NationStates Jolt Archive

The plot thickens.

http://www.bluelemur.com/index.php?p=301

The plot thickens.

http://www.bluelemur.com/index.php?p=301

Maybe not the plot, but definately the BS does. Nice unbiased website you have there. Heck I just found some secret documents that prove that Bush smoked opium and was the real killer OJ has been serching for. I'm also sure that they prove Bush and Kerry were part of the Manson family and committed many numerous "atrocities".

BTW I have some "proof" that Kerry has a love child with a black woman from Ethiopia, and that Bush personally blew up an abortion clinic.

These things must be true as I just put them on the internet.


"The internet...Is that thing still around?" Homer

Maybe not the plot, but definately the BS does. Nice unbiased website you have there. Heck I just found some secret documents that prove that Bush smoked opium and was the real killer OJ has been serching for. I'm also sure that they prove Bush and Kerry were part of the Manson family and committed many numerous "atrocities".

BTW I have some "proof" that Kerry has a love child with a black woman from Ethiopia, and that Bush personally blew up an abortion clinic.

These things must be true as I just put them on the internet.


"The internet...Is that thing still around?" Homer

Does the source matter if the information is true? Hey, I have an idea. How about you come up with an actual argument against the evidence, and then we can intelligently talk?

Remember, it was partisan Republican bloggers who first uncovered the problems with the CBS documents.

MEH!

The whole Viet Nam National guard thing is nothing more then smoke and mirrors.

It takes away from the critical questions.....

Does the source matter if the information is true? Hey, I have an idea. How about you come up with an actual argument against the evidence, and then we can intelligently talk?
Yes, the source is of utmost importance as to the credibility of the information.
The fact that a partisan website posts things up makes them no more credible that the things MoeHoward posted.

Remember, it was partisan Republican bloggers who first uncovered the problems with the CBS documents.
Your first paragraph asserts that the source of the documents doesnt matter if the information is true, yet your second paragraph casts doubt on the fact that it was "republican bloggers" who first uncovered the problems with CBS.

Which way is it?

Does the source matter if the information is true? Hey, I have an idea. How about you come up with an actual argument against the evidence, and then we can intelligently talk?

Remember, it was partisan Republican bloggers who first uncovered the problems with the CBS documents.

Yes it does matter what the source is. But in regards to truth, that is an entirely different matter. This whole awol thing has been going around for years, and guess what? Nothing has stuck to Bush! Maybe that is because there is no truth to these charges? Anyway, this awol arguement is really falling on deaf ears as the American people by and large DO NOT care about them. In fact, his polling numbers are going up, and people are getting tired of these charges as well. The CBS forged documents are proof of all the hatred on the left for the President, and the American people are sick of it.

Truth must be proven by those people making the charges, and as of yet they haven't proven any awol charges.

PS-I really can't talk to you as I am typing a response. If you want my phone number to talk to me sorry I don't give that out as there are many psychopaths around.

Does the source matter if the information is true? Hey, I have an idea. How about you come up with an actual argument against the evidence, and then we can intelligently talk?

Remember, it was partisan Republican bloggers who first uncovered the problems with the CBS documents.

Actually, the source DOES matter, unless your Dan Rather.

Dan Rather was exploited by republican forgerers. It appears now that Bush had his original military records burnt to hide his AWOL and failing marks and he forged all these new documents--does the sleaze ever end with this deranged administration?

Dan Rather was exploited by republican forgerers. It appears now that Bush had his original military records burnt to hide his AWOL and failing marks and he forged all these new documents--does the sleaze ever end with this deranged administration?
Do the facts ever begin with your posts?

Dan Rather was exploited by republican forgerers. It appears now that Bush had his original military records burnt to hide his AWOL and failing marks and he forged all these new documents--does the sleaze ever end with this deranged administration?

Wow. And you think the right propagates conspiracy theories???

That's impressive, MKULTRA.

Just how does it "appear" that way?

Wow. And you think the right propagates conspiracy theories???

That's impressive, MKULTRA.

Just how does it "appear" that way?
remeber the timely fire that burnt Bushs military records?

remeber the timely fire that burnt Bushs military records?

Just as well as I remember any other "timely" event in political history. But how does that justify the statement that " Dan Rather was exploited by republican forgerers"? Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds?

remeber the timely fire that burnt Bushs military records?

Remember the time Sandy (Ham)Burgler stuffed national security documents down his tighty whitey's?

Remember how those law firm papers somehow showed up on Hillarys' desk after they were missing for years?

So many "vast right-wing conspiracies" , so little time.

Just as well as I remember any other "timely" event in political history. But how does that justify the statement that " Dan Rather was exploited by republican forgerers"? Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds?
yes--its sounds rediculous enuf to be totally true