Reagan or Clinton?
Roach-Busters
02-10-2004, 00:15
Suppose Reagan were alive and Presidents were not limited to two terms and Reagan was young enough and didn't have Alzheimer's. Suppose, then, that he ran against Clinton. Who would you vote for?
Sdaeriji
02-10-2004, 00:16
Ooh, tough one. Clinton, I suppose. Could we have co-presidents?
Roach-Busters
02-10-2004, 00:19
Yawn
Paskaeyjar
02-10-2004, 00:23
Reagan is a republican so obviously i'd vote for Clinton, that is if I would have an american citizenshi
La Terra di Liberta
02-10-2004, 00:24
Clinton, although I have a lot of respect for Reagan.
Roach-Busters
02-10-2004, 00:25
The reason I ask is because I hear Republicans talk about what a great economy Reagan gave us, and that it was Reagan, not Clinton, who gave us the nineties' prosperity, and Democrats say Reagan flushed the economy down the toilet and then Bill pulled it out and made things well again. It'll be interesting to see the Reaganites and Clintonites spar over this one.
Layarteb
02-10-2004, 00:30
Everyone loves Reagan :).
He's just an awesome guy.
Roach-Busters
02-10-2004, 00:31
Even though I disliked them both equally as politicians, at least Reagan was charismatic. Clinton is just creepy.
Kramers Intern
02-10-2004, 00:41
Clinton was great! One of the fab. 3 democrats for me. The other two being, FDR and JFK.
Roach-Busters
02-10-2004, 00:43
In my opinion, there's never been a good Republicon President, and there haven't been any good Democratic Presidents since Grover Cleveland.
La Terra di Liberta
02-10-2004, 00:51
[QUOTE=Roach-Busters]In my opinion, there's never been a good Republicon President[QUOTE]
Not even Linclon?
UltimateEnd
02-10-2004, 00:53
The reason I ask is because I hear Republicans talk about what a great economy Reagan gave us, and that it was Reagan, not Clinton, who gave us the nineties' prosperity, and Democrats say Reagan flushed the economy down the toilet and then Bill pulled it out and made things well again. It'll be interesting to see the Reaganites and Clintonites spar over this one.
Truer than I want to think about
Suppose Reagan were alive and Presidents were not limited to two terms and Reagan was young enough and didn't have Alzheimer's. Suppose, then, that he ran against Clinton. Who would you vote for?
And not dead...
Laissez Nous Faire
02-10-2004, 00:56
One brought the Soviet Union to its knees and one brought a fat bird to her knees. Tough choice! :rolleyes:
La Terra di Liberta
02-10-2004, 00:57
And not dead...
Ya, generally the President needs to be alive to run for re-election. I would vote for Clinton though.
Shoobooshaaba
02-10-2004, 01:04
He said "suppose Reagan were still alive," didn't he?
Kwangistar
02-10-2004, 01:07
Viva la Reagan Revolution
Kleptonis
02-10-2004, 01:15
Clinton. He cheated on his wife and lied about it when it was pretty obvious. Thats the kind of thing that tells you that a politician is in touch with the average American.
Seriously though, Clinton. His beliefs are closer to mine than Reagan.
Tuesday Heights
02-10-2004, 01:28
I've always loved Clinton from the very beginning, and even though Reagan did a lot, IMHO, I think Clinton did more for the future than Reagan ever did for the present.
Sdaeriji
02-10-2004, 01:40
Both of them had the foresight to get elected during economic upswings. Kudos to them.