NationStates Jolt Archive


Kerry's biggest supporters - Al-Qaeda

Friends of Bill
20-06-2004, 21:27
http://www.brokennewz.com/displaystory.asp_Q_storyid_E_945qaedakerry

Al-Qaeda Backs Democratic Candidate John Kerry; Plans Big Voter Turnout Effort
Labrador
20-06-2004, 21:31
What a PHUCKING BIASED poll!
Kiss my ass, you aren't worth it, you Bush butt-kisser!

Lemme ask you THIS...

Who are YOU with??

John Kerry and working Americans
or
George Bush and the unemployment line?

John Kerry and decent, hard-working Americans
or
George Bush and rich cronies who ship our jobs overseas like cheap bastards?
Friends of Bill
20-06-2004, 21:33
It was a joke poll in response to the biased pools allways on this site. Calm down, and watch yourself.
Friends of Bill
20-06-2004, 21:34
rich cronies like Hienz Ketchup?
Zukoo
20-06-2004, 21:34
Well to think that Al Qaeda supports either of the two is assanine. However I do suspect that if Al Qaeda's vote was the only vote that mattered come November they would pick Kerry over Bush. Just a hunch.
MKULTRA
20-06-2004, 21:36
its common knowledge already that al queda has endorced Bush for re-election since he is their best recruiter and plays into their hands every time
Berkylvania
20-06-2004, 21:38
Why would they pick Kerry over Bush? Under the Bush presidency, membership in extremist groups has risen and their profile has increased dramatically. Really, the last four years have been nothing but good news for terrorisim organizations world wide as we can see by their massive upswing of actions in 2003. More likely, such organizations would want Bush to continue in office so he can further polarize The World Vs. The US argument.
Irondin
20-06-2004, 21:40
http://www.brokennewz.com/displaystory.asp_Q_storyid_E_945qaedakerry

Al-Qaeda Backs Democratic Candidate John Kerry; Plans Big Voter Turnout Effort

all right now buddy your starting to troal I would stop unless you wana get baned
Formal Dances
20-06-2004, 21:42
its common knowledge already that al queda has endorced Bush for re-election since he is their best recruiter and plays into their hands every time

Prove this MKULTRA!
MKULTRA
20-06-2004, 21:44
its common knowledge already that al queda has endorced Bush for re-election since he is their best recruiter and plays into their hands every time

Prove this MKULTRA!look at al queda membership numbers under Clinton compared to their membership numbers under bumbling Bush
Friends of Bill
20-06-2004, 21:44
http://www.brokennewz.com/displaystory.asp_Q_storyid_E_945qaedakerry

Al-Qaeda Backs Democratic Candidate John Kerry; Plans Big Voter Turnout Effort

all right now buddy your starting to troal I would stop unless you wana get banedKind of like the Bush-Al-qaeda thread. Hypocricy!
MKULTRA
20-06-2004, 21:46
http://www.brokennewz.com/displaystory.asp_Q_storyid_E_945qaedakerry

Al-Qaeda Backs Democratic Candidate John Kerry; Plans Big Voter Turnout Effort

all right now buddy your starting to troal I would stop unless you wana get banedKind of like the Bush-Al-qaeda thread. Hypocricy!there are links to Bush and al queda going way back to the early 90s
Serengarve
20-06-2004, 21:47
http://www.brokennewz.com/displaystory.asp_Q_storyid_E_945qaedakerry

Al-Qaeda Backs Democratic Candidate John Kerry; Plans Big Voter Turnout Effort

all right now buddy your starting to troal I would stop unless you wana get banedKind of like the Bush-Al-qaeda thread. Hypocricy!there are links to Bush and al queda going way back to the early 90s

Where at?
Purly Euclid
20-06-2004, 21:48
What a PHUCKING BIASED poll!
Kiss my ass, you aren't worth it, you Bush butt-kisser!

Lemme ask you THIS...

Who are YOU with??

John Kerry and working Americans
or
George Bush and the unemployment line?

