NationStates Jolt Archive


US admits 25 deaths in custody

Smeagol-Gollum
06-05-2004, 09:25
US admits 25 deaths in custody
By Marian Wilkinson, Herald Correspondent in Washington
May 6, 2004

US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld addresses a press conference at the Pentagon, saying that abuse of Iraqi prisoners by US soldiers was totally unacceptable and promising to take action against them.

The Pentagon has admitted that 25 prisoners have died in US military custody in Iraq and Afghanistan, at least two of them murders. Ten of the deaths are still under investigation, including one involving the CIA.

The admissions came from General George Casey, who briefed Congress on the widening scandal over Abu Ghraib jail, where prisoners were sexually humiliated, abused and beaten as military police guards videotaped and photographed the scenes.

At the same time the Administration scrambled to try to stem the erosion of US credibility caused by the mistreatment of prisoners and to limit any further political damage to President George Bush.

Mr Bush will give an interview to al Ahram, the government-owned Egyptian daily newspaper, on Thursday and is planning interviews with Arab television, an official said.

His National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, told the Dubai-based Arab channel al-Arabiya that Mr Bush was "personally sickened" by pictures displaying some of the abuses.

"We are deeply sorry for what has happened to these people, and what the families must be feeling," she said. "It's just not right. And we will get to the bottom of what happened,"

General Casey blamed the abuse on what he called "a complete breakdown in discipline".

The US Secretary of Defence, Donald Rumsfeld, in his first public comments on the scandal, said he did not believe that the abuses amounted to torture.

"My impression is that what has been charged thus far is abuse, which is I believe technically is different from torture." Mr Rumsfeld promised that the military would take "whatever steps necessary" to hold those responsible accountable.

But senior Republican and Democrat politicians stridently attacked Mr Rumsfeld, and expressed outrage that the Pentagon had failed to brief Congress on the scandal which has inflamed public opinion throughout the Arab world and in the US.

"We have a great sense of revulsion, not only because of these actions but we also recognise what the dangers are for American troops if they are ever taken prisoner and the kind of treatment that they would be subject to," said the Democrats' Senator Ted Kennedy.

Senator John McCain, a Republican, said: "There are so many allegations swirling around . . . that we must have a public hearing with the Secretary of Defence testifying." He said Congress had been "kept in the dark".

But as the Pentagon announced that it had widened its inquiries to include Guantanamo Bay and its detention centres in Afghanistan, a lawyer for one of the military police charged over the abuse told the Herald there was evidence that US military intelligence was in part responsible for the Abu Ghraib mistreatment.

Gary Myers said an order from the office of General Ricardo Sanchez, the senior US military commander in Iraq, turned control of the jail over to military intelligence last November, just when the abuses were escalating.

"The commander of the 205 MI [military intelligence] brigade assumed responsibility for the Baghdad confinement facility made an MI officer rather than a military police officer effectively responsible for the military police units conducting detainee operations at that facility."

Mr Myers's client, Sergeant Chip Frederick, is heavily implicated in the abuses in the photographs and is facing a series of charges but claims he was assisting military intelligence. Mr Myers also said that military intelligence officers going to the jail had worn "sterile uniforms" with no indication of name, rank or unit, making it difficult to identify them.

The Pentagon insists there will be no cover-up, but General Casey said the senior intelligence officer attached to the prison, Colonel Thomas Pappas, is still in his job while the inquiry goes on.

One source told the Herald that the Pentagon has about 60 photographs from Abu Ghraib jail depicting abuse more violent than that already revealed. "The ones seen so far are the mild ones that people can live with," he said. One allegedly depicts an Iraqi teenage boy being raped.

SOURCE
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/05/05/1083635207631.html

COMMENT.
Disgusting. One can only wonder what the "real" numbers may be, I suspect that this story may continue to "grow".
And "a complete breakdown in discipline" is hardly an excuse, alibi, or reason not to have the guilt sheeted home to the US Army. Who, one must ask, is in fact reponsible for maintaining discipline?
And I imagine that fresh relevations will merely provoke more posts from people complaining that the US is being "bashed".
Those who do make such posts really should try, just for once, an objective perspective. If this was being done by another nation to US citizens, would that be O.K.? If not, then why is it alright for the US to do so? Morality is not determined by nationality.
Philopolis
06-05-2004, 09:27
what I like about rumsfeld that he uses the non-sequiter "un-american" :lol:
Colodia
06-05-2004, 09:29
I'm not saying that I'm for these people that did such ****ing terrible crap to these poor Iraqis...but do you not think that they had a reason? This is not the government's fault, or America's fault. It's an army fault, and army personnel will suffer consequences.

War is a terrible thing. Do you not realize the emotions felt during war? Anger, sorrow, joy...revenge?

Revenge is a powerful feeling...perhaps...this is revenge? :?

Hey, this is a new story. When we see what unfolds and who's fault it is, then we can come to conclusions
Kirtondom
06-05-2004, 09:36
I'm not saying that I'm for these people that did such ****ing terrible crap to these poor Iraqis...but do you not think that they had a reason? This is not the government's fault, or America's fault. It's an army fault, and army personnel will suffer consequences.

War is a terrible thing. Do you not realize the emotions felt during war? Anger, sorrow, joy...revenge?

Revenge is a powerful feeling...perhaps...this is revenge? :?

Hey, this is a new story. When we see what unfolds and who's fault it is, then we can come to conclusions
Soldiers are representatives of thier country. But saying that you can't blame a nation for the actions of a few individuals. but saying that does it indicate the attitude of the nation as a whole?
Colodia
06-05-2004, 09:37
I'm not saying that I'm for these people that did such ****ing terrible crap to these poor Iraqis...but do you not think that they had a reason? This is not the government's fault, or America's fault. It's an army fault, and army personnel will suffer consequences.

War is a terrible thing. Do you not realize the emotions felt during war? Anger, sorrow, joy...revenge?

Revenge is a powerful feeling...perhaps...this is revenge? :?

Hey, this is a new story. When we see what unfolds and who's fault it is, then we can come to conclusions
Soldiers are representatives of thier country. But saying that you can't blame a nation for the actions of a few individuals. but saying that does it indicate the attitude of the nation as a whole?

perhaps I didn't say it right, it is 1:36 am

No you cannot blame an entire nation for the actions of individuals who didnt act on orders
No, it does not indicate the atitude of a nation
Detsl-stan
06-05-2004, 09:39
I'm not saying that I'm for these people that did such ****ing terrible crap to these poor Iraqis...but do you not think that they had a reason? This is not the government's fault, or America's fault. It's an army fault, and army personnel will suffer consequences.

War is a terrible thing. Do you not realize the emotions felt during war? Anger, sorrow, joy...revenge?

Revenge is a powerful feeling...perhaps...this is revenge? :?

Hey, this is a new story. When we see what unfolds and who's fault it is, then we can come to conclusions
I'm sure you expressed the same sentiments when news broke out of those four Americans incinerated in Fallujah. Did you not?
Colodia
06-05-2004, 09:40
I'm not saying that I'm for these people that did such ****ing terrible crap to these poor Iraqis...but do you not think that they had a reason? This is not the government's fault, or America's fault. It's an army fault, and army personnel will suffer consequences.

War is a terrible thing. Do you not realize the emotions felt during war? Anger, sorrow, joy...revenge?

Revenge is a powerful feeling...perhaps...this is revenge? :?

Hey, this is a new story. When we see what unfolds and who's fault it is, then we can come to conclusions
I'm sure you expressed the same sentiments when news broke out of those four Americans incinerated in Fallujah. Did you not?

It was Fallujah that did that, not Iraq

Besides, I was ticked that these INNOCENTS were BURNED and their bodies mocked across the streets in pure sight of everyone to see....but I wasn't on my knees crying in pain and threatening murder on Iraq
Detsl-stan
06-05-2004, 09:53
I'm not saying that I'm for these people that did such ****ing terrible crap to these poor Iraqis...but do you not think that they had a reason? This is not the government's fault, or America's fault. It's an army fault, and army personnel will suffer consequences.

War is a terrible thing. Do you not realize the emotions felt during war? Anger, sorrow, joy...revenge?

Revenge is a powerful feeling...perhaps...this is revenge? :?

Hey, this is a new story. When we see what unfolds and who's fault it is, then we can come to conclusions
I'm sure you expressed the same sentiments when news broke out of those four Americans incinerated in Fallujah. Did you not?

It was Fallujah that did that, not Iraq

Besides, I was ticked that these INNOCENTS were BURNED and their bodies mocked across the streets in pure sight of everyone to see....but I wasn't on my knees crying in pain and threatening murder on Iraq
So you accept a possibility that war is a terrible thing and that residents of Fallujah were exacting revenge ("a powerful feeling"), perhaps? After all, you don't know for sure that those whose bodies were burned in Fallujah were totally innocent (they could've been there on a covert assignment) or that those abused at Abu Ghraib were necessarily guilty? Do you?

As for what's worse, to be sexually abused/humiliated while alive or to have your body burned on international TV after you've already been killed--that's a matter of taste, I suppose.
Colodia
06-05-2004, 09:59
I'm not saying that I'm for these people that did such ****ing terrible crap to these poor Iraqis...but do you not think that they had a reason? This is not the government's fault, or America's fault. It's an army fault, and army personnel will suffer consequences.

War is a terrible thing. Do you not realize the emotions felt during war? Anger, sorrow, joy...revenge?

Revenge is a powerful feeling...perhaps...this is revenge? :?

Hey, this is a new story. When we see what unfolds and who's fault it is, then we can come to conclusions
I'm sure you expressed the same sentiments when news broke out of those four Americans incinerated in Fallujah. Did you not?

