NationStates Jolt Archive

Lets declare a crusade to take back the middle east. Let them have their little Jihad with their AK-47s and suicide bombs and we have a crusades with tanks and all the modern war machines. If we waged a war like war should be waged we wouldn't have so called terrorists they would all be dead, in Falujah we would have used conventional forces we would said you just dragged our AMERICA MARINES in the street then we would have pulled our forces out and leveled the entire city men, women, and children alike and eventually terrorist would stop because either they would want to keep their lives or they would all be dead. And also any time a bunch of arabs are dancing in the street cause some Americans were killed fly an AC-130 and kill them ALL. The US needs to stop worrying about world opinion, the UN, and civilian casualties it happens get over it.

Yeah but then there's the small problem with reputation and the fact that little countries can make big alliances.

Meh, what do I know?

I agree more drastic measures should be taken, but not quite that drastic. I am against the intentional killing of unarmed civilians, torture, etc. But we still need to take off the kid gloves, open up a can of whoop @$$, and show these terrorist scum what we're made of! :sniper:

The US is not that stupid, it's simple as that, no matter how big your conventional forces are, you start doing things like that, your fucked. There is no way you will kill every single person, and the one that survives is now against you, deadly against you, and he just links up with other survivors, and the outside world (who I assure you will not like you for what you are doing, which is wholesale slaughter), and now all you've done is multiply the number of people facing you, given them good reason to call themselves freedom-fighters, and lost popular support, I restate, your fucked.

I declare Jihad against all Buccaneer fans! :mad:


Die Buccaneer Scum! :eek: :mp5:

I agree more drastic measures should be taken, but not quite that drastic. I am against the intentional killing of unarmed civilians, torture, etc. But we still need to take off the kid gloves, open up a can of whoop @$$, and show these terrorist scum what we're made of! :sniper:

I'm only for intentional civilian killing when they are cheering because Americans have been killed or if the bodies of dead Americans have been disgraced.

It's been done. GW Bush used the word Crusade to describe the invasion of Afghanistan before he had to recant this due to Arab allies protesting about it.

Get That Muslim!


http://www.click-smilies.de/sammlung0304/waffen/violent-smiley-010.gif

I'm only for intentional civilian killing when they are cheering because Americans have been killed or if the bodies of dead Americans have been disgraced.

No offense, but I still think that's taking it too far...

Lets declare a crusade to take back the middle east. Let them have their little Jihad with their AK-47s and suicide bombs and we have a crusades with tanks and all the modern war machines. If we waged a war like war should be waged we wouldn't have so called terrorists they would all be dead, in Falujah we would have used conventional forces we would said you just dragged our AMERICA MARINES in the street then we would have pulled our forces out and leveled the entire city men, women, and children alike and eventually terrorist would stop because either they would want to keep their lives or they would all be dead. And also any time a bunch of arabs are dancing in the street cause some Americans were killed fly an AC-130 and kill them ALL. The US needs to stop worrying about world opinion, the UN, and civilian casualties it happens get over it.


This is why you don't rule a country. As the same for me, I would just solve the world's glass shortage (nuke the whole damn middle east for those of you who don't understand)

This is why you don't rule a country. As the same for me, I would just solve the world's glass shortage (nuke the whole damn middle east for those of you who don't understand)

I support that to just as long as they are ALL dead.

I agree that harsher war is needed, but not that much. You should never bomb or shoot civilians (its a waste of good munitions).
Anyways, war is just like any other fight. The point is to hit the other guy so hard and so fast that they will be either unwilling or unable to hit back.
But, who would want to control the middle east? A mess of sand and rocks and sand colored rocks and then (just for a change of pace) rock colored sand.

I agree that harsher war is needed, but not that much. You should never bomb or shoot civilians (its a waste of good munitions).
Anyways, war is just like any other fight. The point is to hit the other guy so hard and so fast that they will be either unwilling or unable to hit back.
But, who would want to control the middle east? A mess of sand and rocks and sand colored rocks and then (just for a change of pace) rock colored sand.

Theres oil under the sand and you need oil for tanks and planes.

Since when did the skinheads find out about this game?

Since when did the skinheads find out about this game?

It's an annual thing, last year it was Fascist White States in the forefront, now there seems to be a "pleasant" mix of xenophobes, nationalists, and just pure Nazi's.

Great strategy, really. I mean, why not just clean out the Middle East. All those sand-niggers are terrorists, right? But wait a second, you can't really trust the Arabs in the US either, can you? I got the answer for you, though: fire up the ovens and make some adjustments to some showers. It's not just a solution to your problem, it's the FINAL SOLUTION. Why stop there, though? Can't trust the niggers and Jews either, so you have to deal with them before they step out of line. All those other countries got to go too, because if they don't speak the right fucking language, they're bad news. Just keep going, until everyone and everything is white and safe and Christian, because, hey, white people never blew anything up, except for Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the Oklahoma City Bombing..... oh, and all those people that didn't have the right opinion and skin colour. Never mind those issues though, it's a "WAR ON TERROR"!! Never mind that your proposed "Crusade" (even before my suggestions are used) would kill several times more innocent people than "Terror" ever has. Hell, the "War on Terror" has already killed more people than Terrorism has in the past few years, and served to promote even more acts of terrorism. Never mind that, though, because brown people's lives aren't as important, and they're probably terrorists anyway.

