NationStates Jolt Archive

Now I know you all like to bash Bush and Kerry, Bush more, but at least do it with manners, here is a guideline:

1) You can't insult the man personally
2) You can't not insult the person you are debating with
3) It is recommended you use proper grammer, people take ya more seriously ya know
4) You can insult/criticize the policies of each respective person
5) You can't insult a belief
6) You can question a belief

And of course the most important rule:

THOU SHALT NOT DEFY THE UBER MODS!

Just my opinion on how a good debate should carry, care to add more? ;)

Well, your still not gonna restrict anybody. No one will listen anyway.

3) You can't use proper grammer, people take ya more seriously ya know



I can use proper grammer if I wanna :p

Well, your still not gonna restrict anybody. No one will listen anyway.

You don't have to tell me this is a feeble attempt in civility

I can use proper grammer if I wanna :p

You do know I was talking about netspeak and leet right? :p

You don't have to tell me this is a feeble attempt in civility
I think you have a good idea, just that no one will listen to you. I will. Might.

I think you have a good idea, just that no one will listen to you. I will. Might.

Glad you agree :)

But your rule was that we can't use proper grammar.

I think this should apply to more than just presidential candidates.

But your rule was that we can't use proper grammar.

Oh... damn must edit >.<

I don't insult Bush personally, it's a simple fact that he is, well, "not very intelligent". Then again, Kerry is a spoilt rich boy too. Meh...can I be an exception as long as I bash both?

I don't insult Bush personally, it's a simple fact that he is, well, "not very intelligent". Then again, Kerry is a spoilt rich boy too. Meh...can I be an exception as long as I bash both?
Bush may not be intelligent in the realm of politics, but that does not automatically qualify him as stupid. Besides, I think Bush would probably spell "spoilt" [sic] the same way you did.

I don't see how Kerry is spoiled though. Didn't he morgtage homes to pay for his campaign? Isn't he running out of his own pocket? Don't he and Teresa have a pre-nub?

I don't insult Bush personally, it's a simple fact that he is, well, "not very intelligent". Then again, Kerry is a spoilt rich boy too. Meh...can I be an exception as long as I bash both?

You really don't have to listen to me, it's not like I'm a mod >.>, but I think it'd civilized the debates

Bush may not be intelligent in the realm of politics, but that does not automatically qualify him as stupid. Besides, I think Bush would probably spell "spoilt" [sic] the same way you did.

I don't see how Kerry is spoiled though. Didn't he morgtage homes to pay for his campaign? Isn't he running out of his own pocket? Don't he and Teresa have a pre-nub?

Don't start this to a debate >.<

THOU SHALT ALL FEAR MY WRATH OR FEEL MY FIERY NUCLEAR KILLDEATH.

http://www.newswatchmagazine.org/jan99/nuke.jpg

Bush may not be intelligent in the realm of politics, but that does not automatically qualify him as stupid. Besides, I think Bush would probably spell "spoilt" [sic] the same way you did.

I don't see how Kerry is spoiled though. Didn't he morgtage homes to pay for his campaign? Isn't he running out of his own pocket? Don't he and Teresa have a pre-nub?

Spoilt is an acceptable past and past participle form of spoil. You can use both spoiled and spoilt.

Kerry inherited $600 million. Basically in the US election you have a choice between two upperclass people with their own interests at heart.

Edit- and to refute your point, to quote www.politics1.com

"That now makes Kerry the richest member of Congress with $675 million (note: he repeatedly says he will not spend it on this campaign -- "It's my wife's money, not mine" -- and, legally, he's correct in that he cannot unless it was a "joint asset" before he launched the campaign)"

Don't start this to a debate >.<
I think my post's accuracy prevented any sort of debate from arising. ;)

Now if you could only give it your mod approval :D

I think my post's accuracy prevented any sort of debate from arising. ;)

Mwahaha, not quite. Im determined to destroy this thread.

Mwahaha, not quite. Im determined to destroy this thread.

*thwaps Kanabia*

Don't you dare.

*thwaps Kanabia*

Don't you dare.

Ah, I think he left anyway.

So, what do we all think about gay marriage?

*Collective Groan*

Ah, I think he left anyway.

So, what do we all think about gay marriage?

*Collective Groan*

Oy >.>

I don't insult Bush personally, it's a simple fact that he is, well, "not very intelligent". Then again, Kerry is a spoilt rich boy too. Meh...can I be an exception as long as I bash both?

Bush might seem stupid, Kanabia, but don't misunderestimate him! ;)

I don't insult Bush personally, it's a simple fact that he is, well, "not very intelligent". Then again, Kerry is a spoilt rich boy too. Meh...can I be an exception as long as I bash both?
Unless I'm mistaking they both fall into the spoilt little rich boy category.

Yes of course, hijack my thread and turn it into a clone of every other thread...

Bush might seem stupid, Kanabia, but don't misunderestimate him! ;)

True. It could be a ploy. Or maybe its to scare the little countries. What's more intimidating than someone like Bush with their finger on the button? Not much.

Unless I'm mistaking they both fall into the spoilt little rich boy category.

Yeah, thats what I mean.

Yes of course, hijack my thread and turn it into a clone of every other thread...

Well, I told you I was going to, didnt I :D

Seriously, take this to another thread.

Seriously, take this to another thread.

Haha. No.

Seriously, I think your thread is beyond saving. Take heart in the fact that most people only read the first post before replying though.

2) You can't not insult the person you are debating with

Aw, gee, sounds like too much trouble HAVING to insult the person. ;)
Santa Cruz bumper sticker "Some other (expletive) for president!" about sums it up for me.