NationStates Jolt Archive

Here's a fun article for you to muse over:

http://www.sovereignty.net/center/unu-report.html

What's your views:

I personally dislike they UN they are worthless. Those treehugging ba#$%!*
or
Hurray! Global government, power to the people and all that!
or
I should be king, and I demand virgin sacrifices!
or
...

<Prepares for onslaught of mindless insults and flame wars>
I love starting conflict, he he.

http://www.sovereignty.net/timeline.html

Here's a fun article for you to muse over:

http://www.sovereignty.net/center/unu-report.html

What's your views:

I personally dislike they UN they are worthless. Those treehugging ba#$%!*
or
Hurray! Global government, power to the people and all that!
or
I should be king, and I demand virgin sacrifices!
or
...

<Prepares for onslaught of mindless insults and flame wars>
I love starting conflict, he he.

My view? the first one.
I personally dislike the UN, they are worthless.
Those treehugging ba#$%!*.

Wouldn't the UN have a hard time taking over the world considering every* country would know about it, all being members of the UN?











*shutup, I know that there are a few that aren't.

Wouldn't the UN have a hard time taking over the world considering every country would know about it, all being members of the UN?
But thats part of the plan!
No one pays attention to a single thing the U.N. says or does, thus allowing them to move in and dominate the world while everyone is taking a nap.

But thats part of the plan!
No one pays attention to a single thing the U.N. says or does, thus allowing them to move in and dominate the world while everyone is taking a nap.

But then, would anyone notice they were running the world, anyway?

Ahh its about time they started taking over the world I've been sending them plans for years.

OMG AHHH LOOK OUT IT'S T3H NEW WORLD ORDER OF THE ILLUINATI!!

But then, would anyone notice they were running the world, anyway?
Exactly, no one would know, therefore no one could rebel against them.

I, for instance, have been the Supreme Lord of Mercury for years. No one, however, has noticed this and as such no one can contest my Rule, bwahahahaha!

The U.N. is NOT trying to take over the world, stomp out individualism and all of that other b.s. The U.N. couldn't even try to rule the world if they wanted to. General Assembly resolutions are not binding and even though Security Council resolutions are technically binding, countries do ignore them. So, in essence, the U.N. has NO ABSLOUTE POWER OVER ANY NATION! Heck, the U.S. policy to the U.N. is bascially "do what the hell we tell you to do, but if you do something we don't like we won't do it." Also, interestingly, the forces in the U.N. that appear to try to "rule the world" (IMF, Security Council) are heavily influenced by the United Statesn and in most divisions of the U.N. you need the U.S. representative's support to do something. Soverignty, according to may American anti-U.N. groups, aparently means no interfearence with American Imperialism and forced globalization for U.S. corporation benefit. (and before you say I'm just U.S. bashing, I've done my reading on the U.N. and U.S. foregin policy and I am an American)

So, why is every plot to take over the world an 'evil' plot, anyway?

So, why is every plot to take over the world an 'evil' plot, anyway?
Because people who are taking over the world spend all their efforts doing that and don't get good PR guys.

I've heard some of the people who sincerely believe the UN is out to take power and create a world government that would do such evil things as have democratic elections for the entire world, tighten environmental regulations, and give poor people more money. I can't argue that those aims are not evil, because, as we know, only Satanistic Illuminati believe in democracy, environmental protection, and helping the disadvantaged. [/sarcasm]
They're a funny lot, kind of like Holocaust deniers but slightly less racist. Slightly.

You're right maybe it's an un-evil plot to take over the world. I guess we won't know unless they do. Of course then the terrorists wouldn't have any superpower to terrorize an the bombs on their bodies would blow up before they changed their tactics.... or not. Off topic a little bit, I rather dislike terrorists. I don't mind people with different religions, or sexual preference, but trying to blow me up sends my homocidal meter through the roof. But in the interest of non-violence I'll only beat them with a Nerf Bat.

Speaking of nerf bats I've been thinking about a sort where you put on footbal pads (American not soccer) and everyone picks up a nerf bat and runs around and beats the bejesus out of eachother. It would be like the gladiators but on a much more chaotic scale. Plus nobody would have to die and we wouldn't need human torches because we'll use hallogen lights instead....

I take option C, just for a laugh.

Down with the UN, but up with World Government.

The UN is fundamentally flawed in its foundations, and should be replaced before world government is achieved, but is the best we have at the moment.