NationStates Jolt Archive


My lawsuit against the KKK

Rotovia
15-06-2004, 11:42
Now I was speaking with a Klansmen the other day, whilst he set fire to my Jewish friend and he told me a startling fact. Did you know the Klu Klux Klan has no black, jewish, asian or Catholic members?

Well I was shocked to say the least, since in the state of Queensland this is a clear violation of the Anti Discrimination Act. I plan to lodge a writ with the Supreme Court, seeking an injunction to demand that the KKK comply with the Act and hire at least one racial minority per five members.
Catholic Europe
15-06-2004, 11:44
Do you live in Australia?

Anyways, yeah, the KKK only wants WASP's as members (White, Anglo-Saxon Protestants).
Tygaland
15-06-2004, 11:46
Now I was speaking with a Klansmen the other day, whilst he set fire to my Jewish friend and he told me a startling fact. Did you know the Klu Klux Klan has no black, jewish, asian or Catholic members?

Well I was shocked to say the least, since in the state of Queensland this is a clear violation of the Anti Discrimination Act. I plan to lodge a writ with the Supreme Court, seeking an injunction to demand that the KKK comply with the Act and hire at least one racial minority per five members.

Racial quotas are discriminatory in themselves. Thus this would be a self-defeating argument. Discrimination to counter discrimination.
Tygaland
15-06-2004, 11:46
Anyways, yeah, the KKK only wants WASP's as members (White, Anglo-Saxon Protestants).

You don't say?
Catholic Europe
15-06-2004, 11:47
You don't say?

No, you're wrong. I do say. :roll:
Tygaland
15-06-2004, 11:49
You don't say?

No, you're wrong. I do say. :roll:

It was a question not a statement. A rhetorical one at that as you stated the obvious.
Catholic Europe
15-06-2004, 11:53
It was a question not a statement. A rhetorical one at that as you stated the obvious.

And mine was a sarcastic reply to your rhetorical question.
Rotovia
15-06-2004, 11:54
You don't say?

No, you're wrong. I do say. :roll:

It was a question not a statement. A rhetorical one at that as you stated the obvious.There is no question mark in a rhetorical question.
Rotovia
15-06-2004, 11:55
Now I was speaking with a Klansmen the other day, whilst he set fire to my Jewish friend and he told me a startling fact. Did you know the Klu Klux Klan has no black, jewish, asian or Catholic members?

Well I was shocked to say the least, since in the state of Queensland this is a clear violation of the Anti Discrimination Act. I plan to lodge a writ with the Supreme Court, seeking an injunction to demand that the KKK comply with the Act and hire at least one racial minority per five members.

Racial quotas are discriminatory in themselves. Thus this would be a self-defeating argument. Discrimination to counter discrimination.How is ensuring there are certain amount of minorities per racial majority a descrimination?
Catholic Europe
15-06-2004, 11:55
There is no question mark in a rhetorical question.

Really. Now that is interesting! :lol: :wink:
San haiti
15-06-2004, 11:58
There is no question mark in a rhetorical question.

only if you dont want there to be.

and its a society so they can admit anyone they want, although it would be funny if they had to go reound trying to find black people to meet their race quota.
Rotovia
15-06-2004, 12:02
There is no question mark in a rhetorical question.

only if you dont want there to be.

and its a society so they can admit anyone they want, although it would be funny if they had to go reound trying to find black people to meet their race quota.
1) You cannot make up your own grammar rules.
2) Organisation, Churches and School are covered in the Act
3) Well humour is my goal.
Tygaland
15-06-2004, 12:04
There is no question mark in a rhetorical question.

only if you dont want there to be.

and its a society so they can admit anyone they want, although it would be funny if they had to go reound trying to find black people to meet their race quota.
1) You cannot make up your own grammar rules.
2) Organisation, Churches and School are covered in the Act
3) Well humour is my goal.

As it was a question I closed with a question mark..to highlight it was in fact a question and not a statement. Even though the question mark was there it was still treated as a statement so I guess the tactic failed.
Mutant Dogs
15-06-2004, 12:04
OMG Queensland rules :shock:

On topic:

I take it you are black. Excuse my ignorance, but I didn't believe there was KKK in Queensland. I've never heard anything about them.

Also, are you Aboriginal or African black? I have actually never seen an African/African-American black person in Brisbane. Why is this?
Rotovia
15-06-2004, 12:05
There is no question mark in a rhetorical question.

only if you dont want there to be.

and its a society so they can admit anyone they want, although it would be funny if they had to go reound trying to find black people to meet their race quota.
1) You cannot make up your own grammar rules.
2) Organisation, Churches and School are covered in the Act
3) Well humour is my goal.

