NationStates Jolt Archive


Who'd you rather be president, Hitler or Stalin?

Kleptonis
10-09-2004, 20:10
Just wondering who's more infamous.
Refused Party Program
10-09-2004, 20:13
Rather be dead than alive by their oppression.
Big Jim P
10-09-2004, 20:13
Me
Greenmanbry
10-09-2004, 20:16
Hitler..
Reltaran
10-09-2004, 20:17
Stalin, because he actually had a hand in the things attributed to him. Hitler=puppet, Stalin=decisive. Not a good option either way really, but with Stalin, at least you'd get strength; despite the cruelty, that is a good thing. With Hitler you'd get cruelty and weakness, so there's not much going for him.
Lunatic Goofballs
10-09-2004, 20:18
Hitler. He'd be easier to impeach. *nod*
Superpower07
10-09-2004, 20:21
I'd rather die free than live under tyranny - but Stalin would be less offensive to me b/c Soviet Communism required the eradication of religion - and while I'm don't hate religion, I'd rather live with no religion than with a Christian supremacist like Hitler was
Stalinist China
10-09-2004, 20:28
Not that i agree with what he began doing from the late 30s, Hitler was the best thing that could have happened to germany and turned a depressed country with a struggling economy into an indisputable world power. Just what england needs right about now...
Templarium
10-09-2004, 20:32
Though it pains me ( as I prefer the left to the right ) I'd go with Hitler too...for the reasons above, and because I'd get to wear a much more spiffy looking uniform. Say what you wil, but those Nazis had great design. ;)
Keljamistan
10-09-2004, 20:41
Though it pains me ( as I prefer the left to the right ) I'd go with Hitler too...for the reasons above, and because I'd get to wear a much more spiffy looking uniform. Say what you wil, but those Nazis had great design. ;)

"I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees".
Iceasruler
10-09-2004, 20:43
Hitler... because actually, Stalin killed a hell of a lot more people than Hitler did.
BastardSword
10-09-2004, 20:46
I'd rather die free than live under tyranny - but Stalin would be less offensive to me b/c Soviet Communism required the eradication of religion - and while I'm don't hate religion, I'd rather live with no religion than with a Christian supremacist like Hitler was
Don't know what you been smoking but it soubnds strong. Jk
Hitler was a no God but Germany person, he eradicated religion too.

Seeing as I'm choosing between two people who hate religion. I have to say Hitler because of how he did for the economy.
Von Witzleben
10-09-2004, 20:47
I would choose Hitler. Because I don't speak Russian.
Templarium
10-09-2004, 20:52
"I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees".

Erm, I see. I think both Hitler and Stalin would have the same reaction to your quote, so what was your point?

"I'd rather be in a cooler looking uniform than a communist one and die on my feet than live on my knees"
Gun BearingPot Smokers
10-09-2004, 21:01
Hitler killed about 6,000,000 and Stalin about 20,000,000... but he was in power longer,
A good book, "Laughter and the 20 Million, Koba the Dread", by Martin Amis tells a lot about Stalin..
Gulag vs Concentration Camp.
But I think that Hitler is more infamous because the truth about Russia is only recently coming out.
Bramia
11-09-2004, 09:40
Hitler... because actually, Stalin killed a hell of a lot more people than Hitler did.

ur an idiot
stalin didn't even kill those 4 million who died in labor camps
they died beceause they didn't get enough food from the soldiers in the camps, who ate it all themselves

hitler actually killed 50 million people and he knew he did

and stalin also raised the soviet economy

and no the soviet union was not against religion read the soviet constitution, the right to believe


those 20 million are cold war propaganda


ask every old russian when the life-circomstances where better now or in stalins era, they'll ALL answer stalin

ask every old german when it was better now, or with hitler and they'll ignore you :D
Comandante
11-09-2004, 09:49
You all are forgetting this important bit though. Stalin turned a backwards country into the world's largest superpower. He industrialized the country after only 10 years in power. He pulled off 200 years of modernization in only a decade! Hitler did help the economy, but Stalin created an empire.
Austrealite
11-09-2004, 11:06
I'd rather die free than live under tyranny - but Stalin would be less offensive to me b/c Soviet Communism required the eradication of religion - and while I'm don't hate religion, I'd rather live with no religion than with a Christian supremacist like Hitler was

Hitler wasn't CHRISTIAN!

Why does everyone think he was? Hell he used Christianity as an excuse, nothing more.
Bramia
11-09-2004, 11:11
Hitler wasn't CHRISTIAN!

Why does everyone think he was? Hell he used Christianity as an excuse, nothing more.

he didn't even use it as an excuse

he said:
you are a christian or a german you can't be both

or something like that

if i were a christian i woul choose stalin
Von Witzleben
11-09-2004, 11:22
he didn't even use it as an excuse

he said:
you are a christian or a german you can't be both

or something like that

if i were a christian i woul choose stalin
Heh. Yeah. Stalin of course wasn't anti-religion at all. Religion boomed under his and his succesors reign.
Bramia
11-09-2004, 11:24
Heh. Yeah. Stalin of course wasn't anti-religion at all. Religion boomed under his and his succesors reign.


i think that was sarcasm so i'll respond to it:

like i said before:
in the soviet union there was a law that you have the right to practise religion
and no there were no churches burned in the soviet-union or priests hung in they're own churches, and no jews were prosecuted
ask the people who lived there

i dont say stalin supported religion or that he wasn't anti-religion but he didn't say you cant use religion like hitler
Clontopia
11-09-2004, 11:42
Hitler wasn't CHRISTIAN!

Why does everyone think he was? Hell he used Christianity as an excuse, nothing more.

Hitler was a Catholic. He stated that many times. in many speaches and in his book. He was an alter boy when he was a child. His main reason for killing the jews was that they killed christ.
Hitler also sent any non-christian to the death camps as well. It was not just the jews that died in them.
He WAS a christian supremist. And he lead a holy crusade against non-christian. Just like so many christian supremist before him had done for hundreds of years in Europe.
The Sadistic Skinhead
11-09-2004, 15:08
Hitler
Homicidal Pacifists
11-09-2004, 15:21
Can’t we just get Genghis Khan instead?
Joey P
11-09-2004, 15:53
Stalin had a better moustache.
Demented Hamsters
11-09-2004, 15:54
Stalin, because he actually had a hand in the things attributed to him. Hitler=puppet, Stalin=decisive. Not a good option either way really, but with Stalin, at least you'd get strength; despite the cruelty, that is a good thing. With Hitler you'd get cruelty and weakness, so there's not much going for him.
Hmmm I'd disagree. At least you'd know where you stood with Hitler. Both were megalomaniacs, but Stalin was a real sadist who enjoyed the power. I don't think you can say the same about Hitler. Hitler was more obsessed with fulfilling his dream of a unified and powerful Germany, so he would only use terror tactics and executions if he thought it would achieve his goals.
Stalin on the other hand revelled in his absolute power. For example, his speeches to the Assembley: Whoever stopped clapping first was executed. He would arbitary decide how many dissidents and traitors there would be in a particular suburb and leave it to others to work out who. There are also stories that he would ring them during the night, asking them how many to be shot: "200 sir", "Make it 500." phone goes dead.
Another story I read about Stalin was when he was staying at his country house (what's the Russian word for that again? I keep forgetting) and was woken by a dog barking. He ordered his guards to find the dog and kill it. And then find it's owner and kill him.
Now Hitler never acted like this. So in conclusion, under Stalin, you would have lived in vastly much more fear than under Hitler. Unless you were a gay gypsy jew of course. Oh, and handicapped. And black.
Tyrandis
11-09-2004, 16:10
I'd probably plot an assassination as soon as either of them try to take power.
HippysAgainstWar
11-09-2004, 16:16
I think its sad how americans are more in favour of fascism than communism.
Demented Hamsters
11-09-2004, 16:18
ur an idiot
stalin didn't even kill those 4 million who died in labor camps
they died beceause they didn't get enough food from the soldiers in the camps, who ate it all themselves
hitler actually killed 50 million people and he knew he did
and stalin also raised the soviet economy

Okayyyy...All the ppl who died under Stalin's rule, who were in the gulags because of him can't be attributed to Stalin. No, it was the greedy fat guards.
However, Hitler is personally responsible for every death caused during 1933-1945. That makes sense. I suppose he ran around all those concentration camps chucking the Jews into the showers himself did he?
Meanwhile Stalin was sending off lovely food hampers to all his political prisoners blissfully unaware that the poor dears weren't getting them at all, just those nasty greedy guards pigging out in the barracks. My, I bet Stalin would have been upset if he'd known.
Demented Hamsters
11-09-2004, 16:22
I think its sad how americans are more in favour of fascism than communism.
Well it wasn't really communism was it?
And of course maybe they're getting mentally prepared for another possible four more years of Bush. ;)
Defaultia
11-09-2004, 16:23
Stalin killed 20 million people, Hitler killed 11 million.

I'd go with Stalin if Russia had at least twice as many people as Germany, otherwise Hitler. Whichever one had less a chance of death.
Ingleterra
11-09-2004, 16:24
You all forget that Hitler permitted genocide on a catastrophic scale, executing millions of Jewish people because..they were Jewish.
Stalin may have secretly executed millions of people but at least he didn't allow mass ethnic cleansing in his country.

He also didn't invade neighbouring countries in an attempt to rule the world...

Somehow I'd rather die in freedom and social equality than be ruled by either of these people...But if i had no other option...definitely Stalin...
Defaultia
11-09-2004, 16:27
Stalin did invade neighboring countries to rule the world. Such as Hungary.

Although, really, if either of those became pres, I'd leave the country.
Unfree People
11-09-2004, 16:38
This thread is seriously disturbing. I think I'd have to agree with everyone who said "I'd rather be dead".
Bramia
11-09-2004, 16:38
stalin wanted a doema (democracy)
only during the war the soviet union needed central government
so you would have died in freedom
and no stalin killed 4 million people
but the CIA said 20 million during the cold war

and i mean that hitler gave permission to kill them and stalin gave permission to let them work

and hitler killed people beceause they were jew and stuff like that
stalin killed 2 million nazi-soldiers (not russians) and 2 million traitors
Statburg
11-09-2004, 16:45
Depends. 1930's Brilliant Leader Hitler, or WWII Completely Crazy Hitler?
Bramia
11-09-2004, 17:10
Depends. 1930's Brilliant Leader Hitler, or WWII Completely Crazy Hitler?

in 1930 he already had the idea to conquer the world
and he rebuilded germany to start WWII
Enodscopia
11-09-2004, 17:23
Hitler would be better because he only killed jews, commies, queers (even though I like jews I am not one) Stalin just killed everyone indiscrimnatly and he was a commie. But I would move cause they are both really bad and I hate them both.
Bramia
11-09-2004, 17:30
Hitler would be better because he only killed jews, commies, queers (even though I like jews I am not one) Stalin just killed everyone indiscrimnatly and he was a commie. But I would move cause they are both really bad and I hate them both.

stalin killed nazi's and he killed much phewer people than hitler
if you just shutted your mouth in the ussr you would survive
if you where a jew you had no chance of survival

amricans are really dis-informed...
Kryozerkia
11-09-2004, 17:32
Hmn... as much as I do love my boyfriend, I'd have to say, living during Hitler's regime. I'm not Jewish, I'm white Catholic, so, I'm safe. I'm also mentally strong. So, I'd just have to keep my mouth shut and I'd be fine under that regime. I'd work as a quiet school teacher, never marrying...

I'd never live under Stalin's regime... I'd have more chance of being killed...
Enodscopia
11-09-2004, 17:32
stalin killed nazi's and he killed much phewer people than hitler
if you just shutted your mouth in the ussr you would survive
if you where a jew you had no chance of survival

amricans are really dis-informed...

No Stalin killed about 50 million, Hitler killed about 8 million.
Bramia
11-09-2004, 17:34
like i said before
REALLY disinformed
no stalin killed 4 million

and hitler (i you count murdered soldiers with the deaths)
killed 50 million

otherwise it would be 12 million for hitler
Enodscopia
11-09-2004, 17:38
like i said before
REALLY disinformed
no stalin killed 4 million

and hitler (i you count murdered soldiers with the deaths)
killed 50 million

otherwise it would be 12 million for hitler

Look in any book about Stalin he killed around 50 million, Hitler killed 6-11 million at most, you are the one that is disinformed.
Bramia
11-09-2004, 17:39
cold-war propaganda...
ask a russian.
i did and i'm NOT dis-informed
Enodscopia
11-09-2004, 17:42
cold-war propaganda...
ask a russian.
i did and i'm NOT dis-informed

Sure, whatever, you just go on living in your dream world.
Bramia
11-09-2004, 20:30
its not a dream world
4 million people were murdered by stalin
thats no dream...
A Dead Cat
11-09-2004, 21:07
Hitler.
Ulrichland
11-09-2004, 21:13
Though it pains me ( as I prefer the left to the right ) I'd go with Hitler too...for the reasons above, and because I'd get to wear a much more spiffy looking uniform. Say what you wil, but those Nazis had great design. ;)

LOL. Can´t argue with that!
Clonetopia
11-09-2004, 21:30
I vote for whichever one of them would be most easily assassinated.
Pelleon
11-09-2004, 23:37
cold-war propaganda...
ask a russian.
i did and i'm NOT dis-informed

Actually, you are.

Even the most conservative estimates give him a death count in the double-digits. I suggest that YOU ask a russian, and not one of the ignorant peasant class who were in the dark, ask one of them in the know and they'll tell you.

As to the question, Hitler. I am neither Jewish, homosexual, handicaped, a Gypse or black, have blond hair and blue eyes and the Nazis had spiffy uniforms :D
Eldarana
11-09-2004, 23:39
Whats the difference between the two
Parratoga
12-09-2004, 00:20
Hitler of course! :D
Parratoga
12-09-2004, 00:20
Whats the difference between the two

One's a National Socialist, the other is a Communist.
Sdaeriji
12-09-2004, 00:23
cold-war propaganda...
ask a russian.
i did and i'm NOT dis-informed

Even the most conservative estimates put it in the 8 million to 10 million range. Care to provide a reliable source saying it was only four? Because I've never heard the figure lowballed so much.