If the Presidential Election was Held Today...
Military Weapons Inc
28-08-2004, 10:10
I would vote for Bush.
Demented Hamsters
28-08-2004, 10:25
If the Presidential elections were held today I'd be surprised and wondering where the last couple of months have gone.
Ahtnamas
28-08-2004, 10:29
I would vote for anyone but Bush. He is a stupid, stupid man who has caused nothing but trouble and does not deserve office.
I would vote for anyone but Bush. He is a stupid, stupid man who has caused nothing but trouble and does not deserve office.
I can tell youve only posted 14 times.
Your opinion is officially the same as every other person who doesnt have their own opinion on why to vote for kerry.
Id vote for bush.
Becuz kerry contradicts greenspan on the economy.
Im sorry i trust greenspan WAYWAYWAYWAYWAY more then kerry.
I'm voting for Libertarian candidate Michael Badnarik. If you vote for one of the two major parties, your choices are a two-faced liar with unearned millions at his disposal and a dubious war record, or a two-faced liar with unearned millions at his disposal and a dubious war record. Everyone says I am throwing my vote away, but at least I can leave the booth knowing that I have voted with my convictions rather than going with whatever will win.
Ahtnamas
28-08-2004, 10:58
I can tell youve only posted 14 times.
Your opinion is officially the same as every other person who doesnt have their own opinion on why to vote for kerry.
Id vote for bush.
Becuz kerry contradicts greenspan on the economy.
Im sorry i trust greenspan WAYWAYWAYWAYWAY more then kerry.
Sorry. Better. I'm not from your silly little country. But if I were, I would not vote for Bush, because from where I'm standing, he doesn't seem to be the type to understand that the dominant culture and religion are not universally valid standards, and nor do they need to be. Because let's face it, even I know he cannot comprehend the separation of religion and state, not its importance.
I just can't trust someone who acts as white as he does.
Capsule Corporation
28-08-2004, 11:06
Bush, definately.
By no means perfect, but by all means not John Kerry :)
Seosavists
28-08-2004, 11:15
ANOTHER ONE AHH....:headbang:
:headbang::headbang::headbang:
:headbang::headbang::headbang:
:headbang::headbang::headbang:
Capsule Corporation
28-08-2004, 11:18
I'm voting for Libertarian candidate Michael Badnarik. If you vote for one of the two major parties, your choices are a two-faced liar with unearned millions at his disposal and a dubious war record, or a two-faced liar with unearned millions at his disposal and a dubious war record. Everyone says I am throwing my vote away, but at least I can leave the booth knowing that I have voted with my convictions rather than going with whatever will win.
Voting Libertarian is like ordering a chocolate shake at a jack in the box while the shake machine is broken... while it IS on the menu, you know they can't give you a shake, you know you can't get a shake, but you still order a shake because you refuse to order anything else... just skip the shake and drive on through :)
I can tell youve only posted 14 times.
Your opinion is officially the same as every other person who doesnt have their own opinion on why to vote for kerry.
Id vote for bush.
Becuz kerry contradicts greenspan on the economy.
Im sorry i trust greenspan WAYWAYWAYWAYWAY more then kerry.
10 Nobel Prize in laureates for economics have come out in support of Kerry. I think I'll listen to smart people, thank you.
I just can't trust someone who acts as white as he does.
Umm. How does a white person act? I just want to make sure I'm not doing it wrong...
Arcadian Mists
28-08-2004, 11:28
Voting Libertarian is like ordering a chocolate shake at a jack in the box while the shake machine is broken... while it IS on the menu, you know they can't give you a shake, you know you can't get a shake, but you still order a shake because you refuse to order anything else... just skip the shake and drive on through :)
That's exactly why the US's voting system is so outdated. Sincere voting should be a valid choice. Look back on earlier elections, I appologize for not having them now (posting from work). Third parties have won 30% of the vote or more in some elections. If every voter simply voted for their favorite canditate, a decent one would get into office every now and then. At least the majority of the people would favor the country's leader...
Azgardia
28-08-2004, 11:30
Okay then.
Im not from our country, bt in my opinion you'd be better off without Bush. He stuffed up Iraq soo badly its not funny and the buck stops with him. He couldve made Iraq a model on how to renovate a country instead he made it a model of how to demolish a country.Personally I love america and I think Americans are some of the best people in the world but Bush is bad news. Most of the world is convinced he is dumb and while I think he has done some good his time is up.
Please save America for me ditch bush quickly.
Arcadian Mists
28-08-2004, 11:36
Okay then.
Im not from our country, bt in my opinion you'd be better off without Bush. He stuffed up Iraq soo badly its not funny and the buck stops with him. He couldve made Iraq a model on how to renovate a country instead he made it a model of how to demolish a country.Personally I love america and I think Americans are some of the best people in the world but Bush is bad news. Most of the world is convinced he is dumb and while I think he has done some good his time is up.
Please save America for me ditch bush quickly.
You think we're some of the best people in the world? Aw... That's so sweet! :fluffle:
Azgardia
28-08-2004, 11:41
You think we're some of the best people in the world? Aw... That's so sweet! :fluffle:
Hahaha. Yeh well I'm from Australia! Our Prime Minister tells us were sposeda kiss American rear and hey what can I say I'm a patriot! :D
10 Nobel Prize in laureates for economics have come out in support of Kerry. I think I'll listen to smart people, thank you.
i dont know for sum odd reason id rather trust the guy who's running our economy, considering he's had the best expansion in US history.
Plus let me here your opinion on this:
Bush wants to move all of our troops around, and bring back 70k troops in the next 5 years. Kerry opposes it saying we'd strategically be disadvantaged.
how does taking a hundred thousand troops out of germany, make us strategically disadvantaged?
How does taking a lil pressure off nk fuck us up?(considering they HAVE a nuke) China can handle nk just fine.
This is why i dont like kerry, because he says things just to be in the opposition.