NationStates Jolt Archive

I am out shamlessly recruiting nations for the region of Anarchy Everywhere. We support conflicting views so you don't have to believe in anarchy or even know what it is. I hope that you will go and check it out. ALL NATIONS ARE WELCOME. I hope to see you there! Whoo ANARCHY!! :twisted: 8) :!:

ha, Come To Adelaide!

We have streakers, naked AND Stealth kaimiaze exploding chickens, penguin hitting games, smut, sexual games kingdoms, more smut, socks, porn, even more smut, stalkers and did i mention smut?

And we at Anarchy Everywhere has all of those things only they are unorganized! :twisted:

Free Hint:

Nobody likes recruitment threads.

The next one is gonna cost ya.

ENLIST in Mercia The Next Generation (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/target=display_region/region=Mercia_The_Next_Generation)!

Join this Centrist Region's fight against . . . :?

OK, a lot of people. But we're ADN, so we're cool with them. :)

Tactical Grace
UN Delegate / Minister of War / Defence Consultancy
Mercia The Next Generation (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/target=display_region/region=Mercia_The_Next_Generation)

My friend Anti-Flag, I believe you are one of those people who beleive that they are anarchists because they listen to punk music and dress that part. Do you, nay, CAN you grasp the real meaning of anarchy? It isn't all about disorder, chaos or violence. That is the wrong path of anarchy. That is what people think when they hear anarchy. Real anarchy is practised through civil disobedience and non-violent protest.

You've heard of the punk bands who call themselves anarchist. But have you heard of the real anarchists? Are you familular with Henry David Thoreau? He was a real anarchist, not the bargin-bastment fake crap you find in punk culture. He talks about bringing down the governement, an integeral part of "anarchy culture" that the general uninformed public sees, but his was the proper way. Throeau speaks only of bringing down irresponsible or negligent governments, when it is needed, by non-violent methods.

Other anarchists are not from the 1980s, as they are typically thought of being from, but the late 1800s. They didn't have huge, rediclious hair styles, nor where they violent. They tought effective, peaceful ways of bringing down governments, and the church in order to obtain complete freedom for the people. In fact, Gahdi was the student of one of these true anarchists.

So, until you can speak knowledgably about anarchy, don't speak of it at all. I am an informed anarchist, following the teachings of Throeau. It is the true and right path of anarchy.

do any of ya'l remember the tv show MASH?
doesnt this guy sound like that winchester dude?

do any of ya'l remember the tv show MASH?
doesnt this guy sound like that winchester dude?I'm sorry, I've never heard of "MASH", but I have heard of "M*A*S*H". I am indeed familiar with the show, and "this guy" does not sound like Charles Emerson Winchester III at all. Winchester is pompous. "This guy" is not.

do any of ya'l remember the tv show MASH?
doesnt this guy sound like that winchester dude?

Pardon me? Is that supposed to mean somthing? Who is the character in question, exactly?

hes a surgeon on this korean war show. nvrmnd

My friend Anti-Flag, I believe you are one of those people who beleive that they are anarchists because they listen to punk music and dress that part. Do you, nay, CAN you grasp the real meaning of anarchy? It isn't all about disorder, chaos or violence. That is the wrong path of anarchy. That is what people think when they hear anarchy. Real anarchy is practised through civil disobedience and non-violent protest.

You've heard of the punk bands who call themselves anarchist. But have you heard of the real anarchists? Are you familular with Henry David Thoreau? He was a real anarchist, not the bargin-bastment fake crap you find in punk culture. He talks about bringing down the governement, an integeral part of "anarchy culture" that the general uninformed public sees, but his was the proper way. Throeau speaks only of bringing down irresponsible or negligent governments, when it is needed, by non-violent methods.

Other anarchists are not from the 1980s, as they are typically thought of being from, but the late 1800s. They didn't have huge, rediclious hair styles, nor where they violent. They tought effective, peaceful ways of bringing down governments, and the church in order to obtain complete freedom for the people. In fact, Gahdi was the student of one of these true anarchists.

So, until you can speak knowledgably about anarchy, don't speak of it at all. I am an informed anarchist, following the teachings of Throeau. It is the true and right path of anarchy.

And that's the stuff they don't teach about Thoreau in English class.

Yes, hes also an author. A bit above my head. I belive its universty level reading, correct? Pretty good for a grade 10 eh?

The school is teaching it to us in 11th grade. They never mentioned governments, just a return to simplicity. There were some very interesting writings he had.

The school is teaching it to us in 11th grade. They never mentioned governments, just a return to simplicity. There were some very interesting writings he had.

That would be from "Walden", correct? I happen to have a copy with his "Civil Disobedience" essay as well. That would be something to bring up in class during disscussion. Just mention he was an anarchist and watch them go ballistic.

As soon as we finish these research papers, I might just do that.

Wahahahaha!!! :lol:

Before you do however, I suggest you read up on anarchist principals in case some wise-ass tries to make a fool of you. See if you can find a copy of "Anarchism: Political Innocence or Social Violence?" by James D. Forman. Its a very good book and should give you enough intellectual ammunition in the case of a debate occuring.

Hmmm, Anti-Flag seems to have missed my diatribe.

