Zervok
08-09-2004, 21:35
Besides all the arguments for and against the electorial college there is one key point. Its here, its the system and it wont change in the near future. There is one key thing though. You dont really know anyone in it. I want to change that.
So, I plan to run for electorial college (when I am old enough and experienced enough)! You ask, why vote for someone who can at best agree with us, but at worst make the opposite decision? Its a good question. But I want to ask you, do you know George Bush and John Kerry? Personally? Every detail, have you read their policies on enviornment, looked at their records, read the acts they have voted for. If you say yes to this, you are a true model of what we should partially become.
But most if not all of us havent, where do we find out about the candidates? From themselves, their opponents, or short sections in the media. The first 2 are so obviously biased that I wouldnt listen to them to find any truth. You may find what they want to be, but not what they are. And the latter, doesnt go into the depth for local regional topics and the gritty details that today are needed.
That is what I view my job is. To head a public discussion over the facts and the opinions about where our country is and should be going. If I am elected I would carefully reaserch the details and answer any question posted by voters. I would try to orrange debates where you and others can argue for why we should or should not vote for such and such. Perhaps even get the president himself to answer a few of our colective qustions. That way we can find out what really is the best for, us, the country, and the world.
There is another problem though. Blatent issues devide us. That is how the parties that run the show came into power. Politiicans joined together to support an agenda and formed a party. That is fine, they comprimised so all could have influence on the aganeda, but when he politicians are the agenda we have a problem. On most decisions politicians follow their party by the letter. When we vote we shouldnt have the decision of one set of policy or another. We should have a mix of what we want. You can't say that people in New York have the same needs and concerns as people in a small farm in Ohio, or even for that matter the troops in Iraq. But we still need to be united. How? By values and philosaphy about what government should do. I personally believe that we should vote for the person who show the most suport for:
Giving opportunity to all
An belief that compromise is the way to keep all the concerns of the people in mind.
Keeping America in top shape
Trying to help people before judging
I believe that these values can give us insight into where we want to go and who we want to lead us there. These days with so much info, but so hard to find and understand we need someone to sift through it and show us the parts that are important. A library open to all. If you appoint me to he electorial college I promise to do this and then when we can come to an agreement for what we want, proudly cast the vote showing our beliefs.
This would be my opening speech for a race for electorial college.
Now I ask you, am I deluded, or do I have some truth to this? And if so where and what should I change? And after you read this vote in the poll whether you would vote for me or not. I dont believe I will have an opponent initially, so it is yes or no. Good Reading
So, I plan to run for electorial college (when I am old enough and experienced enough)! You ask, why vote for someone who can at best agree with us, but at worst make the opposite decision? Its a good question. But I want to ask you, do you know George Bush and John Kerry? Personally? Every detail, have you read their policies on enviornment, looked at their records, read the acts they have voted for. If you say yes to this, you are a true model of what we should partially become.
But most if not all of us havent, where do we find out about the candidates? From themselves, their opponents, or short sections in the media. The first 2 are so obviously biased that I wouldnt listen to them to find any truth. You may find what they want to be, but not what they are. And the latter, doesnt go into the depth for local regional topics and the gritty details that today are needed.
That is what I view my job is. To head a public discussion over the facts and the opinions about where our country is and should be going. If I am elected I would carefully reaserch the details and answer any question posted by voters. I would try to orrange debates where you and others can argue for why we should or should not vote for such and such. Perhaps even get the president himself to answer a few of our colective qustions. That way we can find out what really is the best for, us, the country, and the world.
There is another problem though. Blatent issues devide us. That is how the parties that run the show came into power. Politiicans joined together to support an agenda and formed a party. That is fine, they comprimised so all could have influence on the aganeda, but when he politicians are the agenda we have a problem. On most decisions politicians follow their party by the letter. When we vote we shouldnt have the decision of one set of policy or another. We should have a mix of what we want. You can't say that people in New York have the same needs and concerns as people in a small farm in Ohio, or even for that matter the troops in Iraq. But we still need to be united. How? By values and philosaphy about what government should do. I personally believe that we should vote for the person who show the most suport for:
Giving opportunity to all
An belief that compromise is the way to keep all the concerns of the people in mind.
Keeping America in top shape
Trying to help people before judging
I believe that these values can give us insight into where we want to go and who we want to lead us there. These days with so much info, but so hard to find and understand we need someone to sift through it and show us the parts that are important. A library open to all. If you appoint me to he electorial college I promise to do this and then when we can come to an agreement for what we want, proudly cast the vote showing our beliefs.
This would be my opening speech for a race for electorial college.
Now I ask you, am I deluded, or do I have some truth to this? And if so where and what should I change? And after you read this vote in the poll whether you would vote for me or not. I dont believe I will have an opponent initially, so it is yes or no. Good Reading