:eek:

Wow, I sense a flame war coming! It's getting very hot...

(Pops out chocolate, graham crackers, and marshmallows)

Anyone want a s'more?

i perfer the term "racial purging" or "racial holy war" or rahowa to crusade but maybe its just me.

Great strategy, really. I mean, why not just clean out the Middle East. All those sand-niggers are terrorists, right? But wait a second, you can't really trust the Arabs in the US either, can you? I got the answer for you, though: fire up the ovens and make some adjustments to some showers. It's not just a solution to your problem, it's the FINAL SOLUTION. Why stop there, though? Can't trust the niggers and Jews either, so you have to deal with them before they step out of line. All those other countries got to go too, because if they don't speak the right fucking language, they're bad news. Just keep going, until everyone and everything is white and safe and Christian, because, hey, white people never blew anything up, except for Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the Oklahoma City Bombing..... oh, and all those people that didn't have the right opinion and skin colour. Never mind those issues though, it's a "WAR ON TERROR"!! Never mind that your proposed "Crusade" (even before my suggestions are used) would kill several times more innocent people than "Terror" ever has. Hell, the "War on Terror" has already killed more people than Terrorism has in the past few years, and served to promote even more acts of terrorism. Never mind that, though, because brown people's lives aren't as important, and they're probably terrorists anyway.

I did say clean out the middle east. And in my book most arabs are terrorists.

I did say clean out the middle east.

Becuase we all know those damn A-rabs are responsible for such heinous acts as the Oklahoma City Bombi....... hey wait

Arab muslims stolen middle east countries many centuries ago. it's time to get it back and let that f***ing scum to their f***ing camels.

I did say clean out the middle east.

(Wipes sweat from forehead) The heat is really coming on now...egads! My chocolate is melting!!

Arab muslims stolen middle east countries many centuries ago. it's time to get it back and let that f***ing scum to their f***ing camels.

And then politely give back the US to the Indjuns right?

I did say clean out the middle east. And in my book most arabs are terrorists.

The extremely vast majority of Arabs are gentle, peace-loving people. I have a friend who lives in UAE, who is a very kind person.

I did say clean out the middle east. And in my book most arabs are terrorists.
there is a final solution for the terrorist problem if america has the courage to take it, and impliment it thuroughly and systematically

Heh, you guys are making me laugh... the ignorance is AMAZING!

*puts up flame shield of 1337/\/357*

Lets declare a crusade to take back the middle east. Let them have their little Jihad with their AK-47s and suicide bombs and we have a crusades with tanks and all the modern war machines. If we waged a war like war should be waged we wouldn't have so called terrorists they would all be dead, in Falujah we would have used conventional forces we would said you just dragged our AMERICA MARINES in the street then we would have pulled our forces out and leveled the entire city men, women, and children alike and eventually terrorist would stop because either they would want to keep their lives or they would all be dead. And also any time a bunch of arabs are dancing in the street cause some Americans were killed fly an AC-130 and kill them ALL. The US needs to stop worrying about world opinion, the UN, and civilian casualties it happens get over it.

You sound like the kind of person who gets a stiffy at air-shows, and watches far too many B-grade action movies. What are you, like, 12?

If you think the indiscriminate killing of Iraqi civilians will DECREASE terrorism, you are severely mentally lacking.

And then politely give back the US to the Indjuns right?


Can't, we killed them all. :sniper:

And then politely give back the US to the Indjuns right?

No, lets get rid of them "Injuns" all together so they stop complaining about big, mean, whitie to my land think of all the nice casinos we would have.

Becuase we all know those damn A-rabs are responsible for such heinous acts as the Oklahoma City Bombi....... hey wait


that was different tim was a freedom fighter avenging the children janet reno roast alive in waco.

Can't, we killed them all. :sniper:

I have some Native American blood (only a very, very, tiny fraction, though; literally less than one percent) and my mom's cousin's husband is mostly Native American.

The extremely vast majority of Arabs are gentle, peace-loving people. I have a friend who lives in UAE, who is a very kind person.

I have a know some people in the UAE to their nice but like I said most of them are evil. Better be safe than sorry.

You sound like the kind of person who gets a stiffy at air-shows, and watches far too many B-grade action movies. What are you, like, 12?

