NationStates Jolt Archive

I know that a lot of people don't like bush but if you really look at it then you'll under stand that he is doing a good job in iraq.

Bush isn't really doing anything in Iraq.

He made a good decision about going in to iraq.

I know that a lot of people don't like bush but if you really look at it then you'll under stand that he is doing a good job in iraq.

Where did you get that idea from? The media?

yea I think he's doing a good job to

He made a good decision about going in to iraq.

I know, just imagine what would have happen if Saddam used his WM-- oh wait...

He made a good decision about going in to iraq.

Do you understand any of the history going into this conflict? The actual reasons that were given to go?

O wait??

Yes, Bush Is my idol.

He's just misunderestimated by everyone.

_____________________________________
http://www.blurbco.com/~gork/random/ignignot.gif
"Everyone, please, bow your heads, and pretend to be serious."

YES they have hated us for a really ong time and I mean thousands of years

(He's just misunderestimated by everyone. )


a agree with you 100%

YES they have hated us for a really ong time and I mean thousands of years
yeah, those camel jockies have hated us for thousands of years despite america only being 200. :roll:

He made a good decision about going in to iraq.

Bah. Why do I bother?

(He's just misunderestimated by everyone. )


a agree with you 100%


hahahahahaha


You're about as onto it as Bush is too.

need i say more?

Yea bush is doing a pretty good job. If we did not go into iraq than we would be fighting them not with our milatery but with our fire fighters & and our EM's

YES they have hated us for a really ong time and I mean thousands of years

WHO? The Russians? The Chinese?

Who's the enemy we've always been fighting this week?

(yeah, those camel jockies have hated us for thousands of years despite america only being 200. )


they have hated the west for longer thane the U.S. hase been a nation.

Bush is a can of spam on burnt toast. but he's handling the war well enough.

(WHO? The Russians? The Chinese?

Who's the enemy we've always been fighting this week)



The middle eastern

(Bush is a can of spam on burnt toast. but he's handling the war well enough.)


HUH?????

(yeah, those camel jockies have hated us for thousands of years despite america only being 200. )


they have hated the west for longer thane the U.S. hase been a nation.

Considering the Americas make up most of the land in the western hemisphere (although some of western Europe/Africa and a few small islands are there too) and America was only discovered by the eastern hemisphere continents in 1642, I highly doubt they hated the west for 'thousands of years'

This war has been completly mishandled from the reconstruction process onwards.

We should never have maintained a prescence in the city's. We should also not have disbanded the police force, and the mail service, and every other service provided by government (they were all required to join the baath party in order to be gov employees).

We should take Donald Rumsfeld out back and have him shot, he has micromanaged our troops to levels that aren't sustainable. Now we need about 4 times the number of troops we presently are maintaining there and nobody is comming to our aid to assist us in the situation.

Not to mention that the war was stupid, we had no business going there since the UN destroyed all their weapon capabilities with the first round of inspections and the sanctions destroyed most of their infastructure. The only reason terrorists took up base there was because Saddam wasn't able to project air power into the areas because of the no-fly zone.

All in all the whole thing was a bungled mess.

oh yes bush has done a great job.

the worst month just happened w/ 129 dead soldiers. Great job. How's he plan on getting us out? he didnt have a plan. He endorsed Sen. Kerry's plan lol.. what great leader bush is.... kinda like Hitler, can start a war just cant finish

I know that a lot of people don't like bush but if you really look at it then you'll under stand that he is doing a good job in iraq.
If he had to go fight his own battles, he would never have invaded Iraq.

How many unnecesary dead GI's in Iraq? How many unnecessary wounded GI's? How many innocent Iraqis dead?

Answer: 1 was TOO many.

Good Job?: NOT

things in iraq have never been great. especially not during this war thing. but it will get better, once all the fighting stops and we leave.

things in iraq have never been great. especially not during this war thing. but it will get better, once all the fighting stops and we leave.
You mean when all the oil is gone?

I'm kind of curious about how it's going in Afghanistan, too. We ousted the Taliban, woo. Are the people who're now in power any better?

things in iraq have never been great. especially not during this war thing. but it will get better, once all the fighting stops and we leave.
You mean when all the oil is gone?

basically.

Well...up to now I opposed both the war and the subsequent occupation with a vehemence. However with that many exclamation marks in a post, I realised that I didn't have a leg to stand on and changed my views entirely. Go Bush, etc.

When he gets re-elected

We should take Donald Rumsfeld out back and have him shot, he has micromanaged our troops to levels that aren't sustainable. Now we need about 4 times the number of troops we presently are maintaining there and nobody is comming to our aid to assist us in the situation.


Here Here!

Now that the exclamation mark count has been slashed back to a mere three, I've lost all interest and will now revert back to my old position.

I hate Bush, etc.

Dubya and his staff are doing the best they can. If they can get Sador (sp?) to calm his ass down then the country will be fine.

Oh and awesome is spelt with an 'e'.

(yeah, those camel jockies have hated us for thousands of years despite america only being 200. )


they have hated the west for longer thane the U.S. hase been a nation.

There was this little thing called the Crusades, we kind of invaded them, repetitavely. If you read some history you'd find it was the Muslim countries during the Middle Ages who were more tolerant and scientifically advanced/ It was us mush-head Western Christians who hated everyone.

I'm kind of curious about how it's going in Afghanistan, too. We ousted the Taliban, woo. Are the people who're now in power any better?

Depends on what you mean by "In Power"..and it depends on what you mean by any better...

the current President..A Fellow named Karzai....who just happened to work for Bush's Oil Buddy.....is handling the job.
Current thing is.....the regional warlords who have the militias....they have a nice deal struck with the US.

they get to keep growing their opium.....Karzai gets left alone.

Guess where the opium ends up?

Ignorance is Bliss.

For examples please read this thread!

Cheerio.

:twisted:

i think that bush had the right idea about going into Iraq, but he should have pushed the "get saddam cuz he is a evil dictator" as his decision to go to iraq, not the WMD side.

His biggest mistake was not to wait for a joint-UN operation.

i think that bush had the right idea about going into Iraq, but he should have pushed the "get saddam cuz he is a evil dictator" as his decision to go to iraq, not the WMD side.

His biggest mistake was not to wait for a joint-UN operation.
Bush would never have gotten an endorsement from the UN because the UN inspectors couldn't find any WMD.

When he gets re-elected

Re-elected? When was he ever elected by the people in the first place!? So its not 're-elected' but 'when he fixes another election', or better yet "when his daddy fixes another election for him".

Oh and awesome is spelt with an 'e'.

Kinda betrays the level of intelligence that supports ol' Bush, doesn't it? :lol:

As the saying goes... like attracts like :lol:

"There was this little thing called the Crusades, we kind of invaded them, repetitavely. If you read some history you'd find it was the Muslim countries during the Middle Ages who were more tolerant and scientifically advanced/ It was us mush-head Western Christians who hated everyone."

The Crusades were started by the church, true, and they did have a serious problem with the 'infidel' but the Muslim countries were not all sweetness and light. It was their attacking the Byzantine empire which started the proceedings anyway (and the capture of Jerusalem, if I remember correctly.)

Well...up to now I opposed both the war and the subsequent occupation with a vehemence. However with that many exclamation marks in a post, I realised that I didn't have a leg to stand on and changed my views entirely. Go Bush, etc.
All Hail the Great Polarizer!