Siniestro
22-09-2004, 16:00
Dan Rather made a mistake. He showed the world documents that questioned Bush's National Guard Service record (or lack thereof, I should say). The problem with the documents is that they cannot be authenticated. For this whole mess, Dan Rather apologized. He admitted on national tv Monday that he made a mistake.
Yet the Republicans are calling for his head.
I find it kind of ironic. Ironic that Dan Rather made a mistake and the republicans are not willing to forgive and forget. Dan Rather's mistake didn't kill a single person, though.
George Bush, on the other hand, made a very big mistake in March of 2003. He went on national tv and lied to the world and said Saddam had WMD's and that our freedoms were "being threatened". He said we were going to attack Iraq against the UN and international law.
Then, on May 1, 2003, Bush went out in his crotch-stuffed air suit and declared end of major combat and proclaimed "mission accomplished".
I find it kind of funny. Since Bush proclaimed "mission accomplished", the state of Iraq has gotten worse. Iraq is on the verge of civil war. There's killings and suffering being shown on the news every day. Yet, Bush walks around and says the Iraqis are much better off then they ever have been. Try telling the Iraqis that, Bush.
So, what is the result of Bush's mistake and lies to the world? 14,800 innocent Iraqi civilians have been killed since the beginning of the war. (http://www.iraqbodycount.net/) 7,350 of those deaths happened during "major combat" prior to May 2003. Up to this very moment, 1,038 of our soldiers have died, all the result of a lie made by Bush. (http://icasualties.org/oif/) 139 deaths occured in the period of March-May of 2003. The rest of the casualties happened after "major combat" was over.
My point is, is that, instead of attacking Dan Rather--who had the courage to go on tv and admit he made a mistake and that he should've investigated the source of the documents more thouroughly--why don't you republicans attack your leader and president on sending your husbands, wives, children to fight in Iraq based on lies and forged documents? Why don't you force Bush to go on international tv and have him admit that he lied about the reasons for going to war in Iraq? Why don't you ever question Bush about the whole Iraq quagmire? Because of Bush's lies, thousands of people died and thousands more are injured, and Iraq is in the makings of a civil war.
Yet you all attack Dan Rather for his lies and for him misleading the country. :mad:
Yet the Republicans are calling for his head.
I find it kind of ironic. Ironic that Dan Rather made a mistake and the republicans are not willing to forgive and forget. Dan Rather's mistake didn't kill a single person, though.
George Bush, on the other hand, made a very big mistake in March of 2003. He went on national tv and lied to the world and said Saddam had WMD's and that our freedoms were "being threatened". He said we were going to attack Iraq against the UN and international law.
Then, on May 1, 2003, Bush went out in his crotch-stuffed air suit and declared end of major combat and proclaimed "mission accomplished".
I find it kind of funny. Since Bush proclaimed "mission accomplished", the state of Iraq has gotten worse. Iraq is on the verge of civil war. There's killings and suffering being shown on the news every day. Yet, Bush walks around and says the Iraqis are much better off then they ever have been. Try telling the Iraqis that, Bush.
So, what is the result of Bush's mistake and lies to the world? 14,800 innocent Iraqi civilians have been killed since the beginning of the war. (http://www.iraqbodycount.net/) 7,350 of those deaths happened during "major combat" prior to May 2003. Up to this very moment, 1,038 of our soldiers have died, all the result of a lie made by Bush. (http://icasualties.org/oif/) 139 deaths occured in the period of March-May of 2003. The rest of the casualties happened after "major combat" was over.
My point is, is that, instead of attacking Dan Rather--who had the courage to go on tv and admit he made a mistake and that he should've investigated the source of the documents more thouroughly--why don't you republicans attack your leader and president on sending your husbands, wives, children to fight in Iraq based on lies and forged documents? Why don't you force Bush to go on international tv and have him admit that he lied about the reasons for going to war in Iraq? Why don't you ever question Bush about the whole Iraq quagmire? Because of Bush's lies, thousands of people died and thousands more are injured, and Iraq is in the makings of a civil war.
Yet you all attack Dan Rather for his lies and for him misleading the country. :mad: