Why not Ron Paul for President?
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 01:08
In case his name is unfamiliar to anyone, Ron Paul is the only constitutionalist person in Congress.
Brittanic States
10-09-2004, 01:08
In case his name is unfamiliar to anyone, Ron Paul is the only constitutionalist person in Congress.
Wouldnt RuPaul be an even better choice?
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 01:09
Wouldnt RuPaul be an even better choice?
:confused:
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 01:13
Ron Paul would be much better than Kerry or Bush put together.
Agreed. Dr. Paul is the only politician living who even remotely gives a damn about the Constitution.
Enodscopia
10-09-2004, 01:14
Ron Paul would be much better than Kerry or Bush put together.
Cheney-Land
10-09-2004, 01:19
Hey... Why not elect Ron Jeremy? that way you know that he's banging everything with breasts and a pulse before the election, so it won't be a surprise when you catch him giving an intern a body cavity search.
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 01:21
Hey... Why not elect Ron Jeremy? that way you know that he's banging everything with breasts and a pulse before the election, so it won't be a surprise when you catch him giving an intern a body cavity search.
:confused:
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 01:37
Needless to say, the Republicon Party gives Dr. Paul no support.
Libertovania
10-09-2004, 11:16
Ron Paul ran for president once on the Libertarian ticket. Obviously, he didn't win.
Stumpneria
10-09-2004, 20:50
Ron Paul is a member of the Republican Liberty Caucas. [url]www.RLC.org :fluffle: