NationStates Jolt Archive

http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?floc=FF-APO-PLS&idq=/ff/story/0001/20040806/1244627398.htm

what-the-flying-****?

That is scary. I'm sure glad I don't live in Tennessee.

We can't let that guy any more into the government. Eeeek!!

Why on earth did he get this far anyway? Don't people have common sense? *looks around*
I guess that answers my question...

No kidding! What a loser.

I heard about this guy a week ago and thought he was very different, but David Duke a member of the Democratic party was a member of the KKK. This James Hart doesnt represent the conservative values.

Well what do you know? A racist in the south. He won't win. Unlike Robert bird.

YOU CALL THAT AN ASSHOLE!?!? THIS is an asshole... goatse.cx Just kidding dont actually go there but most of you know what it is.

""When I knock on a door and say white children deserve the same rights as everybody else, the enthusiastic response is truly amazing,'' he said. ""

I think he is trying to make a point and the people of Tennessee see the point he is trying to make. I think he went about it wrong but then he is getting free MEDIA ATTENTION.

I heard about this guy a week ago and thought he was very different, but David Duke a member of the Democratic party was a member of the KKK. This James Hart doesnt represent the conservative values.David Duke was most certainly not a member of the Democratic party--he was a Republican who won a seat in the LA legislature, then ran for governor, Senator and President (in the primaries), losing badly every time before finally being convicted of wire fraud. Democrats have enough of their own idiots without having racists pawned off on us.

I heard about this guy a week ago and thought he was very different, but David Duke a member of the Democratic party was a member of the KKK. This James Hart doesnt represent the conservative values.

The KKK? You mean the Klueless Klutz Klan? Lol... :D

David Duke was most certainly not a member of the Democratic party--he was a Republican who won a seat in the LA legislature, then ran for governor, Senator and President (in the primaries), losing badly every time before finally being convicted of wire fraud. Democrats have enough of their own idiots without having racists pawned off on us.

True enough. Al Sharpton is the only racist the Democratic party needs.

And to think that my best friend's family is from Tennessee...

True enough. Al Sharpton is the only racist the Democratic party needs.

Don't forget racist Jesse Jackson.

""When I knock on a door and say white children deserve the same rights as everybody else, the enthusiastic response is truly amazing,'' he said. ""

I think he is trying to make a point and the people of Tennessee see the point he is trying to make. I think he went about it wrong but then he is getting free MEDIA ATTENTION.
I would love for him to knock on my door. I would tell him that I was undecided but leaning towards voting for him. I would let him talk as long as he liked and I would try to get him to expand on all of his topics. The more time he spent with me, would give him less time to spread his word. After he left, I would call his opponent and ask him to put a sign on my lawn.

My guess there is he is reffering to affirmative action? If so, then he's right.


But this KKKish member does not reflect true conservative values.

Don't forget racist Jesse Jackson.

I said NEEDS... the Democratic Party has plenty of other racists besides Mr. Sharpton and Mr. Jackson.

My guess there is he is reffering to affirmative action? If so, then he's right.


But this KKKish member does not reflect true conservative values.


He does not want to kill anyone, he just wants equality. As far as I know, he was never a member of the KKK.

He does not want to kill anyone, he just wants equality. As far as I know, he was never a member of the KKK.

that is why I added "-ish" to the end of KKK. He is not as extreme as them.

I have no problems with his ant for equality. About time we had someone to counter the uberracism of the Left wing. (not sarcasm)

Giant Question Mark.

Giant Question Mark.

Most people call it "reverse racism," but it is just racism.

NAACP chairman for one (don't remember the name), Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton, just to name a few.

that is why I added "-ish" to the end of KKK. He is not as extreme as them.

I have no problems with his ant for equality. About time we had someone to counter the uberracism of the Left wing. (not sarcasm)

I caught the -ish, just wanted to make sure others would not think he was a member of the KKK.

I wouldn't vote for him - I do not care much for the rest of his platform plus he is just as bad as the Sharptons of the world.

I caught the -ish, just wanted to make sure others would not think he was a member of the KKK.

I wouldn't vote for him - I do not care much for the rest of his platform plus he is just as bad as the Sharptons of the world.

Okay, just checking.

I wouldn't vote for him either, but I'm too young to vote, and I don't live in Tennessee.

YOU CALL THAT AN ASSHOLE!?!? THIS is an asshole... goatse.cx Just kidding dont actually go there but most of you know what it is.
So, what'd that feller die of again ....?
;)

In November, the GOP candidate will oppose Rep. John Tanner, a Democrat who has represented the northwest Tennessee district for 15 years.

He won't win anyhow...the GOP people in Tenn are probably just tired of nominating people who lose. I wouldn't pay much attention.

You can find more about him here:
http://www.jameshartforcongress.com/ (http://www.brucespringsteen.net/).

I just have to say this...

Hart, 60, vows if elected to work toward keeping ``less favored races'' from reproducing or immigrating to the United States. In campaign literature, Hart contends that ``poverty genes'' threaten to turn the United States into ``one big Detroit.''

