NationStates Jolt Archive


HA! Take that, Neocons!

Keruvalia
21-09-2004, 22:57
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/state/9722285.htm?1c

32 felony indictments returned in DeLay case

By Jay Root and John Moritz

Star-Telegram Austin Bureau

AUSTIN - A Travis County grand jury returned 32 indictments in the 2002 Republican fund-raising investigation Tuesday, alleging felony election code violations against a top aide to U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land, the head of a political group DeLay founded and eight corporations that provided money for their activities.

Among the companies indicted on grounds that corporate money was illegally funneled into the 2002 legislative elections were Sears and Roebuck, Westar Energy Inc., Cracker Barrel Old Country Store and Bacardi USA.

Three people were indicted: John Colyandro, former executive director of Texans for a Republican Majority, a group DeLay founded; Warren RoBold, a DeLay fund-raiser; and Jim Ellis, a top DeLay political aide.

An attorney for DeLay, Steve Brittain, said the congressman was cooperating fully with the investigation spearheaded by Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle. But Brittain raised questions about the timing of the indictments, issued just a few weeks before the 2004 elections. "All of these people felt very comfortable that they were not violating the law, that they were following the rules as they understood them," Brittain said. "On behalf of Congressman DeLay, we agree, we don't believe that anyone intentionally violated the law."

Earle, a Democrat, said the indictments stem from a 22-month investigation his office made into Republican fund raising on behalf of Texas House candidates during the 2002 election cycle. He said the investigation will continue after the present grand jury's term expires on Sept. 30.

"Texas law makes it a felony to both give and receive political contributions from corporations and labor unions," Earle said during an afternoon news conference. "In the fall of 2002, after the Texas Association of Business boasted that it had engaged in the wholesale flaunting of that law, this office began its investigation."

It was not immediately clear whether Earle intends to seek additional indictments, but he did say that more work remains to be done.

Republicans have suggested that Earle's investigation was politically motivated, and at one point GOP Gov. Rick Perry suggested that the district attorney was on a "witch hunt."

But speaking with reporters before the indictments were unveiled, Perry said that he, like most Texans, supports "the grand jury system."

That's what happens when you try to take Texas away from the people. Bastards.
Gymoor
21-09-2004, 23:27
How much do you want to bet that some conservative will complain that the courts have a liberal bias?
Chess Squares
21-09-2004, 23:31
How much do you want to bet that some conservative will complain that the courts have a liberal bias?
are you kidding? conservatives never shut up about liberal courts creating laws.

of course o conner and scalia and rehnquist and thomas are SOOOOO liberal
Cannot think of a name
21-09-2004, 23:45
How much do you want to bet that some conservative will complain that the courts have a liberal bias?
They did it in the article.

Witch hunt. That's rich, coming from them......
Kwangistar
22-09-2004, 00:10
are you kidding? conservatives never shut up about liberal courts creating laws.

of course o conner and scalia and rehnquist and thomas are SOOOOO liberal
As opposed to Souter, Bader-Ginsberg, Stevens, and Breyer?
CSW
22-09-2004, 00:16
are you kidding? conservatives never shut up about liberal courts creating laws.

of course o conner and scalia and rehnquist and thomas are SOOOOO liberal
I <3 Scalia. Honestly. Even though I hate his politics, I just love him, he is so funny.
Chess Squares
22-09-2004, 00:18
As opposed to Souter, Bader-Ginsberg, Stevens, and Breyer?
lets not forget kennedy for the conservatives
Mr Basil Fawlty
22-09-2004, 00:19
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/state/9722285.htm?1c



That's what happens when you try to take Texas away from the people. Bastards.

What do you expected, Republicans will allways cheat and be fascist bastards.
http://www.atmo.se/zino.aspx?articleID=399&documentID=334&pageID=44 :p
Auraterraxis
22-09-2004, 00:20
Truly a great day in American history. :D
Incertonia
22-09-2004, 00:24
If only they'd indicted Delay. God, I hope one of these people rolls on him.
Kwangistar
22-09-2004, 00:27
lets not forget kennedy for the conservatives
That would make it 5-4 in favor of the conservative justicies... which it is, sometimes. If O'Connor voted with the Republican/Conservative side as much as the other 4 do, you'd have a real point, but she dosen't.
Chess Squares
22-09-2004, 00:49
That would make it 5-4 in favor of the conservative justicies... which it is, sometimes. If O'Connor voted with the Republican/Conservative side as much as the other 4 do, you'd have a real point, but she dosen't.
but she leans conservative more often then the other "liberal" justices, so your attempt at a point dies before it gets there
Kwangistar
22-09-2004, 00:54
but she leans conservative more often then the other "liberal" justices, so your attempt at a point dies before it gets there
I said she leaned conservative, so I really don't see what the point of your post was besides to knock up your post count.
Chess Squares
22-09-2004, 00:57
I said she leaned conservative, so I really don't see what the point of your post was besides to knock up your post count.
you said she leaned conservative, but it wasnt your point. your point is she didnt vote as conservative as the other conservatives. MY point, on the other hand, is that point is moot because she often votesm ore conservatively than liberally

so bravo on boosting your post count
Incertonia
22-09-2004, 00:58
Come on guys--O'Connor is either liberal leaning or conservative leaning depending on your point of view and the issue before her, which means GASP! she's a moderate.
Keruvalia
22-09-2004, 01:21
Well, as it stands right now, the entire Texas Supreme Court is full of moralist republicons. Our only hope is David Van Os, who is running for Texas Supreme Court.

According to the numbers, David has a chance of winning. I've met with him on several occasions and I find him to be friendly, sincere, and a true Texan in every sense of the word. He's got my vote!
Incertonia
22-09-2004, 01:31
Well, best of luck with it. I keep up with Texas politics occasionally by checking in at the Burnt Orange Report weblog and by reading Molly Ivins whenever I can.
Menoparchia
22-09-2004, 01:41
I, for one, am very glad that none of the Supreme Court justices announced their retirement while Bush is president. Especially the more liberal ones.

I have been keeping up on the parade of conservative federal judge nominations that Bush has marched before the Senate for confirmation. Guys who say that women should be subservient to their husbands, or who say that women get pregnant from rape about as often as it snows in Miami (try quintuple digits yearly, moron).

The last thing we need is for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v Wade or to support the Patriot Act, or agree that America is a Christian Nation. god help us all.
Atomerica
22-09-2004, 01:42
Guys! *The point* was not that the Supreme Court is conservative (it tends to run moderate to slightly conservative), simply that isn't liberal, as many conservatives claim all courts are. And that point is quite accurate.

Just like the media, right? Because, after all, the media just looooved Al Gore. John Kerry too.