NationStates Jolt Archive


US SEEKS IRANIAN HELP IN IRAQ

imported_Madouvit
14-04-2004, 16:51
Wow...who'd ever have thought?

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/F445510C-CFBC-4EA4-BE15-04900B594640.htm

The United States has made a formal request to its arch foe Iran to help ease mounting violence in Iraq.

Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharazi said on Wednesday that there has been a "lot of correspondence" with Washington regarding Iraq.

"Naturally, there was a request for our help in improving the situation in Iraq and solving the crisis, and we are making efforts in this regard," the minister said after a cabinet meeting.

He added that exchanges of written communications between Washington and Tehran continued to be made through the Swiss embassy in Iran, asserting that there was no direct contact between the two countries.

Iran and the US cut off diplomatic ties after the 1979 Islamic revolution, which saw the US embassy in Tehran taken over by students and its staff held hostage for 444 days.

In 2001, US President George Bush branded Iran as part of an "axis of evil".

"We have had negotiations in the past but they were stopped. We are of the sentiment that these negotiations are pointless, because the Americans make promises but do not keep them," said Kharazi.

Neighbours meddling?

He also said that a regular forum of Iraq's neighbours -Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, Turkey along with Egypt -remained the best mechanism for advising the US on its presence in Iraq, which Kharazi said was heading in the "wrong direction."
Kharazi's comments came after the official news agency IRNA said a top foreign ministry official had been sent to Iraq on Wednesday for talks with occupation authorities, Iraqi politicians and religious leaders.

The foreign ministry's director for Gulf affairs, Husayn Sadeghi, left for the Iraqi capital to "examine events there and to look into finding the means to solve the crisis," IRNA said.

Iran's supreme spiritual leader Ayat Allah Ali Khamenei on
Wednesday made a bitter denounciation of the US-led occupation.

"The United States accuses other countries of intervening in
Iraq and provoking the Iraqis, but it is perfectly clear that the
crimes committed by the occupying forces and their insulting
behaviour towards Iraqi youth and women are the cause of the Iraqi reaction, whether Sunni or Shia," Khamenei said in a speech broadcast on state television.

He said US actions in Iraq were "contrary to all humanitarian
principles and are destined to fail.

"Sooner or later, the Americans will be obliged to leave Iraq in
shame and humiliation."

On Monday, the head of US Central Command, General John Abizaid, accused Iran, along with Syria, of involvement in what he said were "unhelpful actions" in Iraq. He refused to elaborate what these actions were.

Bloody past

Iran and Iraq fought a bloody war between 1980 and 1988 that left over a million dead.

Tehran is seen as close to the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI), a Shia religious party headed by Abd Aziz al-Hakim who sits on the US-appointed Iraqi Governing Council.

Abizaid also said that "elements" in Iran were trying to limit the influence of Shia leader Muqtada al-Sadr, whose militia has launched an uprising against the occupation this month. Al-Sadr’s militia is the first Shia faction in Iraq to take up arms against the occupation.

"With regard to the Iranians there are elements within Iran that are urging patience and calm and trying to limit the influence of al-Sadr," he said.

"So it's a complicated situation but what we need is all of the nations around Iraq to participate in calming the situation and assisting with a sovereign and stable government emerging."
Tayricht
14-04-2004, 17:07
Tayricht's US Chronology:

America Arms Saddam Hussein to fight against Iran
America Attacks Saddam Hussein
America Attacks Saddam Hussein again
America asks Iran for help against former regime of Saddam Hussein

Wow.

So they want help from a nation they armed Saddam against. If that weren't reason enough for Iran to not help, now they have even more proof of what the US does to little 3rd world countries that trust it.
Daistallia 2104
14-04-2004, 17:25
Thank you, Madouvit. I caught a bit of this story on CNNj a few hours ago, and it is good to get an independent source.
Ice Hockey Players
14-04-2004, 17:31
And with that, George W. Bush can just put a neon sign on the Iranian embassy that says, "Please, Iran, turn Iraq into another iron fist theocracy that captures Americans and threatens stability in the Middle East!" On the plus side, if that happens, there's no way in hell Bush is going to win in 2004.
imported_Madouvit
14-04-2004, 17:33
Seems like only yesterday that Bush was naming Iran as being part of an Axis of Evil...

Wonder what deal has being cut for the US to even think that they'd get a response to their request?
After all, the US did overthrow the democratically elected government there in the '70s.

And all those WMD that the US sold to their buddy Saddam in the '80s were intended for use against Iran too...
imported_Madouvit
14-04-2004, 17:49
imported_Madouvit
14-04-2004, 17:52
And with that, George W. Bush can just put a neon sign on the Iranian embassy that says, "Please, Iran, turn Iraq into another iron fist theocracy that captures Americans and threatens stability in the Middle East!" On the plus side, if that happens, there's no way in hell Bush is going to win in 2004.

I thought that Bush was campaigning on threatening stability in the middle east?

For another good impartial news source, the British Guardian is quite good too.
Below is a very interesting article from there, written by an Iranian diplomat:

Until the west listens to the Middle East's people, the future will be bleak

Mohammad Eskandari
Wednesday April 14, 2004
The Guardian

During the Iraq war the western media showed, in a sentimental and at times theatrical fashion, the kindness of the occupying forces toward the civilian population. Children were frequently chosen for this purpose. But whether this show of compassion was rooted in genuine humanitarian sentiments seems open to question. Today's Middle Easterner is convinced the west only attaches a high value to westerners' lives.
A little reflection gives an indication of the dominance of this mentality. A few hours after the terrorist train blasts in Madrid, western media hurried to the scene and mainstream British television networks broadcast the incident live. On the other hand, no one has suggested holding even a minute's silence for the, at least, 10,000 civilians killed in Iraq by those who claim to have gone there to promote democratic values. For the bereaved families, it did not make any difference whether their sons and daughters were killed by Saddam Hussein or their "liberators".

Further evidence of this conceit can be seen in the escalating efforts of the Bush administration and the neo-conservatives to push through their Greater Middle East initiative. The people of our region now associate the term "democracy" with western greed for oil and incessant interventions in our internal affairs. They regard it as self-evident that the west is not after democracy in the Middle East. The history of the region tells them that grassroots movements for democracy have all been suppressed by the west.

History shows that the west stood against democracy in Iran, but behind the dictatorial regime of Saddam. The reason was a fear of democratic governments coming to power in a domino effect throughout the region.

In 1953, the United States helped orchestrate the overthrow of Iran's popular prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh. It later encouraged Iraq to go to war against Iran. It provided Iraq with sophisticated conventional and non-conventional weapons (except nuclear ones, which were the exclusive domain of Israel).

In its support of "Saddam's democracy", it attacked Iranian oil platforms and naval ships. Finally, the US shot down an Iranian passenger airliner, killing more than 290 innocent passengers, and covered up this atrocity by offering a medal - for his "heroic achievement" - to the captain of the ship responsible.

The same US sent Henry Kissinger to Iran to support the so-called democratic reforms of the shah and offered the Iranian government access to American nuclear power technology. As secretary of state, Kissinger advised Iran to build at least 10 nuclear power plants. It is the height of insincerity for the US to now use bullying tactics against the International Atomic Energy Authority over Iran. Despite all the pressure, the IAEA has declared that Iran is not moving in the direction of manufacturing nuclear weapons.

The US has not learned its lesson and is still paying for past mistakes. It arrested Saddam in a humiliating

way and keeps him hanging like a sword of Damocles over the heads of Iraqis. America is now hunting Osama bin Laden. It used his group, al-Qaida, to coerce Iran and, in collusion with the Taliban, Iranian diplomats were murdered in Mazar-i-Sharif, Afghanistan.
Keeping the people of the Middle East in the dark and prioritising short-term western interests will not produce the desired results. Support for the former shah and the orchestration of two coups d'etat (in 1921 and 1953) by British and US agents did not prevent the victory of the Islamic revolution. This time the west, especially the US, should look at the region with its eyes open.

When Sheikh Yassin was killed leaving a mosque in his wheelchair by an Israeli helicopter, the democracy and accountability of Israel to the UN was demonstrated to the world. Condemnation of Israel's actions rarely goes beyond words. Western governments will not take a stand against the Sharon government's daily atrocities. But it is now taken for granted in the Middle East that if the condemnation concerns Muslims, they will go all the way to sanctions and even war.

It is now one year since the start of war in Iraq and we have had more than two years of the war on terror. Unless three conditions at least are met, the future will remain bleak and hopeless. The people of the region have to be taken into account. They have to be listened to and not prescribed a pre-packaged recipe from afar. And governments that draw their legitimacy from the people need to be supported.

· Mohammad Ali Eskandari is press attache at the Iranian embassy in London

eskandari@iran-embassy.org.uk