NationStates Jolt Archive

John Vs. John

John Kerry made a huge mistake making John Edwards his running mate. Think about it. John Edwards is nothing but a man with nothing really distinguishing about him. He’s just a man like any other man. He pales in comparison to John Edwards. A man who can talk to the dead. Just think of the asset potential. He can send legions of the undead over to hostile areas and get them to spy on the enemy. They would never be detected and they would never divulge any information to the enemy because they can‘t even communicate with them. We would be able to capture Osama so much faster. We could also find out the truth of the WMD situation in Iraq as well as find the location of several insurgents. With John Edwards as our VP would could effectively make the war in Iraq shorter and less costly in terms of both money and lives. That’s why I think John Kerry should have made John Edwards his running mate instead of John Edwards. That would have certainly secured my vote for him. Now I guess I’ll just have to vote for some other guy.


So what do you think? Do you think John Edwards would have made a better running mate? Or do you think Kerry made the right decision by making John Edwards his running mate? Or do you think he should have had somebody else be his running mate? And most importantly state why you think that way.

If that didn't confuse you congratulations, you earn a cookie.

Perhaps, but he's just so damned CUTE! I think he's cute, don't you? He's just got "cute" written all over him. So cute! What a cutie! :D

John Vs. John

John Kerry made a huge mistake making John Edwards his running mate. Think about it.
John Edwards is nothing but a man with nothing really distinguishing about him.
He’s just a man like any other man. He pales in comparison to John Edwards. A man who can talk to the dead. Just think of the asset potential.
He can send legions of the undead over to hostile areas and get them to spy on the enemy. They would never be detected and they would never divulge any information to the enemy because they can‘t even communicate with them. We would be able to capture Osama so much faster. We could also find out the truth of the WMD situation in Iraq as well as find the location of several insurgents.
With John Edwards as our VP would could effectively make the war in Iraq shorter and less costly in terms of both money and lives. That’s why I think John Kerry should have made John Edwards his running mate instead of John Edwards. That would have certainly secured my vote for him. Now I guess I’ll just have to vote for some other guy.


So what do you think? Do you think John Edwards would have made a better running mate? Or do you think Kerry made the right decision by making John Edwards his running mate? Or do you think he should have had somebody else be his running mate? And most importantly state why you think that way.

If that didn't confuse you congratulations, you earn a cookie.

What kind of cookie do I get? Does it have sprinkles?

And Yes John Kerry made a good choice choosing John Edwards. I would rather have Dean that Kerry but I'd rather had Reagon than Bush so you predict elections.
John Edwards is a great speaker. He makes things personal. He does little mud slinging.
I don't like the republican party due to their mud slinging. They need to clean up their act.

Edwards also did great in the debate.

Your "Edwards" wasn't so great but the one Kerry chose was. :)

Perhaps, but he's just so damned CUTE! I think he's cute, don't you? He's just got "cute" written all over him. So cute! What a cutie! :D
WHAT???? CUTE?...OH I GET IT....SARCASIM!

What kind of cookie do I get? Does it have sprinkles?
No, it's a peanut butter cookie

I can feel John Edwards. He is now in me, speaking through me. He wants you to know that he is mad at you all for making fun of his lard-assed wife. He will now sue you and collect a large cash payout.

Perhaps, but he's just so damned CUTE! I think he's cute, don't you? He's just got "cute" written all over him. So cute! What a cutie! :D
Agreed. :D

I think Edwards is wonderful. Even my Dad agrees with me on this one (although that's not necessarily a good thing).

I can feel John Edwards. He is now in me, speaking through me. He wants you to know that he is mad at you all for making fun of his lard-assed wife. He will now sue you and collect a large cash payout.
LOL

LOL
Yes that is funny lol.

Now, admittedly, John Edwards is a great suggestion and wonderful alternative, but I think I have an even better one: John Edwards. Or rather, Jonathan Edwards, the skilled minister and orator who traveled colonial America giving powerfull and frightening speeches, telling sinners that they were always inches from hell at any second and that God was doing them a favor by not dropping them in.
http://www.jonathanedwards.com/images/jesml.jpg
The benefits of having John Edwards as VP, as opposed to John Edwards or John Edwards:

1. His fiery Christian speeches will give Democrats competition for the Christian vote, a crucial and loyal group Dems have been missing out on for a while.
2. His effective use of scare tactics is another wonderfully effective vote-getter, that also has consistently a conservative strategy.
3. He's dead. No one would like it if the conservatives ran attack ads against a dead guy. That's just heartless.

So to sum it up, THAT is who should have been Kerry's VP.

The benefits of having John Edwards as VP, as opposed to John Edwards or John Edwards:

1. His fiery Christian speeches will give Democrats competition for the Christian vote, a crucial and loyal group Dems have been missing out on for a while.
2. His effective use of scare tactics is another wonderfully effective vote-getter, that also has consistently a conservative strategy.
3. He's dead. No one would like it if the conservatives ran attack ads against a dead guy. That's just heartless.

So to sum it up, THAT is who should have been Kerry's VP.
Yeah, but John Edwards could just contact John Edwards, so you wouldn't really need John Edwards as VP.