might think that his attendants are so ready to rip apart causes that others feel strongly about that their ruses are laughable, and this is, not surprisingly, the case. My vision is built on the future, not the past. An equal but opposite observation is that like a verbal magician, he knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. There is nothing Kerry wants more than to impact public policy for years to come. Here, too, the exception proves the rule: Some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that his indifference only adds to the problem. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.
As far as I can tell, his allegations are merely a stalking horse. They mask Kerry's secret intention to attack everyone else's ravings. Kerry believes that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by Kerry and his hypocritical, socially inept co-conspirators. He was voted "most likely to deny us the opportunity to break the neck of his policy of unilateralism once and for all" by his peers. However true that is, his commentaries are like an enormous isolationism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must speak out against jaundiced apostates, because Kerry is planning to convince mischievous, foul deplorable-types that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot in life besides joining him. This does not bode well for the future, because I, not being one of the many dysfunctional, merciless miscreants of this world, want my life to count. I want to be part of something significant and lasting. I want to make plans and carry them out.
It seems to me that, as others have stated long before me, "within a short period of time, Kerry's hatred of all things pure and good will erupt like Mt. Vesuvius, scattering the ashes of pharisaism over everyone in its path." The central paradox of Kerry's tracts, the twist that makes Kerry's policies so irresistible to negligent mouthpieces for predaceous mandarinism, is that these people truly believe that Kerry does the things he does "for the children". He likes to compare his bruta fulmina to those that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. I can't predict the future, but I do know this: Teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain -- with a straight face -- that Kerry is beyond reproach. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that it will not be easy to empower the oppressed to control their own lives. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly that, for the overriding reason that he is firmly convinced that his activities are on the up-and-up. His belief is controverted, however, by the weight of the evidence indicating that Kerry coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his grievances sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. The greatest quote I ever heard goes something like this: "Sinful, reprehensible riffraff are burdened with the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically." Kerry's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Kerry's encomiasts, who loudly proclaim that the cure for evil is more evil. Regardless of those bookish proclamations, the truth is that he can fool some of the people all of the time. He can fool all of the people some of the time. But Kerry can't fool all of the people all of the time.
Lest you think that I'm talking out of my hat here, I should point out that if everyone does his own, small part, together we can point out that the emperor has no clothes on. I need your help if I'm ever to shatter the illusion that Kerry is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, one could truthfully say that Kerry's only motivation is a vapid attachment to wealth and power. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that his "compromises" are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying". Lastly, for those who read this letter, I hope you take it to heart and pass this message on to others.
PRANKED!
http://www.pakin.org/complaint
He seems utterly incapable of understanding that he uses the very intellectual tools he criticizes, namely consequentialist arguments rather than arguments about truth or falsity. The Kerry-ization of our political and spiritual lives will waste natural resources some day. In just a moment I'll discuss some important recent developments based on this fundamental truth. First, however, I want to add a bit to what I wrote previously. If Kerry believes that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to lay the foundation for some serious mischief, then it's obvious why he thinks that he is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha.
To those unprofessional antagonists who think that there should be publicly financed centers of hooliganism, know this: Whenever anyone states the obvious -- that in this era of rising quislingism, we must maintain social tranquillity -- discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "What does Kerry hope to achieve by repeatedly applying his lips to the posteriors of wicked finks?" While I don't know the answer to that particular question, I do know that Kerry's reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth, but only malignant answers, brain-damaged resolutions to conflicts. He feeds on our goodwill like worms feed on buried corpses. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that if the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to make technical preparations for the achievement of freedom and human independence.
You might think this is all pretty funny now, but I doubt I'll hear you laughing if, before the year is over, Kerry is successfully able to obfuscate the issue so that one can't see what ought to be entirely obvious to all. If one needs a sign that he is foolish, consider that the unalterable law of biology has a corollary that is generally overlooked. Specifically, there must be some ascertainable mental block that makes him so libidinous. Period, finis, and Q.E.D. I use such language purposefully -- and somewhat sardonically -- to illustrate how the poisonous wine of priggism had been distilled long before Kerry entered the scene. Kerry is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity. Astute observers have known for years that I can't stand him or his cohorts. If you doubt this, just ask around.
Kerry's allies maintain that "'the norm' shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel." First off, that's a lousy sentence. If they had written that the wisdom that comes from maturation of the spirit, mind, and body will some day prevail over the idiocy of Kerry's flimflams, then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, it is immature and stupid of Kerry to put mephitic, huffy energumens on the federal payroll. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to expose injustice and puncture prejudice, and that's why I say that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, his hired goons don't really care that I want to burn away social illness, exploitation, and human suffering. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé, but because he is totally versipellous. When he's with plebeians, Kerry warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against anarchism. But when he is safely surrounded by his sycophants, Kerry instructs them to weaken family ties. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that I overheard one of Kerry's shock troops say, "Faddism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to lend support to the thesis that we must do away with the misconception that Kerry is omnipotent. Quite simply, I, not being one of the many acrimonious scrubs of this world, am thoroughly shocked and angered by Kerry's illogical, neo-repressive improprieties. Such shameful conduct should never be repeated.
Now that I've had time to think hard about Kerry's precepts, my only question is this: Why? Why evoke a misdirected response to genuine unresolved grievances? If I'm not mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that Kerry truly believes that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. It is just such malicious megalomania, belligerent egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Kerry to force me to play right into the hands of complacent power brokers. While he has a right, as do we all, to believe whatever he wants about recidivism, his petulant objectives are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of heathenism are blooming all around us.
Kerry's convictions are somewhere between a scam and a sham. With this central point cleared up, the rest of his arguments are rendered moot, as I, not being one of the many raving turncoats of this world, have never been in favor of being gratuitously lecherous. I have also never been in favor of sticking my head in the sand or of refusing to raise issues, as opposed to guns or knives. Kerry must think that being unpleasant entitles one to tear down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue. One might think that his attendants are so ready to rip apart causes that others feel strongly about that their ruses are laughable, and this is, not surprisingly, the case. My vision is built on the future, not the past. An equal but opposite observation is that like a verbal magician, he knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. There is nothing Kerry wants more than to impact public policy for years to come. Here, too, the exception proves the rule: Some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that his indifference only adds to the problem. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.
As far as I can tell, his allegations are merely a stalking horse. They mask Kerry's secret intention to attack everyone else's ravings. Kerry believes that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by Kerry and his hypocritical, socially inept co-conspirators. He was voted "most likely to deny us the opportunity to break the neck of his policy of unilateralism once and for all" by his peers. However true that is, his commentaries are like an enormous isolationism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must speak out against jaundiced apostates, because Kerry is planning to convince mischievous, foul deplorable-types that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot in life besides joining him. This does not bode well for the future, because I, not being one of the many dysfunctional, merciless miscreants of this world, want my life to count. I want to be part of something significant and lasting. I want to make plans and carry them out.
It seems to me that, as others have stated long before me, "within a short period of time, Kerry's hatred of all things pure and good will erupt like Mt. Vesuvius, scattering the ashes of pharisaism over everyone in its path." The central paradox of Kerry's tracts, the twist that makes Kerry's policies so irresistible to negligent mouthpieces for predaceous mandarinism, is that these people truly believe that Kerry does the things he does "for the children". He likes to compare his bruta fulmina to those that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. I can't predict the future, but I do know this: Teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain -- with a straight face -- that Kerry is beyond reproach. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that it will not be easy to empower the oppressed to control their own lives. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly that, for the overriding reason that he is firmly convinced that his activities are on the up-and-up. His belief is controverted, however, by the weight of the evidence indicating that Kerry coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his grievances sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. The greatest quote I ever heard goes something like this: "Sinful, reprehensible riffraff are burdened with the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which they previously belonged, both politically and philosophically." Kerry's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Kerry's encomiasts, who loudly proclaim that the cure for evil is more evil. Regardless of those bookish proclamations, the truth is that he can fool some of the people all of the time. He can fool all of the people some of the time. But Kerry can't fool all of the people all of the time.
Lest you think that I'm talking out of my hat here, I should point out that if everyone does his own, small part, together we can point out that the emperor has no clothes on. I need your help if I'm ever to shatter the illusion that Kerry is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, one could truthfully say that Kerry's only motivation is a vapid attachment to wealth and power. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that his "compromises" are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying". Lastly, for those who read this letter, I hope you take it to heart and pass this message on to others.
PRANKED!
http://www.pakin.org/complaint