NationStates Jolt Archive

pssh, when ann coulter can write a single paper without insulting liberals or democrats i will petition the local government to become the town idiot and dress up in a jester suit and dance in the city square
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/ac000320.shtml

Please take a video of you dancing in your jester suit so that we might all enjoy your crowning as the town idiot. Remember, you said it, we didn't.

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/.../ac000320.shtml

Please take a video of you dancing in your jester suit so that we might all enjoy your crowning as the town idiot. Remember, you said it, we didn't.

this link isnt working, i had to go to the townhall site and find the article by hand

I actually thought he already had that position.... ;)

i guess now its official

this link isnt working, i had to go to the townhall site and find the article by hand

I think I fixed the link.. it worked for me when I tested it.
Now if only Chess would see this.. I think he has me on ignore :(

I think Chess Squares can feel confident in never having to fulfill his promise. I just read the article and it is blatantly anti-liberal. Considering the number of times Coulter's lamblasted Liberals and Democrats for being against racial profiling and this etire article is about how wonderful cops ignored that and ended up shooting an innocent man (abeit a stupid one who didn't listen to them, but this post isn't an argument about their actions, which I support) before finally finding the real perpertrator 6 years later.
How can you say it isn't an attack on Liberals and Democrats when it has such lovely quotes as:
the rapes began back in the David Dinkins administration
Any particular reason for Coulter to put this snippet in, other than that Dinkins is a Democrat? What exactly does he have to do with it?

You might not have heard about those 51 victims of barbaric rapes in predominantly black areas of New York City. There were no angry protests. No marches on Fifth Avenue. No sensational specials on "Rivera Live" for two weeks straight. Al Sharpton wasn't demanding that the federal government intervene to bring this monster to justice. Indeed, the serial rapist might have continued his savagery unmolested for another six years for all the self-appointed neighborhood spokesmen cared.
Any particular reason for Coulter to use Sharpton's name, other than that Sharpton is a Democrat?
Fifth Avenue? Isn't that a predominant Democrat part of NY?
Riveria? Doesn't he support the Democrats?

Finally she has a go at NY Times, a liberal newspaper.

But hey, cause she doesn't ever mention the 'L' word or 'D' word, her article isn't attacking Liberals or Democrats in any way is it? :rolleyes:

BTW the real link is:
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/ac000320.shtml

I think Chess Squares can feel confident in never having to fulfill his promise. I just read the article and it is blatantly anti-liberal. Considering the number of times Coulter's lamblasted Liberals and Democrats for being against racial profiling and this etire article is about how wonderful cops ignored that and ended up shooting an innocent man (abeit a stupid one who didn't listen to them, but this post isn't an argument about their actions, which I support) before finally finding the real perpertrator 6 years later.
How can you say it isn't an attack on Liberals and Democrats when it has such lovely quotes as:

Any particular reason for Coulter to put this snippet in, other than that Dinkins is a Democrat? What exactly does he have to do with it?


Any particular reason for Coulter to use Sharpton's name, other than that Sharpton is a Democrat?
Fifth Avenue? Isn't that a predominant Democrat part of NY?
Riveria? Doesn't he support the Democrats?

Finally she has a go at NY Times, a liberal newspaper.

But hey, cause she doesn't ever mention the 'L' word or 'D' word, her article isn't attacking Liberals or Democrats in any way is it? :rolleyes:

BTW the real link is:
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/ac000320.shtml
But that's not what he said... he said
pssh, when ann coulter can write a single paper without insulting liberals or democrats i will petition the local government to become the town idiot and dress up in a jester suit and dance in the city square
In the article she never insults liberals or democrats.. she might be attacking them, and perhaps rightly so, but never insultes them.

you play NS, so how about the world idiot. Set your sights higher dude!

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/ac000320.shtml

Please take a video of you dancing in your jester suit so that we might all enjoy your crowning as the town idiot. Remember, you said it, we didn't.

I couldn't care less whether he does this IRL or not. He does it intellectually. Here. Every day.

I couldn't care less whether he does this IRL or not. He does it intellectually. Here. Every day.
hey, be careful getting off that high horse, you might fall and hurt yourself

lets count
number of times bashed al sharpton: every paragraph
number of times based new york times (purportedly liberal news media): 2
number of times praised republicans specifically (here giuliani): once
number of times she praises the cops for shooting a guy because of incompetence: 4
number of times she insinuates they were validated because the REAL criminal had a gun: once
number of times she random bashes liberals: at least 4

C'mon, One, I can understand taking pot shots at Chess when he says something silly in a post, but was an entire post necessary for this?

HEY!

I want to be the village idiot!

I think I am qualified! :)

HEY!

I want to be the village idiot!

I think I am qualified! :)

You think? Then you are not qualified!

I think Chess Squares can feel confident in never having to fulfill his promise. I just read the article and it is blatantly anti-liberal. Considering the number of times Coulter's lamblasted Liberals and Democrats for being against racial profiling and this etire article is about how wonderful cops ignored that and ended up shooting an innocent man (abeit a stupid one who didn't listen to them, but this post isn't an argument about their actions, which I support) before finally finding the real perpertrator 6 years later.
How can you say it isn't an attack on Liberals and Democrats when it has such lovely quotes as:

Any particular reason for Coulter to put this snippet in, other than that Dinkins is a Democrat? What exactly does he have to do with it?

Im sorry, I forgot when statements of fact became insults.


Any particular reason for Coulter to use Sharpton's name, other than that Sharpton is a Democrat?
Fifth Avenue? Isn't that a predominant Democrat part of NY?
Riveria? Doesn't he support the Democrats?


The very best reason in the world(with regards to this case and Mr. Sharpton)

Tawana Brawley. Read up on her and Sharpton and you will see.



BTW: DH are you by any chance Raging Hampster from the hitman forums?

The article does in fact make fun of liberal so Chess Sqaures can put away his clown suit. Coulter makes fun of Al Sharpton and he's a liberal, though not a very good one. The rest of Coulter's article is pretty much her standard stuff which is to say, trash. Using her a source for relevant information is like saying Marx was a capitalist.

I think we should vote Lunatic Goofballs as town idiot anyway.

Grow up people.