If you think the indiscriminate killing of Iraqi civilians will DECREASE terrorism, you are severely mentally lacking.


not indiscriminate, systematic and total

that was different tim was a freedom fighter avenging the children janet reno roast alive in waco.

Of course it was different, bombing a building were there were innocent people to get back at a government is freedom-fighting, attacking a building full of innocents to get back at a government while being brown however, is terrorism, my mistake.

I have some Native American blood (only a very, very, tiny fraction, though; literally less than one percent) and my mom's cousin's husband is mostly Native American.


I was joking. :rolleyes:

Becuase we all know those damn A-rabs are responsible for such heinous acts as the Oklahoma City Bombi....... hey wait

Please don't flame me for this, anyone, but I've heard plenty of theories that McVeigh and the other guy (damn, I forgot his name...) may not have been the only ones responsible, that some Middle Eastern terrorists may have collaborated with them. Not saying it's true or false, though.

Of course it was different, bombing a building were there were innocent people to get back at a government is freedom-fighting, attacking a building full of innocents to get back at a government while being brown however, is terrorism, my mistake.


its understandable, you haven't developed a racial consciousness yet.

I was joking. :rolleyes:

Oh. Sorry.

You sound like the kind of person who gets a stiffy at air-shows, and watches far too many B-grade action movies. What are you, like, 12?

If you think the indiscriminate killing of Iraqi civilians will DECREASE terrorism, you are severely mentally lacking.

If you kill them all their won't be any left to commit crimes against you. I never said indiscriminate I said TOTAL killing.

If you kill them all their won't be any left to commit crimes against you. I never said indiscriminate I said TOTAL killing.

No offense, but that sounds very Hitlerite...

(I'm not saying you're Hitlerite, only that the idea sounds like it)

If you kill them all their won't be any left to commit crimes against you. I never said indiscriminate I said TOTAL killing.


reduce them to legend and folk tale, to vague memory. to stories told to frighten children in the lands of the new dawn.

Heh, you white people are funny!

You white people don't realize that in 10 years I'm going to be boning your "pure white women" increasing the amount of hispanics throughout the world.

Heh, I swear, you wonder why nobody is listening to you? Because you're spewing off for no reason without facts, maybe you should do what Jews do and control some of the media.

Yes that last part about the Jews controlling the media is a joke.

No offense, but that sounds very Hitlerite...

(I'm not saying you're Hitlerite, only that the idea sounds like it)

are you sure hitlerite is an actual word, or a good description of what you mean. i would suggest fascist, or national socialist, perhaps white nationalist... but hey that's just me.

I'm only for intentional civilian killing when they are cheering because Americans have been killed or if the bodies of dead Americans have been disgraced.

Yes, not like US troops ever whoop and holler in glee after killing some "ragheads", is it now? And "disgracing" the bodies of dead Americans is worse that US troops beating and raping Iraqi prisoners how?

And here I thought the US were "The Good Guys ©™". It's a tired cliche, but if you resort to the actions of "the bad guys" you become "the bad guys".

Not to mention ,that judging all Iraqis/Middle-Easterners by the actions of a few terrorists makes about as much sense as judging all Americans by the actions of Timothy McVeigh, Charles Manson or Ed Gein.

Please don't flame me for this, anyone, but I've heard plenty of theories that McVeigh and the other guy (damn, I forgot his name...) may not have been the only ones responsible, that some Middle Eastern terrorists may have collaborated with them. Not saying it's true or false, though.

Since I respect you, becuase even when you disagree with me it's on a solid base of researched fact, with two different opinions, I wouldn't flame you RB, in fact I rarely flame anyone, except when people post such ludicrous things as this, and even then I try to do it with a tongue-in-cheek humor about it.

No offense, but that sounds very Hitlerite...

(I'm not saying you're Hitlerite, only that the idea sounds like it)

To some extent it does but Hitler supported killing jews because he was just biased against them. I might be wrong but I don't think jew ever killed Germans in mass terrorist attacks.

Not to mention ,that judging all Iraqis/Middle-Easterners by the actions of a few terrorists makes about as much sense as judging all Americans by the actions of Timothy McVeigh, Charles Manson or Ed Gein.

Well said, my friend! :)

Heh, you white people are funny!

You white people don't realize that in 10 years I'm going to be boning your "pure white women" increasing the amount of hispanics throughout the world.

Heh, I swear, you wonder why nobody is listening to you? Because you're spewing off for no reason without facts, maybe you should do what Jews do and control some of the media.

Yes that last part about the Jews controlling the media is a joke.

well a little mongrelism never hurts, if you're a pretty lad

If you kill them all their won't be any left to commit crimes against you. I never said indiscriminate I said TOTAL killing.

Oh, and you don't think that exterminating an entire nation would cause retaliation from OTHER nations?

If you really wanted EVERY muslim and person of middle-eastern extraction united against the USofA, you would find yourselves seriously in the shit.

You see, actions have consequences - this seems to be something that both you and American foreign policy dictators of the last 50 years or so both seem not to understand...;)

well a little mongrelism never hurts, if you're a pretty lad

I've never heard a Facist say pretty lad before :p

OK people, this is just getting stupid:rolleyes:
Not that it wasn't stupid to start with, but now people are just saying things to piss each other off.
Please people, lets all go slam our heads into brick walls, it would be more effective than arguing about genocide and the great non-white conspiracy.
:headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:

Oh, and you don't think that exterminating an entire nation would cause retaliation from OTHER nations?

If you really wanted EVERY muslim and person of middle-eastern extraction united against the USofA, you would find yourselves seriously in the shit.

You see, actions have consequences - this seems to be something that both you and American foreign policy dictators of the last 50 years or so both seem not to understand...;)


massive preemptive nuclear strike on all islamic population centers, as well as china, india and north korea just to be on the safe side.

Oh, and you don't think that exterminating an entire nation would cause retaliation from OTHER nations?

If you really wanted EVERY muslim and person of middle-eastern extraction united against the USofA, you would find yourselves seriously in the shit.

You see, actions have consequences - this seems to be something that both you and American foreign policy dictators of the last 50 years or so both seem not to understand...;)

We can take the world if we can get China to be our ally.

These barbaric terrorist bastards are a problem because we let them be one. When terrorists hide in a mosque or other "holy site", that site should be destroyed. They are like little brats who insult you and then hide behind their mother's skirts. Nah nah nah nah you can't get me, I'm hiding in a holy site. Screw that. One day they'll push us too far. Unfortunately it may not be until some of those nonexistent WMD's get used on a major US city. Then we'll stop playing games and take these guys out.

I've never heard a Facist say pretty lad before :p
do a google search on the historical ernst rohm(not actually sure he ever said that either but its in character)

We can take the world if we can get China to be our ally.
their nuclear armaments are weak and out dated, we should take out the dragon of the first day of the rain of swords.

massive preemptive nuclear strike on all islamic population centers, as well as china, india and north korea just to be on the safe side.
But as anyone who has ever played Civilization 3 can tell you, nuclear weapons only kill 50% of the population.

massive preemptive nuclear strike on all islamic population centers, as well as china, india and north korea just to be on the safe side.

And on America as well - remember, you can't trust those damn immigrants! ;)

And when everyone on the face of the earth is dead from a nuclear winter wiping out all food sources, you can stand, shivering in your tattered rags, saluting "old glory" and smug in your victory over the "evil Muslims" until the day you keel over from starvation.

:p

We can take the world if we can get China to be our ally.

That'll never happen. (China being our ally, I mean)

That'll never happen. (China being our ally, I mean)
I know but if they ever go capitalist its a good possibility.

But as anyone who has ever played Civilization 3 can tell you, nuclear weapons only kill 50% of the population.

you only need to destroy their population centers, military and infrastructure in the first strike, let societal collapse do the rest as you begin a systematic cleansing of the quasi nuetralized lands.

I'm lost now - was this some kind of in-character roleplay, or a real-world political discussion. I'm hoping it's not the latter...

I'm lost now - was this some kind of in-character roleplay, or a real-world political discussion. I'm hoping it's not the latter...

It's the latter.

And on America as well - remember, you can't trust those damn immigrants! ;)

And when everyone on the face of the earth is dead from a nuclear winter wiping out all food sources, you can stand, shivering in your tattered rags, saluting "old glory" and smug in your victory over the "evil Muslims" until the day you keel over from starvation.

:p

well there will have to be a purification of the nation and if necessary we will extend our borders south to deal with any climatic factors. we will eventually spread over the entire cleansed earth.

I'm lost now - was this some kind of in-character roleplay, or a real-world political discussion. I'm hoping it's not the latter...

I would say real-world political discussion.

OK. In all seriousness, Enodscopia, may I ask how old you are? I'm genuinely curious.

well there will have to be a purification of the nation and if necessary we will extend our borders south to deal with any climatic factors. we will eventually spread over the entire cleansed earth.

Of course, first we must purify the country for our upcoming struggle. Then we will have to deal with those who may threaten us first, those to the North and Europe, hit them fast and hard to subjugate them, but not exterminate, than we can ignore whoever doesn't capitulate after most are done, then turn our eyes towards our real enemies to the south.

They are a pathetic subhuman race that will easily be wiped out by our glorious "pure" forces, and as for those in the West? Hah! They are mongrels, too busy listening to their "whatever Chinese listen to" Music and counting their money, they have never been and will never be good fighters able to bring war. And once the purification is complete we can settle our glorious race there.

(I hope someone sees the irony of this post, it should sound familar to most of you).

So, let's see if I got your point of view straight:

You want to wipe out all Iraqis to ensure an end to terrorism directed at the USA.

Can I just ask - exactly which acts of terrorism directed aginst the USA, excluding actions actually IN Iraq which have occurred after the Coalition invaded, have been committed by Iraqis?

damn, no one ever wants to know how old i am...

of coursed i'd just lie....

but its the principle of the thing...

Of course, first we must purify the country for our upcoming struggle. Then we will have to deal with those who may threaten us first, those to the North and Europe, hit them fast and hard to subjugate them, but not exterminate, than we can ignore whoever doesn't capitulate after most are done, then turn our eyes towards our real enemies to the south.

They are a pathetic subhuman race that will easily be wiped out by our glorious "pure" forces, and as for those in the West? Hah! They are mongrels, too busy listening to their "whatever Chinese listen to" Music and counting their money, they have never been and will never be good fighters able to bring war. And once the purification is complete we can settle our glorious race there.

(I hope someone sees the irony of this post, it should sound familar to most of you).

irony is decadent intellectualism

Well, if people are embarrassed about their ages, I'll go first - I'm 32. ;)

irony is decadent intellectualism

It didn't work the first time, just becuase it is a different nation doesn't mean it will work again.

Well, if people are embarrassed about their ages, I'll go first - I'm 32. ;)

Haha, your old and leaky


....31

anyone ever read robin william's plan for world peace?

It didn't work the first time, just becuase it is a different nation doesn't mean it will work again.


if at first you don't succeed, wait til it becomes retrochic and try try again...

I sorry, but I just hafta but in :).

It has come to my attention, that for some reason,
people think that the ENTIRE US army raped and beat
SUPPOSEDLY Iraqi prisoners (Most of them were immigrants).

This is just plain stupid. One bad egg does NOT ruin the
whole bastket, you can take the bad egg, and throw it away.

Only a few people did this stuff. And most of the troops
on the front lines, be they under average IQ, are damn
good people, and have what most human being call "Morales".
They have been through a VERY rigerous training program,
and wouldn't just throw away such a career (Since their arn't
very many pathways after soldier's... Maybe a bouncer? Yay.)

It might surprise you Anti-war guys that.... Wait for it....

THEY'RE NOT ALL ASSHOLES.
THEY ARN'T ALL RACIST.
And by the way, incase you haven't been paying
attention for the last 30 years, the media only
shows what wants to show. Duh.

Come on guys, oppinions are great, but don't be iggnorant
of others right to have one, be it as stupid as it sounds to YOU. :(

Haha, your old and leaky


....31


36 years out of the cloning vats in argentina and still going strong!

I sorry, but I just hafta but in :).

It has come to my attention, that for some reason,
people think that the ENTIRE US army raped and beat
SUPPOSEDLY Iraqi prisoners (Most of them were immigrants).

This is just plain stupid. One bad egg does NOT ruin the
whole bastket, you can take the bad egg, and throw it away.

Only a few people did this stuff. And most of the troops
on the front lines, be they under average IQ, are damn
good people, and have what most human being call "Morales".
They have been through a VERY rigerous training program,
and wouldn't just throw away such a career (Since their arn't
very many pathways after soldier's... Maybe a bouncer? Yay.)

It might surprise you Anti-war guys that.... Wait for it....

THEY'RE NOT ALL ASSHOLES.
THEY ARN'T ALL RACIST.
And by the way, incase you haven't been paying
attention for the last 30 years, the media only
shows what wants to show. Duh.

Come on guys, oppinions are great, but don't be iggnorant
of others right to have one, be it as stupid as it sounds to YOU. :(
you really haven't read any of this thread have you?

I did too!
I just deceided (As I had stated earlier) to butt in.
I didn't say it was on topic. :P

BTW, are you really Argentinian?
If so, you hate Hyper-Inflation right?

I did too!
I just deceided (As I had stated earlier) to butt in.
I didn't say it was on topic. :P

BTW, are you really Argentinian?
If so, you hate Hyper-Inflation right?


no no, that just where the early odessa cloning vats were located

no no, that just where the early odessa cloning vats were located

Somebody's watched Boys from Brazil one too many times.

Oh...








K.

Somebody's watched Boys from Brazil one too many times.


that's highly fictionalized, brazil didn't really have the power infrastructure or the proper political climate at the time, and paraguay and uraguay we just to small and backward. argentina was the only real choice. well that or utah but we went with argentina.

that's highly fictionalized, brazil didn't really have the power infrastructure or the proper political climate at the time, and paraguay and uraguay we just to small and backward. argentina was the only real choice. well that or utah but we went with argentina.

Of course, Utah had all those Mormon nuts, you wouldn't want them stumbling on your cloning vats, we already have too many of them walking around being all Mormon.

I sorry, but I just hafta but in :).

It has come to my attention, that for some reason,
people think that the ENTIRE US army raped and beat
SUPPOSEDLY Iraqi prisoners (Most of them were immigrants).

This is just plain stupid. One bad egg does NOT ruin the
whole bastket, you can take the bad egg, and throw it away.

Only a few people did this stuff. And most of the troops
on the front lines, be they under average IQ, are damn
good people, and have what most human being call "Morales".
They have been through a VERY rigerous training program,
and wouldn't just throw away such a career (Since their arn't
very many pathways after soldier's... Maybe a bouncer? Yay.)

It might surprise you Anti-war guys that.... Wait for it....

THEY'RE NOT ALL ASSHOLES.
THEY ARN'T ALL RACIST.
And by the way, incase you haven't been paying
attention for the last 30 years, the media only
shows what wants to show. Duh.

Come on guys, oppinions are great, but don't be iggnorant
of others right to have one, be it as stupid as it sounds to YOU. :(

Yes, just as stupid as judging the entire Muslim religion or the entire racial group of Arabs/Middle-Easterners on the actions of a few terrorists...

Of course, Utah had all those Mormon nuts, you wouldn't want them stumbling on your cloning vats, we already have too many of them walking around being all Mormon.
they don't seem to have any problems reproducing the old fashion way. what do those crazy decaffienated saints do, have 'em by the litter.

Yeah I agree. Why they only flattened a skyscraper or two in Manhattan on 9/11 is beyond me. If they had done it right the first time, spreading deadly virii or nuking the entire city or using a dirty bomb or stuff like that, americans like you would probably be dead now and could not spout such idiotic nonsense. Just wait and see though, you've made enough enemies by now that I'll be not surprised when NYC or some other big U$ city goes up in flames.

Yeah I agree. Why they only flattened a skyscraper or two in Manhattan on 9/11 is beyond me.

Becuase they are just not as good as us and the Brits at flattening cities, you think they could've learned a thing or two from us, but nooo.

If they had done it right the first time, spreading deadly virii or nuking the entire city or using a dirty bomb or stuff like that, americans like you would probably be dead now and could not spout such idiotic nonsense.

They don't have nukes, and exactly what deadly virus do you think they could spread into the US that would actually become of pandemic proportions without the US noticing.

Just wait and see though, you've made enough enemies by now that I'll be not surprised when NYC or some other big U$ city goes up in flames.

Well, then I'm sure our retaliation will be just as terrible, at least I'll be able to work on my suntan during it. (if you catch my drift)

Becuase they are just not as good as us and the Brits at flattening cities, you think they could've learned a thing or two from us, but nooo.



They don't have nukes, and exactly what deadly virus do you think they could spread into the US that would actually become of pandemic proportions without the US noticing.



Well, then I'm sure are retaliation will be just as terrible, at least I'll be able to work on my suntan during it. (if you catch my drift)
The U$ didnt notice that 4 planes were hijacked, so I can imagine what else the U$ would *not* notice. In your endless arrogance and belief that the U$ is invincible, you are so blind that one could probably detonate a nuke in front of you and you'd declare it a gas explosion or something. Dream on - if you think that the world would watch when you slaughter civilians more than you already do.

The U$ didnt notice that 4 planes were hijacked, so I can imagine what else the U$ would *not* notice. In your endless arrogance and belief that the U$ is invincible, you are so blind that one could probably detonate a nuke in front of you and you'd declare it a gas explosion or something. Dream on - if you think that the world would watch when you slaughter civilians more than you already do.

Heh, it's funny how you think Americans are the spawn of Satan.

Answer me this, do you think Americans are the spawn of Satan, if so, Americans that were born in America or freshly arrived immigrants in America?

The U$ didnt notice that 4 planes were hijacked

Do you have any idea of how many planes are in the air, the multitude of things that could explain it, and the relatively small amount of time between when the planes changed course and hit their targets?

so I can imagine what else the U$ would *not* notice. In your endless arrogance and belief that the U$ is invincible, you are so blind that one could probably detonate a nuke in front of you and you'd declare it a gas explosion or something.

Try it, and I'll let you know of the reaction.

I agree more drastic measures should be taken, but not quite that drastic. I am against the intentional killing of unarmed civilians, torture, etc. But we still need to take off the kid gloves, open up a can of whoop @$$, and show these terrorist scum what we're made of! :sniper:
You already are, and you are being humbled. You are now more vulnerable than ever because I can guarantee you that Al-Qaeda's recruitment rate = up 500%.

Sickening that you can support attacks on unarmed people.

All you silly, silly people bringing up Timothy McVeigh's bombing in Oklahoma City as defense! Why, everyone knows that since Saddam Hussein is /personally/ responsible for every terrorist attack ever (it's true! I read it in a book endorsed by Paul Wolfowitz - he wouldn't lie, would he?), that he simply hired a white supremacist to do it for him so as to confuse all the silly liberals.

