NationStates Jolt Archive


Should girls be allowed to act?

Crabcake Baba Ganoush
01-08-2004, 13:12
Wouldn’t it be better if we went back to the time where it was only guys that were doing the acting. Even all of the lady characters were guys and the audience was still able to enjoy watching performances. So why shouldn’t people today be able to enjoy watching an all male Sex in the City, or an all male Lifetime original movie? I mean people today can still act can’t they?
Jello Biafra
01-08-2004, 13:13
Lol.
Colodia
01-08-2004, 13:14
DAMN STRAIGHT!

*holds up a sign saying "ONLY MEN can do manly things....like acting like a woman"*
Earnhardtism
01-08-2004, 14:07
cuz id rather look at a womans cleavage and thighs than yours!! :p
Crabcake Baba Ganoush
01-08-2004, 16:15
cuz id rather look at a womans cleavage and thighs than yours!! :p
You got something against my hairy legs pal?
:mp5:
Suicidal Librarians
01-08-2004, 16:18
You got something against my hairy legs pal?
:mp5:

Ewwww.....
Chess Squares
01-08-2004, 16:19
cuz id rather look at a womans cleavage and thighs than yours!! :p
dont watch catwoman
Getin Hi
01-08-2004, 16:20
For Shakespeare's 17th Century productions, young boys were used as female characters. That would be a bit iffy today, imagine if there were a sex scene or something... sick!
Reactivists
01-08-2004, 16:21
Wouldn’t it be better if we went back to the time where it was only guys that were doing the acting. Even all of the lady characters were guys and the audience was still able to enjoy watching performances. So why shouldn’t people today be able to enjoy watching an all male Sex in the City, or an all male Lifetime original movie? I mean people today can still act can’t they?

This isn't flamebait as much as confusionbait! I have never, NEVER seen a more random thread.
Von Witzleben
01-08-2004, 16:26
I fully agree!!! How much more enjoyabal would Xena or Buffy or Charmed have been if all the characters had been men!!! As it was supposed to be.
Crabcake Baba Ganoush
01-08-2004, 16:29
This isn't flamebait as much as confusionbait! I have never, NEVER seen a more random thread.
Confusion? I though I made my humorous attempt more obvious this time. Or are you trying to trick me?

*Looks behind and all around just in case*
:eek:
Gophers!!!!

*Runs and hides*
Crabcake Baba Ganoush
01-08-2004, 16:31
Ewwww.....
Yeah well that hair goes all the way up. Not quite as hairy as Robin Williams though.

*Goes back into hiding*
Reactivists
01-08-2004, 16:34
Confusion? I though I made my humorous attempt more obvious this time. Or are you trying to trick me?

*Looks behind and all around just in case*
:eek:
Gophers!!!!

*Runs and hides*

Sorry, I only just saw the "Should girls be allowed to play football" thread; I assume there have been, disturbingly, a whole series of these posted in seriousness.
And yes, you can watch for the gophers, but it's the sloths that'll get you in the end!
Crabcake Baba Ganoush
01-08-2004, 16:52
Sorry, I only just saw the "Should girls be allowed to play football" thread; I assume there have been, disturbingly, a whole series of these posted in seriousness.
And yes, you can watch for the gophers, but it's the sloths that'll get you in the end!
I’ve never seen a sloth with a machinegun before. Earlier I only had to put up with sword wielding gerbils. Now it's machinegun toting gophers.
:eek:
Maybe they use sniper rifles.
Unfree People
01-08-2004, 18:00
DAMN STRAIGHT!

*holds up a sign saying "ONLY MEN can do manly things....like acting like a woman"*
Snerk... it would certainly make the world a better place... right... rofl.