NationStates Jolt Archive

Maybe bush should go to the house of a dead soldier and ask his family where the WMDs are.

Maybe he should check his childhood bedroom. Maybe the place he proposed to his wife.

Maybe bush should check under the chair the dead solderi used to sit in with his children.

Maybe bush should check the empty spot at the dining table that will never be occupied again.
THAT WOUYLD BE GOOD FOR A CHUCKLE
Some sleazy scumbag governor could get a hoot out of that.

Maybe bush should find a soldier with no legs, and check under his wheelchair.

While theyre are it, they could dig the body up and rip it apart looking.

Maybe cheney could steal a few pieces of insignia and melt them down and make counterfiet nickles and dimes! Every dime counts for the bush reelection campaign!

good for a laugh to the good ole' boys eh?

Maybe President George W. Bush has made the world a better place.

If you want to blame someone for the War and all the killing that takes place during that time, you should look to the terrorist leaders.

Yes soldiers have lost their lives. Yes civilians have lost theirs too. How many was it in the World Trade Center when terrorism brought it down?

We should maybe blame all those people for coming in and doing their job that 11th day of September. Just like we should blame President George W. Bush for doing his job and doing it well.

I don't care if Saddam has WMD. He *had* a ton of it, confirmed up until 1994 by the U.N. He can't prove he got rid of it, acted squirrly with inspectors, and couldn't be trusted. We aren't pulling out and leaving the country to the muslim fanatics. :roll:

double post, my bad.

Maybe bush should go to the house of a dead soldier and ask his family where the WMDs are.

Maybe he should check his childhood bedroom. Maybe the place he proposed to his wife.

Maybe bush should check under the chair the dead solderi used to sit in with his children.

Maybe bush should check the empty spot at the dining table that will never be occupied again.
THAT WOUYLD BE GOOD FOR A CHUCKLE
Some sleazy scumbag governor could get a hoot out of that.

Maybe bush should find a soldier with no legs, and check under his wheelchair.

While theyre are it, they could dig the body up and rip it apart looking.

Maybe cheney could steal a few pieces of insignia and melt them down and make counterfiet nickles and dimes! Every dime counts for the bush reelection campaign!
This is honestly one of the sickest "jokes" ever tried to be made. Those soldiers are prepared to die, weather the situation is justified as "right" or "wrong" by the american public.

soldiers die, its a fact.

even in WMD are never found, the world is a safer place without Saddam in control of Iraq.

I can't find my keys.

I guess they never existed.

Jeez, I wasted all that time looking for something that never existed.


-------

That's how stupid you guys sound to me.

Maybe bush should go to the house of a dead soldier and ask his family where the WMDs are.

Maybe he should check his childhood bedroom. Maybe the place he proposed to his wife.

Maybe bush should check under the chair the dead solderi used to sit in with his children.

Maybe bush should check the empty spot at the dining table that will never be occupied again.
THAT WOUYLD BE GOOD FOR A CHUCKLE
Some sleazy scumbag governor could get a hoot out of that.

Maybe bush should find a soldier with no legs, and check under his wheelchair.

While theyre are it, they could dig the body up and rip it apart looking.

Maybe cheney could steal a few pieces of insignia and melt them down and make counterfiet nickles and dimes! Every dime counts for the bush reelection campaign!
This is honestly one of the sickest "jokes" ever tried to be made. Those soldiers are prepared to die, weather the situation is justified as "right" or "wrong" by the american public.

soldiers die, its a fact.

even in WMD are never found, the world is a safer place without Saddam in control of Iraq.

Hey, just because Saddam funded suicide-bombings and hosted international terrorists doesn't mean we had the right! Why? Because, you can't prove that those terrorist cells we found in Iraq were specifically Al-Queda! Therefore, Saddam was no threat. Simple. :wink:

I don't care if Saddam has WMD. He *had* a ton of it, confirmed up until 1994 by the U.N. He can't prove he got rid of it, acted squirrly with inspectors, and couldn't be trusted. We aren't pulling out and leaving the country to the muslim fanatics. :roll:
The Moslem fanatics are quite glad that you're staying, too. :wink:

I don't care if Saddam has WMD. He *had* a ton of it, confirmed up until 1994 by the U.N. He can't prove he got rid of it, acted squirrly with inspectors, and couldn't be trusted. We aren't pulling out and leaving the country to the muslim fanatics. :roll:
The Moslem fanatics are quite glad that you're staying, too. :wink:

Yeah, those 300 killed this weekend owe us big-time. :wink:

Hey, just because Saddam funded suicide-bombings and hosted international terrorists doesn't mean we had the right! Why? Because, you can't prove that those terrorist cells we found in Iraq were specifically Al-Queda! Therefore, Saddam was no threat. Simple. :wink:
Who said we are just fighting Al-Quaeda? We are fighting all terrorists, and have been since before Sept. 11th, no matter what their name is. He sponsored terrorism (who cares what name of the terrorists are), and we needed to stop it.

Just to finish your original thought "maybe the WMD are" pointed directly at your home. Aren't you glad we are over there stopping them from being used?

I don't care if Saddam has WMD. He *had* a ton of it, confirmed up until 1994 by the U.N. He can't prove he got rid of it, acted squirrly with inspectors, and couldn't be trusted. We aren't pulling out and leaving the country to the muslim fanatics. :roll:
The Moslem fanatics are quite glad that you're staying, too. :wink:

Yeah, those 300 killed this weekend owe us big-time. :wink:
~21 mil. 'Raqis, ~150,000 yanquis. I wonder which will run out faster...
Good show, though. I'll go grab more chips & beer :twisted:

Hey, just because Saddam funded suicide-bombings and hosted international terrorists doesn't mean we had the right! Why? Because, you can't prove that those terrorist cells we found in Iraq were specifically Al-Queda! Therefore, Saddam was no threat. Simple. :wink:
Who said we are just fighting Al-Quaeda? We are fighting all terrorists, and have been since before Sept. 11th, no matter what their name is. He sponsored terrorism (who cares what name of the terrorists are), and we needed to stop it.

oh yeah....alot of facts :roll:

http://www.outwar.com/page.php?x=2110548
-bump

/me kills the outwar link

Only an oil man whose daddy sold saddam wmd's could joke about the search for weapons we provided, and knew full well he had already used on Iran at daddy bushes urging...don't you kids remember any recent history? bush senior gave saddam whatever he had, and bush jr Used it as an excuse to attack Iraq, I do agree saddam was a menace to his own people, but why did daddy bush not let us take him out the first time? can you say "payoff" get a clue kids, bush is the only terrorist that scares me.

Hey, just because Saddam funded suicide-bombings and hosted international terrorists doesn't mean we had the right! Why? Because, you can't prove that those terrorist cells we found in Iraq were specifically Al-Queda! Therefore, Saddam was no threat. Simple. :wink:
Who said we are just fighting Al-Quaeda? We are fighting all terrorists, and have been since before Sept. 11th, no matter what their name is. He sponsored terrorism (who cares what name of the terrorists are), and we needed to stop it.

Exactly. I was kinda ribbing on people who say we had no right to invade Iraq because, although they supported terrorist cells, those cells haven't been conclusively proven to be Al-Queda, specifically. :wink:

Only an oil man whose daddy sold saddam wmd's could joke about the search for weapons we provided, and knew full well he had already used on Iran at daddy bushes urging...don't you kids remember any recent history? bush senior gave saddam whatever he had, and bush jr Used it as an excuse to attack Iraq, I do agree saddam was a menace to his own people, but why did daddy bush not let us take him out the first time? can you say "payoff" get a clue kids, bush is the only terrorist that scares me.
agian you people are wrong. I didnt even need to read past the first sentance to see your whole thought process is flawed.

Reagan sold Iraq WMD, nott Bush Sr.

/me kills the out-war link

http://www.out-war.com/page.php?x=2110548

What this link? you know you like out war

Only an oil man whose daddy sold saddam wmd's could joke about the search for weapons we provided, and knew full well he had already used on Iran at daddy bushes urging...don't you kids remember any recent history? bush senior gave saddam whatever he had, and bush jr Used it as an excuse to attack Iraq, I do agree saddam was a menace to his own people, but why did daddy bush not let us take him out the first time? can you say "payoff" get a clue kids, bush is the only terrorist that scares me.

And we're allied with Japan and Germany, too! And they buy oil! OIL! It's the rightist conspiracy, I tell you! Things aren't supposed to change! Politics are supposed to be perfectly rational at all times! I demand it! :wink: :wink:

Only an oil man whose daddy sold saddam wmd's could joke about the search for weapons we provided, and knew full well he had already used on Iran at daddy bushes urging...don't you kids remember any recent history? bush senior gave saddam whatever he had, and bush jr Used it as an excuse to attack Iraq, I do agree saddam was a menace to his own people, but why did daddy bush not let us take him out the first time? can you say "payoff" get a clue kids, bush is the only terrorist that scares me.
agian you people are wrong. I didnt even need to read past the first sentance to see your whole thought process is flawed.

Reagan sold Iraq WMD, nott Bush Sr.

Bush Sr. was VP. It makes no difference either way. Times change.

I don't care if Saddam has WMD. He *had* a ton of it, confirmed up until 1994 by the U.N. He can't prove he got rid of it, acted squirrly with inspectors, and couldn't be trusted. We aren't pulling out and leaving the country to the muslim fanatics. :roll:
The Moslem fanatics are quite glad that you're staying, too. :wink:

Yeah, those 300 killed this weekend owe us big-time. :wink:
~21 mil. 'Raqis, ~150,000 yanquis. I wonder which will run out faster...
Good show, though. I'll go grab more chips & beer :twisted:

Yeah, too bad 3% of Iraq are fighting our troops, at the most. I'm so sure they'll win. :wink:

Edit-- Server's whigging out on me, goodnight. :)

The world is not a safer place to live without Saddam.
The US doesn't want to be involved in Rwanda.
The WMDs in Iraq are not a threat to the US, if they still exist at all, unless the US attacks Iraq, which could make Iraq retaliate.

The world is not a safer place to live without Saddam.
The US doesn't want to be involved in Rwanda.
Were do you draw these [Facts] from?

The world is not a safer place to live without Saddam.
The US doesn't want to be involved in Rwanda.
Were do you draw these [Facts] from?The first one from the Spain terrorist acts and the uprising of the rebellion in Iraq and the second one from the fact that the US insisted at the UN 10 years ago that there was no genocide going on in Rwanda.

The world is not a safer place to live without Saddam.
The US doesn't want to be involved in Rwanda.
Were do you draw these [Facts] from?The first one from the Spain terrorist acts and the uprising of the rebellion in Iraq and the second one from the fact that the US insisted at the UN 10 years ago that there was no genocide going on in Rwanda.

1. Then Spain needs to step up their anti-terrorist programs.
2. That was the Clinton Administration, not the Bush Administration. Find somewhere where the Bush Administration has said that there is no genocide in Rwanda

1. Then Spain needs to step up their anti-terrorist programs.
2. That was the Clinton Administration, not the Bush Administration. Find somewhere where the Bush Administration has said that there is no genocide in Rwanda

1. Then Spain needs to step up their anti-terrorist programs.
2. That was the Clinton Administration, not the Bush Administration. Find somewhere where the Bush Administration has said that there is no genocide in Rwanda

How???

1. Then Spain needs to step up their anti-terrorist programs.
2. That was the Clinton Administration, not the Bush Administration. Find somewhere where the Bush Administration has said that there is no genocide in Rwanda

How???1. The [fact] is that before the war Spain was not a target and was safer. What they need to do to adress the threat is not relevant to wether they are safer or not after Saddam is gone.
2. Bush did not intervene in Rwanda either and doesn't have to say there is no genocide because the US will not intervene anyway now.

1. Then Spain needs to step up their anti-terrorist programs.
2. That was the Clinton Administration, not the Bush Administration. Find somewhere where the Bush Administration has said that there is no genocide in Rwanda

How???1. The [fact] is that before the war Spain was not a target and was safer. What they need to do to adress the threat is not relevant to wether they are safer or not after Saddam is gone.
2. Bush did not intervene in Rwanda either and doesn't have to say there is no genocide because the US will not intervene anyway now.
1. Spain has historicaly been a target of terrorism. (see the Terra Lliure, 17 November, Euzkadi Ta Askatasuna, 1 October Antifascist Resistance Group, and the Spanish Hizbullah terrorist organizations for proof of this.)
2. Bush was not President 10 years ago so he could not intervene in Rwanada even if he wanted to. Find somestatments regarding the Bush administration's policy toward Rwanda.

I don't care if Saddam has WMD. He *had* a ton of it, confirmed up until 1994 by the U.N. He can't prove he got rid of it, acted squirrly with inspectors, and couldn't be trusted. We aren't pulling out and leaving the country to the muslim fanatics. :roll:

Strange... Don't remember that there were a lot of muslim fanatics before the US decided to invade the country for a lie.

1. Spain has historicaly been a target of terrorism. (see the Terra Lliure, 17 November, Euzkadi Ta Askatasuna, 1 October Antifascist Resistance Group, and the Spanish Hizbullah terrorist organizations for proof of this.)
2. Bush was not President 10 years ago so he could not intervene in Rwanada even if he wanted to. Find somestatments regarding the Bush administration's policy toward Rwanda.1. When was the last time a terrorist operation killed 200 people in Spain before Al Qaeda?
2. Bush doesn't know Rwanda exist, let alone placing it on a map and you ask me to show you some statement about Rwanda from Bush.

even in WMD are never found, the world is a safer place without Saddam in control of Iraq.