I'm sure a debate would occur. It always does in that class. You should see all the people getting so emotionally involved and looking so depressed when they find out that they're morons.

Oh, I've seen it all right. Just look at that original post! I've had people breaking down, dropping out of class discussions or debates, stuf like that. I guess you could say I'm a master debater!

You could try joining the Master Debater club. There's one around somewhere.

I don't know, trying typing it in on Google. :lol:

Eh, there's a much bigger chance for a Master Beta club to be around.

Something has to manage all the Beta clubs at all these high schools.

Yes, I agree.

Now, where is that "anarchist" who was so valently trying to recruit others until I showed up?

Probably trying to find a seven inch spike to put through his nose.

That or putting white glue in his hair.

NO YOU SHOULD ALL COME TO The Beach.

*bump*

Boo, get out of here.

Yes, I agree.

Now, where is that "anarchist" who was so valently trying to recruit others until I showed up?

"valently"? lol!

What is wrong with a little recruitment thread. I just want more people into my region.
My friend Anti-Flag, I believe you are one of those people who beleive that they are anarchists because they listen to punk music and dress that part. Do you, nay, CAN you grasp the real meaning of anarchy? It isn't all about disorder, chaos or violence. That is the wrong path of anarchy. That is what people think when they hear anarchy. Real anarchy is practised through civil disobedience and non-violent protest.

You've heard of the punk bands who call themselves anarchist. But have you heard of the real anarchists? Are you familular with Henry David Thoreau? He was a real anarchist, not the bargin-bastment fake crap you find in punk culture. He talks about bringing down the governement, an integeral part of "anarchy culture" that the general uninformed public sees, but his was the proper way. Throeau speaks only of bringing down irresponsible or negligent governments, when it is needed, by non-violent methods.

Other anarchists are not from the 1980s, as they are typically thought of being from, but the late 1800s. They didn't have huge, rediclious hair styles, nor where they violent. They tought effective, peaceful ways of bringing down governments, and the church in order to obtain complete freedom for the people. In fact, Gahdi was the student of one of these true anarchists.

So, until you can speak knowledgably about anarchy, don't speak of it at all. I am an informed anarchist, following the teachings of Throeau. It is the true and right path of anarchy.

What I meant when I said that my region was all of those things but unorganized, I meant that my region was unorganized. I did not mean that because my region is of anarchy that it is unorganized. If that made any sence that is what I mean. I do want my region tobecome organized but we aren't all on the same page yet.
Um and unlike the stereotipical anarchist I do not have spikes in my nose or glue in my hair. Giving you a quote from my favoroite band Anti - flag: "I've never seen an anarchist with such perfect hair, or somany ten dollar spikes or so much punk rock gear.... A-N-A-R-C-H-Y so punk that he's a poser and he will be one 'till he dies." That was about the anarchist that I am not. I did like your point though and I am not an ignorant anarchist that thinks that anarchy is unorganized. My region is unorganized not because it is anarchic.
I did like your word, though, diatribe. Thats a cool word. I think that I will add it to my vocabulary.

What is wrong with a little recruitment thread. I just want more people into my region.
My friend Anti-Flag, I believe you are one of those people who beleive that they are anarchists because they listen to punk music and dress that part. Do you, nay, CAN you grasp the real meaning of anarchy? It isn't all about disorder, chaos or violence. That is the wrong path of anarchy. That is what people think when they hear anarchy. Real anarchy is practised through civil disobedience and non-violent protest.

You've heard of the punk bands who call themselves anarchist. But have you heard of the real anarchists? Are you familular with Henry David Thoreau? He was a real anarchist, not the bargin-bastment fake crap you find in punk culture. He talks about bringing down the governement, an integeral part of "anarchy culture" that the general uninformed public sees, but his was the proper way. Throeau speaks only of bringing down irresponsible or negligent governments, when it is needed, by non-violent methods.

Other anarchists are not from the 1980s, as they are typically thought of being from, but the late 1800s. They didn't have huge, rediclious hair styles, nor where they violent. They tought effective, peaceful ways of bringing down governments, and the church in order to obtain complete freedom for the people. In fact, Gahdi was the student of one of these true anarchists.

So, until you can speak knowledgably about anarchy, don't speak of it at all. I am an informed anarchist, following the teachings of Throeau. It is the true and right path of anarchy.

What I meant when I said that my region was all of those things but unorganized, I meant that my region was unorganized. I did not mean that because my region is of anarchy that it is unorganized. If that made any sence that is what I mean. I do want my region tobecome organized but we aren't all on the same page yet.
Um and unlike the stereotipical anarchist I do not have spikes in my nose or glue in my hair. Giving you a quote from my favoroite band Anti - flag: "I've never seen an anarchist with such perfect hair, or somany ten dollar spikes or so much punk rock gear.... A-N-A-R-C-H-Y so punk that he's a poser and he will be one 'till he dies." That was about the anarchist that I am not. I did like your point though and I am not an ignorant anarchist that thinks that anarchy is unorganized. My region is unorganized not because it is anarchic.
I did like your word, though, diatribe. Thats a cool word. I think that I will add it to my vocabulary.