-But in all seriousness, do you think comitting an act of religious genocide (is there a specific name for this?) unrivalled throughout all of history would make you the good guys? Hell, even Tony Blair would give up on you!

http://www.wackyweaselworld.com/flameINC/images/TS8.jpg

Really, this thread is beyond retarded.

Well, this is one interesting topic, and I've got a few things to say. First I'm going to repeat what was once mentioned to me by an acquaintance, who happens to be an American Muslim, "Osama Bin Laden is the Muslim version of David Caresh," (hope I spelled that right, and David Caresh was the Waco guy for those of you who don't know). Point being, is that religious fanatics can give any religion a bad name. Also, I think that the majority of the Middle East is going through their version of the Dark Ages, because the fall of the Ottoman Empire is their equivalent to the fall of Rome for Western Civillization (and I do mean majority, Kuwait, among others, is doing quite well for itself.)

For those of you who beleive that we should nuke everyone who doesn't think like we do, I will admit to having those same feelings myself once in a while, and that is usually after I see or hear something about another suicide bombing or other idiocy, but those decisions and feelings are made in anger and those are the decisions that we need to stop making.

Lastly, terrorism, as defined by the American pop psyche, will not stop until people who would be labeled terrorists realize their greatest mistake and stop teaching their children to hate America and the rest of the world that they see as the 'Great Satan', or until they are all dead. Sadly, I think that the latter is the more likely outcome of the two.

Lets declare a crusade to take back the middle east. Let them have their little Jihad with their AK-47s and suicide bombs and we have a crusades with tanks and all the modern war machines. If we waged a war like war should be waged we wouldn't have so called terrorists they would all be dead, in Falujah we would have used conventional forces we would said you just dragged our AMERICA MARINES in the street then we would have pulled our forces out and leveled the entire city men, women, and children alike and eventually terrorist would stop because either they would want to keep their lives or they would all be dead. And also any time a bunch of arabs are dancing in the street cause some Americans were killed fly an AC-130 and kill them ALL. The US needs to stop worrying about world opinion, the UN, and civilian casualties it happens get over it.
Umm...Ok.I didn't really get any of that,but yeah,ok

The whole thing is that the wars are so publisized and everyone wants to point out bushes faults. It makes great t.v. and whoever gets those types of stories get tons of money. Everytime we accidentally kill somebody innocent or seemingly innocent we get war crimes on us. Plus to much force makes other people hate us. What I want to know is did we ever really have terrorist attacks IN the u.s. before we attacked Iraq?? If not then did people over look that war as a reason they all hate US now??

You know what pisses me off?
The US can actually do that. Hell! You know your troops bombed a wedding some monthes ago, 40 something iraqis killed? Have you heard about that?!
The US can sure do it your way, yeah, people are gonna hate the US, but not anymore than they already do. I believe the USA can actually do as you say, Endoscopia, because it's the goddamn USA.
Yet when we hit a demonstartion of armed men and killed 9, the whole world was screaming.

I had a bunch of reasons why this is just... wrong. Sometimes I seriously worry about some people doing something to act on their racist beliefs. But, meh, this thread ain't worth me time.

[sarcasm] Why not just nuke the middle east then europe then canada then south america then asia then africa oh then washington

I have an idea..

If we go with your plan, you'll end up nuking 6.2 billion people (leaving only the USA's population.. hell.. PART of the USA's population alive)

Now.. here's my idea..

How about you nuke yourselves?.. It would be very interesting to watch, and the resulting loss of life won't be as scary..

Hell.. the world would be getting rid of arrogance, ignorance, a huge nuclear stockpile, and postponing global warming a few years (even with the nuclear explosions)

4 birds with one stone. http://www.bahrainforums.com/images/smilies/icon16.gif


[DISCLAIMER:]
[The earlier post was written in a period of extreme anger and frustration. The USA's population is not all made up of terrorists and racists and KKK members..]

And then politely give back the US to the Indjuns right?
No. The middle east is histericly a part of the US. Mohammed and his hordes stole it from it's rightfull American owners.

I support that to just as long as they are ALL dead.

And how would that make you any better than the 'terrorists'? Why are you after the 'terrorists'? Is it because of 9/11, where they killed 3k civilians? And what did you just say you want? To kill Millions upon millions of civilians. You disgust me. If you ever get in a position of power I will personaly assassinate you...

what about you nuke all the terrorists so they are dead then everyone else nukes america so the survivors wont become terrorist they will love the rest of the world for riding the world of the people who nuked them

I stand by my previous statement

No. The middle east is histericly a part of the US. Mohammed and his hordes stole it from it's rightfull American owners.
HUH???? HOW is the middle east american??

[sarcasm]

I did say clean out the middle east. And in my book most arabs are terrorists.

Guess then me and my entire family are terrorists :D

(My origins are in Iraq and Iran - guess I'm just bred to be pure terrorist islamo-fascist scum, eh?)

obviously

damn it, wheres my ak-47....

