NationStates Jolt Archive


Corporate Terrorism shuts NM's only leftwing radio station

MKULTRA
01-10-2004, 05:49
*and rightwingers claim its cause enlightened views cant "compete" on the airwaves...

Back in May of this year, radio station KNFT in Silver City, New Mexico began airing a new local talk show called "Radio Free Silver!" The one-hour morning program was broadcast five days a week and hosted by Kyle Johnson - member of the Grant County Peace Coalition.
Radio Free Silver! was the sole hour of liberal programming amidst a slew of right-wing talk on KNFT's air - including seven hours of Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly and Michael Savage.

But after just two months Radio Free Silver! was off the air. Why? Because 20 to 25 of the station's advertisers threatened to pull their spots from all KNFT programming if Radio Free Silver! continued to be aired. KNFT's owner and station manager was faced with $10,000 a month in lost advertising revenue and was forced to drop the show.


AMY GOODMAN: It’s great to be with you here. Matthew Runnels, can you describe what happened when the trouble started? You're the station manager.

MATTHEW RUNNELS: Good morning, Amy. I appreciate you having Kyle and I on. Good morning, Juan, to you also. Essentially, like you said, I made the decision, one day that Kyle had come in with another gentleman, and had spoken on another morning show that we had from 7:00 to 9:00 a.m., and I should say these were on our AM Station. We have an AM and FM combination here. After Kyle had gotten off the air, I caught a bit of controversy of people calling, saying did you hear them, did you know what they're talking about. I said no, but when Kyle walked out, I said you know what, Kyle, we evidently pushed a bunch of buttons there, so let's you and I look into doing a one-hour show. Essentially he at first was going to do it on Saturdays for one hour, and I convinced him that we need to try to do it five days a week. Once we got into it, like you said, there was a lot of turmoil over the show. We were threatened with a boycott by the Grant County Beef Association, and it just escalated into that. You know, $10,000 in New York is not a lot of money on a radio station. In Smalltown New Mexico, it's a tremendous amount. It's a large percentage. We just, because of pure economics had to pull the show.

AMY GOODMAN: Kyle Johnson, what did you think at the time? Can you talk about the content of your program?

KYLE JOHNSON: Yeah, Radio Free Silver!, as I would describe it in a short phrase, is liberal alternative progressive viewpoints on the full range of issues. It wasn't strictly political. The range of issues included environmental things, health issues, universal health care. There are a lot of local water issues in New Mexico. There were issues of domestic violence both from men's and women's viewpoints, other quality of life issues, dark skies, wolf reintroduction. The full gamut. During the two months we were on, I had approximately 40 guests. These were almost all local people. So, it wasn't just my voice that was being silenced it, was the voices of these members of the community as well as the right of the public to hear and evaluate for themselves the full range of ideas in the marketplace of ideas.

JUAN GONZALEZ: And Kyle, what did you do to get the Beef Association upset? Or what shows –

KYLE JOHNSON: I'm a vegetarian.

JUAN GONZALEZ: But aside from that did you have any guests specifically on the show that got –

KYLE JOHNSON: No. Actually, I live out in Gila, as I drive into Silver City, a half hour drive, which is populated heavily by folks who have cattle ranches. I see the big Pearce signs, not the ones that are two feet by three feet, but the ones that are six feet by eight feet. I think that the general tone of the show is one that they are very much opposed to. I think that Steven Pearce is -- I would not be surprised, certainly, if he's aware of this, but if he was even to some degree involved. So, I think it's a national issue. I think that kind of assessment is exactly what they didn't like. Because even though I would talk about a range of issues, I would always look at them with some sense that, okay it's a local issue here. But it's a national issue there. When you talk about universal health care, you can say, well, New Mexicans are not covered, but why is that? It's because there's opposition at the national level and it goes back to the beginning of the Clinton administration. It's probably why they were jumping on him for the entire eight years, because they wanted to make sure that was a non-starter. I think that those kinds of positions and policies and objectives that go out over years and cover large areas are fundamentally what's driving this.

AMY GOODMAN: Matthews Runnels, just a quick question to Matthew Runnels, the station manager, did the companies in town, the local businesses, approach you en mass, and did you say, I mean, you’ve got Rush Limbaugh, you’ve got Bill O'Reilly, you’ve got Michael Savage. Why not allow in another viewpoint?

MATTHEW RUNNELS: I was only approached by four or five. You have to remember I have five salesmen, and I was getting a lot of feedback from the salespeople on the streets. You know, so if you multiply the people that I personally spoke to by the five salespeople I have, that's where you come up with 20, 25, 30 people. No, it was not en mass. It was on a single basis. I did discuss that with them. And since then, we have changed some programming. We have a gentleman now named Ed Schultz that is on. Bill O'Reilly is on. We changed him from his spot from 2:00 to 4:00 in the afternoon to 7:00 to 9:00 at night. We don't run Michael Savage anymore. But yes, I did discuss that with them. Every time I listened to Kyle's show, because I am so busy, and I don't have time to sit and listen to the radio all the time -- every time I tuned in, and I tuned in -- well, I don't know, four times, five times, they were talking about voter registration, people getting out and talking, you know, getting registered to vote and expressing their points of view and water issues, which are very important to everybody. And, so, I never did see the content of the show ever being that offensive. Also, you know, Kyle's a very intelligence, articulate gentleman, and in a free society, if you don't have debate, and you don't have somebody talking about other issues and discussing it, then you essentially just have a censorship, it's really quite sad what has transpired.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Matthew, have you ever been approached by advertisers complaining they would drop their advertising for Rush Limbaugh or Bill O'Reilly or Michael Savage?

MATTHEW RUNNELS: You know, we do. On a national basis and on a local basis, there are a lot of people that don't want to be associated with any of that talk. Because, you know, they don't want to look like they're either on the right or on the left, or anywhere. They just don't. In fact, it's quite difficult to find anybody to do any of those shows, and at times we have looked at just dropping all of the talk shows, and going to a music format.

JUAN GONZALEZ: So, in terms of the reaction to Kyle's show, what was markedly different, then, about that?

MATTHEW RUNNELS: It was just pure out and out blackmail. It was so venomous. I was shocked by the venomous remarks that I was getting back from the salespeople and hearing myself, and I was pretty shocked and stunned and pretty disappointed more than anything, because I really thought that everybody was human enough that they would -- even if they didn't agree -- because I don't agree 100% with what I do. There's many a day that I wake up and go, what was I thinking? It was the type of scenario that I thought they would respect each other as one human to another and allow it to keep going. It kept escalating to the point where it got to be economic blackmail.
www.democracynow.org
Penguinista
01-10-2004, 06:33
And how is this corporate terrorism?
MKULTRA
01-10-2004, 06:51
And how is this corporate terrorism?
because thru media concolidation only corporate propaganda is allowed to be aired while real news that exposes the truth about the war and other things gets censored
Isanyonehome
01-10-2004, 06:56
And how is this corporate terrorism?

beats me, looks like free markets and free will at work.
MKULTRA
01-10-2004, 06:59
beats me, looks like free markets and free will at work.
how is it a free market and free will when it all controlled by evil corporate monopolies who have to use economic terrorism against anyone who tries to compete?
Isanyonehome
01-10-2004, 07:00
because thru media concolidation only corporate propaganda is allowed to be aired while real news that exposes the truth about the war and other things gets censored

Yeah, keep drinking that kool aid.
BoomChakalaka
01-10-2004, 16:25
how is it a free market and free will when it all controlled by evil corporate monopolies who have to use economic terrorism against anyone who tries to compete?
I don't think you understand what terrorism really is.
Eutrusca
01-10-2004, 16:29
how is it a free market and free will when it all controlled by evil corporate monopolies who have to use economic terrorism against anyone who tries to compete?

Um ... like choose to follow the law?
Chess Squares
01-10-2004, 16:31
Um ... like choose to follow the law?
i think your in the wrong topic

this is a LEGAL station that had a program shut down for airing liberal talk shows
Biff Pileon
01-10-2004, 16:37
how is it a free market and free will when it all controlled by evil corporate monopolies who have to use economic terrorism against anyone who tries to compete?

