NationStates Jolt Archive

As somebody once phrased it, couldn't agree more.

Both have no intentions of altering US Foreign Policy.

And Kerry glorifies the murder of a 16 year old.

Once you have been thouroughly been beaten out of one of your own threads, do you just go and create another one?

I agree, it seems that way. However, I will say that his threads, while they do have a common philosophy, are probably not similar enough to constitute spamming. It does seem odd that someone would have so many different ideas in such a relatively short period of time, especially if they are seriously considering the input given on the ideas that they have already posted.

While this guy symbolizes idiocy and deficiencies. He may have stumbled upon some ballad of truth.


Kerry and Bush were both skulls from Yale university. Thats freaky :mp5:

While this guy symbolizes idiocy and deficiencies. He may have stumbled upon some ballad of truth.


Kerry and Bush were both skulls from Yale university. Thats freaky :mp5:

I wouldn't so much mind this thread, even that it was created by him, except for the fact that there is another thread of the exact same name IIRC, somewhere around page 6 or 7.

As somebody once phrased it, couldn't agree more.

Both have no intentions of altering US Foreign Policy.

And Kerry glorifies the murder of a 16 year old.


...this message brought to you by the Uniformed.

...this message brought to you by the Uniformed.

Explain why?

Both are incredibly far right in the political spectrum. Both have non intention of reversing foreign policy. And Both have no intention of altering the way the 'War on Terror' is being fought - even though it can never be won.

Explain why?

Both are incredibly far right in the political spectrum. Both have non intention of reversing foreign policy. And Both have no intention of altering the way the 'War on Terror' is being fought - even though it can never be won.

Everything youve just said is very wrong.

The two people, politically, are very near the extreme opposite poles.

Kerry especially, will dramatically change foreign policy, perhaps not entirely smoothing over the damge Bush has done, but making efforts to regain support.

As for the War on Terror, Kerry will not likely invade a country like Iraq, merely to secure oil for future supply.

You arent american are you?

Bush and Kerry are both twats. Everyone saying vote for Kerry not Bush are extremley narrow minded.

Yes, Bush needs to be taken away from his post but Kerry is no better. Kerry actually voted yes to go to war over Irag but now is anti-Iraq (for obivious reasons such as votes).


Saying vote Kerry instead of Bush is like saying drink Coke instead of Pepsi.


In short, whoever gets in we're screwed big time.

There are other reasons BESIDES war. Like taxing the rich instead of the middle. And giving that money to the lower class.

That is why people should vote for kerry.

It's not just as simple as one issue.

Which leads me to believe.... You simply aren't american, or informed.

Okay,


what do you think is more important?

A fucking madman who invades countries at the drop of a coin killing innocent civillians and military members or someone who taxes a bit differently?

There are other reasons BESIDES war. Like taxing the rich instead of the middle. And giving that money to the lower class.

That is why people should vote for bush.

It's not just as simple as one issue.

Which leads me to believe.... You simply aren't american, or informed.


How can you say that when Bush's tax cuts were aimed at the top percentage wage earners?

He gave tax cuts to the RICH.

Maybe you should vote for Kerry, if thats what you want.

Kerrry will very likely emulate clintons very effective tactic of giving tax breaks to the middle, and lower end.

I think kERRY is just pretending to be more conservative then he is to win election then he'll be good once hes in

And I think that Kerry was acting more liberal during the earlier parts of his campaign to please his core constituency of liberal Democracts. We'll see who ws correct in a few months, won't we?

How can you say that when Bush's tax cuts were aimed at the top percentage wage earners?

He gave tax cuts to the RICH.

Maybe you should vote for Kerry, if thats what you want.

Kerrry will very likely emulate clintons very effective tactic of giving tax breaks to the middle, and lower end.


I meant kerry, not bush. Sorry for that.

How can you say that when Bush's tax cuts were aimed at the top percentage wage earners?

He gave tax cuts to the RICH.

Maybe you should vote for Kerry, if thats what you want.

Kerrry will very likely emulate clintons very effective tactic of giving tax breaks to the middle, and lower end.


And sit on his ass while Osama kills people.


I don't want Bush, But I don't want Kerry either.