I just came back from spending three days with some very good freinds who live in Westland, wich is about 15 minutes from Woodward avenue, which is the heart of Detroit.

Detroit Rules.
There are so many different cultures there, that you can experience them all nearly anywhere in Detroit you go.
In Westland, on Middlebelt road, you can find a small Middle Eastern restuaruant called "Pineland".

They make THE best Middle eastern food Ive ever had.
Its a small , locally owned place run by some guy and his hot duaghter.
They always are superbly nice to me, and recognize us when we go there.

In Farmington Hills, not far from there, is an Indian food place called "Shalimar's".
I recently had the best meal Ive ever eaten, from there.
It was Swordfish, marinated in yogurt, then rolled in cracked black peper, and then grilled.

I had a stiffy throughout the whole meal.

Its not just restaruants, either, theres music, and all sorts of interesting things that most places wouldnt have becuase they lack the diversity of culture.

Its a GOOD thing.

If anyone likes Indian food and lives in the Detroit area...you HAVE to check out Shalimar's.

Best Indian food

EVER.

Affirmative action is an attempt to counter racism.

Affirmative action is an attempt to counter racism.

Instead, though, it just created racism against whites.

Despite everything that is wrong with this nomination.... what really is scary to me is the fact that he was the only one on the ballot. And his opponent has been in the house for 15 years... The GOP must consist of a couple of good ol' boys who have spent too much time making moonshine and running from revenuers.

James L. Hart, a believer in the discredited, phony science of eugenics.
Eugenics was discredited and is being called phony? When did that happen?

Instead, though, it just created racism against whites.
Oh goody.... -.-;

What a nice guy, the sort of person to compliment the GOP agenda.

He does not want to kill anyone, he just wants equality.

Well, actually...
Eugenics is a moral commitment not a racial affiliation and any race that accepted its moral responsibility to protect the right of it's children to be born physically healthy and mentally capable could evolve into and become the next more highly evolved species above homo-sapiens.
... he's pro-Eugenics. That news article tried to take a fair and uncritical view of the man, and posted some of his less controvesial statements.

However, I completely lost my connection to reality for a while this morning, and reviewing some of my thoughts, I can honestly say "at least he'd do less damage than a Libertarian."

Eugenics was discredited and is being called phony? When did that happen?

I think it was something to do with the mass compulsory sterilisation of millions of americans and a small event known as the Holaucast...
Eugenics is FAR worse than affirmitive action, it basicaly states that only the "right" people should be allowed to breed to make the human race better and that all others should be sterilised to stop them continuing on having babies. Races often deemed unworthy and hence inhuman include the jews and people of African decent.

I think it was something to do with the mass compulsory sterilisation of millions of americans and a small event known as the Holaucast...
Eugenics is FAR worse than affirmitive action, it basicaly states that only the "right" people should be allowed to breed to make the human race better and that all others should be sterilised to stop them continuing on having babies. Races often deemed unworthy and hence inhuman include the jews and people of African decent.

Ah. Well, the races should be equal, but people with mental disorders and permanent physical disorders should not be allowed to reproduce. They can live out their lives, but they should not be allowed to reproduce.

Wow... I'm surprised the Republicans haven't tried to silence him. This could tarnish their moderate party views... very, very, intriguing.

Wow... I'm surprised the Republicans haven't tried to silence him. This could tarnish their moderate party views... very, very, intriguing.


Meh. I always said that the Repub's need to get back to the Right Wing, but I did not mean this much.....

I think it was something to do with the mass compulsory sterilisation of millions of americans and a small event known as the Holaucast...
Eugenics is FAR worse than affirmitive action, it basicaly states that only the "right" people should be allowed to breed to make the human race better and that all others should be sterilised to stop them continuing on having babies. Races often deemed unworthy and hence inhuman include the jews and people of African decent.
That only explains the ways in which eugenics can be used. That doesn’t fully explain what it is. Eugenics has two aspect that can either exist independently from each other, or coincide with each other. The first aspect it to promote people with certain characteristics to breed with each other. There is noting really repressive about that now is there? The second aspect is the more disagreeable aspect. Which is to prevent people with disagreeable characteristics from reproducing. This can be done anywhere though sterilization to extermination. The second aspect though is definitely a repressive aspect. However like I said though, those two aspects don’t always have to be together.

And now I return to my original question. What makes it so phony of a science? Is it just the way in which it can be used that makes people want to shy from it? Or is there a better reason?

Despite everything that is wrong with this nomination.... what really is scary to me is the fact that he was the only one on the ballot. And his opponent has been in the house for 15 years... The GOP must consist of a couple of good ol' boys who have spent too much time making moonshine and running from revenuers.
This is the kind of stuff that results from gerrymandering and the creation of "safe" seats. No one else wanted to blow the money on a race they knew they would lose. Both major parties are equally guilty of this, and it's horrible. I mean, a lot of Democrats are bemoaning the fact that there are a number of Republicans running unopposed for re-election to the House--what if a scandal breaks between now and election day? No chance for a pick-up--or worse, you find yourself with someone equally offensive representing your party. Ugh.