As it was a question I closed with a question mark..to highlight it was in fact a question and not a statement. Even though the question mark was there it was still treated as a statement so I guess the tactic failed.However, when the question is rhetorical Cambridge English requires the sentance not be closed with a question mark.
Tygaland
15-06-2004, 12:22
There is no question mark in a rhetorical question.

only if you dont want there to be.

and its a society so they can admit anyone they want, although it would be funny if they had to go reound trying to find black people to meet their race quota.
1) You cannot make up your own grammar rules.
2) Organisation, Churches and School are covered in the Act
3) Well humour is my goal.

As it was a question I closed with a question mark..to highlight it was in fact a question and not a statement. Even though the question mark was there it was still treated as a statement so I guess the tactic failed.However, when the question is rhetorical Cambridge English requires the sentance not be closed with a question mark.

I am sure they also spell sentence correctly
Rotovia
15-06-2004, 12:24
Rotovia
15-06-2004, 12:25
OMG Queensland rules :shock:

On topic:

I take it you are black. Excuse my ignorance, but I didn't believe there was KKK in Queensland. I've never heard anything about them.

Also, are you Aboriginal or African black? I have actually never seen an African/African-American black person in Brisbane. Why is this?
OMFG It does :shock:

I don't like to bring it up in the forums, namely because for some reason people either take some of my more Liberal statements and bursh them off, or take my extremist veiws and avoid critizing them for some reason.

But yes, I am coloured.
Tygaland
15-06-2004, 12:29
In answer to your question as to why racial quotas are discriminatory. Anything that separates a population according to their race or religion is discriminatory. By forcing organisations to accept certain numbers of people based on their colour or religion is discriminatory. Whether you think it is positive discrimination or negative discrimination it is still discrimination.

It is also a breach of a person's right to freedom of association.
Vitania
15-06-2004, 12:30
Now I was speaking with a Klansmen the other day, whilst he set fire to my Jewish friend and he told me a startling fact. Did you know the Klu Klux Klan has no black, jewish, asian or Catholic members?

Well I was shocked to say the least, since in the state of Queensland this is a clear violation of the Anti Discrimination Act. I plan to lodge a writ with the Supreme Court, seeking an injunction to demand that the KKK comply with the Act and hire at least one racial minority per five members.

Two wrongs don't make a right.

You can always do what Tobias Beecher did: beat the guy unconsious and shit on his face.
Rotovia
15-06-2004, 12:30
In answer to your question as to why racial quotas are discriminatory. Anything that separates a population according to their race or religion is discriminatory. By forcing organisations to accept certain numbers of people based on their colour or religion is discriminatory. Whether you think it is positive discrimination or negative discrimination it is still discrimination.

It is also a breach of a person's right to freedom of association.That would work, if only we lived in a society where people were not seperated or descriminated against based upon gender, race and religion.
Xerxes Xavier
15-06-2004, 12:31
OMG Queensland rules :shock:

On topic:

I take it you are black. Excuse my ignorance, but I didn't believe there was KKK in Queensland. I've never heard anything about them.

Yeah I saw this thing on teh news about a KKK movement in the country parts of QLD years ago...but it was a small group then, I'd have no idea how big it would be now.

Also, are you Aboriginal or African black? I have actually never seen an African/African-American black person in Brisbane. Why is this?

Hmm intriguing.

Although I don't really see many black people in NSW either, now I think about it.
Tygaland
15-06-2004, 12:34
In answer to your question as to why racial quotas are discriminatory. Anything that separates a population according to their race or religion is discriminatory. By forcing organisations to accept certain numbers of people based on their colour or religion is discriminatory. Whether you think it is positive discrimination or negative discrimination it is still discrimination.

It is also a breach of a person's right to freedom of association.That would work, if only we lived in a society where people were not seperated or descriminated against based upon gender, race and religion.

As Vitania said, two wrongs don't make a right. By enforcing racial quotas you reinforce the perceived difference between the races and also cause resentment among the so called "majority".
Artoonia
15-06-2004, 12:35
I've actually known several Catholic Klansmen. Either they've relaxed their membership requirements, or the type of people who'd join aren't exactly the brightest crosses on the lawn.

Hmmm... does that need to be an XOR?
Dragoneia
15-06-2004, 13:46
The KKK is a racist group any way and should all be set on fire themselves :D
Spoffin
15-06-2004, 13:51
You don't say?

No, you're wrong. I do say. :roll:

It was a question not a statement. A rhetorical one at that as you stated the obvious.There is no question mark in a rhetorical question.There is.

Look:

No, really

OR

No, really?
Tygaland
15-06-2004, 14:03
The KKK is a racist group any way and should all be set on fire themselves :D

I don't think anyone here has said they support the KKK. I am arguing that racial quotas are divisive and discriminatory and therefore make things worse rather than better.
The KKK was used as an example by the OP for dramatic effect I think.
CoRRuPTeD HaLo
15-06-2004, 14:08
I don't think any other ethnicities of people would want to join the KKK. Really, you are just doing this to bug the group. Anyways, I support that.
Tygaland
15-06-2004, 14:12
I don't think any other ethnicities of people would want to join the KKK. Really, you are just doing this to bug the group. Anyways, I support that.

Yes, by bugging this group and dragging them to court you give them the publicity they seek. Free recruiting drive for any rednecks looking for a club to join.
Tango Urilla
15-06-2004, 14:44
artoonia that cross thing just made me laugh thank you
Tango Urilla
15-06-2004, 14:45
hey i know a redneck! he isnt racist or anything just dumb as a rock.
_Susa_
15-06-2004, 14:45
Now I was speaking with a Klansmen the other day, whilst he set fire to my Jewish friend and he told me a startling fact. Did you know the Klu Klux Klan has no black, jewish, asian or Catholic members?

Well I was shocked to say the least, since in the state of Queensland this is a clear violation of the Anti Discrimination Act. I plan to lodge a writ with the Supreme Court, seeking an injunction to demand that the KKK comply with the Act and hire at least one racial minority per five members.
I think the KKK is a buncha racist bigots, but I also think that if a group exists for the purpose and benefit of one race, then it should stay that way. The KKK should not have to have minority members. This goes the same for any other group, such as a Spanish-American group, to only have the members it wants to have. If the KKK has to have blacks and Jews, then the local group of German-Americans would have to accept Italian-Americans into their group. It makes no sense.
Tango Urilla
15-06-2004, 14:48
Now I was speaking with a Klansmen the other day, whilst he set fire to my Jewish friend and he told me a startling fact. Did you know the Klu Klux Klan has no black, jewish, asian or Catholic members?

Well I was shocked to say the least, since in the state of Queensland this is a clear violation of the Anti Discrimination Act. I plan to lodge a writ with the Supreme Court, seeking an injunction to demand that the KKK comply with the Act and hire at least one racial minority per five members.
I think the KKK is a buncha racist bigots, but I also think that if a group exists for the purpose and benefit of one race, then it should stay that way. The KKK should not have to have minority members. This goes the same for any other group, such as a Spanish-American group, to only have the members it wants to have. If the KKK has to have blacks and Jews, then the local group of German-Americans would have to accept Italian-Americans into their group. It makes no sense.


to the very first part thats a fact they are racist bigots, also germans and italians have gotten along quite when since 39 ;)
The Katholik Kingdom
15-06-2004, 14:50
They've got a KKK Kommune here in Texas. Get this... They've disguised it AS A TRAILER PARK!!!!!!!11111oneoneoneone! The irony is astounding. And guess what it is named... Kris' Kans for Kads! It's so humourous!

By the way, what happened to Fascist white states?
Tango Urilla
15-06-2004, 14:52
he was eating by the three headed mod monster of leetness....and stuff but its gone
The Katholik Kingdom
15-06-2004, 14:54
Yay, five hundred posts.

*dons party hat.*

weee.

Okay, party's done.
Bodies Without Organs
15-06-2004, 16:01
However, when the question is rhetorical Cambridge English requires the sentance not be closed with a question mark.

This I doubt very much. Possibly it does not require that the sentence end in a question mark, but I find it incredibly unlikely that it stipulates that it must not. By the standard you have presented the most famous rhetorical questions in the English language, such as, for example, "Shall I compare thee to a summers day?", are judged not to be rhetorical questions at all.
Insane Troll
15-06-2004, 16:05
Why did such an absurd thread immediately turn into a serious one about racial quotas?

I think some people need to lighten up.
San haiti
15-06-2004, 16:22
Why did such an absurd thread immediately turn into a serious one about racial quotas?

I think some people need to lighten up.

*lightens up*

shall i compare thee to a summer's day.

nah, doesnt work.
Rathmore
15-06-2004, 16:59
Two wrongs don't make a right.

You can always do what Tobias Beecher did: beat the guy unconsious and shit on his face.

Christ, I wonder what this Tobias guy thinks is a wrong.
Tuesday Heights
15-06-2004, 17:26
Did you know the Klu Klux Klan has no black, jewish, asian or Catholic members?

What gave you that thought? :wink: