InfiniteResponsibility
10-10-2004, 16:19
In the second debate, Dubya did a couple things that I believe the Democrats should point out very clearly (so I'm going to point them out here) and repeatedly during the final weeks of the campaign:
1. Bush's short temper: He practically yelled at the man asking about Canadian drugs being cheaper, simply because he's been defensive and unable to separate himself personally from the questions asked of him. The Kerry campaign ought to state how a man who can't calmly accept disagreement from the citizens he supposedly represents doesn't deserve to be put in the most important decision making position in this country. They should also point out how that type of defensiveness only increases the risks that he'll engage in detrimental policy when challenged, because he feels overly defensive and can't control himself.
2. Bush's timber company snafu: I own a lumber company? It's been shown very clearly that Dubya did file $84 from part ownership in the lumber company, and hence would be qualified as a "small business" under the Republican definition. Not only did he not answer Kerry's argument, but he then proceeded to act like Kerry was lying about it. If Bush isn't able to keep track of his own personal finances, why would we trust him with the finances of the entire country?
1. Bush's short temper: He practically yelled at the man asking about Canadian drugs being cheaper, simply because he's been defensive and unable to separate himself personally from the questions asked of him. The Kerry campaign ought to state how a man who can't calmly accept disagreement from the citizens he supposedly represents doesn't deserve to be put in the most important decision making position in this country. They should also point out how that type of defensiveness only increases the risks that he'll engage in detrimental policy when challenged, because he feels overly defensive and can't control himself.
2. Bush's timber company snafu: I own a lumber company? It's been shown very clearly that Dubya did file $84 from part ownership in the lumber company, and hence would be qualified as a "small business" under the Republican definition. Not only did he not answer Kerry's argument, but he then proceeded to act like Kerry was lying about it. If Bush isn't able to keep track of his own personal finances, why would we trust him with the finances of the entire country?