NationStates Jolt Archive


Banning plastic bags - think of the consequences.

Vitania
01-05-2004, 08:40
There has been a recent campaign in Australia to convince the population to use alternatives to plastic bags in order to reduce their useage. While it has not been stated, the ultimate aim seems to be banning stores from offering their customers plastic bags, with some towns having already done this. The reason behind the campaign is that the bags pollute the environment and pose a threat to wildlife. This seems to be all good and well but I think very few people have thought of the consequences of such an action. Issues behind banning them include the following:

*It will be an inconvienience to everyone if we had to carry bags whenever we had to go shopping. Sometimes we intend to buy a few items but end up buying much more. What could the consumer do in such a situation? Could this have an effect on the economy?

*There are some bags retailers offer that you can't buy in calico form, such as those giant bags used to cover large items. The last thing I'd want when purchasing a new computer or other electronic item is for it to rain since there is no guarantee that the box will be able to absorb the moisture and prevent the computer from becoming wet. Then I could come home and find that I've just blown a thousand dollars because my computer is wet and the warranty won't cover such situations.

*The main use for supermarket plastic bags is as garbage liners. Will people be prepared to buy garbage liners if plastic bags are banned?

*Garbage liners are made of plastic anyway, so the issue of plastic bags biodegrading or breaking open and going astray still isn't solved. The alternative would be to go back to the days of incinerators, which I don't think many people would want.

Personally, I think the whole plastic bag/garbage issue could be solved if we burned all garbage in order to create energy. No more landfills, no more stray bags. There is the issue of pollution and greenhouse gases but in actual fact decomposing garbage releases more greenhouse gases than if it were burnt.
01-05-2004, 08:46
So, for Conviniences sake. We should hold onto plastic bags? Thats the crux of your argument.
Greater Valia
01-05-2004, 08:48
for some odd reason this thread is making me feel really good about myself... i wonder why?
CharlotteMaria
01-05-2004, 08:51
http://www.mms.qld.edu.au/5h-artefacts/5h-artefacts-pics/woven-bag.jpg

Guess we would just have to return to using woven bags instead?

That would be a financial burden on the poor.
01-05-2004, 09:14
LOL. I think the poor can take one more for the team.
Anglo-Scandinavia
01-05-2004, 09:47
Here in England, the Co-operative Society uses biodegradable plastic bags at their supermarkets. The question is- is this just a clever marketing ploy.
"Oh yeah- they'll biodegrade <whisper>in about a century</whisper>"

Maybe a better solution instead of banning it outright would be where you have to pay for plastic bags if you don't bring your own bags. This is what they do in the Netherlands.
Sitanel
01-05-2004, 10:30
they do that in england to ya'know. hehe, ever been to Nettos? lmao, still sainsburys did a ploy where you got 10p for every bag you brang yourself.
Collaboration
01-05-2004, 16:58
Back in Beatrix Potter's time people carried a string bag to market.
We could do that.
Hemp would work fine.