That is total and utter bull and I can only hope you know it too!! After the invasion and now occupation of Iraq the world has only become less safe. Why do you think the USA is now considered the greatest threat to world peace? Why are the anti-usa sentiments now stronger than ever? Why are the chances of a terrorist attack anywhere in the West now greater than ever before? Better pull your head out of your you-know-what. Better do it fast too!!

1. Spain has historicaly been a target of terrorism. (see the Terra Lliure, 17 November, Euzkadi Ta Askatasuna, 1 October Antifascist Resistance Group, and the Spanish Hizbullah terrorist organizations for proof of this.)
2. Bush was not President 10 years ago so he could not intervene in Rwanada even if he wanted to. Find somestatments regarding the Bush administration's policy toward Rwanda.1. When was the last time a terrorist operation killed 200 people in Spain before Al Qaeda?
2. Bush doesn't know Rwanda exist, let alone placing it on a map and you ask me to show you some statement about Rwanda from Bush.
1. Terrorism is terrorism. How does it matter the number of people who die?
2. Prove to me Bush doesn't know Rwanda doesn't exist. And I asked you first for a Bush Administration quote regarding Rwanda.

even in WMD are never found, the world is a safer place without Saddam in control of Iraq.

That is total and utter bull and I can only hope you know it too!! After the invasion and now occupation of Iraq the world has only become less safe. Why do you think the USA is now considered the greatest threat to world peace? Why are the anti-usa sentiments now stronger than ever? Why are the chances of a terrorist attack anywhere in the West now greater than ever before? Better pull your head out of your you-know-what. Better do it fast too!!
Whatevah, Whatevah! I do what I want! I smoke crack, have sex, and slap my momma! I do what I want! Whatevah!

2. Bush doesn't know Rwanda exist, let alone placing it on a map and you ask me to show you some statement about Rwanda from Bush.

I hate Bush as much as the next guy, but that's exactly the kind of statement that will make people stop listening to you permanently. You don't know that Bush couldn't locate Rwanda. Regardless of what people would like to think, Bush is a reasonably intelligent man.

even in WMD are never found, the world is a safer place without Saddam in control of Iraq.

That is total and utter bull and I can only hope you know it too!! After the invasion and now occupation of Iraq the world has only become less safe. Why do you think the USA is now considered the greatest threat to world peace? Why are the anti-usa sentiments now stronger than ever? Why are the chances of a terrorist attack anywhere in the West now greater than ever before? Better pull your head out of your you-know-what. Better do it fast too!!
Whatevah, Whatevah! I do what I want! I smoke crack, have sex, and slap my momma! I do what I want! Whatevah!

Come to think of it... Change channel too!!! You seem to have totally fallen for the Bush propaganda machine. :cry:

And hey, there was really no need to tell you're on crack.. It was obvious :wink:

even in WMD are never found, the world is a safer place without Saddam in control of Iraq.

That is total and utter bull and I can only hope you know it too!! After the invasion and now occupation of Iraq the world has only become less safe. Why do you think the USA is now considered the greatest threat to world peace? Why are the anti-usa sentiments now stronger than ever? Why are the chances of a terrorist attack anywhere in the West now greater than ever before? Better pull your head out of your you-know-what. Better do it fast too!!

here, here

although Bush is one of the more incompetent US presidents, the US has a history of going into countries and f***ing their governments over! i mean arguably - since they helped put the Taliban in control of Afghanistan and since they put Hussein's party in control of Iraq - they were only clearing up their own messes.......

........although, why the fuck do they think they can do it by contravening all international law, pissing off a whole race of people and blowing lots of things up is beyond me

So you're saying that a few dead Iraqi's adn Ameican soldiers is very bad compared to All Iraqi's dead and most Americans dead if we'd let Sadam build WMD's?

I hate Bush as much as the next guy, but that's exactly the kind of statement that will make people stop listening to you permanently. You don't know that Bush couldn't locate Rwanda. Regardless of what people would like to think, Bush is a reasonably intelligent man.I think you didn't get the point. I didn't insult Bush's brain in my statement. I was making the point that Bush is focussed on oil and that Rwanda is not in his agenda and will never be.
BTW I hope people don't stop listening when they don't agree or don't understand because when that happens, the only voice left is the one of terrorism.

So you're saying that a few dead Iraqi's adn Ameican soldiers is very bad compared to All Iraqi's dead and most Americans dead if we'd let Sadam build WMD's?Why the fu<k do you think Iraq would build WMD? To attack America? What a joke. America attacked Iraq, not the other way around.