Well im Irish so im obviously in the IRA damn it wheres my semtecs

HUH???? HOW is the middle east american??
They have lots of oil.

heh, i'm from manchester. we had this ira attack a few years back, nobody killed though thank god. whats the general opinion amongst the irish about them?

Lets declare a crusade to take back the middle east. Let them have their little Jihad with their AK-47s and suicide bombs and we have a crusades with tanks and all the modern war machines. If we waged a war like war should be waged we wouldn't have so called terrorists they would all be dead, in Falujah we would have used conventional forces we would said you just dragged our AMERICA MARINES in the street then we would have pulled our forces out and leveled the entire city men, women, and children alike and eventually terrorist would stop because either they would want to keep their lives or they would all be dead. And also any time a bunch of arabs are dancing in the street cause some Americans were killed fly an AC-130 and kill them ALL. The US needs to stop worrying about world opinion, the UN, and civilian casualties it happens get over it.

Very strange comment.
It's rather like saying all Catholics supported the IRA's terrorism. The entire population of the middle east are not terrorists, so you plan would equate to genocide.

I dont know the general opinion but I hate the 'real IRA'. They dont really have any reason to be there. They never get a united Ireland by bombing places.

Back when the british parlimant didnt help with the famine because they said it was punishment from god on the catholics and they could have saved lots of people by helping more. I think almost every revollution against the british in Ireland was because of something like that the british taking land off the irish leaveing them with nothing to lose or putting unfair laws against them and giving none of them a vote and controling our trade so although organisations like them in the past where there because of oppression.
there is absolutly no reason for the IRA now no one is oppressed.

Ps I hate the people in the past who where in power not the ordinary people. Got nothing against the British nowadays.

*edit*


Lets declare a crusade to take back the middle east. Let them have their little Jihad with their AK-47s and suicide bombs and we have a crusades with tanks and all the modern war machines. If we waged a war like war should be waged we wouldn't have so called terrorists they would all be dead, in Falujah we would have used conventional forces we would said you just dragged our AMERICA MARINES in the street then we would have pulled our forces out and leveled the entire city men, women, and children alike and eventually terrorist would stop because either they would want to keep their lives or they would all be dead. And also any time a bunch of arabs are dancing in the street cause some Americans were killed fly an AC-130 and kill them ALL. The US needs to stop worrying about world opinion, the UN, and civilian casualties it happens get over it.

and its also like saying that all germans where nazis and all americans are fat, stupid, lazy and support every thing that Bush does its saying a few people in a region make the entire region are the same.

Do it and, what do you got? WW3! With America as Germany and Bush as Hittler. A world war with nuclear weapons. If America would do that, almost all countries in the world would decleare war upon the US. And the US can have them all on there one, but not all together. I think that would be the end of this world. And just because some stupid, fat Americans got arrogant.

Do it and, what do you got?

Can I just ask here if you are meant to be called The Fire Dessert (as in pudding) or The Fire Desert (as in generally hot sandy place)?

if they are going to make threads with sexual themes carry an NC-17 warning they should make threads like this carry an IQ<80 warning

its not even worth replying to

if they are going to make threads with sexual themes carry an NC-17 warning they should make threads like this carry an IQ<80 warning

its not even worth replying to

True I think me iq as gone doun seen me reads thes treed

If you kill them all their won't be any left to commit crimes against you. I never said indiscriminate I said TOTAL killing.

I think your statements in this thread are most laughable. I say that because surely it must be a joke? You can't possibly be serious? That's like saying we should kill all Americans cause they just might all think like you. Sounds silly doesn't it? :eek: :sniper:

then you have to kill yourselves because thats thinking like him

Jihad Asgar is the highest form for war. I support them 100%. :)

A harsher war is needed, but also a kinder war. The American people have to realize that the only way to stop terrorism in the region is to liberalize the area. That means removing illiberal regimes, but also send billions in aid to develope liberal institutions. We're doing neither.
But killing all civilians, perhaps by nuking the Middle East, is not a good idea. We gain more ideaological enemies than we loose. After all, most of the world's Muslims live outside the Middle East.

Lets declare a crusade to take back the middle east. Let them have their little Jihad with their AK-47s and suicide bombs and we have a crusades with tanks and all the modern war machines. If we waged a war like war should be waged we wouldn't have so called terrorists they would all be dead, in Falujah we would have used conventional forces we would said you just dragged our AMERICA MARINES in the street then we would have pulled our forces out and leveled the entire city men, women, and children alike and eventually terrorist would stop because either they would want to keep their lives or they would all be dead. And also any time a bunch of arabs are dancing in the street cause some Americans were killed fly an AC-130 and kill them ALL. The US needs to stop worrying about world opinion, the UN, and civilian casualties it happens get over it.
Or, we could just kill all the americans, and that'd end the problems too.

I imagine that idea might be less appealling to you though