Wow....you really have lost your mind. I mean really. If advertisers do not want to support something they don't have to. That the program was not "economically viable" does not equate to terrorism as you assert.
BoomChakalaka
01-10-2004, 16:47
this is a LEGAL station that had a program shut down for airing liberal talk shows
That's the nature of the market. When you promote views that don't sit well with the sponsors of a station, you'd better be able to replace those sponsors or you're going to be asked to leave. It's not evil, and it's not terrorism.
Chess Squares
01-10-2004, 16:50
That's the nature of the market. When you promote views that don't sit well with the sponsors of a station, you'd better be able to replace those sponsors or you're going to be asked to leave. It's not evil, and it's not terrorism.
its practically terrorism, you threaten to do something to get whatever you want done done. this is abuse by the corporations to keep left wing media off the airwaves.
Hajekistan
01-10-2004, 21:55
This wasn't anti-leftist diplodunk terrorism, if you actually read through Matthew Runnels even admits that there are people who come to them and threaten to pull funding if Rush isn't dropped. However, Rush is entertaining enough and pulls in enough listener's that he gets to stay, obviously Mr. Runnels here wasn't very good or popular, and as such he wasn't worth the potential cost.
This is what happens in the mystical, magical place most of us know as The Real World. Furthermore, this shifting of the ranks (a relatively regular occurence to ensure that each radio hour is keeping their ratings as high as physically possible) wasn't targetted at Runnels, Michael Savage (who is not only anti-liberal, but crazy, conspiracy theory, foaming at the mouth anti-liberal/government) was also dropped. Now, ask yourself this, why would Conservative Corportate Terrorists Inc. take down a Conservative attack dog?
Tuesday Heights
02-10-2004, 01:36
I love you MKULTRA, but, do you ever use citations from anywhere BUT democracynow?
Kwangistar
02-10-2004, 01:37
I love you MKULTRA, but, do you ever use citations from anywhere BUT democracynow?
I saw him use Indymedia once.
Penguinista
02-10-2004, 01:39
Once again, how is it propoganda? Because the corporations refused to pay for crap? Therefore they're evil? They didn't pull the show, the station did, because it was hurt because the advertisers didn't want to be associated with it.

And, being someone whose been to Iraq, I seriously doubt these yahoos knew the "truth" about Iraq.
Chess Squares
02-10-2004, 01:49
Once again, how is it propoganda? Because the corporations refused to pay for crap? Therefore they're evil? They didn't pull the show, the station did, because it was hurt because the advertisers didn't want to be associated with it.

And, being someone whose been to Iraq, I seriously doubt these yahoos knew the "truth" about Iraq.
lets try "blackmail" instead
BoomChakalaka
02-10-2004, 02:13
lets try "blackmail" instead
Well if that station were indeed economically viable, they would have been able to find enough sponsors that agreed with their message. They didn't, therefore they were shut down.

Basically these companies are paying the radio station for ad space. They have determined that their product or service is best targeted to conservative consumers. They realize that they don't make any money when they advertise to liberal consumers. So when they realize they are paying for ads to run during a liberal show (when their target audience isn't listening) they decide to take their money elsewhere. Since the station doesn't want to lose that revenue, they cancel the show since it makes more financial sense than looking for new sponsors.

It's called business, and that's how it works.
Unfree People
02-10-2004, 02:23
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, because NM doesn't have ANY other left leaning stations in the ENTIRE state. Oh, my mistake then, guess they all disappeared in the month that I haven't been there.
MKULTRA
02-10-2004, 02:24
Um ... like choose to follow the law?
we're under no moral obligation to follow laws that disempower the people
MKULTRA
02-10-2004, 02:27
Wow....you really have lost your mind. I mean really. If advertisers do not want to support something they don't have to. That the program was not "economically viable" does not equate to terrorism as you assert.
its psychological terrorism because theyre trying to force broadcasters to only air corporate propaganda
MKULTRA
02-10-2004, 02:28
That's the nature of the market. When you promote views that don't sit well with the sponsors of a station, you'd better be able to replace those sponsors or you're going to be asked to leave. It's not evil, and it's not terrorism.
yes it is evil cause the sponsors have no right to dictate what can and cannot be said. This is mind control thru economic terrorism
MKULTRA
02-10-2004, 02:34
I love you MKULTRA, but, do you ever use citations from anywhere BUT democracynow?
yeah Im starten to expand my horizons
MKULTRA
02-10-2004, 02:37
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, because NM doesn't have ANY other left leaning stations in the ENTIRE state. Oh, my mistake then, guess they all disappeared in the month that I haven't been there.
that was the only leftwing radio station in all of New Mexico--now all that remains there is the hate media
Tuesday Heights
02-10-2004, 02:42
yeah Im starten to expand my horizons

YAY!
MKULTRA
02-10-2004, 02:48
YAY!
:D I know use indymedia and freakradio too
Star Shadow-
02-10-2004, 03:39
of course this is corpate terrorism its obivous the show wasn't popular enough so they pulled out the money they were spending it obiovously greedy and completely targeted at destroying the left, so firgin obivous.
Star Shadow-
02-10-2004, 03:48
this thread defused
MKULTRA
02-10-2004, 04:01
this thread defused
the left will only get louder
Cannot think of a name
02-10-2004, 04:01
That's the nature of the market. When you promote views that don't sit well with the sponsors of a station, you'd better be able to replace those sponsors or you're going to be asked to leave. It's not evil, and it's not terrorism.
Well, that's sort of the problem, isn't it? I mean, if we stopped to think about the ramifications of what happens here instead of kneejerk jumping on MKULTRA (though I agree he could help himself out a lot by doing this part himself...)

Sure, it is the free market and yes advertisers have the right to support whatever they want. BUT-these are advertisers not making a decision based on market-how many impressions their advertising dollar will make, but on content. In effect, they are dictating content to such a degree that they control a disproportionate amount of what we hear and what we see. What is being presented here is not that this isn't the way things are, clearly this is exactly how things are. Whats being presented is that that is the problem. It is a large problem that doesn't have a simple answer, and it takes some activity on our part to want and need those other voices-YOUR voice, but just like any addiction the first step is admiting there is a problem.

What's the good of saying we have free speech if no one can hear you?

The free market has no interest in allowing you to participate. There has to be mediation, otherwise eventually someone wins the game of Monopoly, and thats only really good for them.
Panhandlia
02-10-2004, 04:03
beats me, looks like free markets and free will at work.
The free market wins again!
Panhandlia
02-10-2004, 04:04
i think your in the wrong topic

this is a LEGAL station that had a program shut down for airing liberal talk shows
The forces of economics triumph again.
Panhandlia
02-10-2004, 04:07
its practically terrorism, you threaten to do something to get whatever you want done done. this is abuse by the corporations to keep left wing media off the airwaves.
You haven't given much time to the thought that perhaps the advertisers realized their sponsorship of such a program would lose them money? Radio stations (TV too) can sustain themselves through the sale of advertisements. However, I am sure the station will be glad to put that show back on the air, if the producer will pay for all the advertising time that the station loses.

Again, the free market rules.
Panhandlia
02-10-2004, 04:08
I saw him use Indymedia once.
Democracynow and Indymedia...wow, double dose of Kool-Aid for TRA.
Panhandlia
02-10-2004, 04:09
the left will only get louder
Or, in your case, weirder.
EmoBuddy
02-10-2004, 04:21
that was the only leftwing radio station in all of New Mexico--now all that remains there is the hate media

Then start your own radio station and find funding and sponsors for it. If no one is willing to pay to be associated with your ideas, it isn't terrorism, it's the market, buddy, like it or not.
EmoBuddy
02-10-2004, 04:24
of course this is corpate terrorism its obivous the show wasn't popular enough so they pulled out the money they were spending it obiovously greedy and completely targeted at destroying the left, so firgin obivous.