At least if you have an asshole of a politician in your midst you can assassinate them in the time-honoured fashion,thanks to your easy access to weapons.
Here in britain,we have to make to make do with throwing eggs,flour or bags of dye (No,really)
There is a selection of high-calibre rifles & quality scopes at your friendly local gun store,but remember kids......
-Always go for the head shot
-Always take into account windspeed & direction
-Practice makes perfect,try shooting watermelons first
-happy shooting!!
Frank White,
President of Luckdonia

This is the danger of party loyalty.

How many people will vote for him simply because he's The Republican?

Too many.

At least in this case, there's little if any chance the retard will be elected, but even so, if the local Republican party isn't upset about this, there's little hope for them. I think it would be a great thing for some higher-ups in the party to publicly disavow the guy--I would hope that if something similar happened in the Democratic party we'd do the same thing. Hell, I'm ready to disavow Joe Lieberman and he's nowhere near the same league as this guy. :D

Mebbe Republicans just want someone to balance out Democratic Senator Robert "KKK" Byrd? Democrats shouldn't get a monopoly on racism. They get Jesse "Lovechild" Jackson, Al "What was the bitch doing in the park?" Sharpton, and Robert "KKK" Byrd. What do 'publicans get? This nut ball, a dead senator, and <Insert name of conservative talk show host you hate>. Damn I hate <Previously Inserted Name>, we should kill <him/her/it>.

Hajekistan: Never afraid to take a stand against annoying talk show hosts, that means you <Previously Inserted Name>!

If I ever met this guy I'd give him the Nazi salute, seems the right type of person to give it to. Mainly because the Nazis and him are racist idiots.

Eugenics, in its current incarnations, is total bullshit. It has become a method for social, political, and religious bigotry. Yes, the science is still valid, as proved by the successful breeding of many domestic animal species, but when practiced on humans, its applications become slanted, fictitous, and disgusting. It is an avenue by which racists try to legitimize and popularize their deplorable views.

About time to stand against political correctness even though I'm not really a racist.

Mebbe Republicans just want someone to balance out Democratic Senator Robert "KKK" Byrd? Democrats shouldn't get a monopoly on racism. They get Jesse "Lovechild" Jackson, Al "What was the bitch doing in the park?" Sharpton, and Robert "KKK" Byrd. What do 'publicans get? This nut ball, a dead senator, and <Insert name of conservative talk show host you hate>. Damn I hate <Previously Inserted Name>, we should kill <him/her/it>.

Hajekistan: Never afraid to take a stand against annoying talk show hosts, that means you <Previously Inserted Name>!

If you don't like it, don't listen to it. Taking them off the air violates their free speech.

I am exceedingly confused. He accepts (or pretends to accept) the concept of evolution. Yet he is a deranged right-wing asshat. My brain will implode if anything this contradictory comes up within the next few days.

Also-if he has read Origin of Species, surely he saw mentioned the fact that diversity is what keeps a species alive? Without diversity, there are fewer mutations, and hence less chance of a species evolving to cope with the environment. Plus, a narrow (shallow?) gene pool increases the risks of genetic disorders cropping up. So...eugenics of the type he accepts would be very damaging to the subspecies Homo sapiens sapiens.

(brain implodes)

Ow. Damn. I kinda want him to get elected: with ol' Strom gone, who will make racist comments in Congress for our amusement now?

I'm a right-winger, and I accept evolution AND creationism.

God created the first life, and evolution took care of itself.

About time to stand against political correctness even though I'm not really a racist.
So this is how one makes such a stand.....

Hart, 60, vows if elected to work toward keeping ``less favored races'' from reproducing or immigrating to the United States. In campaign literature, Hart contends that ``poverty genes'' threaten to turn the United States into ``one big Detroit.''

.....and you support such a stand? Hmmmmm

(brain implodes)

Ow. Damn. I kinda want him to get elected: with ol' Strom gone, who will make racist comments in Congress for our amusement now?

You are joking?

If you don't like it, don't listen to it. Taking them off the air violates their free speech.

Then my not being on air violates MY free speech!

The right to free speech does not include the right to be on a talk show, you know.

Then my not being on air violates MY free speech!

The right to free speech does not include the right to be on a talk show, you know.

Hey, if you want to be on Talk radio, get a job there.

It is the talk show host's JOB to spout opinions. If you don't like it, don't listen. If talk show hosts were to be shut down, then NPC, Air America, and the New York Times needs to be shut down.

If you don't like it, don't listen to it. Taking them off the air violates their free speech.
Damn, I was just making a joke. I didn't even mention the name, I just mentioned that I completely agreed with whoever was reading this on who the most annoying talk show host, even by agreeing I was inherently contradicting myself. how you ca get offended by someone agreeing with you I'll never guess.

Wow, I had these words i was gonna say, but I don't think I can say anything about this. It's disturbing

Damn, I was just making a joke. I didn't even mention the name, I just mentioned that I completely agreed with whoever was reading this on who the most annoying talk show host, even by agreeing I was inherently contradicting myself. how you ca get offended by someone agreeing with you I'll never guess.

Sorry. In the General forum, you just can never tell.....

*Twilight Zone music*