So true.

Why do you think he's suddenly against the war in Iraq?


To please the Liberals and Lefties.

Wait a couple of months when he's in power and people will probably wish they still had Bush. It's not just the person in the power the whole system needs to be changed.


America is rotten from the core outwards.

And sit on his ass while Osama kills people.


I don't want Bush, But I don't want Kerry either.

The thing is, from what I have read and heard from Kerry, he would've been almost as proactive as Bush on terrorism if he had been running and won in 2000. The problem now is that he will be elected by a significant number of people who will expect him to reimpose peace and not get involved in more conflicts, which could tie his hands politically if he feels there is something that should be done but is not popular enough to be practical. All Presidents have to deal with similar issues, but coming after a President who is viewed as somewhat militaristic creates unsustainable expectations of dovishness.

And sit on his ass while Osama kills people.


I don't want Bush, But I don't want Kerry either.



Bush has less than 11,000 troops in Afghanistan "hunting" for Bin Laden.

Thats less than the number of police in Manhattan.

How hard do you think he's looking for him?

Bush has less than 11,000 troops in Afghanistan "hunting" for Bin Laden.

Thats less than the number of police in Manhattan.

How hard do you think he's looking for him?


Kerry will give Osama a pass. Anyway Afghanistan has alot of troops in it from other countries.

BTW, Pakistan is on Osama worthless ass.

So true.

Why do you think he's suddenly against the war in Iraq?


To please the Liberals and Lefties.

Wait a couple of months when he's in power and people will probably wish they still had Bush. It's not just the person in the power the whole system needs to be changed.


America is rotten from the core outwards.

Heres something for you to think about:

Bush claims that while he was wrong about Iraq, the reason was becuase of faulty information.
If you support Bush, then you realize that, and believe it, right?

Why then, when Kerry supported the war, on the same bad information, and then, when we realize that information to have been false, object to the war, so utterly wrong, and "makes him a flip-flopper".

Isnt that the very height of hippocracy?

What makes it ok for bush to have been wrong, but not Kerry?

Kerry didnt start the war.
Bush did.

Tens of thousands of people didnt die becuase of Kerry....that distinction id Bush's.

Kerry will give Osama a pass. Anyway Afghanistan has alot of troops in it from other countries.

BTW, Pakistan is on Osama worthless ass.

I'm not sure why you think Kerry would ignore Osama, since it is the one target that he can still pursue and not have to deal with criticism. Also, while the ruling elite in Pakistan is our ally, many of the rank and file as well as the general citizenry are not, which is a very unstable situation to be allied to and mirrors the situation in Saudi Arabia. It also makes me fairly dubious that Pakistan will have a great deal of success in catching a popular figure like Osama bin Laden, although I will admit they have been very satisfactory at helping the US nab other al-Qaeda suspects

Kerry will give Osama a pass. Anyway Afghanistan has alot of troops in it from other countries.

BTW, Pakistan is on Osama worthless ass.


No....

The total number of troops on "our side" is less than 11,000.

How do you expect to find ONE guy, with that number of people, in a country Afghanistans size?


"BTW, Pakistan is on Osama worthless ass"

^ What?

And sit on his ass while Osama kills people.


I don't want Bush, But I don't want Kerry either.

And thus, proof was revelead that FOX News, CNN and other assorted Corporate Media stations, actually did their job when it came to indoctrinating the populace.

There are other reasons BESIDES war. Like taxing the rich instead of the middle. And giving that money to the lower class.

That is why people should vote for kerry.

It's not just as simple as one issue.

Which leads me to believe.... You simply aren't american, or informed.Inform us then. Give us sourced references on the real difference between Bush and Kerry on policy.

Kent: Senator Dole, why should people vote for you instead of President Clinton?
Kang: It makes no difference which one of us you vote for. Either way, your planet is doomed. DOOMED!
Kent: Well, a refreshingly frank response there from senator Bob Dole.

Kodos: It's a two party system. You have to vote for one of us.
Man in crowd: I believe I'll vote for a third candidate.
Kang: Go ahead, throw your vote away!

Homer: Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!


Has there ever been a president who wasn't part of some weirdo organisation?