NationStates Jolt Archive

That muppet George Bush will start World War 3 if he is re-elected. A reason for this is that he has made it quite clear in several speeches that if he thinks that something may benefit the USA then he couldn't give a shit if it harmed another country, the man is a deluded born again christian for christ sake so how could you take seriously a word that the uneducated goon says!

...born again christian for christ sake...

Sorry, that was just too funny not to highlight.

lol bush=hitler+stalin+satin

Haven't you heard? WWIII has already begun: http://www.september11news.com/TVScreenCNNBreakingNews.jpg

Haven't you heard? WWIII has already begun: http://www.september11news.com/TVScreenCNNBreakingNews.jpg
Funny, I didn't get the memo saying New York City was the world. The damn fax machine must be unplugged again.

lol bush=hitler+stalin+satin

Bush is the leader of Nazi Germany, Totalitarian-Communist Russia, and a soft smooth fabric all at the same time! Holy crap! :D

Bush is the leader of Nazi Germany, Totalitarian-Communist Russia, and a soft smooth fabric all at the same time! Holy crap! :D
Damn it!

I never get the good comments! ;)

Can you guys find another channel on this propoganda radio pls?

How about debating a real issue? I'll give you one, is Japan or Germany a real comparison model for the current situation in Iraq?

WW3 is more of a war on terrorism from what should be and what hopefully will be a worldly effort against terrorism. and yeah, bush is a retard, and so are all of the federal agencies for not working together.

retards.

Funny, I didn't get the memo saying New York City was the world. The damn fax machine must be unplugged again.

Does it matter? The USA practically owns this world. How many other countries can do pretty much whatever it wants by invading whoever it likes without any international restraints and still form policies that make every other country subject to Our doctrine?

Although, I am a Kerry-Edwards supporter…………Your statement about Bush being an uneducated man is incorrect. Bush is a Harvard Graduate.

WWWIII a distinct possibly

Uneducated -Not true

Can you guys find another channel on this propoganda radio pls?

How about debating a real issue? I'll give you one, is Japan or Germany a real comparison model for the current situation in Iraq?

If we started pumping the equivilent of a million dollars (1945) into Iraq, maybe, but short of that, no. And in fact, it would take more money because the Japanese social structure was perfectly receptive to the transformation from a warrior culture to a business culture and the Japanese people's traditions with regards to the conquered and the conquering allowed for a smooth transition. Germany had an easy time because most Germans just wanted to forget that WWII had ever happened. Iraq was not the site of a massive war and acts of genocide on the scale of the Holocaust, nor was it the aggressor in this most recent conflict. The people of Iraq would live their country to benifit as well as Germany or Japan did from the war, but the culture and the circumstance simply aren't the same.

Although, I am a Kerry-Edwards supporter…………Your statement about Bush being an uneducated man is incorrect. Bush is a Harvard Graduate.

WWWIII a distinct possibly

Uneducated -Not true
Yale.

Does it matter? The USA practically owns this world. No it doesn't. Not even close. Weilding great power in the world and owning it are very different.

How many other countries can do pretty much whatever it wants by invading whoever it likes without any international restraints and still form policies that make every other country subject to Our doctrine?

Firstly, what doctrines are you talking of? I'd like to see some examples.
Secondly, there are dozens of nations that could potentially invade another nation without international restraints. And several that could do it in spite of international restraints. What is the point of this argument?

Thirdly, what is the point of this argument? it still does not prove to any degree that the attacks on the Twin Towers initiated World War III.

Does it matter? The USA practically owns this world. How many other countries can do pretty much whatever it wants by invading whoever it likes without any international restraints and still form policies that make every other country subject to Our doctrine?
See that kind of attitiude is why the world thinks that George Bush is a ignorant pillock.

Damn it!

I never get the good comments! ;)

Gotta be quick. :)

Nah...it's not WWIII til a huge collition forms to take our mad power hungry country out. When North Korea, Russia, and China finally see the danger and unite, THEN it will be upon us. Frankly, I hope the day never comes. Bush may not be ignorant (meaning uneducated), but he's still a completely stupid man. All the learning in the world can't compensate for such a total lack in judgement. Maybe he was just too high to notice the devestation caused by Vietnam....just a thought.

