NationStates Jolt Archive


Jury acquits an innocent Saudi from Ashcrofts facism

MKULTRA
17-06-2004, 00:02
In February 2003, the FBI raided the home of Saudi student at the University of Idaho. Sami Omar Al-Hussayen a 34 year-old Ph.D. candidate who studied in the U.S. for nine years had volunteered his time to a Michigan-based group, the Islamic Assembly of North America, to set up a website that promoted the study of Islam.
The website contained a link to another website set up by a group the U.S. government had listed as a terrorist organization. Another link pointed to a site that advocated suicide bombings in Israel and Chechnya.

Al-Hussayen was arrested and charged with three counts of terrorism, four counts of making false statements, and seven counts of visa fraud. The terrorism charges against him were made under the Patriot Act and charged him with providing ''expert guidance or assistance'' to groups deemed terrorist. In the year before Al-Hussayen was arrested the government closely tracked him by intercepting 29,000 emails and phone calls.

Last week, after more than a year in jail, a jury found Al-Hussayen innocent of most of the charges, including all three terrorism charges dealing the Justice Department a major defeat.

The trial, which lasted seven weeks, featured a convicted terrorist who said he was influenced by Al-Hussayen's Web writings, and retired CIA operative, Frank Anderson, who was the only witness called by defense attorneys. After the acquittal, Anderson said “I am embarrassed and ashamed that our government has kept a decent and innocent man in jail for a very long time." Al Hussayen remains in prison on immigration charges.

www.democracynow.org
Akaviir
17-06-2004, 00:19
i sincerely ask you to stop with this. you just flood the forum space with your garbage. no one cares! if his website advertised a terrorist group which supports the terror against inncoent israelies, then he mustsupport terrorism!
Incertonia
17-06-2004, 00:33
if his website advertised a terrorist group which supports the terror against inncoent israelies, then he mustsupport terrorism!Sorry, but your logic fails there. Just because there's a link to a site on your site doesn't mean you support every single thing said on the other site. That's ridiculous. By that logic, Atrios (Eschaton) supports everything that Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit) says, even though they disagree on pretty much everything.

And regardless of whether or not Al-Hussayen agreed with the views espoused on those website, he still has the right to express those views, doesn't he? Far as I know, it's only against the law to lend material support to groups on the US terror list--not to agree with tehm.
Akaviir
17-06-2004, 00:40
if his website advertised a terrorist group which supports the terror against inncoent israelies, then he mustsupport terrorism!Sorry, but your logic fails there. Just because there's a link to a site on your site doesn't mean you support every single thing said on the other site. That's ridiculous. By that logic, Atrios (Eschaton) supports everything that Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit) says, even though they disagree on pretty much everything.

And regardless of whether or not Al-Hussayen agreed with the views espoused on those website, he still has the right to express those views, doesn't he? Far as I know, it's only against the law to lend material support to groups on the US terror list--not to agree with tehm.

good point
Purly Euclid
17-06-2004, 00:43
if his website advertised a terrorist group which supports the terror against inncoent israelies, then he mustsupport terrorism!Sorry, but your logic fails there. Just because there's a link to a site on your site doesn't mean you support every single thing said on the other site. That's ridiculous. By that logic, Atrios (Eschaton) supports everything that Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit) says, even though they disagree on pretty much everything.

And regardless of whether or not Al-Hussayen agreed with the views espoused on those website, he still has the right to express those views, doesn't he? Far as I know, it's only against the law to lend material support to groups on the US terror list--not to agree with tehm.
And that's why he was acquitted, as the arrest impinged his first amendment rights. However, as a prosecutor, I'd have a strong case by arguing that providing a link is enough to qualify as material aid, as he was actively promoting this site. There is a precedent, when many Christian group leaders were arrested for their active support of Branch-Davidian activities.