NationStates Jolt Archive

They really should.

Given their completely opposed ideologies, their child would be raised in an environment open to both sides, from the talk radio the mom blasts, to the MSNCB and Newsweek the dad plasters across the house.

Incidentally, the dad is just fat enough and the mom just skinny enough that the child might actually look normal.

It would be good for the opposing camps, kind of a Romeo and Juliet effect, should Michael Moore and Ann Coulter procreate, their respective sides would have to bury the hatchet and realize that we all are just people. Singing of koombayah is optional.

OMG!!! No, no, no, no, no! Each of them is a total disaster, though for different reasons. Can you just IMAGINE an amalgam of those two!!! Ohhhh ... I feel another headache coming on! :D

What a waste of a thread. If you really knew Ann Coultier, Michael Moore would become a "Lorena Bobbitt"-like victim. Remember what she did to her husband's private parts?

[QUOTE=Chodolo]They really should.[QUOTE]

What a waste of a thread. If you really knew Ann Coultier, Michael Moore would become a "Lorena Bobbitt"-like victim. Remember what she did to her husband's private parts?

Ouch! That just gave me a twinge! Heh!

[QUOTE=Chodolo]They really should.[QUOTE]

What a waste of a thread. If you really knew Ann Coultier, Michael Moore would become a "Lorena Bobbitt"-like victim. Remember what she did to her husband's private parts?

In order to become a "Lorena Bobbit" victim, you must first have the hardware.

In order to become a "Lorena Bobbit" victim, you must first have the hardware.

Good point! I should have thought of that .... ;)

In order to become a "Lorena Bobbit" victim, you must first have the hardware.

ROFLMAO!!!!! OMG! LOL!

Of all the things I've read and heard people say about Moore, this has got to be a new low.

And do you mean, all of the "pole and tackle"? Or just the "courage-making" bits?

What a waste of a thread. If you really knew Ann Coultier, Michael Moore would become a "Lorena Bobbitt"-like victim. Remember what she did to her husband's private parts?

Ann Coulter is the furthest thing from a feminist. Michael Moore's penis would be safe. Plus, I doubt she could find the damn thing among the folds of skin. ;)

Then again, she might be pulling a fast one on us. Ann Coulter has a visible Adam's apple. She's said it's because she's so thin...or could it be...PRE-OP TRANSGENDERED? :D

Would explain Ann's apparent opposition to a woman's right to do, well anything.

I like Coulter, she's smart and knowlegable, unlike Moore.

Of all the things I've read and heard people say about Moore, this has got to be a new low.

And do you mean, all of the "pole and tackle"? Or just the "courage-making" bits?

Ask him if he has to sit down to pee! LOL!

Come on folks, this is not a bashing-Moore thread. Get back on topic. ;)

How would Michael Moore and Ann Coulter's child look? Would it have the daddy's smirk, the mommie's evil stare? Would the child prefer radio or movies for political slant? Would the child grow up to be drop-dead sexy or an abomination of DNA? :p

Come on folks, this is not a bashing-Moore thread. Get back on topic. ;)

How would Michael Moore and Ann Coulter's child look? Would it have the daddy's smirk, the mommie's evil stare? Would the child prefer radio or movies for political slant? Would the child grow up to be drop-dead sexy or an abomination of DNA? :p

Can we say "freak of nature" boys and girls? :D

I like Coulter, she's smart and knowlegable, unlike Moore.

Mm, Christians are really gonna win the support of Muslims by going in and forcibly ruling over and converting them, aren't they (sarcastic, in case you didn't notice).

What IS this whole Lorena Bobbitt thingy?

Lorena Bobbit cut off her husband's dick with a carver's knife. She grabbed the severed member and drove away, and tossed the offending meat out the window at one point. They were able to recover the penis, and reattach it I believe? But I don't think it got back inside Lorena after that incident.

Anyhow, I think they'd have lovely children. :D

Lorena Bobbit cut off her husband's dick with a carver's knife. She grabbed the severed member and drove away, and tossed the offending meat out the window at one point. They were able to recover the penis, and reattach it I believe? But I don't think it got back inside Lorena after that incident.

Anyhow, I think they'd have lovely children. :D

LOL! Not only that, but John Wayne Bobbit later starred in a porno movie entitled "John Wayne Bobbit Uncut!" I kid you not! LOL! :D

I would have just opted for a replacement mechanical wang. Reinforced titanium steel. Let's see the bitch cut through that!

And I would have starred in a porno: "Go Go Gadget Dick!" :D



But back to the serious discussion...who do you think would be on top? :p

Coulter would have to be. Moore's bulk would crush her otherwise.

alright,
so michael moore has never made fun of any of your penis's, so pray tell what makes you think you have the right to talk about his?

honestly. that man and woman are both trying to do something for their country and are taking an active role in the political scene. i may not like ann coulter, but i do believe that she is at least trying to do something that she sees as right, as is moore

while you peopole are sitting behind your computers making fun of them. shut the hell up, honestly. i dont see what you guys are doing to support your beliefs and thoughts (read: not political parties)

*arg*

honestly kids. honestly
-alpha

Then again, she might be pulling a fast one on us. Ann Coulter has a visible Adam's apple. She's said it's because she's so thin...or could it be...PRE-OP TRANSGENDERED? :D

Would explain Ann's apparent opposition to a woman's right to do, well anything.
Isn't his/her long-forsaken Christian name "Anthony?" As in, he/she/it was born "Anthony Love Coultrovski?"

What pray tell would this right be then?
Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

It may not be the nicest thing to say, but I may say such things.
And as for standing up for my beliefs and thoughts, what do you thing I am doing right now?
Moore and Coulter may say what they like about the political situation, and I may say what I like about their relationship situation. If I were to print this, for profit, then they may consider legal action. (libel and slander)

Of all the things I've read and heard people say about Moore, this has got to be a new low.

And do you mean, all of the "pole and tackle"? Or just the "courage-making" bits?

I can get lower as I have no standards for decency! Unless he uses his mirror, he hasn't seen his own Kak (http://www.cheryllavender.com/Cock%20A%20Doodle%20Do.jpg) in years.

What pray tell would this right be then?
Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

It may not be the nicest thing to say, but I may say such things.
And as for standing up for my beliefs and thoughts, what do you thing I am doing right now?
Moore and Coulter may say what they like about the political situation, and I may say what I like about their relationship situation. If I were to print this, for profit, then they may consider legal action. (libel and slander)

They are both public figures, thus it is hard to prove malice which is important in any celebrity case. Remember that Falwell vs. Hustler lawsuit (how he learned about sex by getting it on with his mother).

<What pray tell would this right be then?
Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

It may not be the nicest thing to say, but I may say such things.
And as for standing up for my beliefs and thoughts, what do you thing I am doing right now?
Moore and Coulter may say what they like about the political situation, and I may say what I like about their relationship situation. If I were to print this, for profit, then they may consider legal action. (libel and slander) >


how is that any of your business? with the first amendment, freedom of speech comes the responsiblity to know what is and is not appropriate and to make judgements and comments based upon that responsibilty.

It is not a right to abuse.

I jsut find it rude and deragtory towards two people that are doing more than you are to try and right the supposed wrongs in this country.

so standing up for your beliefs and thoughts requires you to make fun of people? wow, i feel like we are bcak in the second grade. no wander the children of america are not learning basic manners. congrats

and besides who cares if it is not libel and slander until you print it? it is still hurtful and therefor, obviously wrong.

now i doubt that moore or coulter would make a big deal about it, im sure they are expecting this time of crap from people. i still think its wrong.
-alpha

-alpha

<What pray tell would this right be then?
Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

It may not be the nicest thing to say, but I may say such things.
And as for standing up for my beliefs and thoughts, what do you thing I am doing right now?
Moore and Coulter may say what they like about the political situation, and I may say what I like about their relationship situation. If I were to print this, for profit, then they may consider legal action. (libel and slander) >


how is that any of your business? with the first amendment, freedom of speech comes the responsiblity to know what is and is not appropriate and to make judgements and comments based upon that responsibilty.

It is not a right to abuse.

I jsut find it rude and deragtory towards two people that are doing more than you are to try and right the supposed wrongs in this country.

so standing up for your beliefs and thoughts requires you to make fun of people? wow, i feel like we are bcak in the second grade. no wander the children of america are not learning basic manners. congrats

and besides who cares if it is not libel and slander until you print it? it is still hurtful and therefor, obviously wrong.

now i doubt that moore or coulter would make a big deal about it, im sure they are expecting this time of crap from people. i still think its wrong.
-alpha

-alpha

In other words: you don't like it, so it has to go. How about you just leave this thread? Everybody will be happy that way.

My god, he's trying to bring about the Apocalypse. Or at least, trying to have them procreate, which will end only in a bloody deathmatch and either Ann eating his head like a praying mantis or him toppling a statue over onto her.

LOL! Not only that, but John Wayne Bobbit later starred in a porno movie entitled "John Wayne Bobbit Uncut!" I kid you not! LOL! :D

I actually own this film. BORING!!

alright,
so michael moore has never made fun of any of your penis's, so pray tell what makes you think you have the right to talk about his?

honestly. that man and woman are both trying to do something for their country and are taking an active role in the political scene. i may not like ann coulter, but i do believe that she is at least trying to do something that she sees as right, as is moore

while you peopole are sitting behind your computers making fun of them. shut the hell up, honestly. i dont see what you guys are doing to support your beliefs and thoughts (read: not political parties)

*arg*

honestly kids. honestly
-alpha

Goddamit stop bringing serious discussion into this thread! :p

I just wanted one, just ONE non-serious thread, after endless repetitive bickering, across many threads that all, very quickly, start to seem similar.

My god, he's trying to bring about the Apocalypse. Or at least, trying to have them procreate, which will end only in a bloody deathmatch and either Ann eating his head like a praying mantis or him toppling a statue over onto her.

That's the spirit! Carry on! :D

I actually own this film. BORING!!

I wouldn't know. I only saw the title and thought it was hilarious! :D

Moore and Coulter may say what they like about the political situation, and I may say what I like about their relationship situation. If I were to print this, for profit, then they may consider legal action. (libel and slander)

No they couldn't. They could only consider Libel, slander being spoken defamtion. But in any event, hypothesizing over a clearly fictional realtionship between public figures can never be libelous as everyone knows its not true and therefore is inactionable.

Check this out: Tom Cruise and Chuck Norris had sex. You see, even though Tom is known to be sue happy about charges that he is gay, there is nothing he can do about that one. It's so obviously not true, it can never qualify as libel.

Ha-ha. In the US courts hate restrictions on freedom of speech so much, it's almost impossible to win a Libel suit, so you can say pretty much anything about a public figure, and quite about private ones and totally get away with it.

Hmmm, let's get back to the actual topic. Now, we have to accept that for there to be an ideological imprinting from both parents, the two of them would not only have to offer their respective genetic material but to also raise the child (or children,) cooperatively.

I smell a sitcom!

Michael could be the anti-Archie Bunker mixed with Oscar Madison, Ann Coulter could be a Colonel Klink-like anal retentive. The two of them could be always one step behind their politically moderate, highly rational, intellectually honest, and generally freakishly brilliant precocious son and daughter who also, for no explainable reason why, happen to also be African-American.

Now, there's also a middle child, a neurotic bi-polar who finds himself tossed and turned amidst the raging tides of his parent's philosophical intercourse. Wan and underfed, pale to the point of not quite looking alive, he documents his trials and tribulations in a diary, read aloud by the voiceover of Oscar Winning Actor, Ben Kingsley.

All political/ethical/moral debates or conflicts will be resolved within 30 minutes, usually with a heartwarming moment where the parents are both made to look like complete idiots, yet maybe a little wiser. There will be a group hug. Every once in a while, there will be an extra-special episode, where Michael Moore is molested by the Maytag repairman, Ann Coulter is held hostage by a rag-tag group of uber-hippies, lead by TV's Conan O'Brien, or the two of them together are locked in a walk-in freezer for an entire night and learn a valuable lesson about togetherness that will save the producers a lot of money, because it will of course be 75% retrospective footage.

What do you all think?

They really should.

Given their completely opposed ideologies, their child would be raised in an environment open to both sides, from the talk radio the mom blasts, to the MSNCB and Newsweek the dad plasters across the house.

Incidentally, the dad is just fat enough and the mom just skinny enough that the child might actually look normal.

It would be good for the opposing camps, kind of a Romeo and Juliet effect, should Michael Moore and Ann Coulter procreate, their respective sides would have to bury the hatchet and realize that we all are just people. Singing of koombayah is optional.

I think they'd kill each other before they could get a chance to slip between the sheets.

I think they'd kill each other before they could get a chance to slip between the sheets.

The crime scene would be interesting. There'd be Moore with a knife in his chest and Coulter crammed halfway down his throat. She looks like a right-wing chicken-finger.

Then again, she might be pulling a fast one on us. Ann Coulter has a visible Adam's apple. She's said it's because she's so thin...or could it be...PRE-OP TRANSGENDERED? :D

Would explain Ann's apparent opposition to a woman's right to do, well anything.
You're not the first person to propose this theory. Even some people on Free Republic--where she is practically the resident pin-up girl--swear that she's really a man.

You're not the first person to propose this theory. Even some people on Free Republic--where she is practically the resident pin-up girl--swear that she's really a man.

This may be the most disturbing post of the day.

it should be illegal for those two to produce offspring together or otherwise

Hmmm, let's get back to the actual topic. Now, we have to accept that for there to be an ideological imprinting from both parents, the two of them would not only have to offer their respective genetic material but to also raise the child (or children,) cooperatively.

I smell a sitcom!
(All that from before)

What do you all think?
I think you should have thought of that a month ago and submitted it to Bravo's SITuation Comedy contest. You've got a winner!