UN is Not US
Dark Fututre
08-08-2004, 03:32
The UN is not able or capable its half dictatorships, the US has the abilty to pull out but we think if we Pull out WW3 so we don't and we get the evil end of the stick, we are the UN's servant personaly we need to tell people who whine about nukes tough people becasue we have done more and you ain't helping.
Opal Isle
08-08-2004, 03:33
Again, another thread that doesn't make sense, but it's a post by a conservative concerning the UN, so it's probably wrong.
Von Witzleben
08-08-2004, 03:34
I suggest you take some English lessons and then try again.
Berkylvania
08-08-2004, 03:47
UN bad, blah, blah, blah, US good, blah, blah, blah, no one else whine because I'm too busy whining, blah, blah, blah.
Opal Isle
08-08-2004, 03:48
Oh.
Opal Isle
08-08-2004, 03:53
psst...clicky (http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=346756)
Von Witzleben
08-08-2004, 03:54
psst...clicky (http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=346756)
I don't get it.
Opal Isle
08-08-2004, 03:55
Clicky = hidden url
Von Witzleben
08-08-2004, 03:56
Clicky = hidden url
I clicked on both URL's. i still don't get it.
The Mycon
08-08-2004, 04:20
I clicked on both URL's. i still don't get it.
Well, that's because you're not very bright.
Take a guess on how many threads can be around 897 posts without everyone having seen it, and then think what would be the purpose of bringing a topic to the front page in spite of lack of activity.
New Kingman
08-08-2004, 04:20
The UN is not able or capable its half dictatorships, the US has the abilty to pull out but we think if we Pull out WW3 so we don't and we get the evil end of the stick, we are the UN's servant personaly we need to tell people who whine about nukes tough people becasue we have done more and you ain't helping.
That's nice. Now go back to Free Republic and play with your mouthbreather friends.
LordaeronII
08-08-2004, 04:23
The UN is not able or capable its half dictatorships, the US has the abilty to pull out but we think if we Pull out WW3 so we don't and we get the evil end of the stick, we are the UN's servant personaly we need to tell people who whine about nukes tough people becasue we have done more and you ain't helping.
I get a vague feeling I might agree with you if I had a clue in hell what you said.... simply because I don't like the UN and your post doesn't seem to have a very high opinion of the UN. Other than that though, work on your English man.
Bodies Without Organs
08-08-2004, 04:30
The UN is not able or capable its half dictatorships, the US has the abilty to pull out but we think if we Pull out WW3 so we don't and we get the evil end of the stick, we are the UN's servant personaly we need to tell people who whine about nukes tough people becasue we have done more and you ain't helping.
Can I try to help:
"The UN is not able or capable of fulfilling its function. It's comprised of countries, half of which are just dictatorships (and thus go against the spirit with which the UN was set up).
The US has the ability to withdraw from the UN, but we think that if we do so, then World War III will start - so we don't. Thus we get the evil end of the stick: the US is kept in a disadvantageous position with regard to its national interests, in order to work towards world peace.
Personaly speaking, I think we need to tell people who whine about nukes "tough, people" becasue we (the US) have done more to remove their threat, and you ain't helping."
Just a guess.
New Foxxinnia
08-08-2004, 04:32
Can I try to help:
"The UN is not able or capable of fulfilling its function. It's comprised of countries, half of which are just dictatorships (and thus go against the spirit with which the UN was set up).
The US has the ability to withdraw from the UN, but we think that if we do so, then World War III will start - so we don't. Thus we get the evil end of the stick: the US is kept in a disadvantageous position with regard to its national interests, in order to work towards world peace.
Personaly speaking, I think we need to tell people who whine about nukes "tough, people" becasue we (the US) have done more to remove their threat, and you ain't helping."
Just a guess.I think it's a plea for help.
LordaeronII
08-08-2004, 04:38
Can I try to help:
"The UN is not able or capable of fulfilling its function. It's comprised of countries, half of which are just dictatorships (and thus go against the spirit with which the UN was set up).
The US has the ability to withdraw from the UN, but we think that if we do so, then World War III will start - so we don't. Thus we get the evil end of the stick: the US is kept in a disadvantageous position with regard to its national interests, in order to work towards world peace.
Personaly speaking, I think we need to tell people who whine about nukes "tough, people" becasue we (the US) have done more to remove their threat, and you ain't helping."
Just a guess.
Hmmmm *if* in fact that is what he meant, it can make sense I suppose. I see nothing wrong with authoritarian rule though. I do believe the U.S. should withdraw from the U.N, as I don't not see the U.N as a voice of reason or anything like that, quite the opposite actually.
Bodies Without Organs
08-08-2004, 04:41
I think it's a plea for help.
Just as long as we don't start doing Lassie jokes: "What's that, Dark Future? The United States has fallen down a geopolitical mineshaft and broken its leg? It can't climb out of the United Nations? Is that it? Gee, Dad, I think he wants us to follow him!"
That would be mean.
Eldarana
08-08-2004, 05:30
I think we the U.S. should pull out of the UN because they do nothing but discuss things in a comittee while letting dictators ride on tigers as Churchill put it.
Undecidedterritory
08-08-2004, 05:39
the UN 'S goal is to bring peace to the world. a noble goal. however it has failed.....dismaly.......again and again. It seems to me to be yet another bueracratic waste of money on a massive scale. all the humanitarian work it does is already done by other organizations. It's peace keeping efforts are notable ( any one ever hear about the killing fields of pol pot?) or maybe the crises of rwanda during which UN guards were not issued weapons. or how about the latest problem where they would not enforce their own resolutions. how about the oil for food scandal. A deeply flawed organization. I think that since most americans dissaprove of it , now would be a good time to relocate it and think about disbanning it. The only UN that even has the potential of working is the one on nationstates. at least the one on nationstates isnt a psuedo luege of nations that is so impotant like the united nations.
Tuesday Heights
08-08-2004, 06:27
The US uses the UN just as the UN uses the nations within it to pit itself against the UN; it's a vicious cycle the UN should've kicked the US out of a long time ago for... alas, it'll never happen, they need our army and our money. * sigh * :headbang:
Bodies Without Organs
08-08-2004, 06:34
The US uses the UN just as the UN uses the nations within it to pit itself against the UN; it's a vicious cycle the UN should've kicked the US out of a long time ago for... alas, it'll never happen, they need our army and our money. * sigh * :headbang:
...and I think that tonight we have all learnt a valuable lesson about the nature of codependency and abusive relationships. Thanks for watching, and goodnight.