John Kerry and decent, hard-working Americans
or
George Bush and rich cronies who ship our jobs overseas like cheap bastards?
You're just as biased there.
Irondin
20-06-2004, 21:48
http://www.brokennewz.com/displaystory.asp_Q_storyid_E_945qaedakerry

Al-Qaeda Backs Democratic Candidate John Kerry; Plans Big Voter Turnout Effort

all right now buddy your starting to troal I would stop unless you wana get banedKind of like the Bush-Al-qaeda thread. Hypocricy!

but it was a mod who started that and I giveing advice not rying to but you down man
MKULTRA
20-06-2004, 21:49
http://www.brokennewz.com/displaystory.asp_Q_storyid_E_945qaedakerry

Al-Qaeda Backs Democratic Candidate John Kerry; Plans Big Voter Turnout Effort

all right now buddy your starting to troal I would stop unless you wana get banedKind of like the Bush-Al-qaeda thread. Hypocricy!there are links to Bush and al queda going way back to the early 90s

Where at?afghanistan and CIA blowback schemes
Enodscopia
20-06-2004, 21:49
The numbers of increased terrorist recruits might be up but what is the number of killed terrorists President Bush is doing a good job. And islam is the problem and the sooner it ends the better.
MKULTRA
20-06-2004, 21:51
The numbers of increased terrorist recruits might be up but what is the number of killed terrorists President Bush is doing a good job. And islam is the problem and the sooner it ends the better.Bush is a tool for the terrorists to such an extent it makes one wonder if theyre not working together--Bush has also alienated america from the world
Friends of Bill
20-06-2004, 21:53
The numbers of increased terrorist recruits might be up but what is the number of killed terrorists President Bush is doing a good job. And islam is the problem and the sooner it ends the better.Bush is a tool for the terrorists to such an extent it makes one wonder if theyre not working together--Bush has also alienated america from the worldTHe world chose to do nothing about repeated violations of U.N. demands by Saddam Hussien. THe world is responsible for this war, not America. The world hates us for all our advantages.
Opal Isle
20-06-2004, 22:07
I normally don't pyramid quote, so I'm gonna break these up:

The numbers of increased terrorist recruits might be up but what is the number of killed terrorists President Bush is doing a good job. And islam is the problem and the sooner it ends the better.
Since bin Laden declared Jihad on the American people, terrorists have no problem dying to further the cause as they are gauranteed to go to the Holy Land (or whatever it is they call their heaven) and whether or not you think that is a good idea to want to die, it doesn't change the fact that the terrorist accept this, believe this, and therefore enroll, knowing they have this oppurtunity. Besides, you just condoned the murder of another human being, which makes you little better than a terrorist yourself.

Bush is a tool for the terrorists to such an extent it makes one wonder if theyre not working together--Bush has also alienated america from the world
Uhm, I don't know if I entirely agree with all of this, but it is true that Bush has alienated America from most of the world.

THe world chose to do nothing about repeated violations of U.N. demands by Saddam Hussien. THe world is responsible for this war, not America. The world hates us for all our advantages.
Well...first off, doing something about Saddam's UN violations would have been a UN violation in itself (yes, Bush's actions in Iraq is a UN violation, he recieved no Security Council clearance), and second off, there is still no proof that Saddam was violating the UN resolutions passed concerning his allowance of weaponry. And if there was proof somewhere, link me to the CNN article. Oh wait, you'll just find the link about how the Kurds are enjoying the US soldiers being there. The obvious solution is give the souther Iraqis the nation of Iraq, and take northern Iraq and make a new nation, calling it Kurdistan. The Kurds have never had a nation of their own and have been persecuted by Iraq, Turkey, Iran, and Syria. So if removing Saddam for persecuting his own people is the reason for our invasion of Iraq, then Syria, Iran, and our fellow NATO member, Turkey are the next three nations on the list. Last time something was done about violating decisions made by an international organization was World War II. And that wasn't even preimptive (sp.); Germany struck first. So, you are not only saying that Saddam was more dangerous to the Kurds than Hitler was to the Jews, but you are also saying that Iraq was more of a threat to the world as a whole than Nazi Germany was to the world. In fact, if Japan was not a German ally at that time, Germany would probably control all of Europe today. That's kind of scary (not to bash the Germans), and I know there is no way that Iraq could have ever controlled all of the Middle East. So, yea....
MKULTRA
20-06-2004, 22:07
The numbers of increased terrorist recruits might be up but what is the number of killed terrorists President Bush is doing a good job. And islam is the problem and the sooner it ends the better.Bush is a tool for the terrorists to such an extent it makes one wonder if theyre not working together--Bush has also alienated america from the worldTHe world chose to do nothing about repeated violations of U.N. demands by Saddam Hussien. THe world is responsible for this war, not America. The world hates us for all our advantages.so now your trying to say that all the UN-hating conservatives all of a sudden care about UN laws?
Superpower07
20-06-2004, 22:20
Al-Qaeda Backs Democratic Candidate John Kerry; Plans Big Voter Turnout Effort

So turnabout is fair play, huh?

The minute I saw you write this I knew you were just playing politics. There's already a thread like this saying the same about Bush
Spoffin
20-06-2004, 22:35
http://www.brokennewz.com/displaystory.asp_Q_storyid_E_945qaedakerry

Al-Qaeda Backs Democratic Candidate John Kerry; Plans Big Voter Turnout Effort

all right now buddy your starting to troal I would stop unless you wana get banedKind of like the Bush-Al-qaeda thread. Hypocricy!No, Myrth actually had a point though, about A-Q membership rolls increasing under Bush's presidency. You just had a tragicly unfunny link and a biast poll.
Republic of Texas
20-06-2004, 22:39
I'm going to fly an airplane into your house, FOB.
Myrth
20-06-2004, 22:40
Stupid poll removed.
Spoffin
20-06-2004, 22:58
Stupid poll removed.I agree with you Myrth, but its worth mentioning that censoring people on this site for merely being stupid is a slippery slope
Arammanar
20-06-2004, 23:03
Stupid poll removed.I agree with you Myrth, but its worth mentioning that censoring people on this site for merely being stupid is a slippery slope
Being stupid or being coversative? If they censored people for being stupid there'd be about five topics and three posters left.
Arammanar
20-06-2004, 23:04
Stupid poll removed.I agree with you Myrth, but its worth mentioning that censoring people on this site for merely being stupid is a slippery slope
Being stupid or being coversative? If they censored people for being stupid there'd be about five topics and three posters left.
Labrador
20-06-2004, 23:14
Actually, for being neither stupid, nor conservative (though in my not so humble opinion, those go hand in hand...right along with greed, selfishness, and mean spiritedness...and unkindness to your fellow men.)

No...it was removed because it is phucking FLAMEBAIT!!

I don't know about other Liberals, I can't speal for them, but, speaking for me...I HAVE JUST ABOUT PHUCKING HAD IT WITH ALL THESE GODDAM CONSERVO-CREEPS WHO SAY IF YOU DO NOT SUPPORT BUSH, THEN YOU ARE UNPATRIOTIC, UN-AMERICAN, AND THAT YOU SUPPORT AL-QAEDA, JUST BECAUSE YOU DON'T SUPPORT BUSH...BECAUSE YOU THINK HIS ECONOMIC POLICIES SUCK, AND HIS FOREIGN POLICIES CAUSE MORE PROBLEMS THAN THEY SOLVE!!

GODDAM IT!!

ok, rant over.
Arammanar
20-06-2004, 23:16
ok, rant over.
Haha, that's the biggest load I've ever read. You haven't made a post where you don't bash "conservo-creeps" who are trying to destroy the world and all of civilization. Your post is more flamebait than the poll ever was, but I suppose hypocrisy is the order of the day for idiots.
Nuclear Infidels
20-06-2004, 23:18
Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups would just LOVE an American preident who won't strike back no matter how many citizens (of many nations) are massacred. Oh wait, they already had one, remember Clinton?