And I'm sure if YOU ran a radio station you would REALLY want a conservative viewpoint on it - they're all 'terrorists.' Owners of private enterprises are free to do as they please, whether their decisions be influenced by funding or not.
Hajekistan
02-10-2004, 05:08
And I'm sure if YOU ran a radio station you would REALLY want a conservative viewpoint on it - they're all 'terrorists.' Owners of private enterprises are free to do as they please, whether their decisions be influenced by funding or not.
You're right, corporations are allowed to everything. Well, except commit murder.
Everything but Murder than. Well, Murder and lying to the public, but otherwisse they are never evercharged with anything.
Yeah, that sounds right Murder, Lying, and Theft. Yes, those and Slavery.
So that is the final list: Murder, Lying, Theft, and Slavery, ok, and Treason.
Oh yes, and Rape.
So there are no laws on corporations except they can't Lie, Steal, Rape, Murder, or commit Treason.
Yes, just like those motorcycle gangs of Mad Max, roaming the country side, pulling their wantonly funding from anyone who gets in their way.
MKULTRA
02-10-2004, 05:21
You haven't given much time to the thought that perhaps the advertisers realized their sponsorship of such a program would lose them money? Radio stations (TV too) can sustain themselves through the sale of advertisements. However, I am sure the station will be glad to put that show back on the air, if the producer will pay for all the advertising time that the station loses.

Again, the free market rules.
if the free markets always winning then why is there no democracy on our airwaves?
MKULTRA
02-10-2004, 05:23
Then start your own radio station and find funding and sponsors for it. If no one is willing to pay to be associated with your ideas, it isn't terrorism, it's the market, buddy, like it or not.
the market has no right to tell people what opinions they can hear--thats corporate facism
Hajekistan
02-10-2004, 07:58
the market has no right to tell people what opinions they can hear--thats corporate facism
Except for the fact that it is the people that tell the markets what they want to here.
Limbaugh has come under similar fire, and yet he is still around because enough people listen to him. Obviously, this guy was dumped because not enough people liked him to justify the hastle with advertisors.
BoomChakalaka
02-10-2004, 14:05
the market has no right to tell people what opinions they can hear--thats corporate facism
You just don't understand... the market IS WHAT PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO SPEND MONEY ON. If the market doesn't support something, that means that the people don't want it. The market is a direct reflection of what is popular and what people want.
MKULTRA
03-10-2004, 01:59
You just don't understand... the market IS WHAT PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO SPEND MONEY ON. If the market doesn't support something, that means that the people don't want it. The market is a direct reflection of what is popular and what people want.
thats not true--the market is manipultaed by self serving corporate maggots who have their own special interest agenda
Star Shadow-
03-10-2004, 04:26
go hang yourself anyhow, Corperations who don't want to advetrise don't gasp, this is true when they think they won't make money gasp, and when they don't want to support a PRODUCT NOT TO THEIR LIKING :eek: :eek: :eek:
Sileetris
03-10-2004, 05:48
While there is nothing technically wrong with this, the problem I think MKULTRA is trying to hint at is the cultural trend of one mindset gaining superiority and eventually crushing the other. Those already in the 'winning' mindset see no problem with this, the 'losing' mindset however feels it is being oppressed and a social regime is forming. The problem with one side dominating like this is that neither side is totally correct; they need one another for the criticism that leads to evolution. Without a semblance of balance, society will eventually overturn catastrophically rather than correcting itself in increments. Naturally, no one is going to(or is capable of) enforcing such a balance, so you'll watch each side fight tooth and nail until a revolution occurs.

Basically:
If A=B
then we get AB, which is as stable as possible
If A>B or B>A
then we get an imbalance that leads to violent uprising by the minority
If A~=B
then we slowly build up hatred and get an organized fight
Diamond Mind
03-10-2004, 10:17
Wasn't Savage dropped from radio to take a spot on MSNBC when they booted Donahue? And Rush can't be dropped for advertising support, he has the support of the largest media conglomeration in the world- Clear Channel. They pretty much determine everything we listen to in the US now, clear channel only plays music from clear channel labels and they own entire markets leaving zero competition, is that what's being heralded as "free" market. If free means you have one and only one choice then yeah.
Violets and Kitties
03-10-2004, 12:09
The free market wins again!

Wrong.

In a free market the show would succeed or fail on its own merits. Businesses get to choose which time slots during which they will pay to have their ads ran. I will agree that no one should force businesses to run ads during shows that the business owners do not agree with or that they think will not garner them enough revenue. Had the show been pulled because its time slot could not receive enough advertising dollars, that would have been the consequences of a free market.

