NationStates Jolt Archive


The War for Oil...

Opal Isle
25-07-2004, 05:45
because if the war on terror was really about terrorism we would have attacked Iran or Saudi Arabia and if it was really about defending our country from attack, we would have attacked North Korea.
The Friendly Facist
25-07-2004, 05:50
I wont correct you on your mention of North korea. But I will say that the more cynical and progressive of conservatives say "Yes, but so what"
Furor Atlantis
25-07-2004, 05:51
Exactly. Whenever I strike up this conversation with some right-wingers, all they do is hold their ears tight and scream as loud as they can "NOT TRUE ALL LIES!!!!!"



:rolleyes:
Opal Isle
25-07-2004, 05:51
I wont correct you on your mention of North korea. But I will say that the more cynical and progressive of conservatives say "Yes, but so what"
How is my mention of North Korea inaccurate?
The Friendly Facist
25-07-2004, 05:56
I said I wouldnt correct you. but I will say that North korea is not a threat to the U.S anymore than any other Nuclear capable power. Its all sabre rattling.
the situation is under control.
Southern Industrial
25-07-2004, 05:56
The risk of attacking SK is that we're fairly certian that their number ten in the nuclear club (And I know who the other nine are! I feel so smart!)
Opal Isle
25-07-2004, 05:58
The risk of attacking SK is that we're fairly certian that their number ten in the nuclear club (And I know who the other nine are! I feel so smart!)
Why would we attack SK?
Furor Atlantis
25-07-2004, 05:58
south korea????? how uneducated is the south????
Opal Isle
25-07-2004, 05:58
I said I wouldnt correct you. but I will say that North korea is not a threat to the U.S anymore than any other Nuclear capable power. Its all sabre rattling.
the situation is under control.
...but Iraq was a threat...as some NS Repubs have claimed...?
Southern Industrial
25-07-2004, 05:59
Why would we attack SK?

I'm sorry... Brain fart. I meant North Korea, NK.
Furor Atlantis
25-07-2004, 06:00
Another thing is that south korea doesnt have oil. But neither does the Al Quaida. But saddam does.
Furor Atlantis
25-07-2004, 06:01
At least I don't think Al Quaida has oil :confused:
Opal Isle
25-07-2004, 06:08
Another thing is that south korea doesnt have oil. But neither does the Al Quaida. But saddam does.
...and NORTH Korea doesn't have oil either...
Opal Isle
25-07-2004, 06:08
North Korea just has like the world's scariest army...like seriously...we'd actually have to try to take over North Korea. Bush has no gonads.
Furor Atlantis
25-07-2004, 06:20
i thought a whole chunk of north korea was killed in that train crash that was "said" to be deliberately done by the government/dictator.
Opal Isle
25-07-2004, 06:22
i thought a whole chunk of north korea was killed in that train crash that was "said" to be deliberately done by the government/dictator.
Yea, but North Korea doesn't have oil so they can kill their own people.
Furor Atlantis
25-07-2004, 06:29
True, true...




Whatever happend to morals?