Nah...it's not WWIII til a huge collition forms to take our mad power hungry country out. When North Korea, Russia, and China finally see the danger and unite, THEN it will be upon us. Frankly, I hope the day never comes. Bush may not be ignorant (meaning uneducated), but he's still a completely stupid man. All the learning in the world can't compensate for such a total lack in judgement. Maybe he was just too high to notice the devestation caused by Vietnam....just a thought.
The day China and Russia unite against the US is the day volcanoes spew ice.

The day China and Russia unite against the US is the day volcanoes spew ice.

That'd be awesome!

Although, I am a Kerry-Edwards supporter…………Your statement about Bush being an uneducated man is incorrect. Bush is a Harvard Graduate.

WWWIII a distinct possibly

Uneducated -Not true

Frankly, I think Bush quotes speak for themselves.

"I belive the human bieng and the fish can coexist peacefully"

"Tribal sovereignty means that; it's sovereign. I mean, you're a — you've been given sovereignty, and you're viewed as a sovereign entity. And therefore the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities"

"We stand for things."

"So thank you for reminding me about the importance of being a good mom and a good voulenteer too"

"More and more of our imports are coming from overseas."

The list goes onnnnnnnnnnnnn

But, I bow to my knees to you anyway, for supporting Kerry.

President Bush was born on July 6, 1946, in New Haven, Connecticut, and he grew up in Midland and Houston, Texas. He received a bachelor's degree from Yale University in 1968, then served as an F-102 fighter pilot in the Texas Air National Guard. President Bush received a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School in 1975. After graduating, he moved back

:headbang:

I do totally support Kerry, but why do people count on him to be more peaceful than Bush? I may just be a silly european but I can't accept people as "presidents of peace" when they are running their campaigns on how many purple hearts they've got...

The day China and Russia unite against the US is the day volcanoes spew ice.
It's not that impossible, they are both commuinist countries, dont even try and tell me that Russia is a democracy they control all of their media and Putin continues to make more dictorial laws by the day so that no-one can take him out of power. China and Russia in several years time might have a common motive, which would be to take the influence the USA has over the world so that they can dictate their own ideals? Remember two super powers might be better than one in China and Russia's eyes, just like USA and Russia thought during WW2 when the Fascists were around.

Frankly, I think Bush quotes speak for themselves.

"I belive the human bieng and the fish can coexist peacefully"

"Tribal sovereignty means that; it's sovereign. I mean, you're a — you've been given sovereignty, and you're viewed as a sovereign entity. And therefore the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities"

"We stand for things."

"So thank you for reminding me about the importance of being a good mom and a good voulenteer too"

"More and more of our imports are coming from overseas."

The list goes onnnnnnnnnnnnn

But, I bow to my knees to you anyway, for supporting Kerry.
LMAO reading those!

It's not that impossible, they are both commuinist countries, dont even try and tell me that Russia is a democracy they control all of their media and Putin continues to make more dictorial laws by the day so that no-one can take him out of power. China and Russia in several years time might have a common motive, which would be to take the influence the USA has over the world so that they can dictate their own ideals? Remember two super powers might be better than one in China and Russia's eyes, just like USA and Russia thought during WW2 when the Fascists were around.

Do you know what comunism stands for at all? To call either Putin or the government of China for communists is just plain stupid. In fact the risque for these people are that the old communists will use the argument, look how good it was BEFORE we opened up free market. If anything is in the interest of the western world it would be to support the communists of these countries, otherwise their economies will wipe out the ones in the first world (and now we aren't even mentioning India). And what ideals do these tyranns have to implent?

WW3 is pretty much inevitable.
He [Bush] wont be the one to start it if hes re-elected, it'll be those terrorists fault. Frankly, i believe that Bush and all the world powers at the UN need to stop talking and do something about this problem we got. Terrorist, especially the ones we're facing today, are not easy to fight against, so we need to all co-operate as a world to at least have any chance of controlling this problem.
These are harsh, difficult times we live in, so to anybody against Bush I'd have to say that he's probably got one of the hardest jobs in the world, n i think hes doing a fine job.
:headbang:

Firstly, what doctrines are you talking of? I'd like to see some examples.

Secondly, there are dozens of nations that could potentially invade another nation without international restraints. And several that could do it in spite of international restraints. What is the point of this argument?