In this case, however, the show was pulled because certain businesses were threatening to remove advertising from ALL time slots if this one show that they did not like was removed. They were not just exercising their right not to advertise during the show. That is corporate dictatorship of content.

Get the difference?
Tamarket
03-10-2004, 13:46
This is why I hate the Right Wing. They use financial brute force to quell all opposing viewpoints. They do this because they twist the facts to such a degree that any sane person would not believe a thing they say.
Eutrusca
03-10-2004, 13:49
"Corporate terrorism!" Aaahahahahahahahahahhahahahahaha!
MKULTRA
03-10-2004, 23:59
While there is nothing technically wrong with this, the problem I think MKULTRA is trying to hint at is the cultural trend of one mindset gaining superiority and eventually crushing the other. Those already in the 'winning' mindset see no problem with this, the 'losing' mindset however feels it is being oppressed and a social regime is forming. The problem with one side dominating like this is that neither side is totally correct; they need one another for the criticism that leads to evolution. Without a semblance of balance, society will eventually overturn catastrophically rather than correcting itself in increments. Naturally, no one is going to(or is capable of) enforcing such a balance, so you'll watch each side fight tooth and nail until a revolution occurs.

Basically:
If A=B
then we get AB, which is as stable as possible
If A>B or B>A
then we get an imbalance that leads to violent uprising by the minority
If A~=B
then we slowly build up hatred and get an organized fightI agree that civilization will crumble when anti-human rightwing values predomonate
_Susa_
04-10-2004, 00:17
beats me, looks like free markets and free will at work.
voila!
Comestibles
04-10-2004, 00:28
So privately owned companies should be forced to sponsor radio programs they don't like? What's the quota for country music DJs? At least one Dixie Chicks song per hour? Who are the real totalitarians here?


Some people need a crash course on how the First Amendment actually works. And others might prefer to spend their lives in a socialist paradise like Cuba or North Korea.
Tehok
04-10-2004, 00:42
I don't care who the Feds raid, just as long as they don't take my weed and masterbation privilages.
Penguinista
04-10-2004, 01:13
Why is this even still on the front page? This is an idiotic issue. GO AWAY NON-SENSICAL ANTI-CORPORATE ANARCHIST WANNABE'S!
Sileetris
04-10-2004, 01:20
*sigh* This event is just a tiny hint at the mounting social problems that threaten the stability of civilization in general. Everyone here reacting to it the way they are only prove this further.

No one knows the definition of compromise! Rightwingers and leftwingers alike, instead of swallowing their pride and listening to one another, have decided to retreat behind walls of non-negotiable ideology. Fundamentalists are getting crazier by the day, and the normals are slowly following them.

Rightwingers are becoming more and more intolerant and impersonal.

Leftwingers are becoming more and more unrealistic and idealistic.

(both are hypocritical to extreme degrees in any category anyway)

Neither side would make a good permanent society, but they refuse to listen to one anothers complaints. And the worst part is, they hate eachother and purposely try to piss eachother off!

Political parties, by definition, are horrible, stupid entities. Uniting and indoctrinating people under something, with no alternative besides another just-as-evil something, is a recipe for collapse. Political parties are just big mobs, not competant and educated policy making entities.

Imagine a two-headed ogre; the heads hate eachother and each control their own half of the body. They decide to fight and pick up big clubs, then start pounding eachother unconcious. It tries this on a regular basis, meaning it is almost constantly weak and bruised. The only thing the two heads ever agree on is their domination of the various smaller goblins, and even then their opion differs from case to case. One day they are fighting and...... Ooops! One knocks the other out, and suddenly the ogre cannot function.
Gurnee
04-10-2004, 04:14
So much for freedom of the press in America... it was nice while it lasted
MKULTRA
04-10-2004, 08:11
So privately owned companies should be forced to sponsor radio programs they don't like? What's the quota for country music DJs? At least one Dixie Chicks song per hour? Who are the real totalitarians here?


Some people need a crash course on how the First Amendment actually works. And others might prefer to spend their lives in a socialist paradise like Cuba or North Korea.
thats not the issue--the issue is communistic media concolidation
MKULTRA
04-10-2004, 08:12
I don't care who the Feds raid, just as long as they don't take my weed and masterbation privilages.
they want your weed