Kerry made a disgrace of the uniform. He tossed medals into the potomac. SF veterans (for you retards out there, thats Special Forces) and other members and former members of the Armed forces (you know the guys who smoke A$$-Holes so that you can sleep peacefully at night) are coming out AGAINST Kerry, and these guys have been on the front line defending your right to bitch and whine while you sit on your fat egos thinking you know everything

If anyone watches the news you will popssibly remember a US Marine who saluted Reagen's coffin, except he had no hands. This man is not seeking any special attetion or priveleges. But Kerry is claiming that he is all important because he got a piece of shrapnel shoved in his cheek. That VC should have paid more attention, maybe he could have actually killed this anti-american, pro-terror lefty.
Nuclear Infidels
20-06-2004, 23:20
My apologies to anyone who is like-minded posting here, that definetly WAS NOT aimed at you.
Nuclear Infidels
20-06-2004, 23:23
I don't know about other Liberals, I can't speal for them, but, speaking for me...I HAVE JUST ABOUT PHUCKING HAD IT WITH ALL THESE GODDAM CONSERVO-CREEPS WHO SAY IF YOU DO NOT SUPPORT BUSH, THEN YOU ARE UNPATRIOTIC, UN-AMERICAN, AND THAT YOU SUPPORT AL-QAEDA, JUST BECAUSE YOU DON'T SUPPORT BUSH...BECAUSE YOU THINK HIS ECONOMIC POLICIES SUCK, AND HIS FOREIGN POLICIES CAUSE MORE PROBLEMS THAN THEY SOLVE!!

I don't know about other conservatives, but I don't think you're un-patriotic just because you don't like Bush. It's the fact that people like you don't like to defend yourselves and your neighbors who would rather behead you than listen to your retarded sayings like "No Blood For Oil!"
Fluffywuffy
20-06-2004, 23:26
Anyone who claims either Bush, Kerry, or any political nemesis is a worker for the enemy had better get off of drugs. For all retardness, I think MKULTRA is a worker for al-Qaeda :roll: . In his lifetime numbers of al-Qaeda have increased, and he has a strong hate of the current US President, far beyond that of normal political mudslinging.
Arammanar
20-06-2004, 23:33
When has A Q's members not increased? The current President is killing them off, but it's like squashing ants, kill a dozen and then there's 20 more.
Formal Dances
20-06-2004, 23:58
For all retardness, I think MKULTRA is a worker for al-Qaeda .

I have to agree with you Fluffywuffy.
MKULTRA
21-06-2004, 00:16
Anyone who claims either Bush, Kerry, or any political nemesis is a worker for the enemy had better get off of drugs. For all retardness, I think MKULTRA is a worker for al-Qaeda :roll: . In his lifetime numbers of al-Qaeda have increased, and he has a strong hate of the current US President, far beyond that of normal political mudslinging.because I rightly see him as being more of a threat to america then any terrorist--I dont understand how you cant see it when your presented with so much evidence of it day in and out
MKULTRA
21-06-2004, 00:16
Anyone who claims either Bush, Kerry, or any political nemesis is a worker for the enemy had better get off of drugs. For all retardness, I think MKULTRA is a worker for al-Qaeda :roll: . In his lifetime numbers of al-Qaeda have increased, and he has a strong hate of the current US President, far beyond that of normal political mudslinging.because I rightly see him as being more of a threat to america then any terrorist--I dont understand how you cant see it when your presented with so much evidence of it day in and out
The Trojan Empire
21-06-2004, 00:23
GIve us a reliable source to this evidence. A documented source
Berkylvania
21-06-2004, 00:26
GIve us a reliable source to this evidence. A documented source

What evidence are you looking for again?
The Trojan Empire
21-06-2004, 00:30
The rise in al-Qaeda numbers -- rather than speculate and say that they've risen, provide a source that proves that theyve risen
Berkylvania
21-06-2004, 00:32
The rise in al-Qaeda numbers -- rather than speculate and say that they've risen, provide a source that proves that theyve risen

Right. I'm on it. I shall report back forthwith! 8)
Fluffywuffy
21-06-2004, 00:45
because I rightly see him as being more of a threat to america then any terrorist--I dont understand how you cant see it when your presented with so much evidence of it day in and out Let's see.

One could also argue Clinton was a threat to our national security, I mean, he cut military funding and the size of the military. He also didn't react very strongly to threats; the first WTC bombing could have spurred us to a massive manhunt for all terrorists globaly, and the bombing of the Cole could have done so too.

One could argue that any president was a threat to our national security. The people in charge during the Cuban Missile Crisis were a threat to security, they helped escalate the Cold War.

Ronald Reagen was a threat to our national security. He helped raise tensions with the Soviets again, which obviously could have caused a nice war.

George Bush Sr. was a threat to our national security; he attacked a nation in the Middle-east and probably riled (sp?) up some friendly terrorists.
Berkylvania
21-06-2004, 00:57
Okay, here we go.

According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies (http://www.iiss.org/), in their Strategic Survey published in May 2004, Al Qaeda, while losing about half it's leadership after the 9/11 attacks and subsequent Afghanistan action, has maintained it's networks and finances and has increased recruitment. It has changed it's organization, becoming more decentrilized, making it harder to isolate and pin down. It has around 18,000 operatives spread throughout 60 nations. These numbers are widely accepted, though still open for debate.

An article published in the Sydney Morning Herald, (http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/12/07/1070732073147.html), in December of 2003, claims that there is a new targeting of six countries across Europe for recruitment with intent to send them to Iraq. This is echoed in and article the from the April 26th, 2004, New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/26/international/europe/26EURO.html?ex=1087876800&en=f86883f9280b1918&ei=5070&hp)
Young Muslims across Europe are answering to the call of jihad in response to the US invasion of Iraq.

Those are a couple of good starts.
Friends of Bill
21-06-2004, 02:37
It is inevitable that when the United States declared war against Muslim Fundamentalist Terrorism, that there would be an influx of recruits to Al-Qaeda, and other extremist groups. However, with the United States having killed most of the top leadership, closing in on Bin Laden, and havinh won the war in Iraq, It is probable that these groups will collapse by the end of the decade. This is not a short, easy war. THese people care little for others, and are in this war to destory western civilization, and to earn their pass to heavan. You can't rationilize with them.
Formal Dances
21-06-2004, 02:45
Okay, here we go.

According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies (http://www.iiss.org/), in their Strategic Survey published in May 2004, Al Qaeda, while losing about half it's leadership after the 9/11 attacks and subsequent Afghanistan action, has maintained it's networks and finances and has increased recruitment. It has changed it's organization, becoming more decentrilized, making it harder to isolate and pin down. It has around 18,000 operatives spread throughout 60 nations. These numbers are widely accepted, though still open for debate.

An article published in the Sydney Morning Herald, (http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/12/07/1070732073147.html), in December of 2003, claims that there is a new targeting of six countries across Europe for recruitment with intent to send them to Iraq. This is echoed in and article the from the April 26th, 2004, New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/26/international/europe/26EURO.html?ex=1087876800&en=f86883f9280b1918&ei=5070&hp)
Young Muslims across Europe are answering to the call of jihad in response to the US invasion of Iraq.

Those are a couple of good starts.

Can I say this without getting jumped because that is all that appears to be happening to this sweet innocent girl!

Weren't Al Qaeda's numbers larger than before the war on terror started? I could have sworn that they were before we started to kill them.

Just a thought/question. no need to jump me. (goes back to her spider hole)
Formal Dances
21-06-2004, 02:47
It is inevitable that when the United States declared war against Muslim Fundamentalist Terrorism, that there would be an influx of recruits to Al-Qaeda, and other extremist groups. However, with the United States having killed most of the top leadership, closing in on Bin Laden, and havinh won the war in Iraq, It is probable that these groups will collapse by the end of the decade. This is not a short, easy war. THese people care little for others, and are in this war to destory western civilization, and to earn their pass to heavan. You can't rationilize with them.