Firstly, if you are unaware of ANY recent examples of the USA invading a country when it felt like it then you are either an idiot or simply playing stupid.

Thirdly, what is the point of this argument? it still does not prove to any degree that the attacks on the Twin Towers initiated World War III.

We might as well own the world. We have more imperialistic influence in around the globe than anyone else. Pretty much every continent has a U.S. military base protecting our regional interests and/or incluencing regional affairs.

Guys and Gals I hate to tell you but the president doesn’t have as much power as you think he does, the only thing he did was get the war started, like he’s allowed to for 60 days as stated in our constitution...the rest of congress voted to keep troops in (and don’t buy anything about them not knowing what was over there because they saw just about everything everyone else did and if they still voted wrong its their own fault for not being prepared as the leaders of this country). And as far as a world war 3 goes, I don’t think you can call either the war on Iraq or the war on terrorism the start of world war 3. There is nobody else truly involved in these conflicts to make this a WORLD war. The lack of world involvement is a big issue in this topic, so it is clearly not a world war.

See that kind of attitiude is why the world thinks that George Bush is a ignorant piloc.

Ok first off, I’m guessing you meant Pollock, which would make you seem pretty racist and ignorant yourself for saying something like that. Besides, it’s not like President Bush said that at all, I’m not sure how you turned that around on him.

Do you know what comunism stands for at all?
Do you even know how to spell communism.

Ok first off, I’m guessing you meant Pollock, which would make you seem pretty racist and ignorant yourself for saying something like that. Besides, it’s not like President Bush said that at all, I’m not sure how you turned that around on him.
No i said PILLOCK because i meant PILLOCK.

Do you even know how to spell communism.
That is totally irelevant (I know that is misspelled too), and if you would have read my post you would have seen that I later on spelled communists instead of comunists, read my post and then you can flame it!:)

"More and more of our imports are coming from overseas."

I'm not sure what is wrong with this statement. One can import something without having to go overseas. As far as I can tell, this refers to more imports coming from Asia and Europe as opposed to Canada and Mexico.

It's not that impossible, they are both commuinist countries

Can YOU even spell communism.

Though I don't like Bush, World War III will defiantly be Israel's fault.

Does it matter? The USA practically owns this world. How many other countries can do pretty much whatever it wants by invading whoever it likes without any international restraints and still form policies that make every other country subject to Our doctrine?


what!?!?!?!
one day a half decent EU will batter America

how do you do that Quote thing

Bush is an offense to any right minded human being on the face of the Earth. I wouldn't put it past him to blow up this planet just to see what kind of pretty explosion it would make.
I find it hard to understand what makes Bush think that he has the right to turn America into some kind of world police. I also love the way that he invaded Iraq to give the country 'back to the Iraqi people' - please, they've just traded one dictator for another. And if anyone doesn't think that Bush is a dictator, consider the fact that he sent troops storming into Iraq, guns blazing, killing anyone who looked at them sideways and claiming that it was for the public good. We wouldn't let Hitler get away with it, but because it's America, then it's okay....

"Tribal sovereignty means that; it's sovereign. I mean, you're a — you've been given sovereignty, and you're viewed as a sovereign entity. And therefore the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities"


A friend of mine was at a journalism conference earlier this year when he uttered this typical Bushism. The context (which you should always get when you hear quotes like this) was as follows: during the Q&A session, a Native American journalist asked him to define sovereignty as it applies to Native Americans.

I think in this case, it's funnier (and scarier) once you see that he doesn't understand the meaning of the word sovereignty. Seriously, how can he talk about Iraqi sovereignty when he can't even define the word? :eek:

In case Dubya is reading this, for future reference, www.dictionary.com has this to say about the matter:

sov·er·eign·ty

1. Supremacy of authority or rule as exercised by a sovereign or sovereign state.
2. Royal rank, authority, or power.
3. Complete independence and self-government.
4. A territory existing as an independent state.

*walks in and looks around*

OOOoooOOoooo!! Look at the pretty flames!

*sits down in her camping clothes, pulls her sleeping bag around her and gets out her roasting stick*

Now...where did I push those marshmellow... Ah yes!

*starts roasting marshmellowed on the flames.

NOTE - Yes, I know it;s majorly off topic, but there are a few flames here.

Just to point out something,the cold war was world war three.Though not fully accepted,it pretty much was.At least say it like it is,This will be world war four.WW4 is already started pretty much,the war on terror.

