Sum up humanity as you see them in one word
Star Shadow-
13-09-2004, 02:24
Mankind In a Word “Greedy” choose your word, In a short but not in a word "Greedy for pretty much anything,respect, power, money, love, someone to care, intrest in something, challenages, power (yes its worth saying twice) an easy life."
1337><0rz
That IS a word, right?
Roach-Busters
13-09-2004, 02:26
Royally screwed. Oh, sorry, you said one word.
F***ed.
Gigatron
13-09-2004, 02:29
Mankind In a Word “Greedy” choose your word, In a short but not in a word "Greedy for pretty much anything,respect, power, money, love, someone to care, intrest in something, challenages, power (yes its worth saying twice) an easy life."
Ignorant.
Antebellum South
13-09-2004, 02:32
American!!!
Katganistan
13-09-2004, 02:33
Beautiful.
Neo-Tommunism
13-09-2004, 02:34
Arrogant? It isn't really fair to sum up all of humanity, seeing as some of us aren't all that bad, but some of us really think that out of all the possible beings in the universe, God thought they were the only ones worthy of being saved?
Cannot think of a name
13-09-2004, 02:34
fleshy.
anything else misses.
Unfree People
13-09-2004, 02:36
Stupid.
The Atheists Reality
13-09-2004, 02:37
rooted.
Smelly.
A longer explanation:
Like a non black Barry White. Meaning Without Soul.
Arenestho
13-09-2004, 02:39
Parasitic.
Ienotheisa
13-09-2004, 02:46
'Hopeless,' would be my first impulse. 'Inevitable,' would be my final choice.
Ashmoria
13-09-2004, 02:49
messy
Bereavia
13-09-2004, 02:54
Infected
New Fuglies
13-09-2004, 02:57
Egotistical.
Parratoga
13-09-2004, 03:00
Incompetant
Barretta
13-09-2004, 03:10
illogical
(Spock sums it up quite well.)
The Island of Rose
13-09-2004, 03:14
Cool!
Based on most of the responses, I'd say self-hating (That's one word, no really, it is)
Roachsylvania
13-09-2004, 03:46
beef... stew... Oh wait, that's 2 words, isn't it?
Demented Hamsters
13-09-2004, 03:46
selfish
or
self-centred
LordaeronII
13-09-2004, 03:54
Pathetic.
CRACKPIE
13-09-2004, 03:54
leeches, parasites, republicans, either of the three work the same.
Free Soviets
13-09-2004, 04:01
variable
Sir Peter the sage
13-09-2004, 04:17
Man, lots of glass is half-empty people on NS :D
One word to sum up mankind. Not really possible but I'll go with
Hope
Sir Peter the sage
13-09-2004, 04:18
Bananarama
I thought Hope was good, but that beats the shit out of everything :D:D:D
BLARGistania
13-09-2004, 04:19
egotistical
Mutated chipmunks
13-09-2004, 04:27
dust
Almendrastan
13-09-2004, 04:36
Ambitious
Johnistan
13-09-2004, 04:37
Toasted. Nicely Toasted.
'Hopeless,' would be my first impulse. 'Inevitable,' would be my final choice.
"Do you hear that, Mr. Anderson? It's the sound of inevitability."
Glass half-empty response: Lemmings.
Glass half-full response: Audacious.
Raishann
13-09-2004, 04:42
Torn or split.
(That is, between hope and hopelessness.)
Tarlachia
13-09-2004, 04:50
challenged (to become better than we are)
Quote of the thread:
"A man must strive long and mightily within himself, before he can learn fully to master himself."
EDIT: In the end, I wonder if one of the most important steps on our journey is the one in which we throw away the map. In jettisoning the grinds and brambles of our own preconceptions, perhaps we are better able to find the real secrets of each place; to remember that we are all extensions of our collective history.
Tarlachia
13-09-2004, 05:27
BUMP-a-rama!
Dozastaria
13-09-2004, 06:11
really dum.
Demonic Furbies
13-09-2004, 06:11
Stupid.
agreed
Big Jim P
13-09-2004, 06:17
Overpopulated.
Spookistan and Jakalah
13-09-2004, 06:19
Tasty.
Big Jim P
13-09-2004, 06:20
Tasty.
Not really.
Jim2004
Incertonia
13-09-2004, 06:20
Fascinating. Utterly fascinating.
Robotistan
13-09-2004, 06:27
slaves
Big Jim P
13-09-2004, 06:30
slaves
*shhh...*
Jim2004!
Finished
(As in doomed. World War III will wipe out civilization, an event that unfortunately seems rather soon.)
The God King Eru-sama
13-09-2004, 06:36
Gods.
Tarlachia
13-09-2004, 06:37
Finished
(As in doomed. World War III will wipe out civilization, an event that unfortunately seems rather soon.)
I'm curious...why do you say this?
Big Jim P
13-09-2004, 06:38
Gods.
Morons.
Jim 2004.
Immensea
13-09-2004, 06:40
Animals
Mullendom
13-09-2004, 06:43
untrustworthy
Neo-Caliban
13-09-2004, 06:43
Temporary
The God King Eru-sama
13-09-2004, 06:48
Morons.
Jim 2004.
(You fail it. The emo concert is in the next room.)
International spies
13-09-2004, 06:51
Harmless
DON'T PANIC!
Comandante
13-09-2004, 06:56
Followers, or sheep, I like sheep better.
Westerney
13-09-2004, 07:04
variable
Yeah.
Diverse. Everybody's right (negative or somewhat egotistical, but right).
Legit Business
13-09-2004, 07:14
we still fight the same fight that our great grandfathers did in WWI and grandfathers in WWII one between the free world and tyranny and persicuation it was a clash of civilisations then and it still is the west vs islamic extreemism. the world today is just teh same as it was 50 or 100 years ago just that its inside our boarders now we still fight the same fight as those who went before us
dog
forwards and backwards.
Arcadian Mists
13-09-2004, 07:39
unpredictable
BackwoodsSquatches
13-09-2004, 07:49
Stupid.
Most of em.
The White Hats
13-09-2004, 08:40
Winsome
Legless Pirates
13-09-2004, 08:57
2 Monkeys
New Vinnland
13-09-2004, 10:42
Insecure, apathetic, ignorant, arrogant, aggressive, irrational, greedy, deceitful, nieve, misguided, cruel, confused, stubborn...
...but have the potental to improve, grow, evolve, and progress.
Harmless
DON'T PANIC!
HITCHHIKERS GUIDE THE THE GALAXAY.........BEST BOOK SERIES EVER
HITCHHIKERS GUIDE THE THE GALAXAY.........BEST BOOK SERIES EVER
wish he hadn't died
Flawed.
We have so many destructive tendencies, most based on either hedonistic disregard for others or the desire to control other people, but I'm not willing to say hopeless just yet, because I'm an optimist.
Willamena
21-09-2004, 03:55
imagination
Sileetris
21-09-2004, 03:55
crap
.
.
.
bucket
The Blacklisted
21-09-2004, 04:28
One half ignorant, other half spoiled.
In one word "spoilorant"!
imported_Berserker
21-09-2004, 04:46
Potential
Lenbonia
21-09-2004, 04:57
Weak
Weak emotionally
Weak intellectually
Weak physically
Weak morally
There are varying degrees of weakness, and some people balance strength in one area with weakness in another. But in the end we are all children grasping at the stars.
"If people bring so much courage to this world the world has to kill them, so of course it kills them. The world breaks everyone and afterward many are strong at the broken places. But those that will not break it kills. It kills the very good and the very gentle and the very brave... "
Ernest Hemingway
A Farewell to Arms
Kernlandia
21-09-2004, 05:04
gullible
Lord-General Drache
21-09-2004, 08:02
Stunted.
BackwoodsSquatches
21-09-2004, 08:04
Viruses with shoes.
Thats more than one word.
Humanity as I see it in one word:
humane?
(the quesstionmark is essential for the meaning.)
***thinking about this question I've come to the conclusion that my solid one word summation of the human race is "optomistic".
Sileetris
21-09-2004, 08:40
poontab
Biff Pileon
21-09-2004, 14:14
Doomed
Clonetopia
21-09-2004, 23:54
Potential
I thought of that. As well as "developing" and "us".
Nueva America
22-09-2004, 00:04
Uneducated
Tupping Liberty
22-09-2004, 03:16
Deluded
Sumamba Buwhan
22-09-2004, 03:23
cancer
Destroyer Command
22-09-2004, 13:19
Mankind In a Word “Greedy” choose your word, In a short but not in a word "Greedy for pretty much anything,respect, power, money, love, someone to care, intrest in something, challenages, power (yes its worth saying twice) an easy life."
scum
Crabcake Baba Ganoush
22-09-2004, 13:40
Humanity as a whole = Spam
Greater Merchantville
22-09-2004, 13:47
Unimpressive
I'm surprised with all the negative publicity, this one hasn't come up: sinful.
But that's probably because most of you don't have a religious worldview, much less a Christian one.
Keruvalia
22-09-2004, 22:33
Food
For Cthulu.
Impalabra
22-09-2004, 22:46
searching
Star Shadow-
25-09-2004, 07:00
I'm surprised with all the negative publicity, this one hasn't come up: sinful.
But that's probably because most of you don't have a religious worldview, much less a Christian one.
Really late on this but nice one.
Tropical Montana
25-09-2004, 07:04
Self-important ants.
Camel Eaters
25-09-2004, 07:37
eclectic
The Irish King
25-09-2004, 08:03
drunk
hey its my nation and we drink here, ,so everyone is always drunk, mabey ill give a serious word.
gods
we are the gods of the planet, yet we treat it like garbage....... go figure
Carlemnaria
25-09-2004, 08:51
gullable but creative
(greed is a culture thing (and basicly just another form of aggressiveness). that is why no revealer of organized belief ever endorsed capitolism)
(while it is true that capitolism enabled tecnology to make up for time previously lost to other forms of fanatacism, whithout fanatacism in the first place it would never have needed to. nature, tecnology and creativity get allong with each other just fine when aggressiveness, austentation and the automobile arn't preventing them from doing so.
the only reason our earth isn't universaly a paradise is because we keep destroying it. like i said; gullable)
=^^=
.../\...
Sileetris
25-09-2004, 09:13
spud-gun
Lunatic Goofballs
25-09-2004, 11:23
overanalyzed.
:)
Crackmajour
25-09-2004, 12:22
Possibilities (are infinite)
Mouldy Teacups
25-09-2004, 13:08
Curious
First of Two
25-09-2004, 13:18
Irritating.
Lagrange 4
25-09-2004, 13:18
Indifferent.
Tactical Grace
25-09-2004, 13:21
Transient.
Waffleria
25-09-2004, 13:26
Tetris
Alverrin
25-09-2004, 13:29
we still fight the same fight that our great grandfathers did in WWI and grandfathers in WWII one between the free world and tyranny and persicuation it was a clash of civilisations then and it still is the west vs islamic extreemism. the world today is just teh same as it was 50 or 100 years ago just that its inside our boarders now we still fight the same fight as those who went before us
In Response to the original thread topic: Myopic.
All current technologically developed cultures have so many blinkers over our eyes, because we're used to the mindset of social, political, or economic imperialism we've been operating under for the past 3 centuries.
Which brings us to the above quote.
In some ways, this quote is true. Violent Islamic fundamentalism is an agressive force that will fight (or create those it percieves as) enemies, no matter who or what. That much is true.
However, to connect the threat of a violent fringe group of a culture/religion to the danger of the expansionist Fascist dictatorship is a very faulty premise.
Firstly, Islamic fundamentalism is primarily a reactive movement, rather than pro-active political agenda (as Fascism is). The roots of what is happening today were laid years ago, when the western world dealt in primarily bad faith with middleeastern cultures, and the reaction, so long in coming is predictably violent. Violent Islamic fundamentalism is a negative movement in that it needs an enemy to strive against, in order to be the 'good' against a percieved 'evil'. Remove the enemy, the thing to be fought against, and the movement collapses until it can re-create a new 'evil'.
This doesn't make the reaction right or good, but it's one that could (read- should) have been anticipated long before now. If it had been truly anticipated, the right course of action would have been to correct the wrongs done, even if only by gesture or admitting fault. Instead, the western world short-sightedly decided to strong arm its way around such cultures. The result has been the powderkeg that exploded over the past four to five years and more.
Please note- there is no, and should not be ANY reason to deal with those who believe that a car bomb or airline hijacking is justified as a weapon of war in normal and open discourse. Their actions preclude that.
However; I am saying that if the nations and cultures that gave rise to these splinter groups had been treated with respect, rather than being used as proxies/puppets in larger conflicts (such as Saddam Hussien's Iraq by the United States) then those splinter groups and radical factions would have a much harder time recruiting new members, or even finding backing.
So I guess the basic upshot of the situation is this: Why is the developed West battling against a symptom of thier own mismanagement of diplomacy, rather than removing the causes of conflict?
Sarumland
25-09-2004, 13:37
Fools, I tell ye, fools the lot of them!