Well I know that this is a fact in that we never declared war on Muslim Fundamentalist Terrorism.
Friends of Bill
21-06-2004, 02:51
Stupid poll removed.I agree with you Myrth, but its worth mentioning that censoring people on this site for merely being stupid is a slippery slopeI would expect nothing less of the forum moderators here.
Israel 126
21-06-2004, 02:55
The numbers of increased terrorist recruits might be up but what is the number of killed terrorists President Bush is doing a good job. And islam is the problem and the sooner it ends the better. :cry: Its wicked sad that people have to be biased about a religion that promotes peace
Friends of Bill
21-06-2004, 02:56
It is inevitable that when the United States declared war against Muslim Fundamentalist Terrorism, that there would be an influx of recruits to Al-Qaeda, and other extremist groups. However, with the United States having killed most of the top leadership, closing in on Bin Laden, and havinh won the war in Iraq, It is probable that these groups will collapse by the end of the decade. This is not a short, easy war. THese people care little for others, and are in this war to destory western civilization, and to earn their pass to heavan. You can't rationilize with them.

Well I know that this is a fact in that we never declared war on Muslim Fundamentalist Terrorism.When was the last time America formally declared war?
Formal Dances
21-06-2004, 02:58
It is inevitable that when the United States declared war against Muslim Fundamentalist Terrorism, that there would be an influx of recruits to Al-Qaeda, and other extremist groups. However, with the United States having killed most of the top leadership, closing in on Bin Laden, and havinh won the war in Iraq, It is probable that these groups will collapse by the end of the decade. This is not a short, easy war. THese people care little for others, and are in this war to destory western civilization, and to earn their pass to heavan. You can't rationilize with them.

Well I know that this is a fact in that we never declared war on Muslim Fundamentalist Terrorism.When was the last time America formally declared war?

December 8th 1941 in a declaration of War against japan a day after December 7th 1941 a date that will live in infamy.
Myrth
21-06-2004, 02:59
What a PHUCKING BIASED poll!
Kiss my ass, you aren't worth it, you Bush butt-kisser!

Lemme ask you THIS...

Who are YOU with??

John Kerry and working Americans
or
George Bush and the unemployment line?

John Kerry and decent, hard-working Americans
or
George Bush and rich cronies who ship our jobs overseas like cheap bastards?

Labrador, altering the spellings of obscenities to get around the word censors is not appreciated. Please discontinue this.


http://www.satanstephen.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DrChaotica.jpg (http://www.satanstephen.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/taunt1.mp3)
Myrth
Ruler of the Cosmos
Forum Moderator
Friends of Bill
21-06-2004, 03:43
http://www.warriorpolitics.com/al-qaeda-for-kerry.html
Tuesday Heights
21-06-2004, 04:24
Friends of Bill, check your facts; if anyone is the terrorists' biggest support, it's Bush, because he refuses to admit where America went wrong in the world.
Friends of Bill
21-06-2004, 04:28
Friends of Bill, check your facts; if anyone is the terrorists' biggest support, it's Bush, because he refuses to admit where America went wrong in the world. and where is that?
Laskin Yahoos
21-06-2004, 10:47
It's good to see that al-Qaeda is so enthusiastic about the current choice of candidates for the 2004 election. :lol: Now if they could only support Nader...
Thanes
21-06-2004, 10:52
It really doesn't matter if Kerry or Bush is the president, because the real reason that terror groups like al-Qaeda despise the United States is solely for our support of Israel. As long as the US supports Israel, there will be terrorists targeting the US.
Zukoo
21-06-2004, 14:40
Why would they pick Kerry over Bush? Under the Bush presidency, membership in extremist groups has risen and their profile has increased dramatically. Really, the last four years have been nothing but good news for terrorisim organizations world wide as we can see by their massive upswing of actions in 2003. More likely, such organizations would want Bush to continue in office so he can further polarize The World Vs. The US argument.