And thank you Olangapo.Though yes,Bush started the war,Congress voted to allow it to go on.And you know,whenever something wrong goes on in the country,its not congresses fault (you know,that small thing that makes all the federal laws),its President Bush's!

Bush is an offense to any right minded human being on the face of the Earth. I wouldn't put it past him to blow up this planet just to see what kind of pretty explosion it would make.
I find it hard to understand what makes Bush think that he has the right to turn America into some kind of world police. I also love the way that he invaded Iraq to give the country 'back to the Iraqi people' - please, they've just traded one dictator for another. And if anyone doesn't think that Bush is a dictator, consider the fact that he sent troops storming into Iraq, guns blazing, killing anyone who looked at them sideways and claiming that it was for the public good. We wouldn't let Hitler get away with it, but because it's America, then it's okay....

I know,I mean WW1,WW2,Korea,Vietnam,etc....THOSE weren't to protect people when we were never threatened.

Have you ever been in a war?America did everything it could to prevent innocent deaths,but have you forgotten the last efforts of the Iraqi army to defeat us? They dressed as civilians and fired upon our troops from crowds of civilians.But don't yell about how bad that was,complain when a stray bullet wanders into a crowd when US troops were shooting back for their lives.

Bush will be assassinated if he is re-elected, trust me.

Does it matter? The USA practically owns this world. How many other countries can do pretty much whatever it wants by invading whoever it likes without any international restraints and still form policies that make every other country subject to Our doctrine?

lol... its quite funny the US still think they are best, strongest... blah blah blah. It is right that the US got the worlds largest military (congrats btw: I would really like my taxes to be used for that crap :p ) BUT: If the EU would block their economy the would really be f***** up.

BTW: Have you realized, that no one likes the US any more? At least the public does not :rolleyes: .

Just to point out something,the cold war was world war three.Though not fully accepted,it pretty much was.At least say it like it is,This will be world war four.WW4 is already started pretty much,the war on terror.

And thank you Olangapo.Though yes,Bush started the war,Congress voted to allow it to go on.And you know,whenever something wrong goes on in the country,its not congresses fault (you know,that small thing that makes all the federal laws),its President Bush's!
For gods sake 'think' before you start spouting off a load of bullsh*t. A War is only a World War when the conflict spans more than 2 continents, in which atleast 20 major countries participate in an attack against a common enemy and which has the attention of the-man-in-the-street due to the significant loss of life.
This never happened during the cold war, learn some bloody history!

lol... its quite funny the US still think they are best, strongest... blah blah blah. It is right that the US got the worlds largest military (congrats btw: I would really like my taxes to be used for that crap :p ) BUT: If the EU would block their economy the would really be f***** up.

BTW: Have you realized, that no one likes the US any more? At least the public does not :rolleyes: .
It's not the USA the world has a problem with it's George Bush and his mindless advisers! Generally speaking americans are very friendly, generous and thoughtfull people :D

I know,I mean WW1,WW2,Korea,Vietnam,etc....THOSE weren't to protect people when we were never threatened.

Have you ever been in a war?America did everything it could to prevent innocent deaths,but have you forgotten the last efforts of the Iraqi army to defeat us? They dressed as civilians and fired upon our troops from crowds of civilians.But don't yell about how bad that was,complain when a stray bullet wanders into a crowd when US troops were shooting back for their lives.

What are you on about? Y'know I think we were under a *certain* amount of risk with WW1 and WW2, what with the whole 'world conquest' thing.

No, I've never been in a war - firstly I'm a pacifist and think war is bloody stupid, and secondly, I'm 16 years old - you'd be surprised at how they *don't* let you fight in wars at that age.

Why did the Iraqi army fire on US troops, I wonder? Could it be because the American army had just invaded their country? The reason I'm complaining about innocent Iraqi people being killed and not US soldiers is because US soldiers chose to put themselves at trisk when they joined the army. They signed up for it and had a choice. I thought the whole point of the 'war on terror' and so-forth was to prevent the loss of innocent human life.

President Bush is full of shit.