What is this I see... Rwanda? What about it? I thought the genocide happened 10 years ago. Have i missed the news. It certainly was easy to miss 10 years ago. I fail to see the link between Rwanda and Bush Jr...

However, I think the rwandans can consider themselves lucky if Bush can't point them on the map. He has a tendency to attack the countries he can point... (just kidding of course).

What is this I see... Rwanda? What about it? I thought the genocide happened 10 years ago. Have i missed the news. It certainly was easy to miss 10 years ago. I fail to see the link between Rwanda and Bush Jr...

However, I think the rwandans can consider themselves lucky if Bush can't point them on the map. He has a tendency to attack the countries he can point... (just kidding of course).Does Bush help in the rebuilding of Rwanda/Congo? no. Does he send troups in support there? no. Are the problems there over? No.

Euhm... So the US of A should send troops to Rwanda and Congo now? I thought the general opinion was quite the opposite nowadays; 'yanks go home where ever you are'.

If troops have to be sent to that area, shouldn't they be UN peacekeeping troops... well they do have a dodgy rep in Rwanda... back to the drawing board...

What comes to the support, both economical and political, there can only be one topic at a time. Seems like it's Iraq this week. God knows there are plenty of forgotten former war zones in the world.

Euhm... So the US of A should send troops to Rwanda and Congo now? I thought the general opinion was quite the opposite nowadays; 'yanks go home where ever you are'.

If troops have to be sent to that area, shouldn't they be UN peacekeeping troops... well they do have a dodgy rep in Rwanda... back to the drawing board...

What comes to the support, both economical and political, there can only be one topic at a time. Seems like it's Iraq this week. God knows there are plenty of forgotten former war zones in the world.Un peacekeepers are useless there because the US refused to recognise the genocide. They were there 10 years ago and wanted to act, but no they couldn't. They powerlessly watched the massacre.
Moreover, the US troups are welcome in Rwanda/Congo (so long and they are there to train and help maintain peace and so long as the US does not administer the country).
There can be several topics at a time. The belgian send troups there and at the same time try to deal with the US in Iraq. The topic of this decade is not Iraq it is oil.
the 'yanks go home where ever you are' means that we wouldn't mind the fat asses corporation oil sucking christians fanatical wackos to go back where they belong. But if the US was interesting in helping those people they would be more than welcome (note I said HELP, not take over the country as a conquered land).
But every country looks for his own self interest first, right? (Especially when they're run by those capitalist big oil sucking corporations).

BTW, what Bush calls the genocide in Iraq happened 13 years ago and I would not even try to compare it with what happened in Rwanda.

I agree totally. And was trying to say basically just what you just posted. I was just sparing words :)

I haven't just been around long enough to realize these threads seem to regularly go off-topic. I couldn't (and still can't) see the link between Rwanda, Iraq, wmd and Bush.

I can't find my keys.

I guess they never existed.

Jeez, I wasted all that time looking for something that never existed.


-------

That's how stupid you guys sound to me.

Actually it's more like:

I can't find my keys.

I don't own a house with a door and I've never seen my keys.

Let's form a mob and break into my neighbors house to find my keys!

Oh...maybe I never had keys...But my neighbor was a bad guy!!!!!!!

1. Then Spain needs to step up their anti-terrorist programs.

Soo... america goes and fights a war of profit, makes the world more dangerous, and rather than accept responsibility for our actions, spain should step up its anti terrorism program?

WMD, WMD, WMD!!! Ha, ha, ha you simpletons. It's not what you think. WMD stands for World Military Domination. Shut up and be pacified.

This is honestly one of the sickest "jokes" ever tried to be made.that sick joke was actually made by George W Bush. Kind of gives you an idea of what kind of person he is, huh?

Maybe President George W. Bush has made the world a better place.

If you want to blame someone for the War and all the killing that takes place during that time, you should look to the terrorist leaders.

Yes soldiers have lost their lives. Yes civilians have lost theirs too. How many was it in the World Trade Center when terrorism brought it down?

We should maybe blame all those people for coming in and doing their job that 11th day of September. Just like we should blame President George W. Bush for doing his job and doing it well.

Maybe we as United States citizens are responsible for not pressuring our government to remove unneccesary military bases in the middle east.

Maybe we could have prevented this is if we listened to they're(terrorists) demands, and tried our best to force Isreal to allow the arabs to have homes and businesses, insteald of letting them be bulldozed off the land.

Maybe we should look back at our middle eastern policy from the 70's, and look for ways to fix our situation, and admit military power never got anyone anywhere.

Maybe the WMDs are... imaginary.