Well, if their membership has risen, good, the more we can kill. I recall that at one point 2/3 of their people were either killed, or in custody. You say the last four years have been nothing but good news, but you point to 2003 for proof. That would be one year. Do you think Al-Qaeda would stop, or even slow their efforts if a different 'infidel' were elected? We saw what happened in Spain, they want the crusaders in the war on terror out of office.
The Holy Word
21-06-2004, 14:46
Well, if their membership has risen, good, the more we can kill. And the more they can kill in return, no? Personally, if I was an American citizen, I'd find your willingness to put American lives at risk so you can feel all macho highly disturbing.
Labrador
21-06-2004, 16:15
The numbers of increased terrorist recruits might be up but what is the number of killed terrorists President Bush is doing a good job. And islam is the problem and the sooner it ends the better. :cry: Its wicked sad that people have to be biased about a religion that promotes peace

Islam promotes peace, my left clavicle!!

Straight from the Koran (or Qu'ran) however you prefer to spell it, though the spelling in parenthesis is actually the correct spelling...

"I was commanded to kill them (referring to the infidels) until they declared there was but one God, Allah, and His prophet, Mohammed." Yeah, it sure promotes peace!!
Paul Johnson and Nicholas Berg get beheaded, and now a South Korean is being held captive, and they are threatening to behead him, too...and in the name of Islam. Meanwhile, Muslim clerics and holy men are remaining silent, and not speaking out against these barbarians who are carrying out these acts in the name of Islamic Fundamentalism. If they truly promoted peace, then the leaders of the Muslim faith ought to be speaking out against these horrific acts of barbarism! Only one who is truly depraved could commit such acts against innocent civilians.
no, the leaders cannot stop the fundamentalists from "perverting" the religion of Islam, and using it to "justify" these acts...but they could at least denounce the acts, and proclaim, for the world to hear, that these acts are not supported by the Islamic faith...or by them.
Yet, they remain silent...and by their silence, they are condoning these barbaric acts of depravity.
At least, when disgusting acts have been committed against them by our people (the "torture" of prisoners in Abu Gharib comes to mind) our leaders, both political and spiritual, have come out and publicly condemned such acts...and at least we are not KILLING them, and dessicrating their bodies in such a horrific, brutal, and depraved manner as decapitation!
When the leaders of the Muslim faith remain silent, and do not condemn these acts, they feed the notion that Islam is NOT a religion that promotes peace...in fact, they feed the notion that they are all a bunch of sick, depraved people with no value for human life!
This is like another Vietnam...we don't even know who is the enemty and who isn't, so, as liberal as I am...far as I am concerned, they are ALL the enemy, and they should all be exterminated!
Islam, in my opinion, is a hell-spawned "religion" right from the bowels of Hades!! They are sick, evil, barbaric, depraved people that, quite frankly, do not even deserve to share the same planet as I do. If they want me, and others, to reverse such an opinion, tnhen their leaders need to begin to speak out, and condemn these barbarous acts of depravity against innocent people.
End of sermon, I'm climbing down off my soapbox for now.
Labrador
21-06-2004, 16:16
The numbers of increased terrorist recruits might be up but what is the number of killed terrorists President Bush is doing a good job. And islam is the problem and the sooner it ends the better. :cry: Its wicked sad that people have to be biased about a religion that promotes peace

Islam promotes peace, my left clavicle!!

Straight from the Koran (or Qu'ran) however you prefer to spell it, though the spelling in parenthesis is actually the correct spelling...

"I was commanded to kill them (referring to the infidels) until they declared there was but one God, Allah, and His prophet, Mohammed." Yeah, it sure promotes peace!!
Paul Johnson and Nicholas Berg get beheaded, and now a South Korean is being held captive, and they are threatening to behead him, too...and in the name of Islam. Meanwhile, Muslim clerics and holy men are remaining silent, and not speaking out against these barbarians who are carrying out these acts in the name of Islamic Fundamentalism. If they truly promoted peace, then the leaders of the Muslim faith ought to be speaking out against these horrific acts of barbarism! Only one who is truly depraved could commit such acts against innocent civilians.
no, the leaders cannot stop the fundamentalists from "perverting" the religion of Islam, and using it to "justify" these acts...but they could at least denounce the acts, and proclaim, for the world to hear, that these acts are not supported by the Islamic faith...or by them.
Yet, they remain silent...and by their silence, they are condoning these barbaric acts of depravity.
At least, when disgusting acts have been committed against them by our people (the "torture" of prisoners in Abu Gharib comes to mind) our leaders, both political and spiritual, have come out and publicly condemned such acts...and at least we are not KILLING them, and dessicrating their bodies in such a horrific, brutal, and depraved manner as decapitation!
When the leaders of the Muslim faith remain silent, and do not condemn these acts, they feed the notion that Islam is NOT a religion that promotes peace...in fact, they feed the notion that they are all a bunch of sick, depraved people with no value for human life!
This is like another Vietnam...we don't even know who is the enemty and who isn't, so, as liberal as I am...far as I am concerned, they are ALL the enemy, and they should all be exterminated!
Islam, in my opinion, is a hell-spawned "religion" right from the bowels of Hades!! They are sick, evil, barbaric, depraved people that, quite frankly, do not even deserve to share the same planet as I do. If they want me, and others, to reverse such an opinion, tnhen their leaders need to begin to speak out, and condemn these barbarous acts of depravity against innocent people.
End of sermon, I'm climbing down off my soapbox for now.
Labrador
21-06-2004, 16:16
The numbers of increased terrorist recruits might be up but what is the number of killed terrorists President Bush is doing a good job. And islam is the problem and the sooner it ends the better. :cry: Its wicked sad that people have to be biased about a religion that promotes peace

Islam promotes peace, my left clavicle!!

Straight from the Koran (or Qu'ran) however you prefer to spell it, though the spelling in parenthesis is actually the correct spelling...

"I was commanded to kill them (referring to the infidels) until they declared there was but one God, Allah, and His prophet, Mohammed." Yeah, it sure promotes peace!!
Paul Johnson and Nicholas Berg get beheaded, and now a South Korean is being held captive, and they are threatening to behead him, too...and in the name of Islam. Meanwhile, Muslim clerics and holy men are remaining silent, and not speaking out against these barbarians who are carrying out these acts in the name of Islamic Fundamentalism. If they truly promoted peace, then the leaders of the Muslim faith ought to be speaking out against these horrific acts of barbarism! Only one who is truly depraved could commit such acts against innocent civilians.
no, the leaders cannot stop the fundamentalists from "perverting" the religion of Islam, and using it to "justify" these acts...but they could at least denounce the acts, and proclaim, for the world to hear, that these acts are not supported by the Islamic faith...or by them.
Yet, they remain silent...and by their silence, they are condoning these barbaric acts of depravity.
At least, when disgusting acts have been committed against them by our people (the "torture" of prisoners in Abu Gharib comes to mind) our leaders, both political and spiritual, have come out and publicly condemned such acts...and at least we are not KILLING them, and dessicrating their bodies in such a horrific, brutal, and depraved manner as decapitation!
When the leaders of the Muslim faith remain silent, and do not condemn these acts, they feed the notion that Islam is NOT a religion that promotes peace...in fact, they feed the notion that they are all a bunch of sick, depraved people with no value for human life!
This is like another Vietnam...we don't even know who is the enemty and who isn't, so, as liberal as I am...far as I am concerned, they are ALL the enemy, and they should all be exterminated!
Islam, in my opinion, is a hell-spawned "religion" right from the bowels of Hades!! They are sick, evil, barbaric, depraved people that, quite frankly, do not even deserve to share the same planet as I do. If they want me, and others, to reverse such an opinion, tnhen their leaders need to begin to speak out, and condemn these barbarous acts of depravity against innocent people.
End of sermon, I'm climbing down off my soapbox for now.