Okay, frankly, you are all ignorant democrats who seem to think that kerry would be better suited to be president. Thats fine, I respect you opinion. But we are actually in WW 4. WW 3 was the cold war because we had the korean and the Vietnam wars. Plus the threat of nuclear armageddon. So if your going to slam bush, make sure what you say is how you feel, not just what some liberal media source is shoving down your throats. just a word of advice from an american who actually loves america, unlike some people. :mad:

Okay, frankly, you are all ignorant democrats who seem to think that kerry would be better suited to be president. Thats fine, I respect you opinion. But we are actually in WW 4. WW 3 was the cold war because we had the korean and the Vietnam wars. Plus the threat of nuclear armageddon. So if your going to slam bush, make sure what you say is how you feel, not just what some liberal media source is shoving down your throats. just a word of advice from an american who actually loves america, unlike some people. :mad:
So there was atleast 20 major countries on 2 different continents involved in the Korean and vietnam war then? :rolleyes:

What are you on about? Y'know I think we were under a *certain* amount of risk with WW1 and WW2, what with the whole 'world conquest' thing.

No, I've never been in a war - firstly I'm a pacifist and think war is bloody stupid, and secondly, I'm 16 years old - you'd be surprised at how they *don't* let you fight in wars at that age.

Why did the Iraqi army fire on US troops, I wonder? Could it be because the American army had just invaded their country? The reason I'm complaining about innocent Iraqi people being killed and not US soldiers is because US soldiers chose to put themselves at trisk when they joined the army. They signed up for it and had a choice. I thought the whole point of the 'war on terror' and so-forth was to prevent the loss of innocent human life.

President Bush is full of shit.


At the time of the war,there were plenty protests against the US joining world war two.Yes we were under danger during ww2,but against Germany we attacked them before they did (excluding the attack of the japs against us.)

The Iraqi army had every right to defend themselves during the invasion,but the attrocity of using civilians for cover is not something you can ignore.

To quote one of my favorite signs: Except for ending Slavery,Facisim,Nazism, and communisim; War has never solved anything.

We might as well own the world. We have more imperialistic influence in around the globe than anyone else. Pretty much every continent has a U.S. military base protecting our regional interests and/or incluencing regional affairs.

You seem to misunderstand the word own. Own means have control of. If the US actualy tried to attack a high standing UN country(France, england ect) we would see how much control America has.

Funny, I didn't get the memo saying New York City was the world. The damn fax machine must be unplugged again.
You know, in WWII you damn Europeans didn't think Poland, or Czechlslovakia, or anywhere else Hitler took over was worth fighting over either. Of course, when you were threatened, it was time to ask good ol' US of A for money and men to help you save your own asses...

You seem to misunderstand the word own. Own means have control of. If the US actualy tried to attack a high standing UN country(France, england ect) we would see how much control America has.
If the US attacked France, England would help. You know why? Because England hates them as much as us. And we could probably convince some others to help. And who would stop us? China couldn't care less about you. In fact, there is no European nation near enough to pose a significant threat. Unless of course you chose to resort to nukes...

So there was atleast 20 major countries on 2 different continents involved in the Korean and vietnam war then? :rolleyes:
I don't think 20 major countries were involved in the two previous World Wars, respectively. Some minor ones got taken over, but as for nations that were considered aggressors/active participants, there weren't nearly that many.

For all of this petty talk I don't see anybody mentioning that the same bull was said about Reagan. He is dumb.....he will start ww3.....he is a liar......his staff runs him, well guess what, the nuclear threat and cold war were gone and over by his last year in office. Hardly ww3 right? I find it sad that the left feels they must personaly attack the President. it is , after all, easier to attack a man than an ideology right?

If the US attacked France, England would help. You know why? Because England hates them as much as us. And we could probably convince some others to help. And who would stop us? China couldn't care less about you. In fact, there is no European nation near enough to pose a significant threat. Unless of course you chose to resort to nukes...

You're right China doesn't care about us. China will never care about us. Considering we just replaced our entire combat wing with a continent sized shield called Australia and maintaining nuclear free laws I dout I will be nuking you any time soon. I live in New Zealand. Dont assume just because im not pro American im British. Anyway my point was not that England and France would ally, it was that America does not own the world.

If the US attacked France, England would help. You know why? Because England hates them as much as us. And we could probably convince some others to help. And who would stop us? China couldn't care less about you. In fact, there is no European nation near enough to pose a significant threat. Unless of course you chose to resort to nukes...
No, ithe UK would help France because of the EU. Heck the US would have to deal with the whole EU and possibly NATO if they were stupid enough to attack France.