It was Fallujah that did that, not Iraq

Besides, I was ticked that these INNOCENTS were BURNED and their bodies mocked across the streets in pure sight of everyone to see....but I wasn't on my knees crying in pain and threatening murder on Iraq
So you accept a possibility that war is a terrible thing and that residents of Fallujah were exacting revenge ("a powerful feeling"), perhaps? After all, you don't know for sure that those whose bodies were burned in Fallujah were totally innocent (they could've been there on a covert assignment) or that those abused at Abu Ghraib were necessarily guilty? Do you?

As for what's worse, to be sexually abused/humiliated while alive or to have your body burned on international TV after you've already been killed--that's a matter of taste, I suppose.

What if they were innocents? Not everyone's a secret member of a government agency ya know. Not everyone's hidden by the government

And what if those abused at Abu Ghraib were guilty in the first place?


Also, being put to sexual positions and having photographs shot at you in private hardley (yet closely) compares itself to having your body burned and dragged through a street throughout a city by a rope.
Free Soviets
06-05-2004, 10:04
Also, being put to sexual positions and having photographs shot at you in private hardley (yet closely) compares itself to having your body burned and dragged through a street throughout a city by a rope.

though one of the pictures quite cleary is of a prisoner who was beaten to death (or at least is dead and was beaten). and we don't know how many other photos we haven't seen. nor do we have any reason to think that they photographed all or even most of what went on.
Detsl-stan
06-05-2004, 10:26
What if they were innocents? Not everyone's a secret member of a government agency ya know. Not everyone's hidden by the government

And what if those abused at Abu Ghraib were guilty in the first place?

But you don't know for certain one way or the other, or, as Free Soviets notes, anywhere close to 100% of what was going on in Fallujah or within the walls of Abu Ghraib. Yet you automatically presume that American MPs must have had a "reason" for their dishonourable acts, whereas the 'Raqis haven't had one for theirs.

Also, being put to sexual positions and having photographs shot at you in private hardley (yet closely) compares itself to having your body burned and dragged through a street throughout a city by a rope.

To my mind living with the shame of sexual abuse is worse than having your body mutilated after death. But, as I said, it's a matter of personal taste.
Amazonica
06-05-2004, 10:37
The mercenaries executed in Fallujah where as innocent as the SS guards of Auschwitz they are part of the war machine wich has killed thousands of Iraqis, even millions if you count those who died during the blockade.

True, the did deserve a fair trail before execution, but how can the Yankees demand that after braking each and every law of war?

And what kind of revange is that if the Yankee terrorists rape teenagers in prison?
Smeagol-Gollum
06-05-2004, 11:00
I'm not saying that I'm for these people that did such ****ing terrible crap to these poor Iraqis...but do you not think that they had a reason? This is not the government's fault, or America's fault. It's an army fault, and army personnel will suffer consequences.

War is a terrible thing. Do you not realize the emotions felt during war? Anger, sorrow, joy...revenge?

Revenge is a powerful feeling...perhaps...this is revenge? :?

Hey, this is a new story. When we see what unfolds and who's fault it is, then we can come to conclusions

Revenge? For what? Not having the weapons of mass destruction that they were invaded for?

And "revenge" is no excuse or alibi either. Hitler's SS claimed "revenge" killings following partisan attacks. They were rightfully regarded as war crimes. What is different? Is the US supposedly immune from the standards they set for others?
Please try to firstly accept what has happened (or at least what has been revealed to date). Secondly, attempt to accept that it is and was wrong, and inexcusable. From there, you have a point where you can proceed from. Otherwise, you are just in a form of denial.
Texastambul
06-05-2004, 11:26
The mercenaries executed in Fallujah where as innocent as the SS guards of Auschwitz they are part of the war machine wich has killed thousands of Iraqis, even millions if you count those who died during the blockade.

True, the did deserve a fair trail before execution, but how can the Yankees demand that after braking each and every law of war?

And what kind of revange is that if the Yankee terrorists rape teenagers in prison?

http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18588
Many of the "security contractors" were death-squad leaders during the apartheid.
Texastambul
06-05-2004, 11:28
No you cannot blame an entire nation for the actions of individuals who didnt act on orders
No, it does not indicate the atitude of a nation

Would you have the same opinion if there were acting on orders?
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4909251/
No-Dachi Yo
06-05-2004, 11:43
Also, being put to sexual positions and having photographs shot at you in private hardley (yet closely) compares itself to having your body burned and dragged through a street throughout a city by a rope.

But you are dead? Why should you care, actually you cant care as you are dead therefore the neurons in your brain do not fire and you dont really care. Life is ended, eternal blackness, no feelings.

As for being sexually abused, well, in a Muslim nation that is a humiliation, in public or private. Which would you prefer? Have you been sexually assulted? Freinds of mine has and it is awful and tortureous; flashbacks, nighmares, sleep trauma - just try it eh?
Free Soviets
06-05-2004, 18:20
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18588
Many of the "security contractors" were death-squad leaders during the apartheid.

hey, you need to make sure when you hire death squads that they know what they are doing. you wouldn't want inexperienced death squads roaming iraq. they might really mess things up.