NationStates Jolt Archive


Whats with the hiding under desks?

Kleptonis
18-06-2004, 02:20
I was never around during the Cold War, so I was wondering, why did you guys think that the Soviets would nuke an elementary school, and more importantly, how would a desk save you from a nuclear attack? Did they invent some kind of shield against radiation that they applied to all desks in public schools? I mean, it seems kind of farfetched if you ask me.
Gigatron
18-06-2004, 02:22
It serves no purpose, other than suggesting you a sense of safety.
Word Games
18-06-2004, 02:23
The glue holding the laminate top on was lead based
imported_Happy Lawn Gnomes
18-06-2004, 02:40
Plus all the glue stuck to the bottom would weigh the desk down, so it wouldn't blow away during the compression blast.
Word Games
18-06-2004, 02:42
Exactly and the chewing gum could be consumed afterwards untill growing things return.
Velumae
18-06-2004, 02:44
Well, if your in the blast radius, you're practicly dead. But it can sheild you from debree. Its like how people recomend that you hid under a table in an earthquake.
Purly Euclid
18-06-2004, 02:47
The Soviets certainly had enough nukes to blast the whole world through a couple of times, and I'm sure that one of their priorities would be to disable our agriculture. Thus, rural areas would need to be nuked.
And I have no idea what "duck and cover" was all about. I don't even know if it was based on sound science of the time, instinct, or just propaganda.
Soviet Haaregrad
18-06-2004, 02:47
Placebo effect. It wouldn't do anything but maybe keep the ceiling tiles from hitting you, heavier stuff would break the desk. But hey, it keeps the kids calm.
NewXmen
18-06-2004, 02:48
Propoganda.
Bodies Without Organs
18-06-2004, 02:49
In this kind of situation I think hiding under the desks serves several purposes:

1. it gives the kids a sense of safety and activity, rather than standing exposed and waiting, they are actually doing something. Would you rather be in charge of 30 kids curled up under desks sucking their thumbs and crying, or 30 kids running around and screaming and crying?

2. if you are crouched hiding under a desk you are less likely to be hit by broken glass from shattered windows.

3. similarly, if the ceiling starts coming down the desk will provide a modicum of protection.

4. certainly hiding under a desk isn't the ideal way to face a nuclear explosion, but being underneath the desk is better than sitting on top of it. It may only be 3/4" of plywood, but it is better than nothing. Kind of like having the choice between being hit with a 16 ton weight or a 15 ton1999 pound one... the chances aren't much better with the lighter one, but they are just slightly more attractive.
Pudawallah
18-06-2004, 02:51
'..Slightly more attractive.'

LOL :lol:


But, right you are!
Bodies Without Organs
18-06-2004, 02:59
'..Slightly more attractive.'

LOL :lol:


But, right you are!

The general point of the whole thing being that the people who had their hands on the buttons shouldn't have been let near sharp objects, never mind nuclear devices...
Tuesday Heights
18-06-2004, 03:07
It's not that Soviets would bomb your elementary school, it's the fact that the bomb 10 miles away would demolish anything in its wake and your school might be next to that secret military base 10 miles from your school.
NewXmen
18-06-2004, 03:10
This whole question is moot. The US had won the cold war. The cold war is over.
Bodies Without Organs
18-06-2004, 03:16
This whole question is moot. The US had won the cold war. The cold war is over.

So why does the US* keep its nuclear weapons then?



* or: Russia, UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, Israel.