Bush already started World War 3! :mad:

Yale.

DamN! Harvard Aint what it used to be, i wonder in what he graduated, adhow much cost the diploma that he bought?

" If you lt me graduate harvard, once i ll be presdent i will destroye any university that makes competition with you.. DEAL?" :rolleyes:

That muppet George Bush will start World War 3 if he is re-elected. A reason for this is that he has made it quite clear in several speeches that if he thinks that something may benefit the USA then he couldn't give a shit if it harmed another country, the man is a deluded born again christian for christ sake so how could you take seriously a word that the uneducated goon says!

Funny thing, NATIONAL LEADERS ARE SUPPOSED TO PUT THE INTERESTS OF THEIR OWN COUNTRY FIRST. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS.

Even ghandi put india first.

...a deluded born again christian for christ sake so how could you take seriously a word that the uneducated goon says!Wow, nation states has another leftist bigot. What a surprise.

Thank you Kryozerkia. Aren't you sick of that select group of Americans who think that because they have the largest military that they can do what they want. It seems that they never learnt about this little thing called alliances. They must either ignore them completely or actually think they can take on the rest of the world :headbang: . You have the largest military for ONE COUNTRY. Germany was pretty powerful but look what happened to it. The same thing could happen to America if you push the other nations too far.

You know, in WWII you damn Europeans didn't think Poland, or Czechlslovakia, or anywhere else Hitler took over was worth fighting over either. Of course, when you were threatened, it was time to ask good ol' US of A for money and men to help you save your own asses...

1) I am japanese. Last time I checked, japanese was not european in any way, shape, or form. Therefore your entire rant, in all of its rank arrogance, is entirely useless to me.
2) Furthermore, you have illustrated an entire lack of comprehension with regards to the topic even at hand in this thread. I pointed out that the world trade center attacks were not an initiation of world war III, and you instead go into a strange venting on how Europeans are self-centered. Get your facts straight, get your mind straight, and for gods sake get over whatever nationalistic fervor has got your railing at those "damn Europeans" anytime you hear a voice to the contrary of your beliefs.

There is no conclusive proof that Bush would start WW3; the terrorists already have begun this campaign, and they did so a long time before George W. Bush took the oath of office.

....the man is a deluded born again christian....

No. He's not a born-again Christian. He's just an uneducated goon, and I hate him. And I'm a born-again Christian!!

That'd be awesome!



LMAO

*walks in and looks around*

OOOoooOOoooo!! Look at the pretty flames!

*sits down in her camping clothes, pulls her sleeping bag around her and gets out her roasting stick*

Now...where did I push those marshmellow... Ah yes!

*starts roasting marshmellowed on the flames.

NOTE - Yes, I know it;s majorly off topic, but there are a few flames here.

LMAO DAM THIS THREAD IS FUNNIER THAN IT IS SERIOUS.

Okay, frankly, you are all ignorant democrats who seem to think that kerry would be better suited to be president. Thats fine, I respect you opinion. But we are actually in WW 4. WW 3 was the cold war because we had the korean and the Vietnam wars. Plus the threat of nuclear armageddon. So if your going to slam bush, make sure what you say is how you feel, not just what some liberal media source is shoving down your throats. just a word of advice from an american who actually loves america, unlike some people. :mad:

Oh wow! An other mindless sheep brained conservative! Maybe if you knew a little more about your beloved dear leader, "President Bush", you would know he has actually done some very shitty low down things, like mayb, hmm, whitewashing the stragetic information coming from Iraq so he can make speaches on it making his poll ratings to go up, yes, this is our glorious President, he does not care about our soldier's lives, only about being re-elected, he does not care about looking at the problems in Iraq in the face, only extracting the whitewashed information to use as propaganda to deceive the American people even further into lies and treachery, we are never going to win in Iraq or the Middle East the way Bush is carrying on.

So, my advice is, get a brain and stop mindlessly worshipping your leader and eating, let it be truth, or even most likely lie and really love your country by questioning authority and standing up for whats wrong. Bush is so full of shit, lies, decievment, two faced, doubletalk that if he is re-elected, there has to be a coup e'dat or popular uprising just for the sake of the well being of the human race.